| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:03:29 GMT, "RG" wrote: I agree with one exception. Paint Shop Pro by Corel is more than adequate editing software. The full boat version is $99 and does what Photoshop does only differently. If you are just starting off editing digital photos, PSP is probably the way to go - most bang for the buck. Photoshop Elements is nice, but it's not comparable to the complete version of PSP. It's only limitation is that is doesn't handle all versions of RAW and you wouldn't be shooting in RAW anyway. He might. The S6000 does have raw capability. I remember many years ago using CorelDRAW. It was the king of graphic programs in its day. Then Corel bought WordPerfect, and they've been steamrolled into a second-tier software company by the likes of Microsoft and Adobe ever since. When it comes to buying software, I'm a firm believer in hitching your wagon to the horse most likely to remain pulling for the long run. Especially if you're starting from scratch in a particular genre. So for me, the issue isn't so much about whether PSP is capable, I have no reason to believe it is not. Rather the issue for me is how much third party support is offered in the form of books, magazine articles and online tutorials. I've bought a number of such books over the years, and have taken advantage of web-based instructional aides as well and have found them invaluable. I also subscribe to several digital photography magazines as. All their how-two articles seem to assume Photoshop speak, and it's really not too surprising, given the market share of Adobe's products. So, I would advise a guy just starting out in photo editing software to hitch his wagon to Adobe. And besides, Corel is Canadian, which is reason enough to avoid them. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:39:18 GMT, "RG" wrote:
And besides, Corel is Canadian, which is reason enough to avoid them. Intersting take - I gather your not familiar with the history of PSP. It was the original digital photo manipulation software. In fact, many of the features of what eventually became Adobe Photoshop were lifted almost directly from PSP. It's been around since 1992 and is cross platform for Mac and Windows. And it's still the only software available under $100 that handles both vector and raster manipulation. It's every bit as capable as Adobe and in some ways, better. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:39:18 GMT, "RG" wrote: And besides, Corel is Canadian, which is reason enough to avoid them. Intersting take - I gather your not familiar with the history of PSP. Nope. It was the original digital photo manipulation software. In fact, many of the features of what eventually became Adobe Photoshop were lifted almost directly from PSP. It's been around since 1992 and is cross platform for Mac and Windows. Sounds very much like the history of CorelDRAW. And it's still the only software available under $100 that handles both vector and raster manipulation. How or why would you use vector manipulation in pixel-based photo editing? I believe Elements uses vector manipulation when you ask it to build frames around your photos and silly stuff like that, but I don't understand where vector manipulation would come into play in the actual editing process. Can you assist? It's every bit as capable as Adobe and in some ways, better. As I said earlier, the issue for me isn't about capability. I assume both are capable. WordPerfect is a capable word processor and QuatroPro is a capable spreadsheet. I just wouldn't use them over Word or Excel. When it comes to software, I believe in using products that dominate their market in terms of user base. It's one of the reasons I don't use a Mac, which is just as capable as a PC and in some ways, better. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 4, 9:01 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:39:18 GMT, "RG" wrote: And besides, Corel is Canadian, which is reason enough to avoid them. Intersting take - I gather your not familiar with the history of PSP. It was the original digital photo manipulation software. In fact, many of the features of what eventually became Adobe Photoshop were lifted almost directly from PSP. It's been around since 1992 and is cross platform for Mac and Windows. And it's still the only software available under $100 that handles both vector and raster manipulation. It's every bit as capable as Adobe and in some ways, better. Wow, I remember when PSP was from Jasc, we had one of the earliest versions. Used Corel for a while too, the mrs. did a 3d fish tank thing, maybe I can find it, prett cool. We did a couple of fliers for a retirement home with PSP too, made a watercolor rendition of the building and grounds. Had the 4 color seperations done and they have been using it ever since. Still use PSP for everything digital though. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|