On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:23:05 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:08:51 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote:
I have noticed that
spoiled little children with no moral core can get you in a lot of
trouble in their ever constant self indulgence.



Indeed, look at all the trouble Cheney has caused with his
self-indulgent bull****.

Harry, did you get your computer fixed?":
--
John H


John... why are you always instigating trouble?
We know you don't boat any longer, but what about your golf proshop job?
Sell many tees?


Yes Don, I still own and operate my boat. You are believing too much of
what you read posted by JimH or HK. I'd think you knew better by now,
especially after you acknowledged this mistake earlier.
--
John H

On Jul 12, 2:22 am, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...





On Jul 11, 8:57 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...

On Jul 11, 6:46 pm, jps wrote:

Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php

Wow, your getting wound up. Hows the blood pressure holding out?

Why don't you have a little read and see what may have caused me to call
Bill O a ****ing cocksucker.

Could it be that he deserves it and that it's an accurate description?
Decide for yourself.

jps

Hummmm, you link me to an opinon page, with no transcripts? I saw the
interview, which is convieniently omitted from the story, your link is
only hearsay and specualtion of what the writer thinks happened in the
Green room, taken from an intervies with only one side of the issue.
You don't have a problem with that? You automatically beleive it as if
it were fact, even though there are no facts to back it up? Again, you
fail to show me anything more than propoganda, probably sponsored by
networks and commentators who are loosing viewers in droves to Bill.

What a laugh. Both he and Fox are losing viewers to networks who's
broadcasts more closely resemble actual news.

jps-

- Show quoted text -

OK, so you can't back up your statement about Bill with anything more
than straight lies, (saying Bill went off on gay gangs when it was
someone else, and it was corrected, in primetime) or third party
anecdotal stories by openly partizan groups and individuals (the
caption on the website you sent me to said "we watch fox so you don't
have to"), anything you are saying. You have shown no zero evidence of
Bill's lies.

Now, you are going to just skip on to the next dishonest "talking
point" about ratings, that of course you won't be able to prove
either.

You have proven without a doubt however that you are a foul mouthed
liar... Have a nice day, please man up and check your facts before
making any more of a fool of yourself...

wrote:
On Jul 12, 2:22 am, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...





On Jul 11, 8:57 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...
On Jul 11, 6:46 pm, jps wrote:
Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...
http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php
Wow, your getting wound up. Hows the blood pressure holding out?
Why don't you have a little read and see what may have caused me to call
Bill O a ****ing cocksucker.
Could it be that he deserves it and that it's an accurate description?
Decide for yourself.
jps
Hummmm, you link me to an opinon page, with no transcripts? I saw the
interview, which is convieniently omitted from the story, your link is
only hearsay and specualtion of what the writer thinks happened in the
Green room, taken from an intervies with only one side of the issue.
You don't have a problem with that? You automatically beleive it as if
it were fact, even though there are no facts to back it up? Again, you
fail to show me anything more than propoganda, probably sponsored by
networks and commentators who are loosing viewers in droves to Bill.
What a laugh. Both he and Fox are losing viewers to networks who's
broadcasts more closely resemble actual news.

jps-

- Show quoted text -

OK, so you can't back up your statement about Bill with anything more
than straight lies, (saying Bill went off on gay gangs when it was
someone else, and it was corrected, in primetime) or third party
anecdotal stories by openly partizan groups and individuals (the
caption on the website you sent me to said "we watch fox so you don't
have to"), anything you are saying. You have shown no zero evidence of
Bill's lies.

Now, you are going to just skip on to the next dishonest "talking
point" about ratings, that of course you won't be able to prove
either.

You have proven without a doubt however that you are a foul mouthed
liar... Have a nice day, please man up and check your facts before
making any more of a fool of yourself...



I've wondered for some time what sort of retards watched O'rally and
actually believed him. Now I know.

On Jul 12, 9:35 am, HK wrote:

I've wondered for some time what sort of retards watched O'rally and
actually believed him. Now I know.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Still no proof I see. I have always wondered what kind of a retard
would keep spouting the same old crap in a room full of folks who know
she is full of crap, now I know.

wrote:
On Jul 12, 9:35 am, HK wrote:
I've wondered for some time what sort of retards watched O'rally and
actually believed him. Now I know.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Still no proof I see. I have always wondered what kind of a retard
would keep spouting the same old crap in a room full of folks who know
she is full of crap, now I know.




Proof of what? That O'Rally is a lying old fool who gets offs calling
young girls in showers and begging them to use a loofah? Even other
right-wing media types poke fun at him. He's a useless old fart with a
still large but declining audience of equally useless old farts.

On Jul 12, 10:05 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jul 12, 9:35 am, HK wrote:
I've wondered for some time what sort of retards watched O'rally and
actually believed him. Now I know.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Still no proof I see. I have always wondered what kind of a retard
would keep spouting the same old crap in a room full of folks who know
she is full of crap, now I know.

Proof of what? That O'Rally is a lying old fool who gets offs calling
young girls in showers and begging them to use a loofah? Even other
right-wing media types poke fun at him. He's a useless old fart with a
still large but declining audience of equally useless old farts.

It's dead Harry, you and JPS are liars. Like most ideologues, willing
to sell out for a little attention or power.

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:20:43 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
...

Herring just wants to be noticed. But since he really has nothing to add
to any conversation, he just sort of jumps up and down, like a little
puppy.



Trouble is...you know what those little puppies do on the floor...


Gosh Don, I don't recall making any personal attacks on you lately. Why do
you find it necessary?

--
John H

Since you gave up your self appointed sheriff position for your better
fitting 'instigator hat', I felt someone had to step up and try to maintain
order.

"John H." wrote in message
...
Can you not attempt to maintain order without a personal attack?
--
John H



What have I said that you would consider 'a personal attack'?

Don't mention Dan... he doesn't count!

In article .com,
says...
On Jul 12, 10:05 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jul 12, 9:35 am, HK wrote:
I've wondered for some time what sort of retards watched O'rally and
actually believed him. Now I know.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Still no proof I see. I have always wondered what kind of a retard
would keep spouting the same old crap in a room full of folks who know
she is full of crap, now I know.

Proof of what? That O'Rally is a lying old fool who gets offs calling
young girls in showers and begging them to use a loofah? Even other
right-wing media types poke fun at him. He's a useless old fart with a
still large but declining audience of equally useless old farts.

It's dead Harry, you and JPS are liars. Like most ideologues, willing
to sell out for a little attention or power.

I noticed the only response from you of the four postings detailing the
outright lies and deceptions by Bill O garnered not a single response
other than me calling Bill O a cocksucker.

You asked for proof, I gave you proof. Burst your bubble little girl or
could you not bring yourself to read such blasphemy of your idol?

I think you've joined Bill O's cocksucking club.

jps

On Jul 12, 12:34 pm, jps wrote:
In article .com,
says...





On Jul 12, 10:05 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jul 12, 9:35 am, HK wrote:
I've wondered for some time what sort of retards watched O'rally and
actually believed him. Now I know.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Still no proof I see. I have always wondered what kind of a retard
would keep spouting the same old crap in a room full of folks who know
she is full of crap, now I know.

Proof of what? That O'Rally is a lying old fool who gets offs calling
young girls in showers and begging them to use a loofah? Even other
right-wing media types poke fun at him. He's a useless old fart with a
still large but declining audience of equally useless old farts.

It's dead Harry, you and JPS are liars. Like most ideologues, willing
to sell out for a little attention or power.

I noticed the only response from you of the four postings detailing the
outright lies and deceptions by Bill O garnered not a single response
other than me calling Bill O a cocksucker.

You asked for proof, I gave you proof. Burst your bubble little girl or
could you not bring yourself to read such blasphemy of your idol?

I think you've joined Bill O's cocksucking club.

jps- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

First off I made several posts proving your information was wrong and
untruthful. I proved you were lied to about who said what about gay
gangs. I proved the source you trusted lied further by omitting the
conclusion and interview with Glaad. I read your link to the pundit
page with no more information or text proof than unsubstantiated
accusations, and ego boosting rants. I have proven again and again
your information is bogus, or you yourself are a liar, what more can I
do? I saw both interviews and commented on both, your above
accusation is just another lie. I realize you can't address the issues
at hand here, but come on.

Others commented exclusively on your juvenile use of language. You on
the other hand have brought not one fact to the discussion, only
second hand stories, name calling, and false accusations. Does that
not bother you that you are so ill informed?

And as far as calling me a little girl, I'm not. You really got
nothing to add, do you? I suppose you will, in the face of all the
facts, still spout your lies and that is the most disturbing thing
about all this. IRL I don't even talk to liars, as soon as you lie to
me, the conversation is over, period, ask my neighbor. If I can't
trust you, I have no need for you. so buh-bye...