On Jul 12, 2:22 am, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...





On Jul 11, 8:57 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

On Jul 11, 6:46 pm, jps wrote:

Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php

Wow, your getting wound up. Hows the blood pressure holding out?

Why don't you have a little read and see what may have caused me to call
Bill O a ****ing cocksucker.

Could it be that he deserves it and that it's an accurate description?
Decide for yourself.

jps

Hummmm, you link me to an opinon page, with no transcripts? I saw the
interview, which is convieniently omitted from the story, your link is
only hearsay and specualtion of what the writer thinks happened in the
Green room, taken from an intervies with only one side of the issue.
You don't have a problem with that? You automatically beleive it as if
it were fact, even though there are no facts to back it up? Again, you
fail to show me anything more than propoganda, probably sponsored by
networks and commentators who are loosing viewers in droves to Bill.

What a laugh. Both he and Fox are losing viewers to networks who's
broadcasts more closely resemble actual news.

jps-

- Show quoted text -

OK, so you can't back up your statement about Bill with anything more
than straight lies, (saying Bill went off on gay gangs when it was
someone else, and it was corrected, in primetime) or third party
anecdotal stories by openly partizan groups and individuals (the
caption on the website you sent me to said "we watch fox so you don't
have to"), anything you are saying. You have shown no zero evidence of
Bill's lies.

Now, you are going to just skip on to the next dishonest "talking
point" about ratings, that of course you won't be able to prove
either.

You have proven without a doubt however that you are a foul mouthed
liar... Have a nice day, please man up and check your facts before
making any more of a fool of yourself...