Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
 

NOYB wrote:

Nevertheless, I'll be waiting for your letter of inquiry to the CCDA.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

Actually, Harry, I credit the tax cut for a very recent increase in
patients' disposable income...leading to a sharp increase in spending
on
dental care vs. last summer. The increase in productivity is the
reason
I
needed to expand my staff.

As for me supplying my name and phone number, here are my terms:

1) I get at least 3 paragraphs of space in your article to share my
views
(in full, and unedited of course)

Sorry, you'd get the space you deserve, depending on what you say.



2) I get a chance to review the entire article, and *OK* any portion
dealing
with me and my practice, prior to publication

I don't give anyone that privilege on my articles.



3) You contact the Collier County Dental Association with a synopsis
about
the theme of your article, and they'll pass it along to me. The
contact
should be made on official letterhead of the organization that will
do
the
publishing, and should be signed by you. This would mean you are who
you
say
you are and you're acting in good faith.

No problem.

Well then send your proposal, and ask that our officers announce the
theme
of your article at the next meeting. Perhaps there are other dentists
that
would like to share their thoughts on this subject. If you go that far,
I'll email you my name and phone number. Of course, I'll make sure the
other members read some of your less-than-positive posts about dentists
and
conservatives. Afterall, it's only fair that they know what kind of
person
they are dealing with before providing ammunition for your biased
article.

I'll be waiting...





Oh, I like my dentist just fine. But, then, he's not a horse's ass, as
you are.

--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.





Sorry...you changed the terms.

--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
 

???
It seems like you were the one that rejected 2 out of the 3 terms I
proposed.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

Nevertheless, I'll be waiting for your letter of inquiry to the CCDA.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

Actually, Harry, I credit the tax cut for a very recent increase
in
patients' disposable income...leading to a sharp increase in
spending
on
dental care vs. last summer. The increase in productivity is the
reason
I
needed to expand my staff.

As for me supplying my name and phone number, here are my terms:

1) I get at least 3 paragraphs of space in your article to share
my
views
(in full, and unedited of course)

Sorry, you'd get the space you deserve, depending on what you say.



2) I get a chance to review the entire article, and *OK* any
portion
dealing
with me and my practice, prior to publication

I don't give anyone that privilege on my articles.



3) You contact the Collier County Dental Association with a
synopsis
about
the theme of your article, and they'll pass it along to me. The
contact
should be made on official letterhead of the organization that
will
do
the
publishing, and should be signed by you. This would mean you are
who
you
say
you are and you're acting in good faith.

No problem.

Well then send your proposal, and ask that our officers announce the
theme
of your article at the next meeting. Perhaps there are other
dentists
that
would like to share their thoughts on this subject. If you go that
far,
I'll email you my name and phone number. Of course, I'll make sure
the
other members read some of your less-than-positive posts about
dentists
and
conservatives. Afterall, it's only fair that they know what kind of
person
they are dealing with before providing ammunition for your biased
article.

I'll be waiting...





Oh, I like my dentist just fine. But, then, he's not a horse's ass, as
you are.

--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.





Sorry...you changed the terms.

--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
 

NOYB wrote:

???
It seems like you were the one that rejected 2 out of the 3 terms I
proposed.



As I have stated from time to time, I'm not that interested in you or
your terms or much else about you. But I do believe you are a typical
right-wing coward, afraid to post with your real name because your
"opinions" are so outrageous.




--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

???
It seems like you were the one that rejected 2 out of the 3 terms I
proposed.



As I have stated from time to time, I'm not that interested in you or
your terms or much else about you. But I do believe you are a typical
right-wing coward, afraid to post with your real name because your
"opinions" are so outrageous.

One of the differences between us is the fact that I interact on a
professional level with people of *diverse* backgrounds every single
day...and you just work with and cozy up to like-minded liberals. You write
for a two-bit union rag because 99% of the respectable publications out
there wouldn't put a single word of yours into print. You can say what you
want in your piece of rubbish mag because you already know your audience.
Try stepping outside your "comfort zone" into an arena where there are
others that don't share your political views. Then let's see if you're
willing to sign your name to the bull**** you write.

BTW--I noticed you backed out of the deal about contacting the CCDA about
your story as soon as I mentioned passing along to them some of your quotes
about dentists and conservatives. So you see? We're not much different.

Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
 

You're trying to disprove the theory that the Bush tax cut will create jobs.
That's not political?


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:


BTW--I noticed you backed out of the deal about contacting the CCDA
about
your story as soon as I mentioned passing along to them some of your
quotes
about dentists and conservatives. So you see? We're not much
different.

Nope. You turned it into a political tirade..in which I have no
interest. Sorry.








--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
 

It is funny that while there was some name calling in the last few weeks,
nothing to compare with the tirade that has developed since Harry returned.
Say what you will about the right wing trash or left wing socialist, no one
is more frustrated in his futile efforts to make an impact in the world than
Harry.


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

Social security and medicare are the only *fair* taxes...'cause the rate
is
the same for all income levels.

Not when considered as a percentage of total income. SS cuts off at
$80-some k.
For a lot of people, the SS pain in the butt disappears fairly early in
the
year (although the employer's contribution continues). Most of the working
poor
will *never* see a paychek without a deduction for SS.

I understand that there is some equity because benefits for higher income
wage
earners are also capped, but it is inaccurate to say that the rate is the
same
for all workers.

Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
 

Bill Cole wrote:

It is funny that while there was some name calling in the last few weeks,
nothing to compare with the tirade that has developed since Harry returned.
Say what you will about the right wing trash or left wing socialist, no one
is more frustrated in his futile efforts to make an impact in the world than
Harry.


Unlike you, Bill, I have no delusions about political statements in
rec.boats having any impact on the real world. I just refuse to engage
right-wing trash in debate on issues. There's no reason to do so...if
you mud wrestle with a right-wing pig, you're going to get covered in
garbage and excrement, because that is their only product. It's more fun
to pinprick the little suckers and watch them go ballastic.



--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
 

LOL. I was expecting a zinger from you on the dental care...and, of
course, your silence about the other benefits.



But you did post that you prefer to hire two part time workers rather than a
full time worker, and thereby avoid paying for fringe benefits. Are you going
to 'fess up or do I have to wade through Google? :-)

Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
 

GDP growth has been increasing every month for almost a year now...long
enough for almost every economist to now declare the recession is officially
over.

Yahoo (Reuters) has a news piece just released that is entitled "Analysts
Say U.S. Economy in Recovery, 2001 Recession Over".

Of course, every economist will also tell you job growth lags GDP growth
almost every time...so your "research" means very little at this early
stage. Hell, paychecks just started reflecting the tax cut a mere 2 months
ago...and Americans received their child tax credit more recently than that.

Here's a very telling quote:
"All the data's saying the same thing: this quarter is going to be a
cracker," said Ram Bhagavatula, chief economist at Royal Bank of Scotland
Financial Markets, predicting gross domestic product growth will hit a 6
percent to 7 percent annual rate this quarter. "

6-7% *annual* growth rate! The last time we had a greater than 7% annual
growth in GDP was 1984...the year Reagan won in a landslide.




"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

You're trying to disprove the theory that the Bush tax cut will create
jobs.
That's not political?




I'm not trying to prove or disprove a thing. I'm merely part of a group
trying to find legitimate evidence that the Bush tax cuts have resulted
in significant job growth among substantial manufacturing or service
employers.


By the middle of last week, some 1,500 employers have been contacted
nationally by our researchers. The data to date indicates no job growth
traceable to Bush's little giveaway.


--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands
 

Go wade through google, Gould. I have never hired a part-time employee to
avoid paying benefits.


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
LOL. I was expecting a zinger from you on the dental care...and, of
course, your silence about the other benefits.



But you did post that you prefer to hire two part time workers rather than
a
full time worker, and thereby avoid paying for fringe benefits. Are you
going
to 'fess up or do I have to wade through Google? :-)