![]() |
Yachtspotters, yet another reason to choose a modest boat
I always knew there was some reason I didn't own a 400+ foot boat. To
avoid the embarrassment of admitting its financial, I'll instead blame it on an aversion to "yachtspotters". :-) ********** http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2007/10/...acht-spotters/ |
Yachtspotters, yet another reason to choose a modest boat
Chuck Gould wrote:
I always knew there was some reason I didn't own a 400+ foot boat. To avoid the embarrassment of admitting its financial, I'll instead blame it on an aversion to "yachtspotters". :-) ********** http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2007/10/...acht-spotters/ My ego is satisfied by the fees my you-know-what earns as the model for Doc Johnson's "huge, lifelike, vibrating" you know what. |
Yachtspotters, yet another reason to choose a modest boat
ho hum.
The truth is that a lot of us might enjoy10 days on a yacht or a weekend on a big cruiser, but it's not our kind of boating. I'd really be happy to live somewhere that I could enjoy a 24'-26' Bayliner. But until I win the lottery (because there's only so many entertainment dollars in our household), I content with my bowrider. "HK" wrote in message . .. Chuck Gould wrote: I always knew there was some reason I didn't own a 400+ foot boat. To avoid the embarrassment of admitting its financial, I'll instead blame it on an aversion to "yachtspotters". :-) ********** http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2007/10/...acht-spotters/ My ego is satisfied by the fees my you-know-what earns as the model for Doc Johnson's "huge, lifelike, vibrating" you know what. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com