Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: I've been looking around for a new anti-virus/spyware/firewall provider as I'm highly dissatisfied with the Norton products - not so much on the technical end, but their incessant begging for renewal starting two months before the license is up. I stumbled into AVG on the recommendation of a friend. She says it works great and prefers it to Norton by a factor of 10. Anybody else use it? I'm leaning towards AVG, but just want another opinion. I had it installed on my mothers computer, and she never got a virus, but she is a low risk user. I changed from AVG to Avast when she purchased a new computer due to a better review in one of the magazines I read. AVG and Avast are both considered light weight, small footprint AV and do a fair job of catching virus, but might be slow to update databases with new viruses. Kaspersky Anti-Virus has been the highest rated, and is priced similar to Norton. I used McAfee because it is free from my ISP. It has a large footprint, but does a great job. Even AVG "light" updates its virii database every day on my laptop. I am basing my evalution on it's ability to catch the most current virus, based upon the reviews by experts. You can still update your antivirus database daily, and still not catch the latest variation of viruses. The reviews i have read concerning AVG and Avast, (and I have installed both of them), is they are good free programs but "scored poorly when compared to Kaspersky and NOD32". |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|