On Mar 6, 1:30*pm, wrote:
On Mar 6, 12:43*pm, HK wrote:



wrote:
On Mar 6, 10:41 am, wrote:
On Mar 6, 8:20 am, Tim wrote:

;
Don't worry about the drunk, but anyway Tim. I could be wrong because
I don't have a reader, but if I understand correctly some readers can
be set up with filters.. That is why when I tag a post as spam, I put
the word spam first, in caps.. That way the readers who have set
filters, don't have to see it.. But I could be wrong...

Harry's found a new way to get the heat off of him when he starts his
daily lies, he changes the subject line. Pretty juvenile, huh?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Awwww, loogie.. please don't follow Harry down this path...

wrote:

Awwww, loogie.. please don't follow Harry down this path...


P*L*E*A*S*E!!!

pretty please?

(with sugar on top?)

Tim wrote:
wrote:

Awwww, loogie.. please don't follow Harry down this path...


P*L*E*A*S*E!!!

pretty please?

(with sugar on top?)

OOPS! wrong header to the wrong thread.

never said I was perfect.

sorry

(JoeSpareBedroom) wrote
I'll go make some popcorn.


No doubt chased with a steaming hot mug of Land O' Lakes.
UD

""UglyDan®©T"" wrote in message
...
(JoeSpareBedroom) wrote
I'll go make some popcorn.


No doubt chased with a steaming hot mug of Land O' Lakes.
UD


Is there any other way? (burp)

On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:30:55 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Mar 6, 12:43*pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 6, 10:41 am, wrote:
On Mar 6, 8:20 am, Tim wrote:

;
Don't worry about the drunk, but anyway Tim. I could be wrong because
I don't have a reader, but if I understand correctly some readers can
be set up with filters.. That is why when I tag a post as spam, I put
the word spam first, in caps.. That way the readers who have set
filters, don't have to see it.. But I could be wrong...

Harry's found a new way to get the heat off of him when he starts his
daily lies, he changes the subject line. Pretty juvenile, huh?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



Following an immature little twit is not the way to go, Loogy.

On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:48:03 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:



wrote:
On Mar 6, 8:20?am, Tim wrote:
;

Don't worry about the drunk, but anyway Tim. I could be wrong because
I don't have a reader, but if I understand correctly some readers can
be set up with filters.. That is why when I tag a post as spam, I put
the word spam first, in caps.. That way the readers who have set
filters, don't have to see it.. But I could be wrong...

But you know, Scott?

the more I see less-than-juvinile thread title changes, I'm very well
considering on getting a reader.

I'll send you one! Just let me know.

HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 6, 10:41 am, wrote:
On Mar 6, 8:20 am, Tim wrote:

;
Don't worry about the drunk, but anyway Tim. I could be wrong because
I don't have a reader, but if I understand correctly some readers can
be set up with filters.. That is why when I tag a post as spam, I put
the word spam first, in caps.. That way the readers who have set
filters, don't have to see it.. But I could be wrong...

Harry's found a new way to get the heat off of him when he starts his
daily lies, he changes the subject line. Pretty juvenile, huh?

We do agree on some things. This is one...