Bye!

McCain did pretty good, but illegal immigration didn't come up. That's
where he takes a lot of heat in my book.
--
John H

John H. wrote:
Bye!

McCain did pretty good, but illegal immigration didn't come up. That's
where he takes a lot of heat in my book.

Where McCain takes heat in MY book was his stand against torture and our
treatment of prisoners, then standing next to Bush in the 2004 election.

He clearly showed me that he has no principles. It's more important to
be a good Republican than to stand up for something you believe in.

I would be a McCain supporter if he had a spine, if he tried to put a
stop to something he said he was against.

What does the man actually stand for? I think a vote for McCain is a
vote for another term for the Bushies.

On Feb 3, 6:18�am, John H. wrote:
Bye!

McCain did pretty good, but illegal immigration didn't come up. That's
where he takes a lot of heat in my book.
--
John H

You mean FOX threw McCain a softball?

No.....

Imagine that. :-)

Jim wrote:
John H. wrote:
Bye!

McCain did pretty good, but illegal immigration didn't come up. That's
where he takes a lot of heat in my book.

Where McCain takes heat in MY book was his stand against torture and our
treatment of prisoners, then standing next to Bush in the 2004 election.

He clearly showed me that he has no principles. It's more important to
be a good Republican than to stand up for something you believe in.

I would be a McCain supporter if he had a spine, if he tried to put a
stop to something he said he was against.

What does the man actually stand for? I think a vote for McCain is a
vote for another term for the Bushies.

Where does Romney stand today? Oh...in a different place than he stood
yesterday.

On Feb 3, 12:13Â*pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 3, 6:18�am, John H. wrote:

Bye!

McCain did pretty good, but illegal immigration didn't come up. That's
where he takes a lot of heat in my book.
--
John H

You mean FOX threw McCain a softball?

No.....

Imagine that. Â*:-)

Well, after the debacles of CNN and MSNBC not allowing the repubs to
discuss any issues of interest to us, it is only fair... The debates
on MSNBC were nothing but setups for the repubs and free campaign ads/
events for the dems...

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 09:13:31 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On Feb 3, 6:18?am, John H. wrote:
Bye!

McCain did pretty good, but illegal immigration didn't come up. That's
where he takes a lot of heat in my book.
--
John H

You mean FOX threw McCain a softball?

No.....

Imagine that. :-)

They just didn't throw the ball. It was neither soft nor hard. From the
liberals perspective, McCain is pretty hard on illegal immigrants, i.e., he
calls them illegal instead of 'undocumented', as though they lost their ID
card.

If you watched, you'll have noted that Wallace was just as rough with
McCain as he was with Hillary.
--
John H

On Feb 3, 1:39*pm, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 09:13:31 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould

wrote:
On Feb 3, 6:18?am, John H. wrote:
Bye!

McCain did pretty good, but illegal immigration didn't come up. That's
where he takes a lot of heat in my book.
--
John H

You mean FOX threw McCain a softball?

No.....

Imagine that. *:-)

They just didn't throw the ball. It was neither soft nor hard. From the
liberals perspective, McCain is pretty hard on illegal immigrants, i.e., he
calls them illegal instead of 'undocumented', as though they lost their ID
card.

If you watched, you'll have noted that Wallace was just as rough with
McCain as he was with Hillary.
--
John H

That is what the left calls bias They have ruled the media for half
a century, they are not happy...

On Feb 3, 8:18*am, John H. wrote:
Bye!

McCain did pretty good, but illegal immigration didn't come up. That's
where he takes a lot of heat in my book.
--
John H

did she have to sit on two chairs?

On Feb 3, 10:42�am, wrote:
On Feb 3, 1:39�pm, John H. wrote:





On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 09:13:31 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould

wrote:
On Feb 3, 6:18?am, John H. wrote:
Bye!

McCain did pretty good, but illegal immigration didn't come up. That's
where he takes a lot of heat in my book.
--
John H

You mean FOX threw McCain a softball?

No.....

Imagine that. �:-)

They just didn't throw the ball. It was neither soft nor hard. From the
liberals perspective, McCain is pretty hard on illegal immigrants, i.e., he
calls them illegal instead of 'undocumented', as though they lost their ID
card.

If you watched, you'll have noted that Wallace was just as rough with
McCain as he was with Hillary.
--
John H

That is what the left calls bias They have ruled the media for half
a century, they are not happy...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I don't see any great shift on the horizon for media "rule".
The only media the right controls is whatever stations it can buy.
Buying up all the TV, radio, and newspaper outlets in dusty little
towns
around the country may make a particular editorial viewpoint the only
"voice" locally available, but that still doesn't make that viewpoint
any big deal on a national basis.

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 11:04:43 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Feb 3, 8:18*am, John H. wrote:
Bye!

McCain did pretty good, but illegal immigration didn't come up. That's
where he takes a lot of heat in my book.
--
John H

did she have to sit on two chairs?

Salty's gonna get you!
--
John H