"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
...


When he commented
that Big Bill didn't do anything about Iraq, I thought that perhaps it
would be a kind gesture to refresh his memory. Otherwise, I'm staying
out of this.

Let the name calling and personal attacks continue.....

---------------------------------------------------

I saw the interview with the FBI agent. I also recall that as the buildup
continued and Bush called upon Saddam to honor the UN resolutions, giving
him chance after chance in a public forum (UN), the feedback, even then, was
that Saddam didn't believe the US would actually invade.

Sometimes we forget that the attack and invasion was not exactly a deeply
held secret or surprise. All Saddam had to do was agree to abide by the
resolutions he had previously signed up for. If he had, Bush would have
lost what little support he had for an invasion and I suspect history would
be different.

I also find it contradictory that people like Nancy Pelosi, a 10 year member
of The Select Committee on Intelligence in Congress, was also raising the
alarm, promoting the "disarming" of Iraq during the Clinton administration,
along with many others who had access to classified intelligence reports.
All this when the arms investigators were reporting that Saddam had already
disarmed?

Doesn't make sense, does it?

Eisboch

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:17:20 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

What part of QED do you not understand?
--
John H

"Smoked Herring" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 07:18:07 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:

Hey Chuck - Stay out of the political ****.

After your rant the other day, you make yourself look the fool when you
chime in with your liberal crap.

Stay above it, although, if I remember correctly, you were on the
political
bandwagon several months ago when Harry first started again.
--
John H

pot, kettle, black

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:34:01 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"Smoked Herring" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 07:18:07 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:

Hey Chuck - Stay out of the political ****.

After your rant the other day, you make yourself look the fool when you
chime in with your liberal crap.

Stay above it, although, if I remember correctly, you were on the
political
bandwagon several months ago when Harry first started again.
--
John H

pot, kettle, black


Yay! You got the point!
--
John H

I haven't seen Harry in here for quite a while. Well, since about
9:20 am


Too much overload???

Tim wrote:
I haven't seen Harry in here for quite a while. Well, since about
9:20 am


Too much overload???


I've been working assiduously collecting all the bits of wit and wisdom
you've posted here over the years into a heavy tome worthy of selling on
eBay, and to ensure high sales volume, I'm including with each a
potato(e) with a dark figure on it that looks like Jesus. I've got all
the potato(e)s I need for sale of a first printing, so do you think you
could make one (1) clever post? Blank pages don't sell too well.

Maybe you could team up with all the other clever numnutzes
here...Herring, Loooooogy, Wally, the Reggies, Bertie, W'hine...the
whole bowling team. Surely, collectively, you can think of something
clever I can include.

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:07:57 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

I haven't seen Harry in here for quite a while. Well, since about
9:20 am


Too much overload???

If you had a decent news service instead of Moron Groups, you would
know wouldn't you? :)

On Jan 27, 7:31*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:07:57 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

I haven't seen Harry *in here for quite a while. Well, since about
9:20 am

Too much overload???

If you had a decent news service instead of Moron Groups, you would
know wouldn't you? *:)

Pfffftttt.. as if it matters. Does your news server have metal flake,
does it find nice ads for you? Does it change emocons based on the
season? Geeze...

On Jan 27, 6:31*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:07:57 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

I haven't seen Harry *in here for quite a while. Well, since about
9:20 am

Too much overload???

If you had a decent news service instead of Moron Groups, you would
know wouldn't you? *:)

Well, jug..er JAR head, until just recently his last posting in this
thread was at approx 9:20 am, and wasn't seen in this thread till 6:18
pm. I honestly thought he'd given up. too many "righties" y'know....

But I can see I'm wrong. Harold is out collecting wit and wisdom from
[me] Evidently because he lacks some he must glean stuff from others.

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:49:30 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Jan 27, 6:31*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:07:57 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

I haven't seen Harry *in here for quite a while. Well, since about
9:20 am

Too much overload???

If you had a decent news service instead of Moron Groups, you would
know wouldn't you? *:)

Well, jug..er JAR head, until just recently his last posting in this
thread was at approx 9:20 am, and wasn't seen in this thread till 6:18
pm. I honestly thought he'd given up. too many "righties" y'know....

Actually, 90% of the Earth's population are righties. Only 10% of the
population are lefties.

Oddly, lefties also suffer from the largest percentage of metal
retardation as compared to righties.

Which, when you think about it, makes sense. :)

But I can see I'm wrong. Harold is out collecting wit and wisdom from
[me] Evidently because he lacks some he must glean stuff from others.

From the ether man, from the ether.