![]() |
Just when I thought it was safe to buy a prop
The local prop shop says that the Revolution4 (17 pitch) will yeild similar WOT
as my SS 3 blade (19 pitch) and recommended the apollo 4 blade SS in 16 pitch That seems like a lot to drop -- and seems like it'd make my top end & midrange suffer. The mercury prop selector pushes the rev4 17; and I just can't find any other prop-calculators... They weren't too thrilled about me "trying the prop" and 'would have to get back to me' Thoughts on this mojo-prop-magic ? -j |
Just when I thought it was safe to buy a prop
The difference between a 3 blade and 4 blade is...
wait for it.... DING! 1 blade more. All things being equal(which they're not)the 4 blade takes more power to turn for a given diameter and pitch. Thus, smaller Dia. I went through the 4 blade thing a while back, couldn't see the case for it to justify the expense then, or now. JR Josh Assing wrote: The local prop shop says that the Revolution4 (17 pitch) will yeild similar WOT as my SS 3 blade (19 pitch) and recommended the apollo 4 blade SS in 16 pitch That seems like a lot to drop -- and seems like it'd make my top end & midrange suffer. The mercury prop selector pushes the rev4 17; and I just can't find any other prop-calculators... They weren't too thrilled about me "trying the prop" and 'would have to get back to me' Thoughts on this mojo-prop-magic ? -j -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth |
Just when I thought it was safe to buy a prop
Josh Assing wrote:
The local prop shop says that the Revolution4 (17 pitch) will yeild similar WOT as my SS 3 blade (19 pitch) and recommended the apollo 4 blade SS in 16 pitch That seems like a lot to drop -- and seems like it'd make my top end & midrange suffer. The mercury prop selector pushes the rev4 17; and I just can't find any other prop-calculators... They weren't too thrilled about me "trying the prop" and 'would have to get back to me' Thoughts on this mojo-prop-magic ? -j If you don't need the additional surface area of a 4 blade, it is beyond superfluous, it is a burden. It sounds like you should stick with the 19P SS wheel. There are many choices in that spec alone, even from just Quicksilver. Rob |
Just when I thought it was safe to buy a prop
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:48:56 -0700, JR North
wrote: I went through the 4 blade thing a while back, couldn't see the case for it to justify the expense then, or now. I had a different experience. When I repowered with the ETEC, I used the recommended SS three blade and had the exact same problem I had with the FICHT - no bow lift. The boat just plowed until the engine got up to about 3k, then wham, it was on plane. I switched over to a same size/pitch four blade and big difference. I had plenty of bite, bow lift up the wazoo and smooth acceleration. Another problem solved by the four blade was cavitation. I've had that problem with this boat for a long time in particular with certain types of wave/wind conditions. When I switched to the four blade, that problem also went away. Since last summer, I've played with a couple of different 3 blade props, but they just don't work as well as the four blade. |
Just when I thought it was safe to buy a prop
I slip hard in turns -- as I understnad it; a 4 blade won't slip as much
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:48:56 -0700, JR North wrote: The difference between a 3 blade and 4 blade is... wait for it.... DING! 1 blade more. All things being equal(which they're not)the 4 blade takes more power to turn for a given diameter and pitch. Thus, smaller Dia. I went through the 4 blade thing a while back, couldn't see the case for it to justify the expense then, or now. JR Josh Assing wrote: The local prop shop says that the Revolution4 (17 pitch) will yeild similar WOT as my SS 3 blade (19 pitch) and recommended the apollo 4 blade SS in 16 pitch That seems like a lot to drop -- and seems like it'd make my top end & midrange suffer. The mercury prop selector pushes the rev4 17; and I just can't find any other prop-calculators... They weren't too thrilled about me "trying the prop" and 'would have to get back to me' Thoughts on this mojo-prop-magic ? -j |
Just when I thought it was safe to buy a prop
19p isn't giving me the correct wot rpm range.
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:29:36 -0400, trainfan1 wrote: Josh Assing wrote: The local prop shop says that the Revolution4 (17 pitch) will yeild similar WOT as my SS 3 blade (19 pitch) and recommended the apollo 4 blade SS in 16 pitch That seems like a lot to drop -- and seems like it'd make my top end & midrange suffer. The mercury prop selector pushes the rev4 17; and I just can't find any other prop-calculators... They weren't too thrilled about me "trying the prop" and 'would have to get back to me' Thoughts on this mojo-prop-magic ? -j If you don't need the additional surface area of a 4 blade, it is beyond superfluous, it is a burden. It sounds like you should stick with the 19P SS wheel. There are many choices in that spec alone, even from just Quicksilver. Rob |
Just when I thought it was safe to buy a prop
Josh Assing wrote:
19p isn't giving me the correct wot rpm range. That's an important piece of information you left out of your original post. What are your numbers now? What boat/weight/engine/gear ratio? Still, if you don't need the additional surface area of a 4 blade, it is beyond superfluous. It sounds like you should move to a quality 17P SS 3 blade wheel. The prop design and your gear ratio will determine how much of a change will occur. Every prop is a compromise of sorts. The most efficient prop is a one blade. They're a bear to balance, though. 2 blades are more efficient than 3, and are fine for very light planing hulls(like hydros) that do not rely on a large surface area. Balancing is still critical. A 3 blade is a good compromise of surface area, balancing ease, weight, & efficiency. 3 blade props have the widest choice of shapes/profiles/cupping designs available. 4 & 5 blades are really specialty props for specific applications where the extra surface area & ease of balancing are important, & weight is not. The CNC'd 4 blade ski props, for example, are super-smooth & quiet, and on a tournament hull very little if any top end is sacrificed. A 4 blade can also help on certain planing hull designs where porpoising is prevalent even with minimal trim-out. You really need to know what your goal is in selecting a prop. The ability to try several different styles would be a huge advantage. I have one shop down in the Finger Lakes that has allowed me to do this over the years. Rob On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:29:36 -0400, trainfan1 wrote: Josh Assing wrote: The local prop shop says that the Revolution4 (17 pitch) will yeild similar WOT as my SS 3 blade (19 pitch) and recommended the apollo 4 blade SS in 16 pitch That seems like a lot to drop -- and seems like it'd make my top end & midrange suffer. The mercury prop selector pushes the rev4 17; and I just can't find any other prop-calculators... They weren't too thrilled about me "trying the prop" and 'would have to get back to me' Thoughts on this mojo-prop-magic ? -j If you don't need the additional surface area of a 4 blade, it is beyond superfluous, it is a burden. It sounds like you should stick with the 19P SS wheel. There are many choices in that spec alone, even from just Quicksilver. Rob |
Just when I thought it was safe to buy a prop
That's an important piece of information you left out of your original
post. What are your numbers now? What boat/weight/engine/gear ratio? Blue water, unknown weight (heavy for hte size) 22' foot cuddy 350 GM engine (mercruiser) 1.47 ratio 4100 rpm at WOT, 45 mph in "perfect waters" (no chop, no wind, everything trimmed to max it out w/o slip) You really need to know what your goal is in selecting a prop. The ability to try several different styles would be a huge advantage. I have one shop down in the Finger Lakes that has allowed me to do this over the years. My goal is to maintain (or improve) fuel usage in mid-range cruisng (30mph or so), and get on plane faster.... The "local" shop I use doesn't do loaners, havent' found one that will -- one said "as long as you test it on the lakes, no salt water" the problem is that is where I'm using the boat, so I need to test it in salt water ... Thanks for your time. |
Just when I thought it was safe to buy a prop
Josh Assing wrote:
That's an important piece of information you left out of your original post. What are your numbers now? What boat/weight/engine/gear ratio? Blue water, unknown weight (heavy for hte size) 22' foot cuddy 350 GM engine (mercruiser) 1.47 ratio 4100 rpm at WOT, 45 mph in "perfect waters" (no chop, no wind, everything trimmed to max it out w/o slip) You really need to know what your goal is in selecting a prop. The ability to try several different styles would be a huge advantage. I have one shop down in the Finger Lakes that has allowed me to do this over the years. My goal is to maintain (or improve) fuel usage in mid-range cruisng (30mph or so), and get on plane faster.... The "local" shop I use doesn't do loaners, havent' found one that will -- one said "as long as you test it on the lakes, no salt water" the problem is that is where I'm using the boat, so I need to test it in salt water ... Thanks for your time. OK, I can't see going beyond a 17P SS 3 blade. Double cup, wide(er) blades, maybe down 1/2" in diameter at most. If you can get to a popular anchoring spot in season & strike up conversations on props, you may find some folks who would like to try your prop & your spare, and you theirs. I'm assuming your an Alpha(drive), so there will plenty of those around. Rob |
Just when I thought it was safe to buy a prop
trainfan1 wrote:
Josh Assing wrote: That's an important piece of information you left out of your original post. What are your numbers now? What boat/weight/engine/gear ratio? Blue water, unknown weight (heavy for hte size) 22' foot cuddy 350 GM engine (mercruiser) 1.47 ratio 4100 rpm at WOT, 45 mph in "perfect waters" (no chop, no wind, everything trimmed to max it out w/o slip) You really need to know what your goal is in selecting a prop. The ability to try several different styles would be a huge advantage. I have one shop down in the Finger Lakes that has allowed me to do this over the years. My goal is to maintain (or improve) fuel usage in mid-range cruisng (30mph or so), and get on plane faster.... The "local" shop I use doesn't do loaners, havent' found one that will -- one said "as long as you test it on the lakes, no salt water" the problem is that is where I'm using the boat, so I need to test it in salt water ... Thanks for your time. OK, I can't see going beyond a 17P SS 3 blade. Double cup, wide(er) blades, maybe down 1/2" in diameter at most. If you can get to a popular anchoring spot in season & strike up conversations on props, you may find some folks who would like to try your prop & your spare, and you theirs. I'm assuming your an Alpha(drive), so there will plenty of those around. Rob There use to be a program with Merc dealers to let you try props before you buy them. They would paint the loaner props blue. I have no idea if they still do it, but you might try asking around with merc dealers in your area. Capt Jack R.. |
Just when I thought it was safe to buy a prop
OK, I can't see going beyond a 17P SS 3 blade. Double cup, wide(er) blades, maybe down 1/2" in diameter at most. If you can get to a popular anchoring spot in season & strike up conversations on props, you may find some folks who would like to try your prop & your spare, and you theirs. I'm assuming your an Alpha(drive), so there will plenty of those around. Good idea. What's the bennefit of going down in diameter? |
Just when I thought it was safe to buy a prop
I work nights these days; and I havne't been able to get to the merc dealer
around me in time... They (as far as I can tell) do not have a website/email. but they are listed as a premier dealer on the mercuryprop site. On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:42:50 GMT, Jack Redington wrote: trainfan1 wrote: Josh Assing wrote: That's an important piece of information you left out of your original post. What are your numbers now? What boat/weight/engine/gear ratio? Blue water, unknown weight (heavy for hte size) 22' foot cuddy 350 GM engine (mercruiser) 1.47 ratio 4100 rpm at WOT, 45 mph in "perfect waters" (no chop, no wind, everything trimmed to max it out w/o slip) You really need to know what your goal is in selecting a prop. The ability to try several different styles would be a huge advantage. I have one shop down in the Finger Lakes that has allowed me to do this over the years. My goal is to maintain (or improve) fuel usage in mid-range cruisng (30mph or so), and get on plane faster.... The "local" shop I use doesn't do loaners, havent' found one that will -- one said "as long as you test it on the lakes, no salt water" the problem is that is where I'm using the boat, so I need to test it in salt water ... Thanks for your time. OK, I can't see going beyond a 17P SS 3 blade. Double cup, wide(er) blades, maybe down 1/2" in diameter at most. If you can get to a popular anchoring spot in season & strike up conversations on props, you may find some folks who would like to try your prop & your spare, and you theirs. I'm assuming your an Alpha(drive), so there will plenty of those around. Rob There use to be a program with Merc dealers to let you try props before you buy them. They would paint the loaner props blue. I have no idea if they still do it, but you might try asking around with merc dealers in your area. Capt Jack R.. |
Just when I thought it was safe to buy a prop
Josh Assing wrote:
OK, I can't see going beyond a 17P SS 3 blade. Double cup, wide(er) blades, maybe down 1/2" in diameter at most. If you can get to a popular anchoring spot in season & strike up conversations on props, you may find some folks who would like to try your prop & your spare, and you theirs. I'm assuming your an Alpha(drive), so there will plenty of those around. Good idea. What's the bennefit of going down in diameter? Less drag. Slight increase in RPM. The whole prop selection process is a balancing act. Rob |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com