"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
This is the problem with having liberal activist judges on the bench:
http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx


The court didn't do this without a kick in the ass from someone else. Who
is the owner of the foot?

Environmentalist groups. But a court shouldn't be beholden to any special
interests.


If you sue someone, YOU are the special interest. What's the opposite of "be
beholden"? Make up these ideas themselves?

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
This is the problem with having liberal activist judges on the bench:
http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx


The court didn't do this without a kick in the ass from someone else.
Who is the owner of the foot?

Environmentalist groups. But a court shouldn't be beholden to any
special interests.


If you sue someone, YOU are the special interest. What's the opposite of
"be beholden"? Make up these ideas themselves?

Courts shouldn't allow frivolous suits to proceed that attempt to circumvent
the legislative process and create legislation from the bench.

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

Courts shouldn't allow frivolous suits to proceed that attempt to
circumvent the legislative process and create legislation from the bench.


Someone has to keep the sleezy self-serving politicians in check......and
don't say the people will serve justice on the next election.
twiddle dee...twiddle dum.