On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:39:51 -0700, Tim wrote:

OK, sorry I'm so slow, but ... I still wear army boots

Well, that explains a lot.

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:49:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:39:51 -0700, Tim wrote:

OK, sorry I'm so slow, but ... I still wear army boots

Well, that explains a lot.

To think of the hours I'd have saved, daily, if we'd had the 'no polish'
army boots of today.

Other than that, what could you possibly have against Army boots?

On Oct 11, 6:20 am, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:49:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing

wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:39:51 -0700, Tim wrote:

OK, sorry I'm so slow, but ... I still wear army boots

Well, that explains a lot.

To think of the hours I'd have saved, daily, if we'd had the 'no polish'
army boots of today.

Other than that, what could you possibly have against Army boots?

I like 'em

and still wear em, when I can find them in my size.

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:10:08 -0000, Tim wrote:

On Oct 11, 6:20 am, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:49:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing

wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:39:51 -0700, Tim wrote:

OK, sorry I'm so slow, but ... I still wear army boots

Well, that explains a lot.

To think of the hours I'd have saved, daily, if we'd had the 'no polish'
army boots of today.

Other than that, what could you possibly have against Army boots?

I like 'em

and still wear em, when I can find them in my size.

Size 9, A narrow?

~~ snerk ~~

I have a strong understanding 13-1/2 to 14 for me


Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:10:08 -0000, Tim wrote:

On Oct 11, 6:20 am, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:49:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing

wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:39:51 -0700, Tim wrote:

OK, sorry I'm so slow, but ... I still wear army boots

Well, that explains a lot.

To think of the hours I'd have saved, daily, if we'd had the 'no polish'
army boots of today.

Other than that, what could you possibly have against Army boots?

I like 'em

and still wear em, when I can find them in my size.

Size 9, A narrow?

~~ snerk ~~

On Oct 11, 6:20 am, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:49:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing

wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:39:51 -0700, Tim wrote:

OK, sorry I'm so slow, but ... I still wear army boots

Well, that explains a lot.

To think of the hours I'd have saved, daily, if we'd had the 'no polish'
army boots of today.

Other than that, what could you possibly have against Army boots?

yes John, as if the Marines wore something different.

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:11:01 -0000, Tim wrote:

On Oct 11, 6:20 am, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:49:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing

wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:39:51 -0700, Tim wrote:

OK, sorry I'm so slow, but ... I still wear army boots

Well, that explains a lot.

To think of the hours I'd have saved, daily, if we'd had the 'no polish'
army boots of today.

Other than that, what could you possibly have against Army boots?

yes John, as if the Marines wore something different.

I prefer the term combat or jump boots.

The Army does not have exclusive rights to the name. :)

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:11:01 -0000, Tim wrote:

On Oct 11, 6:20 am, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:49:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing

wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:39:51 -0700, Tim wrote:

OK, sorry I'm so slow, but ... I still wear army boots

Well, that explains a lot.

To think of the hours I'd have saved, daily, if we'd had the 'no polish'
army boots of today.

Other than that, what could you possibly have against Army boots?

yes John, as if the Marines wore something different.

I prefer the term combat or jump boots.

The Army does not have exclusive rights to the name. :)

I liked my Boon Dockers!

D.Duck wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:11:01 -0000, Tim wrote:

On Oct 11, 6:20 am, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:49:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing

wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:39:51 -0700, Tim wrote:
OK, sorry I'm so slow, but ... I still wear army boots
Well, that explains a lot.
To think of the hours I'd have saved, daily, if we'd had the 'no polish'
army boots of today.

Other than that, what could you possibly have against Army boots?
yes John, as if the Marines wore something different.
I prefer the term combat or jump boots.

The Army does not have exclusive rights to the name. :)

I liked my Boon Dockers!




I prefer my Teva sandals.

HK wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:11:01 -0000, Tim wrote:

On Oct 11, 6:20 am, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:49:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing

wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:39:51 -0700, Tim wrote:
OK, sorry I'm so slow, but ... I still wear army boots
Well, that explains a lot.
To think of the hours I'd have saved, daily, if we'd had the 'no
polish'
army boots of today.

Other than that, what could you possibly have against Army boots?
yes John, as if the Marines wore something different.
I prefer the term combat or jump boots.

The Army does not have exclusive rights to the name. :)

I liked my Boon Dockers!



I prefer my Teva sandals.

Harry,

I would have thought you were more of the Birkenstock kind of guy.

I have started to wear Crocs on the boat. I don't have the problem I
had with my Rockport deck shoes, wet leather smells and leather staining
my feet when they got wet. Since you have that LT Parker, and accept
that wet feet is normal in the LTP, you may want to check them out.

http://www.dickssportinggoods.com/pr...tPage=category