Hillay bites the dust
 

John wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:37:46 -0500, "John" wrote:

John, we're glad to see you can copy and paste emails you've received.
--
John H

I'm glad you appreciate it, but of course you miss the point. Where Obama
maybe an unknown - Bush's track recorded was abysmal, but the American
people were stupid enough to elect him - TWICE! In spite of starting a war
based on lies and running up the national debt to point where China has us
by the gonads.....

We've been through this "based upon lies" business quite a few times. If
you are going to make that assertion you accepting that Clinton lied
about Iraq and WMD's too. Do you want to smear the Clinton with the same
brush?

Hillay bites the dust
 

"HK" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Feb 13, 3:37 pm, "John" wrote:
wrote in message

The big question on all the news shows to undecideds is "what
exactly
has Obama done?". There are still no answers except that he is
motivational, Black, and hopeful... Not one accomplishment could
even
be noted by his strongest supporters...


OK, let's try again...

===========

Pick me.....pick me........

1. He promised to raise our taxes.
2. He promised to increase the size of government.
3. He promised to increase entitlement programs.
4. He looks good in a suit.
5. He has a good tailor.
6. He is eloquent.
7. He is black.
8. He is charismatic.
9. He is young.
10.He has 2 years as a Senator.

Impressive.........eh?

Is that all it takes to become our next POTUS?


Hey, our current POTUS is a failed businessman with an arrest record.

Careful about slamming presidents. Bill Clinton wasn't exactly a paragon
of virtue, integrity, nor truthfulness. Now that I think about it, maybe
Bush 43 learned at all from his predecessor.....

Hillay bites the dust
 

HK wrote:
JimH wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Feb 13, 3:37 pm, "John" wrote:
wrote in message

The big question on all the news shows to undecideds is "what exactly
has Obama done?". There are still no answers except that he is
motivational, Black, and hopeful... Not one accomplishment could even
be noted by his strongest supporters...


OK, let's try again...

===========

Pick me.....pick me........

1. He promised to raise our taxes.
2. He promised to increase the size of government.
3. He promised to increase entitlement programs.
4. He looks good in a suit.
5. He has a good tailor.
6. He is eloquent.
7. He is black.
8. He is charismatic.
9. He is young.
10.He has 2 years as a Senator.

Impressive.........eh?

Is that all it takes to become our next POTUS?



Hey, our current POTUS is a failed businessman with an arrest record.

Our previous POTUS was a failed laywer, misogynist and an accused rapist
and a federally acknowledge liar.

Hillay bites the dust
 

"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Feb 13, 3:37 pm, "John" wrote:
wrote in message


The big question on all the news shows to undecideds is "what exactly
has Obama done?". There are still no answers except that he is
motivational, Black, and hopeful... Not one accomplishment could even
be noted by his strongest supporters...


OK, let's try again...

===========

Pick me.....pick me........

1. He promised to raise our taxes.
2. He promised to increase the size of government.
3. He promised to increase entitlement programs.
4. He looks good in a suit.
5. He has a good tailor.
6. He is eloquent.
7. He is black.
8. He is charismatic.
9. He is young.
10.He has 2 years as a Senator.

Impressive.........eh?

Is that all it takes to become our next POTUS?

You're forgetting...he has Oprah in his corner.

Hillay bites the dust
 

John wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
John wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:37:46 -0500, "John" wrote:

John, we're glad to see you can copy and paste emails you've received.
--
John H
I'm glad you appreciate it, but of course you miss the point. Where
Obama maybe an unknown - Bush's track recorded was abysmal, but the
American people were stupid enough to elect him - TWICE! In spite of
starting a war based on lies and running up the national debt to point
where China has us by the gonads.....
We've been through this "based upon lies" business quite a few times. If
you are going to make that assertion you accepting that Clinton lied about
Iraq and WMD's too. Do you want to smear the Clinton with the same brush?



Minor distinction - Clinton may have believed that Saddam was trying to get
more WMD's - but he was not going to do anything without proof. AS ANY
rational human should do.

Bush on the other hand, wanted to invade Iraq so bad, that he FABRICATED
proof.
Sorry if you are too stupid to understand the difference.....


Very few Bush supporters understand that difference.

Hillay bites the dust
 

HK wrote:
John wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
John wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:37:46 -0500, "John" wrote:

John, we're glad to see you can copy and paste emails you've received.
--
John H
I'm glad you appreciate it, but of course you miss the point. Where
Obama maybe an unknown - Bush's track recorded was abysmal, but the
American people were stupid enough to elect him - TWICE! In spite
of starting a war based on lies and running up the national debt to
point where China has us by the gonads.....
We've been through this "based upon lies" business quite a few times.
If you are going to make that assertion you accepting that Clinton
lied about Iraq and WMD's too. Do you want to smear the Clinton with
the same brush?



Minor distinction - Clinton may have believed that Saddam was trying
to get more WMD's - but he was not going to do anything without
proof. AS ANY rational human should do.

Bush on the other hand, wanted to invade Iraq so bad, that he
FABRICATED proof.
Sorry if you are too stupid to understand the difference.....


Very few Bush supporters understand that difference.

Keep stroking each other.

Hillay bites the dust
 

On Feb 13, 1:57*pm, wrote:
On Feb 13, 1:33*pm, wrote:





On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:17:15 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 13, 7:13*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
That loud sucking sound heard in Potomic area was Hillary losing 3 more
primaries.

It looks like the only way Hillary will win the primary is if Billary
can steal this away with super delegates and some rule changes.

Nah, as far as delegates, she's really not that far behind. The media
spin, however makes it look like Obama is just running away with the
nomination.

Perhaps because he is passing her at warp speed. Look where things
were a month ago. It's not really attributable to spin no matter how
much you might wish it was. Hillary's in the breakdown lane and
Barack's in the passing lane.

At the instant when a car going 100 mph passes a car going 30, do you
interpret them to be doing about the same thing as each other?

The statement that I was replying to was this:

It looks like the only way Hillary will win the primary is if Billary
can steal this away with super delegates and some rule changes

They aren't far apart. So let's use your analogy, shall we? What
happens if the car going 100 mph slows to a crawl, and the car doing
30 speeds up considerably long before the end of the race? See, pretty
simple

Well, I suppose it woud take consideration of how far back the
accelerating care is, and how close (inch's?) the crawling car is to
the finish line.


I guess...

Hillay bites the dust
 

On Feb 13, 5:05*pm, "JimH" wrote:

10.He has 2 years as a Senator.

And most of his senate time has been promoting himself to be the next
POTUS

Hillay bites the dust
 

Tim wrote:
On Feb 13, 5:05 pm, "JimH" wrote:

10.He has 2 years as a Senator.

And most of his senate time has been promoting himself to be the next
POTUS


So? If elected he will be a far better president than the lying, stupid
scumbag who currently occupies the White House.

Hillay bites the dust
 

On Feb 13, 8:34*pm, HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Feb 13, 5:05 pm, "JimH" wrote:

10.He has 2 years as a Senator.

And most of his senate time has been promoting himself to be the next
POTUS

So? If elected he will be a far better president than the lying, stupid
scumbag who currently occupies the White House.

Maybe. and I'm not saying he won't but...

"Beware of Trojans bearing gifts"