Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Dec 6, 7:12 pm, BAR wrote: JimH wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: The actual phone service is not bad. It all depends on the quality of your internet service. When speeds drop in my area (Time Warner sucks) then the voice quality degrades to unacceptable. Vonage needs to improve tech support and stop routing these calls through India. You are correct. I am also concerned that the infringement lawsuit might be the death of them, so I am glad others are getting into the VOIP market at competitive prices. Indeed. I could care less if Vonage goes under as there are plenty of other options available. In the end I could do without any sort of home based phone service and it may eventually get to the point with us relying only our cell phones. Bad move. Keep the land-line for emergencies. It only costs about $10 a month. Maybe we are just stuck in our old habits................after all, how does the younger generation living on their own survive with *only* a cell phone?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What emergency would a land line handle that a cell phone won't? When AC power is down. Landline phones run off large battery banks. One of the reasons that you should have at least one, old fashioned non wireless phone in the house. If the power goes out, ou can not call for help of service. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|