![]() |
Happiness is...
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:54:25 -0500, "Scotty" wrote:
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message .. . I think that railway engines are basically generator prime movers and run at a constant RPM all the time. At least that is the way a power plant engine runs. It always runs at approximately rated RPM and the governor makes small adjustments up or down to maintain the proper frequency. A train engine will increase RPM as the electric load goes up. I guess I assumed that because they drove a "generator" that they were generating A.C. . Bruce-in-Bangkok (Note:remove underscores from address for reply) |
Happiness is...
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message ... On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 20:10:41 -0500, Red wrote: On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:49:00 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:12:41 -0600, Brian Whatcott wrote: Diesels don't have this problem, and so are less wasteful at low revs. That's true but they have maintenance issues if run at low speed/low load for extended periods of time. Bruce said: Yes there "seems" to be that but mention of "it is bad to run the engine at low poser" seems confined to the boating world. I've worked many construction jobs where diesel engines were started in the morning and shut down at the end of the day. During smoke breaks or lunch they just sat there and idled. Cranes are a perfect example, that spend most of their life at very low power settings. Generator sets - I've never seen a gen set operating manual that said "run this engine at high power settings". Not that I'm advocating idling your diesel for days and days but I do wonder about the people who worry about letting the engine idle. I've seen people that would hardly let the poor old thing cool down before stop-cocking it, "because it is bad to let the engine run at low load". The Perkins I have in the sail boat has a continuous rating of 3,000 RPM and for years I ran it at 1500 - 1800. When I overhauled it I could see no evidence of abnormal wear or carbon or any other evidence that slow running harmed anything. have the feeling that someone once said "it's not a good idea to idle a diesel for a long time" and as the message passed from dockie to dockie it became an urban legend and now everyone is worried about idling the engine. But what do I know? Bruce-in-Bangkok Bruce, I suspect that all this came about as there are different types of diesels out there, and *some of them* surely cannot be safely idled for long periods. I knew a few tow truck operators that drove ford diesels that told me that if the engines were not equipped with high-idle switches the engines consistently did not last that long (tow trucks spend a lot of time at idle). On the other hand, guys that drove some other brands of tow trucks said they didn't need the fast idle, the engines lasted just fine. My Dodge/Cummins pickup truck owner's manual says to avoid idle any longer than 3-5 minutes - kind of a bitch since I spend half the day in traffic. In boats we have some (mostly older now) slow-turning diesels that can be run all year at low speeds without any harm. But I suspect that most of the newer, lighter, fast turning diesels of recent vintage are better off above idle. One more thing... *most* people I've observed around here driving their boats into the dockage area are idling anyway. By the time they are docked the engine is already sufficiently cooled and needs no more idling at the dock, yet they usually spend another five or ten minutes wasting fuel. Red I suspect that you are correct. I recently set the governor on a Gardner 6 cylinder that turned a roaring 1,000 at full throttle and drove a 50 foot teak junk at 7 - 8 knots. My personal thoughts about diesels is that if you idle them for days and days it is not good. However some idling followed by running them at rated speed is not harmful. I may be wrong but I've been treating them that way for a lot of years and they haven't complained yet =:-) Bruce-in-Bangkok (Note:remove underscores from address for reply) Okay, so it's been educational reading this thread. It'll be another couple months to go, but I imagine Dad and I will do some experimenting with fuel consumption in the GB42, with both engines throttled back & one enging at a time shut down (probably alternating every couple hours). Any ideas of where to look for appropriate fuel flow meters for these? I have another question, that's been brought up by reading this thread. My own boat (GS41) has a Perkins 4-108. I have always been redicent to operate it more than say 1350. What would the safe operating RPM be for this engine? Reasonable cruising RPM? Thanks! Glenn. s/v Seawing. |
Happiness is...
....
It'll be another couple months to go, but I imagine Dad and I will do some experimenting with fuel consumption in the GB42, with both engines throttled back & one enging at a time shut down (probably alternating every couple hours). Any ideas of where to look for appropriate fuel flow meters for these? I think this is the unit that I saw in Tonga: http://www.navman.com/Navman/Templat...____22129.aspx -- Tom. |
Happiness is...
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:04:59 GMT, "Glenn \(s/v Seawing\)"
wrote: "Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 20:10:41 -0500, Red wrote: On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:49:00 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:12:41 -0600, Brian Whatcott wrote: Diesels don't have this problem, and so are less wasteful at low revs. That's true but they have maintenance issues if run at low speed/low load for extended periods of time. Bruce said: Yes there "seems" to be that but mention of "it is bad to run the engine at low poser" seems confined to the boating world. I've worked many construction jobs where diesel engines were started in the morning and shut down at the end of the day. During smoke breaks or lunch they just sat there and idled. Cranes are a perfect example, that spend most of their life at very low power settings. Generator sets - I've never seen a gen set operating manual that said "run this engine at high power settings". Not that I'm advocating idling your diesel for days and days but I do wonder about the people who worry about letting the engine idle. I've seen people that would hardly let the poor old thing cool down before stop-cocking it, "because it is bad to let the engine run at low load". The Perkins I have in the sail boat has a continuous rating of 3,000 RPM and for years I ran it at 1500 - 1800. When I overhauled it I could see no evidence of abnormal wear or carbon or any other evidence that slow running harmed anything. have the feeling that someone once said "it's not a good idea to idle a diesel for a long time" and as the message passed from dockie to dockie it became an urban legend and now everyone is worried about idling the engine. But what do I know? Bruce-in-Bangkok Bruce, I suspect that all this came about as there are different types of diesels out there, and *some of them* surely cannot be safely idled for long periods. I knew a few tow truck operators that drove ford diesels that told me that if the engines were not equipped with high-idle switches the engines consistently did not last that long (tow trucks spend a lot of time at idle). On the other hand, guys that drove some other brands of tow trucks said they didn't need the fast idle, the engines lasted just fine. My Dodge/Cummins pickup truck owner's manual says to avoid idle any longer than 3-5 minutes - kind of a bitch since I spend half the day in traffic. In boats we have some (mostly older now) slow-turning diesels that can be run all year at low speeds without any harm. But I suspect that most of the newer, lighter, fast turning diesels of recent vintage are better off above idle. One more thing... *most* people I've observed around here driving their boats into the dockage area are idling anyway. By the time they are docked the engine is already sufficiently cooled and needs no more idling at the dock, yet they usually spend another five or ten minutes wasting fuel. Red I suspect that you are correct. I recently set the governor on a Gardner 6 cylinder that turned a roaring 1,000 at full throttle and drove a 50 foot teak junk at 7 - 8 knots. My personal thoughts about diesels is that if you idle them for days and days it is not good. However some idling followed by running them at rated speed is not harmful. I may be wrong but I've been treating them that way for a lot of years and they haven't complained yet =:-) Bruce-in-Bangkok (Note:remove underscores from address for reply) Okay, so it's been educational reading this thread. It'll be another couple months to go, but I imagine Dad and I will do some experimenting with fuel consumption in the GB42, with both engines throttled back & one enging at a time shut down (probably alternating every couple hours). Any ideas of where to look for appropriate fuel flow meters for these? I have another question, that's been brought up by reading this thread. My own boat (GS41) has a Perkins 4-108. I have always been redicent to operate it more than say 1350. What would the safe operating RPM be for this engine? Reasonable cruising RPM? Thanks! Glenn. s/v Seawing. According to the Perkins manual the 4-107, the predecessor to the 4-108 had a maximum continuous rating of 37.5 HP @ 3000 RPM. As the major difference between the 4-107 and the 4-108 was the change from wet to dry liners on the 4-108 your RPM would be the same. However, as my 4-107 is a bit long in the tooth I normally run at 2,000 - 2200 RPM Please note: that the maximum rating is horse power at a specified RPM If you were producing more horse power then the RPM should be reduced. Another note: Fuel consumption at rated H.P. is listed as 0.43 Lbs./BHP/Hour. A Westerbeck added page shows the following: High Speed Intermittent Rating - 47 HP @ 4000 RPM Maximum Continuous Rating - the same as Perkins Fuel consumption: 1500 RPM 0.5 GPH 1750 0.57 2000 0.66 2250 0.75 2500 0.82 2750 1.0 3000 1.3 Over the years I have arrived at 3/4 gal per hour (or about 3 Lt./Hr) as an average fuel consumption at 2000 - 2200 RPM Bruce-in-Bangkok (Note:remove underscores from address for reply) |
Happiness is...
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:26:59 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok
wrote: A train engine will increase RPM as the electric load goes up. I guess I assumed that because they drove a "generator" that they were generating A.C. . They probably are but then rectify it to DC at some point like an alternator. If so, the RPMs/frequency do not matter. |
Happiness is...
wrote in message ... ... It'll be another couple months to go, but I imagine Dad and I will do some experimenting with fuel consumption in the GB42, with both engines throttled back & one enging at a time shut down (probably alternating every couple hours). Any ideas of where to look for appropriate fuel flow meters for these? I think this is the unit that I saw in Tonga: http://www.navman.com/Navman/Templat...____22129.aspx -- Tom. Hey, thanks! This looks like more than I had imagined. Should be a good addition. Glenn. |
Happiness is...
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:02:07 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:26:59 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok wrote: A train engine will increase RPM as the electric load goes up. I guess I assumed that because they drove a "generator" that they were generating A.C. . They probably are but then rectify it to DC at some point like an alternator. If so, the RPMs/frequency do not matter. Years ago I had a train guy, who didn't understand it very well, try to tell me about how an electric locomotive worked. He was a bit vague about 'lectricity but did talk a lot about some sort of coils or resistance grid on the top of the engine that got very hot under certain conditions. Bruce-in-Bangkok (Note:remove underscores from address for reply) |
Happiness is...
Years ago I had a train guy, who didn't understand it very well, try
to tell me about how an electric locomotive worked. He was a bit vague about 'lectricity but did talk a lot about some sort of coils or resistance grid on the top of the engine that got very hot under certain conditions. My first job straight out of college was at the National Carbon Company in Cleveland. As I was being given a plant introduction tour saw a couple of guys at bandsaws cutting carbon blocks into small pieces. Was told these guys worked on piece rate and were the highest paid hourly employees in the place. All those little carbon pieces ended up becoming carbon brushes for Electromotive train engine DC motors. Lew |
Happiness is...
The hot grids referred to are resistance loads used to dissipate the
energy produced by the dynamic electric braking action employed as part of the engine braking system. Terry K |
Happiness is...
On Nov 30, 7:54 pm, "Glenn \(s/v Seawing\)"
wrote: wrote in message ... ... It'll be another couple months to go, but I imagine Dad and I will do some experimenting with fuel consumption in the GB42, with both engines throttled back & one enging at a time shut down (probably alternating every couple hours). Any ideas of where to look for appropriate fuel flow meters for these? I think this is the unit that I saw in Tonga: http://www.navman.com/Navman/Templat...____22129.aspx -- Tom. Hey, thanks! This looks like more than I had imagined. Should be a good addition. Glenn. You are welcome. I was very impressed by it. I wish they made one that worked with my little diesels. -- Tom. |
Happiness is...
wrote in message ... On Nov 30, 7:54 pm, "Glenn \(s/v Seawing\)" wrote: wrote in message ... ... It'll be another couple months to go, but I imagine Dad and I will do some experimenting with fuel consumption in the GB42, with both engines throttled back & one enging at a time shut down (probably alternating every couple hours). Any ideas of where to look for appropriate fuel flow meters for these? I think this is the unit that I saw in Tonga: http://www.navman.com/Navman/Templat...____22129.aspx -- Tom. Hey, thanks! This looks like more than I had imagined. Should be a good addition. Glenn. You are welcome. I was very impressed by it. I wish they made one that worked with my little diesels. -- Tom. I had the same thought. This'll work great on Dad's GB...but my little 4-108 is far too tiny for this thing...but I burn very little fuel really, so am not as concerned about consumption. Glenn. s/v Seawing. |
Happiness is...
tOn Sat, 1 Dec 2007 06:38:47 -0800 (PST), Terry K
wrote: The hot grids referred to are resistance loads used to dissipate the energy produced by the dynamic electric braking action employed as part of the engine braking system. Terry K Thanks I always wondered what the guy was talking about. He was really knowledgable about trains right up to the engine. Bruce-in-Bangkok (Note:remove underscores from address for reply) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com