Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimH wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message news ![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:49:44 -0500, " JimH" ask wrote: Explain how the "Republicans" caused the increase in gasoline prices. That's easy: - The Iraq war - Huge federal defecits - Weak dollar - Poor energy policies - Huge trade imbalance They are all intertwined with high energy prices in various ways. And of course the Republicans are the cause of all of them.......eh? Nice try Wayne. Yeah, they are. Remind me again who has control of Congress. At the moment, no one. The Dems do not yet have a working majority. Nice try but no cigar for you. I don't smoke, but my statement is correct. If the Dems had "control" of Congress, they would have the votes within their party to override a presidential veto. That's what control means when the other party controls the white house. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 11, 8:55 am, HK wrote:
JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message news ![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message om... On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:49:44 -0500, " JimH" ask wrote: Explain how the "Republicans" caused the increase in gasoline prices. That's easy: - The Iraq war - Huge federal defecits - Weak dollar - Poor energy policies - Huge trade imbalance They are all intertwined with high energy prices in various ways. And of course the Republicans are the cause of all of them.......eh? Nice try Wayne. Yeah, they are. Remind me again who has control of Congress. At the moment, no one. The Dems do not yet have a working majority. Nice try but no cigar for you. I don't smoke, but my statement is correct. If the Dems had "control" of Congress, they would have the votes within their party to override a presidential veto. That's what control means when the other party controls the white house.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bull****. the only bills that he has vetoed were nothing to do with our economy, cept to drown it with a huge socialized medical spending bill for the limosine liberals and illegals... They have not even tried to put up any appropriations bills or any other energy bills either, they are just concerened with power and earmark spending... |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
ups.com... On Nov 11, 8:55 am, HK wrote: JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message news ![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message om... On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:49:44 -0500, " JimH" ask wrote: Explain how the "Republicans" caused the increase in gasoline prices. That's easy: - The Iraq war - Huge federal defecits - Weak dollar - Poor energy policies - Huge trade imbalance They are all intertwined with high energy prices in various ways. And of course the Republicans are the cause of all of them.......eh? Nice try Wayne. Yeah, they are. Remind me again who has control of Congress. At the moment, no one. The Dems do not yet have a working majority. Nice try but no cigar for you. I don't smoke, but my statement is correct. If the Dems had "control" of Congress, they would have the votes within their party to override a presidential veto. That's what control means when the other party controls the white house.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bull****. the only bills that he has vetoed were nothing to do with our economy, cept to drown it with a huge socialized medical spending bill for the limosine liberals and illegals... They have not even tried to put up any appropriations bills or any other energy bills either, they are just concerened with power and earmark spending... There is already a socialized medicine program whose existence you approve of, and might even admire. If I told you that I had the power to end this program and that I intended to do so, you'd say nasty things about me. Guess what this program is. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... wrote in message ups.com... On Nov 11, 8:55 am, HK wrote: JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message news ![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message om... On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:49:44 -0500, " JimH" ask wrote: Explain how the "Republicans" caused the increase in gasoline prices. That's easy: - The Iraq war - Huge federal defecits - Weak dollar - Poor energy policies - Huge trade imbalance They are all intertwined with high energy prices in various ways. And of course the Republicans are the cause of all of them.......eh? Nice try Wayne. Yeah, they are. Remind me again who has control of Congress. At the moment, no one. The Dems do not yet have a working majority. Nice try but no cigar for you. I don't smoke, but my statement is correct. If the Dems had "control" of Congress, they would have the votes within their party to override a presidential veto. That's what control means when the other party controls the white house.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bull****. the only bills that he has vetoed were nothing to do with our economy, cept to drown it with a huge socialized medical spending bill for the limosine liberals and illegals... They have not even tried to put up any appropriations bills or any other energy bills either, they are just concerened with power and earmark spending... There is already a socialized medicine program whose existence you approve of, and might even admire. If I told you that I had the power to end this program and that I intended to do so, you'd say nasty things about me. Guess what this program is. And when the Dems gain control, all will be sweetness and light. Ha! |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:00:32 -0500, "Lu Powell"
wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... wrote in message ups.com... On Nov 11, 8:55 am, HK wrote: JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message news ![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message om... On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:49:44 -0500, " JimH" ask wrote: Explain how the "Republicans" caused the increase in gasoline prices. That's easy: - The Iraq war - Huge federal defecits - Weak dollar - Poor energy policies - Huge trade imbalance They are all intertwined with high energy prices in various ways. And of course the Republicans are the cause of all of them.......eh? Nice try Wayne. Yeah, they are. Remind me again who has control of Congress. At the moment, no one. The Dems do not yet have a working majority. Nice try but no cigar for you. I don't smoke, but my statement is correct. If the Dems had "control" of Congress, they would have the votes within their party to override a presidential veto. That's what control means when the other party controls the white house.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bull****. the only bills that he has vetoed were nothing to do with our economy, cept to drown it with a huge socialized medical spending bill for the limosine liberals and illegals... They have not even tried to put up any appropriations bills or any other energy bills either, they are just concerened with power and earmark spending... There is already a socialized medicine program whose existence you approve of, and might even admire. If I told you that I had the power to end this program and that I intended to do so, you'd say nasty things about me. Guess what this program is. And when the Dems gain control, all will be sweetness and light. Ha! You of course are familiar with the saying "lesser of two evils." You'd prefer the more evil was left in charge? Dems, while not effective, are at least focused on more positive outcomes. The Republicans will bankrupt us with bullets tax cuts and the Dems with social programs. At least the social programs benefit someone of than arms manufacturers and oil companies. Which do you prefer? jps |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jps wrote:
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:00:32 -0500, "Lu Powell" wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... wrote in message ups.com... On Nov 11, 8:55 am, HK wrote: JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message news ![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:49:44 -0500, " JimH" ask wrote: Explain how the "Republicans" caused the increase in gasoline prices. That's easy: - The Iraq war - Huge federal defecits - Weak dollar - Poor energy policies - Huge trade imbalance They are all intertwined with high energy prices in various ways. And of course the Republicans are the cause of all of them.......eh? Nice try Wayne. Yeah, they are. Remind me again who has control of Congress. At the moment, no one. The Dems do not yet have a working majority. Nice try but no cigar for you. I don't smoke, but my statement is correct. If the Dems had "control" of Congress, they would have the votes within their party to override a presidential veto. That's what control means when the other party controls the white house.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bull****. the only bills that he has vetoed were nothing to do with our economy, cept to drown it with a huge socialized medical spending bill for the limosine liberals and illegals... They have not even tried to put up any appropriations bills or any other energy bills either, they are just concerened with power and earmark spending... There is already a socialized medicine program whose existence you approve of, and might even admire. If I told you that I had the power to end this program and that I intended to do so, you'd say nasty things about me. Guess what this program is. And when the Dems gain control, all will be sweetness and light. Ha! You of course are familiar with the saying "lesser of two evils." You'd prefer the more evil was left in charge? Evil is subjective. Right now we have the evil witch Pelosi and the evil prick Reid ruining congress. Dems, while not effective, are at least focused on more positive outcomes. The Republicans will bankrupt us with bullets tax cuts and the Dems with social programs. "While not effective?" The Dems are less than not effective. They are pursing political ends rather than doing what this country needs and that is long term planning. What do we, the USA, need to do to continue to be the sole super power for the next 100 years? At least the social programs benefit someone of than arms manufacturers and oil companies. Social programs are a drain on the productivity of the USA. Let the churches and charitable organizations help out the down trodden. Which do you prefer? I prefer perpetuating the "oil" companies over social programs. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:31:44 -0800, jps wrote:
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:00:32 -0500, "Lu Powell" wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... wrote in message ups.com... On Nov 11, 8:55 am, HK wrote: JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message news ![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message om... On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:49:44 -0500, " JimH" ask wrote: Explain how the "Republicans" caused the increase in gasoline prices. That's easy: - The Iraq war - Huge federal defecits - Weak dollar - Poor energy policies - Huge trade imbalance They are all intertwined with high energy prices in various ways. And of course the Republicans are the cause of all of them.......eh? Nice try Wayne. Yeah, they are. Remind me again who has control of Congress. At the moment, no one. The Dems do not yet have a working majority. Nice try but no cigar for you. I don't smoke, but my statement is correct. If the Dems had "control" of Congress, they would have the votes within their party to override a presidential veto. That's what control means when the other party controls the white house.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bull****. the only bills that he has vetoed were nothing to do with our economy, cept to drown it with a huge socialized medical spending bill for the limosine liberals and illegals... They have not even tried to put up any appropriations bills or any other energy bills either, they are just concerened with power and earmark spending... There is already a socialized medicine program whose existence you approve of, and might even admire. If I told you that I had the power to end this program and that I intended to do so, you'd say nasty things about me. Guess what this program is. And when the Dems gain control, all will be sweetness and light. Ha! You of course are familiar with the saying "lesser of two evils." You'd prefer the more evil was left in charge? Dems, while not effective, are at least focused on more positive outcomes. The Republicans will bankrupt us with bullets tax cuts and the Dems with social programs. At least the social programs benefit someone of than arms manufacturers and oil companies. Which do you prefer? jps A political troll got you out, huh? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Lu Powell" wrote in message
. .. "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... wrote in message ups.com... On Nov 11, 8:55 am, HK wrote: JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message news ![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message om... On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:49:44 -0500, " JimH" ask wrote: Explain how the "Republicans" caused the increase in gasoline prices. That's easy: - The Iraq war - Huge federal defecits - Weak dollar - Poor energy policies - Huge trade imbalance They are all intertwined with high energy prices in various ways. And of course the Republicans are the cause of all of them.......eh? Nice try Wayne. Yeah, they are. Remind me again who has control of Congress. At the moment, no one. The Dems do not yet have a working majority. Nice try but no cigar for you. I don't smoke, but my statement is correct. If the Dems had "control" of Congress, they would have the votes within their party to override a presidential veto. That's what control means when the other party controls the white house.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bull****. the only bills that he has vetoed were nothing to do with our economy, cept to drown it with a huge socialized medical spending bill for the limosine liberals and illegals... They have not even tried to put up any appropriations bills or any other energy bills either, they are just concerened with power and earmark spending... There is already a socialized medicine program whose existence you approve of, and might even admire. If I told you that I had the power to end this program and that I intended to do so, you'd say nasty things about me. Guess what this program is. And when the Dems gain control, all will be sweetness and light. Ha! That doesn't answer the question. Please name the socialized medicine which you approve of and would not want to see eliminated. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Lu Powell" wrote in message . .. "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... wrote in message ups.com... On Nov 11, 8:55 am, HK wrote: JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message news ![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:49:44 -0500, " JimH" ask wrote: Explain how the "Republicans" caused the increase in gasoline prices. That's easy: - The Iraq war - Huge federal defecits - Weak dollar - Poor energy policies - Huge trade imbalance They are all intertwined with high energy prices in various ways. And of course the Republicans are the cause of all of them.......eh? Nice try Wayne. Yeah, they are. Remind me again who has control of Congress. At the moment, no one. The Dems do not yet have a working majority. Nice try but no cigar for you. I don't smoke, but my statement is correct. If the Dems had "control" of Congress, they would have the votes within their party to override a presidential veto. That's what control means when the other party controls the white house.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bull****. the only bills that he has vetoed were nothing to do with our economy, cept to drown it with a huge socialized medical spending bill for the limosine liberals and illegals... They have not even tried to put up any appropriations bills or any other energy bills either, they are just concerened with power and earmark spending... There is already a socialized medicine program whose existence you approve of, and might even admire. If I told you that I had the power to end this program and that I intended to do so, you'd say nasty things about me. Guess what this program is. And when the Dems gain control, all will be sweetness and light. Ha! That doesn't answer the question. Please name the socialized medicine which you approve of and would not want to see eliminated. I would get rid of Medicaid, Medicare and any other government sponsored, managed or promoted medicine. People live too long. Those over 60 should have the decency to do the right thing and die. This would stop the drain on the Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid. And that silly Part D plan that Bush promoted. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 11, 9:24 am, wrote:
On Nov 11, 8:55 am, HK wrote: JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message news ![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message om... On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:49:44 -0500, " JimH" ask wrote: Explain how the "Republicans" caused the increase in gasoline prices. That's easy: - The Iraq war - Huge federal defecits - Weak dollar - Poor energy policies - Huge trade imbalance They are all intertwined with high energy prices in various ways. And of course the Republicans are the cause of all of them.......eh? Nice try Wayne. Yeah, they are. Remind me again who has control of Congress. At the moment, no one. The Dems do not yet have a working majority. Nice try but no cigar for you. I don't smoke, but my statement is correct. If the Dems had "control" of Congress, they would have the votes within their party to override a presidential veto. That's what control means when the other party controls the white house.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bull****. the only bills that he has vetoed were nothing to do with our economy, cept to drown it with a huge socialized medical spending bill for the limosine liberals and illegals... They have not even tried to put up any appropriations bills or any other energy bills either, they are just concerened with power and earmark spending...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Is that you, Rush Hannity? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bad day at the office | ASA | |||
Bad day at the office | Cruising | |||
Bad day at the office | Cruising | |||
( OT ) Abuse of office (this time not by Bush) | General |