Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#181
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What is it about Democrat leaders
"Smoked Herring" wrote in message
... On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:22:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message om... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:47:10 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message news:6MOdncJnI4ue2AbanZ2dnUVZ_vHinZ2d@comcas t.com... I've seen all that crap a zillion times. Bush lied us into war. No way out of it. Pretty much sums it up. I gave him another chance at it - let's see if he'll man up and say the right thing. It's my considered opinion that Bush was set up by the Clintons and their main henchman in the process was George Tenant. I suppose you think Reagan was set up by Carter, in terms of inheriting the Pakistan nightmare. There you go again, dissing old Ronny Wrinkles, who has nothing to do with this topic and, BTW, is a favorite of Barack Obama. Eisboch Actually, I wasn't dissing Reagan at all. The implied point was that all presidents inherit nightmares from their predecessors. You know that, and so does Tom. Any other conclusion suggests a dependency on children's books for knowledge of recent history. You've become a joke, and you just don't get it. -- John H You disagree with what I just wrote? If you disagree, explain why. |
#182
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What is it about Democrat leaders
wrote in message
... On Jan 26, 1:42 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in messagenews:dppmp3pdv23mnd9vi1mb8icepan7qciei7@4ax .com... On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:47:10 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message m... I've seen all that crap a zillion times. Bush lied us into war. No way out of it. Pretty much sums it up. I gave him another chance at it - let's see if he'll man up and say the right thing. It's my considered opinion that Bush was set up by the Clintons and their main henchman in the process was George Tenant. I suppose you think Reagan was set up by Carter, in terms of inheriting the Pakistan nightmare.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, with my tin hat firmly pulled down I have always thought just the opposite. Regan set up Carter with some kind of back room deal or threat to Iran... =============== Reagan set up Carter? In what capacity (job) did Reagan do that? |
#183
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Yo!! Harry!! What is it about Democrat leaders
|
#184
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What is it about Democrat leaders
On Jan 26, 9:59*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 26, 1:42 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in messagenews:dppmp3pdv23mnd9vi1mb8icepan7qciei7@4ax .com... On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:47:10 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message m... I've seen all that crap a zillion times. Bush lied us into war. No way out of it. Pretty much sums it up. I gave him another chance at it - let's see if he'll man up and say the right thing. It's my considered opinion that Bush was set up by the Clintons and their main henchman in the process was George Tenant. I suppose you think Reagan was set up by Carter, in terms of inheriting the Pakistan nightmare.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, with my tin hat firmly pulled down I have always thought just the opposite. Regan set up Carter with some kind of back room deal or threat to Iran... =============== Reagan set up Carter? In what capacity (job) did Reagan do that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - none |
#185
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Yo!! Harry!! What is it about Democrat leaders
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:56:22 -0500, Eisboch wrote:
Yet most of the Democratic leadership at the time, well before Bush took office, trusted the intel and advocated action. You've been provided with a partial list. The names are very familiar. Why didn't Big Bill do something? Eisboch A better question is, why are Republicans so slow? Clinton did attack Iraq. On 12/16/98, he launched 200 cruise missiles at Iraq. What was the Republican response? Clinton's "Wagging the Dog" to avoid dealing with the Lewinsky matter. Fast forward 5 years, and the Republicans are all on board invading Iraq. Clearly there were no political motivations as this was a matter of national security, so one just has to assume Republicans are slow. |
#186
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Yo!! Harry!! What is it about Democrat leaders
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... The decision to invade Iraq was entirely the responsibility of George W. Bush. He has the con until next January. You guys sound like bookies, trying to lay off bets. Well, fortunately and despite the public's unpopular view of the war, your extreme position is somewhat unique and not shared by most .... even within your political party of choice. Not to fear though. In short order you'll have another Republican POTUS to call a dumbf...k. Eisboch How about an Obama / Lieberman ticket? May be a winning ticket. |
#188
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Yo!! Harry!! What is it about Democrat leaders
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:52:16 -0500, JG2U wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 22:11:39 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... wrote: On Jan 26, 8:45 pm, HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. It's an absolutely honest answer. The Dems got their intel from the Bush Admin. In 1998? Eisboch Whatever information Clinton had in 1998 wasn't enough for him to decide to invade Iraq, depose Saddam, and set up an ersatz "democracy." Yet most of the influencial Democrats in Congress promoted such action at the time, a fact you seem to refuse to recognize. "You fellows keep missing the real points. " One of them is that it was Bush, not Clinton, that had the hard on to invade, ......" Stop. Again, most leading Dems advocated such action well before Bush took office. The fact that Clinton didn't is somewhat of a mystery. Maybe Bill didn't trust the intel. I wouldn't trust a word from certain federal intel or police agencies, e.g., the FBI. That's only cause you have the ear of the Supreme Overlord... No, it is because I believe the FBI is a corrupt agency. -- George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever! Is there anything, just anything about this country that you like? harry is the original disenfranchised voter. Astounding. He will not apply reason, intellectual honesty, or rationality to his anti-Bush or anti-religion rhetoric, yet this morning there were about 50 posts between HK, et al, on politics, just in two threads. -- John H |
#189
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What is it about Democrat leaders
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:57:30 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "Smoked Herring" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:03:44 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Smoked Herring" wrote in message ... On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 22:39:27 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Smoked Herring" wrote in message om... On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:37:19 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Kippered" wrote in message news:hnjmp3ht9pue2tp4dv1imbqb0qrvl3c3en@4ax .com... On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:42:05 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Kippered" wrote in message news:hvcmp3tqorgj6ulot8732op3hapktbe70a@4 ax.com... On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 02:22:22 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "JG2U" wrote in message news:gi5lp3ph0vpuv5blqs6ae6htl9agct4eg4 @4ax.com... On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:05:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "JG2U" wrote in message news:271lp3lvkn4ovp9po2ta8suv0hr9flo6 ... On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:44:45 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "JG2U" wrote in message news:9vukp3llhf10ko0rpqv5h4rk6r2c5i ... On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:55:10 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message news:MLWdnS7E37GyoAfanZ2dnUVZ_oji ... wrote: On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:24:18 -0500, Kippered wrote: Harry, it's not the sex. I know this is, for you, especially hard to understand. The guy *perjured* himself. That means lying. Believe it or not, most folks consider that wrong. Of course, you and your buddy find nothing wrong with that because it gains you notoriety, and some probably think it's right cool. But it isn't. Uh, perjury and lying are not the same thing. Clinton was guilty of one, but we was not guilty of the other. Don't you remember Bill pointing his finger at us and saying "I did not have sex with that woman, Monica Lewinski!" Let's ask the wives if a blow job is sex or not before you parse Bill's answer. I wonder if it's illegal for presidents to have sex with anyone they want, wherever they want. I said ILLEGAL. Yes, it IS illegal. A president can not have sex with anyone they want, wherever they want. Period. Do you think they can? If so, explain how. I might be wrong, but I don't think it's illegal. You sound pretty sure of it, though. Do you recall where you heard or read that? As far as my explaining "how", that's really a subject better discussed with your dad. You *are* wrong. Anyone? OK, your ex-wife. Anywhere? Town Square at noon. Illegal on two counts, rape (unless she's easy) and indecent exposure. Hell, you made the rules. You made it too easy. Anyway, being pres does NOT let you have sex with anyone, anywhere you choose. You know that. You've now been taught why. ;-) Bye You knew I meant "consenting adults", but you're now using that technicality to wiggle out of proving your legal theory. You also knew I meant that the act would not happen in the place where it would be illegal for ANYONE. You're also using that as an excuse to not prove your point. I can't (and wouldn't want to) read your mind. I can't help that your statement was poorly defined. My statement your original statement stands as true. Prove that it was illegal for Clinton to have sex with Lewinski. Do it now. Unless he coerced her, that was not illegal. Unethical, sleazy, immoral, indicative of his moral values, proof of his lack of a moral compass, proving him to ba a risk to national security, YES. Illegal, no. It was the purgery that was illegal. But I never said otherwise. You know that. Great. We agree. It wasn't illegal. Now, you can agree that the fake saints asked him the infamous question only for political gain. There were no ***SINCERE*** concerns about blackmail or national security. Only a child pretends that the president cannot make a problem like that vanish. He was questioned about his unethical, sleazy, and immoral activities. Or is unethical behavior something that you don't believe can exist? You never saw me claim that his behavior was NOT unethical. If you disagree, please find the text, written by me, which suggests that I approve of what he did. Copy & past a sample of that text into your next response. "Now, you can agree that the fake saints asked him the infamous question only for political gain." No. They asked him the question because of his unethical, sleazy, and immoral behavior. Your implication that they had no reason to question his behavior is horse****. You will (or should) recall that the biggest mouth during the inquisition belonged to Gingrich, who later said he was having an affair at the time. He didn't think HIS OWN behavior was wrong. Therefore, he didn't REALLY believe Clinton's behavior was wrong. Based on these FACTS, we can only conclude that he led the charge for political gain, not because of his opinion of Clinton's behavior. How can you possibly claim to know what Gingrich thought. You are way too full of yourself. Your implication is still horse****. -- John H Do you think Gingrich was wracked with guilt during his affair? Of course not. He did it because he thought it was enjoyable. Gingrich's guilt or lack thereof has no bearing on your horse**** implication. -- John H My implication is perfect. Gingrich went after Clinton for only one reason: To make political hay because he needed to at the time. Nobody gave a damn about Clinton's sex life. Clinton simply provided them with a tool to use against him. That was his biggest mistake. Other than the fact that his sex life was sleazy, unethical, and immoral, no one gave a **** about it. But, he perjured himself. That's what gave 'them' the tool to use. -- John H Work backwards, John. He perjured himself because he was asked a question. The question was asked because someone needed ammunition. The question should never have been asked, particularly because the loudest proponent of the question was Gingrich, who was equally guilty AT THE VERY TIME THE QUESTION WAS ASKED. Backwards my ass. He perjured himself, regardless of your 'reason'. Your implication remains horse****. -- John H |
#190
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What is it about Democrat leaders
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:58:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "Smoked Herring" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:22:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:R8OdnXXDtfCYXQbanZ2dnUVZ_vamnZ2d@giganews. com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:47:10 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message news:6MOdncJnI4ue2AbanZ2dnUVZ_vHinZ2d@comca st.com... I've seen all that crap a zillion times. Bush lied us into war. No way out of it. Pretty much sums it up. I gave him another chance at it - let's see if he'll man up and say the right thing. It's my considered opinion that Bush was set up by the Clintons and their main henchman in the process was George Tenant. I suppose you think Reagan was set up by Carter, in terms of inheriting the Pakistan nightmare. There you go again, dissing old Ronny Wrinkles, who has nothing to do with this topic and, BTW, is a favorite of Barack Obama. Eisboch Actually, I wasn't dissing Reagan at all. The implied point was that all presidents inherit nightmares from their predecessors. You know that, and so does Tom. Any other conclusion suggests a dependency on children's books for knowledge of recent history. You've become a joke, and you just don't get it. -- John H You disagree with what I just wrote? If you disagree, explain why. I neither agree nor disagree. I think you're farcical. (Look it up.) You and Harry belong in the same room. He beat you, by the way. -- John H |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Storage for trolling lures w/leaders | General | |||
Wire leaders for blackfin tuna???? | General | |||
Opinion Leaders Deserting Bush | General | |||
(OT) Foreign Leaders For Kerry Identified | General |