![]() |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
Dear Friends,
I'm posting here to see if someone can give me advice on a land grabbing situation in Crystal Bay. Maybe this isn't the correct forum, but I was hoping to find some information and/or sympathetic support. The issue: I am a frequent visitor to Crystal Bay, NV. My friend's have owned a modest and adorable cabin designed in the old spirit of Lake Tahoe before mansions were built in the area -- truly a gem, and we love being able to visit the lake. In 2001, a resident constructed a fence that blocks an easement that gave access to a boat and swimming dock located on Nevada Public Land. The easement passes through a portion of this resident's property. My friends do not have lake access. For years, we used the easement in order to access the lake. Now that the fence is in place, the dock is fairly inaccessible, and we have just a few options: Trespass on another resident's property and access the dock from a steep and dangerous hill Climb the fence and risk the resident calling the sheriff's department which she has done in the past ... or risk being harassed by the resident which she has done on numerous occasions Refrain from using dock at all. The resident was issued a cease and desists while the fence was being built by the Nevada State Lands Division. When Nevada officials left the scene, the resident continued construction, installed a gate, and she locked the gate with a padlock. She offered a key to the local residents ONLY if they signed a paper acknowledging that she owns the land beyond the gate. Obviously, my friends refused, so she refused to give them a key. There is some conjecture that the fence also blocks access by emergency vehicles like Fire trucks. I am not sure if this is true or if it is a rumor. We made the climb to the dock a few months ago, and we found the dock in a sad state of disrepair. It doesn't look like the state of Nevada can even access the land in order to maintain it. I have contacted the Washoe County Clerk and the Nevada State Lands Division. This issue has been pending for 6 years. Does anyone have advice on how to approach this issue from the perspective of local politics or government? Any help would be really appreciated. Best Regards |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
"sillz" wrote
Climb the fence and risk the resident calling the sheriff's department which she has done in the past ... What does she tell the sheriff? That someone is using the public easement that she illegally blocked? |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
On Sep 10, 6:06?pm, sillz wrote:
In 2001, a resident constructed a fence that blocks an easement that gave access to a boat and swimming dock located on Nevada Public Land. The easement passes through a portion of this resident's property. My friends do not have lake access. For years, we used the easement in order to access the lake. For how many years? Was the use public, "notorious", etc? Your friend and his landlocked neighbors may have established a "proscriptive" easement. In addition, the deed for the property the easement crosses may list that easement as an exception to free and clear title- and if it does the property owner cannot simply deny you access. Trespass on another resident's property and access the dock from a steep and dangerous hill Climb the fence and risk the resident calling the sheriff's department which she has done in the past ... or risk being harassed by the resident which she has done on numerous occasions If the easement is recorded at the county, stick a copy of the public record in your pocket and climb the fence. I understand there is a lot of rowdy behavior in the middle of the night in that vicinity, and it would be a shame if some young hoodlums took after that fence with bolt cutters. If you climb the fence (assuming it remains intact) and the sheriff shows up you can say, "Am I glad to see you! I've been meaning to call you guys about this fence that has been illegally erected across a public easement!" If the property owner sticks her head out the window and bitches, let her. Refrain from using dock at all. The resident was issued a cease and desists while the fence was being built by the Nevada State Lands Division. When Nevada officials left the scene, the resident continued construction, installed a gate, and she locked the gate with a padlock. She offered a key to the local residents ONLY if they signed a paper acknowledging that she owns the land beyond the gate. Obviously, my friends refused, so she refused to give them a key. There is some conjecture that the fence also blocks access by emergency vehicles like Fire trucks. I am not sure if this is true or if it is a rumor. We made the climb to the dock a few months ago, and we found the dock in a sad state of disrepair. It doesn't look like the state of Nevada can even access the land in order to maintain it. I have contacted the Washoe County Clerk and the Nevada State Lands Division. This issue has been pending for 6 years. Does anyone have advice on how to approach this issue from the perspective of local politics or government? Make it a crisis. Create a major public stink, get the media involved, and don't let up until the political inertia becomes political action. Any help would be really appreciated. Best Regards |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
"sillz" wrote in message
ups.com... Dear Friends, I'm posting here to see if someone can give me advice on a land grabbing situation in Crystal Bay. Maybe this isn't the correct forum, but I was hoping to find some information and/or sympathetic support. The issue: When you spoke to an **LOCAL** attorney from that town, what did he/she suggest? |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
sillz wrote:
Does anyone have advice on how to approach this issue from the perspective of local politics or government? Hire an attorney to search the Courthouse land records to verify that a recorded easement actually exists. If it does, your attorney will know what to do next. It won't be all that difficult. If it doesn't, be glad you had access while it lasted, accept the owner's right to her property and get a key. A prescriptive easement is very difficult (maybe impossible in this case) to obtain. Rick |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Sep 10, 6:06?pm, sillz wrote: In 2001, a resident constructed a fence that blocks an easement that gave access to a boat and swimming dock located on Nevada Public Land. The easement passes through a portion of this resident's property. My friends do not have lake access. For years, we used the easement in order to access the lake. For how many years? Was the use public, "notorious", etc? Your friend and his landlocked neighbors may have established a "proscriptive" easement. In addition, the deed for the property the easement crosses may list that easement as an exception to free and clear title- and if it does the property owner cannot simply deny you access. Trespass on another resident's property and access the dock from a steep and dangerous hill Climb the fence and risk the resident calling the sheriff's department which she has done in the past ... or risk being harassed by the resident which she has done on numerous occasions If the easement is recorded at the county, stick a copy of the public record in your pocket and climb the fence. I understand there is a lot of rowdy behavior in the middle of the night in that vicinity, and it would be a shame if some young hoodlums took after that fence with bolt cutters. If you climb the fence (assuming it remains intact) and the sheriff shows up you can say, "Am I glad to see you! I've been meaning to call you guys about this fence that has been illegally erected across a public easement!" If the property owner sticks her head out the window and bitches, let her. Refrain from using dock at all. The resident was issued a cease and desists while the fence was being built by the Nevada State Lands Division. When Nevada officials left the scene, the resident continued construction, installed a gate, and she locked the gate with a padlock. She offered a key to the local residents ONLY if they signed a paper acknowledging that she owns the land beyond the gate. Obviously, my friends refused, so she refused to give them a key. There is some conjecture that the fence also blocks access by emergency vehicles like Fire trucks. I am not sure if this is true or if it is a rumor. We made the climb to the dock a few months ago, and we found the dock in a sad state of disrepair. It doesn't look like the state of Nevada can even access the land in order to maintain it. I have contacted the Washoe County Clerk and the Nevada State Lands Division. This issue has been pending for 6 years. Does anyone have advice on how to approach this issue from the perspective of local politics or government? Make it a crisis. Create a major public stink, get the media involved, and don't let up until the political inertia becomes political action. It sounds to me that the property owner has already spoken to an attorney and is following their recommendations. If the "easement" is an express easement, one that is actually on the public records, the paper acknowledging the owners land, would not remove the easement. If their is no real easement on the property and she allows the public to continue to use the land without enforcing her rights, she can give up her legal right to enforce her rights as a landowner, and a prescriptive easements can come in effect. It sounds like she is taking the necessary legal actions to insure she does not lose her property rights due to a proscriptive easement. |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
Hire an attorney to search the Courthouse land records to verify that
a recorded easement actually exists. Or simply go to the land records office at the court house yourself. It's easy. I spent several summers helping my Dad by doing title searches. Real estate law varies between states and even in different counties. There may be other issues associated with access to public waters and lands. That property owner may or may not have legal rights to block public access to public property. They may WANT to do such, but that doesn't make it legal. But it's impossible to say one way or the other without being versed in local Nevada real estate laws and that property in particular. This would be where, after visiting the court house and speaking with the land records folks, that you'd probably need to retain a lawyer known to handle cases in THAT particular county. -Bill Kearney |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote:
It sounds like she is taking the necessary legal actions to insure she does not lose her property rights due to a proscriptive easement. I second that notion. Wouldn't hurt to check for sure but....... Rick |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:06:49 -0700, sillz penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: She offered a key to the local residents ONLY if they signed a paper acknowledging that she owns the land beyond the gate. Though I don't get the meaning in this.... I'm pretty sure that this is what the drill was all about. I'd check with an attorney. If there is an easement permitting access, I suspect that one moonless night, the fence's integrity would be severely compromised. -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
Gene Kearns wrote:
If there is an easement permitting access, I suspect that one moonless night, the fence's integrity would be severely compromised. LoL! Moonless night?? If an easement exists, the gate will come down in broad daylight, right in front of God & EVERYbody, no prob. |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
On Sep 11, 1:50 pm, wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote: If there is an easement permitting access, I suspect that one moonless night, the fence's integrity would be severely compromised. LoL! Moonless night?? If an easement exists, the gate will come down in broad daylight, right in front of God & EVERYbody, no prob. Thanks for all of the replies. I did some more research with the county and discovered more information. The easment has been used since the 1930's. There is a map from 1930 that shows that easment but the map was never "recorded." The resident is now suing the state of nevada and the county. Her argument is based on the fact that the map wasn't recorded, but the map HAS been used over and over again as reference by the state and by the county. Another legal battle with another resident looked into the map issue, and the map was allowed or accepted because it's been used for so long. The resident who is suing has another argument -- that the public land is not intended for recreational use. The land was purchased using bond act money @ 1993. The bond act was intended to purchase land that could not be developed so that it could be maintained and kept pristine. The State of Nevada repaired the dock at the location and installed a foot path when they purchased the land. Legally, public lands must have "reasonable access." It seems to me that someone intended that the land be accessed. My friends have been using the easment since they purchased the property in 1950. I have been using the easment beginning in 1997. I haven't spoken to an attorney. I don't really have the money for that. Just to clear something up: The resident is saying that she put the fence up in order to protect herself, but the fence only blocks the state property which is adjacent to hers. The fence does not block her property. On the fence is a gate with a padlock. She has made multiple copies of the key and will give a key ONLY to the residents that sign a paper stating that they agree that she owns the road and the easment. She is essentially blocking only the easment and therefor blocking access to the public land. The State of Nevada and County have counter sued and there is a court date set for November 17th. I guess I'll have to await the outcome of the trial. Thanks again for all of your replies. |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:13:28 -0700, sillz penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: The State of Nevada and County have counter sued and there is a court date set for November 17th. I guess I'll have to await the outcome of the trial. Please let us know the outcome..... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
sillz wrote:
There is a map from 1930 that shows that easment but the map was never "recorded." The resident is now suing the state of nevada and the county. Her argument is based on the fact that the map wasn't recorded, Sounds like a reasonable argument to me. but the map HAS been used over and over again as reference by the state and by the county. Sooooo... who owns the map? Where is it located? And how would the general public know of its existence? ..... much less get access to it? The land was purchased using bond act money @ 1993. The bond act was intended to purchase land that could not be developed Now I'm confused. Is the strip in question "owned" by the State? I thought it was owned by the resident with an easement across it for access to the lake. The State of Nevada repaired the dock at the location and installed a foot path when they purchased the land. Soooo.... there's not actually an easement ("easement" in this case meaning the right to cross but not fee simple title). Legally, public lands must have "reasonable access." I don't know about Nevada but that's not the case everywhere. Lots of public lands are semi or totally restricted, although that may be irrelevant in this case. The resident is saying that she put the fence up in order to protect herself, but the fence only blocks the state property which is adjacent to hers. Have you looked at the property description on her deed (it's public info at the courthouse)? Might take a surveyor to figure out who owns what. But if her property description covers only the property "adjacent" to the strip in question..... I'd think she has a problem. The State of Nevada and County have counter sued and there is a court date set for November 17th. I guess I'll have to await the outcome of the trial. I second the request to let us know how it comes out. Rick |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
On Sep 12, 1:13 pm, wrote:
sillz wrote: There is a map from 1930 that shows that easment but the map was never "recorded." The resident is now suing the state of nevada and the county. Her argument is based on the fact that the map wasn't recorded, Sounds like a reasonable argument to me. but the map HAS been used over and over again as reference by the state and by the county. Sooooo... who owns the map? Where is it located? And how would the general public know of its existence? ..... much less get access to it? The map is the Crystal Bay Corporation's publically accessible subdivision map dated 1931. It is on record with the city of Crystal Bay, but it was never officially recorded with the county. The county has historically used this same map over the years. The county and state assert that there is implied "dedication" of the map through historical use The land was purchased using bond act money @ 1993. The bond act was intended to purchase land that could not be developed Now I'm confused. Is the strip in question "owned" by the State? I thought it was owned by the resident with an easement across it for access to the lake. The parcel of land containing the dock is owned by Nevada Division of Public Lands. The resident's property is adjacent to the State parcel. The state parcel does not have road access. The resident owns the land in front of the State parcel as well. A foot path was established years ago so that Nevada could maintain the land and dock. The State of Nevada repaired the dock at the location and installed a foot path when they purchased the land. Soooo.... there's not actually an easement ("easement" in this case meaning the right to cross but not fee simple title). As I have been told, the easment is recorded in the 1931 subdivision map. This is the state's argument -- that the map clearly shows a legal easement. She's arguing that the map is not legitimate because it was never recorded with the county ... although it's been on record with the city for over 70 years. Legally, public lands must have "reasonable access." I don't know about Nevada but that's not the case everywhere. Lots of public lands are semi or totally restricted, although that may be irrelevant in this case. According to the transcripts I read from Nevada Division of Public Lands staff meeting, land belonging to them must be reasonably accessibly by the public. The resident is saying that she put the fence up in order to protect herself, but the fence only blocks the state property which is adjacent to hers. Have you looked at the property description on her deed (it's public info at the courthouse)? Might take a surveyor to figure out who owns what. But if her property description covers only the property "adjacent" to the strip in question..... I'd think she has a problem. I haven't been able to look up this information yet. The State of Nevada and County have counter sued and there is a court date set for November 17th. I guess I'll have to await the outcome of the trial. I second the request to let us know how it comes out. I'll certainly let you know the outcome! Rick |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
sillz wrote:
The state parcel does not have road access. The resident owns the land in front of the State parcel aha! That makes a big difference. In theory, every landowner has the legal right to access his land whether that landowner is an individual or a State. In an access dispute, a judge will decide where and how that access will be accomplished. It might not be convenient or sensible or inexpensive and it might be via a totally different route, but rest assured, there will be access for the State some way somehow. My bet is that the State and the Landowner will work out a deal before it goes to trial. The State may agree to pay for the easement annually or something like that. Unfortunately, this doesn't guarantee that the gate will come down. But this'll be interesting. Don't forget to let us know, Thanks, Rick btw, I'm not a lawyer. I'm just a broker and investor who's been through my fair share of boundary and access disputes. |
Nevada Public Lands -- Dock Blocked by Irrate Resident
On Sep 12, 4:12 pm, wrote:
sillz wrote: The state parcel does not have road access. The resident owns the land in front of the State parcel aha! That makes a big difference. In theory, every landowner has the legal right to access his land whether that landowner is an individual or a State. In an access dispute, a judge will decide where and how that access will be accomplished. It might not be convenient or sensible or inexpensive and it might be via a totally different route, but rest assured, there will be access for the State some way somehow. My bet is that the State and the Landowner will work out a deal before it goes to trial. The State may agree to pay for the easement annually or something like that. Unfortunately, this doesn't guarantee that the gate will come down. But this'll be interesting. Don't forget to let us know, Thanks, Rick btw, I'm not a lawyer. I'm just a broker and investor who's been through my fair share of boundary and access disputes. Yeah, they came close to a settlement on 3 different occasions over the past 2 years. In each case, the settlement never materialized. When I spoke to the Nevada Lands Division, they seemed confident it will go to trial this time. We'll see. Thanks for all the information. Sorry you got your experience through disputes. I'll write more after Nov. 17th! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com