Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More on Global Warming
Provided without comment:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6Wr1hcIp2U -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** John H |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More on Global Warming
John H. wrote:
Provided without comment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6Wr1hcIp2U -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** John H JohnH, This can't be the real JohnH, because he would never post a political troll guaranteed to stir up one hell of a flamefest. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More on Global Warming
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:17:13 -0400, RJSmithers wrote:
John H. wrote: Provided without comment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6Wr1hcIp2U -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** John H JohnH, This can't be the real JohnH, because he would never post a political troll guaranteed to stir up one hell of a flamefest. No, not true. Global warming is a boating related topic. It's been mentioned often by those among us who are true to the concept of 'on topic'. Besides, those who would start a flamefest have you and me filtered (?) anyway! -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** John H |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More on Global Warming
"John H." wrote in message ... Provided without comment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6Wr1hcIp2U -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** John H .....and you also still believe that cigarettes don't cause cancer? Even if the CO2 emmissions aren't warming up the earth, they sure are poisoining the environment. We know...a lot of the garbage spewed south of the border makes it's way up here and dumps on us. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/nova-scotia...-petition.html |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More on Global Warming
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... Provided without comment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6Wr1hcIp2U -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** John H ....and you also still believe that cigarettes don't cause cancer? Even if the CO2 emmissions aren't warming up the earth, they sure are poisoining the environment. We know...a lot of the garbage spewed south of the border makes it's way up here and dumps on us. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/nova-scotia...-petition.html Global warming doesn't fit into Herring's Republican twit mindset. |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More on Global Warming
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... Provided without comment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6Wr1hcIp2U -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** John H ....and you also still believe that cigarettes don't cause cancer? Even if the CO2 emmissions aren't warming up the earth, they sure are poisoining the environment. We know...a lot of the garbage spewed south of the border makes it's way up here and dumps on us. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/nova-scotia...-petition.html Global warming doesn't fit into Herring's Republican twit mindset. Harry, calling carbon dioxide a poison as the supreme court just did is silly, all animal life exhales carbon dioxide and ammonia and water vapor (another greenhouse gas that's 20 times as effective as carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas). I'm royally ****ed at the ignorance and silliness of you and others on this issue. To call anyone with a realistic mindset based on SCIENCE a twit points out your bias and lack of education. In the recently heard supreme court case Mass. would benefit from a 5 degree temp rise by 2100. They have not shown, to my knowledge, any loss or potential loss from current EPA policies. I thought from the little I know about the legal system that was a necessity for any legal case, you have to show damages. If I am correct we just had the legal system make a political decision, guess who voted for it.........Expect this to be overturned within 5 years. Florida and Texas MIGHT have a case in that insect life won't get a die off each year as temps don't reach freezing long enough. The other STUFF that usually accompanies carbon dioxide out of power plant smoke stacks is already being addressed. If you want stricter regulations go for it. If Clinton had not made the low sulfur coal in Utah off limits (he made it a national park) then we could economically switch to that coal and at the same time reduce emissions with tighter standards. As it is, this won't happen because the anti carbon dioxide lobby will block it. So you in the north above the US industrial belt get acid rain and yellow air to breathe. I hope you like our political system. I think it stinks. no pun intended |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More on Global Warming
Jeff Rigby wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... Provided without comment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6Wr1hcIp2U -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** John H ....and you also still believe that cigarettes don't cause cancer? Even if the CO2 emmissions aren't warming up the earth, they sure are poisoining the environment. We know...a lot of the garbage spewed south of the border makes it's way up here and dumps on us. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/nova-scotia...-petition.html Global warming doesn't fit into Herring's Republican twit mindset. Harry, calling carbon dioxide a poison as the supreme court just did is silly, all animal life exhales carbon dioxide and ammonia and water vapor (another greenhouse gas that's 20 times as effective as carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas). I'm royally ****ed at the ignorance and silliness of you and others on this issue. I'm sorry, but I'm really not interested in reading any more anti-science Republican screeds. Save it for the believers in the awakening of Terry Schiavo. |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More on Global Warming
Harry Krause wrote:
Jeff Rigby wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... Provided without comment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6Wr1hcIp2U -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** John H ....and you also still believe that cigarettes don't cause cancer? Even if the CO2 emmissions aren't warming up the earth, they sure are poisoining the environment. We know...a lot of the garbage spewed south of the border makes it's way up here and dumps on us. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/nova-scotia...-petition.html Global warming doesn't fit into Herring's Republican twit mindset. Harry, calling carbon dioxide a poison as the supreme court just did is silly, all animal life exhales carbon dioxide and ammonia and water vapor (another greenhouse gas that's 20 times as effective as carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas). I'm royally ****ed at the ignorance and silliness of you and others on this issue. I'm sorry, but I'm really not interested in reading any more anti-science Republican screeds. Save it for the believers in the awakening of Terry Schiavo. We can see that you are not interested in discussion just political points. |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More on Global Warming
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jeff Rigby wrote: We know...a lot of the garbage spewed south of the border makes it's way up here and dumps on us. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/nova-scotia...-petition.html Global warming doesn't fit into Herring's Republican twit mindset. Harry, calling carbon dioxide a poison as the supreme court just did is silly, all animal life exhales carbon dioxide and ammonia and water vapor (another greenhouse gas that's 20 times as effective as carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas). I'm royally ****ed at the ignorance and silliness of you and others on this issue. To call anyone with a realistic mindset based on SCIENCE a twit points out your bias and lack of education. In the recently heard supreme court case Mass. would benefit from a 5 degree temp rise by 2100. They have not shown, to my knowledge, any loss or potential loss from current EPA policies. I thought from the little I know about the legal system that was a necessity for any legal case, you have to show damages. If I am correct we just had the legal system make a political decision, guess who voted for it.........Expect this to be overturned within 5 years. Florida and Texas MIGHT have a case in that insect life won't get a die off each year as temps don't reach freezing long enough. The other STUFF that usually accompanies carbon dioxide out of power plant smoke stacks is already being addressed. If you want stricter regulations go for it. If Clinton had not made the low sulfur coal in Utah off limits (he made it a national park) then we could economically switch to that coal and at the same time reduce emissions with tighter standards. As it is, this won't happen because the labor unions (jobs for dirty coal mines in the east) and anti carbon dioxide lobby will block it. So you in the north above the US industrial belt get acid rain and yellow air to breathe. I hope you like our political system. I think it stinks. no pun intended I'm sorry, but I'm really not interested in reading any more anti-science Republican screeds. Save it for the believers in the awakening of Terry Schiavo. Anti-science?????? OK, a question. How can the US affect the amount of carbon dioxide being produced globally. We account for 25% of the worlds total man made carbon dioxide, that's 5% of the total carbon dioxide produced worldwide. That percentage is going to drop as the price of oil increases while the world wide production is going to increase. Perhaps we could encourage India and China to build more nuclear power plants. opps..done that, Bush authorized funds for that and released technologies to both those countries to make sure those power plants were safe. Hmmm...what else. CAFE standards increase...opps, Bush is doing that. Build more nuclear power plants here...doing that. Release technologies for synthetic fuels ....doing that. Fund research...doing that. Higher efficiency for air conditioning systems..doing that. Higher standards for insulation in homes...doing that. Perhaps a small tax on carbon based fuel that goes entirely to subsidize retrofit insulation to existing homes. What more can be done? Please offer your suggestions. You can believe that Bush now believes in man made global warming or you can believe that the war on terror requires us to be less dependant on foreign oil. Anything that reduces the worlds dependence on "Arab" oil is good for the world and bad for terrorists. Jumping on the "global warming bandwagon makes him more in tune with the political climate and gets his agenda forward. For my part it's good for this country to be less dependant on foreign oil regardless of the reason you do it. I'd like to see sustainable renewable energy sources developed. |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More on Global Warming
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:24:26 GMT, "Don White"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Provided without comment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6Wr1hcIp2U -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** John H ....and you also still believe that cigarettes don't cause cancer? Even if the CO2 emmissions aren't warming up the earth, they sure are poisoining the environment. We know...a lot of the garbage spewed south of the border makes it's way up here and dumps on us. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/nova-scotia...-petition.html To whom are you writing? I didn't do the documentary, and you obviously didn't watch it. -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** John H |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT More on Global Warming | General | |||
Heads up, Harry... | General | |||
OT Global Warming Water Shortages | General | |||
Global Warmings Puts Reefs in Peril | General |