On Mar 12, 10:40�am, "JimH" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

ps.com...
On Mar 12, 4:15?am, "JimH" wrote:





"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

oups.com...
On Mar 11, 3:32?pm, wrote:

Sea Ray has better name recognition than Rinker thanks mainly to great
marketing. On the other hand the Rinker *may* actually have higher
quality hardware and workmanship. Compare the quality of things like
deck rails (welded or t-fittings, diameter) and cabin cabinetry and
hardware.

Do you have some basis for that statement, (opinion) or is it purely
rhetorical?

====================

Note the key word *may* Chuck. I am also asking him to *compare* the
quality.

IMO Sea Ray is overpriced and it's reputation as being a 1st class boat is
overstated.

Got it now? Good. ;-)

Of course.

One should *compare* KIA and Mercedes Benz. Who knows? The KIA *may*
be a better car. *:-)

=================

Having another bad day Chuck?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not at all.

You always read a lot of angst into things where it doesn't exist. Not
everybody is in an emotional knot all the time. (And here's the
secret, stop giving a darn about what people you don't know and will
never meet think about you- or whether they think about you at all).

My original question was: "Do you have some basis for that statement,
(opinion) or is it purely rhetorical?"

Your repsonse was a non-answer- you chose to challenge my reading
perception. However, based on the nature of your response its easy to
conclude that there was no basis of either information or experience
for your statement and it was indeed purely rhetorical.

As I then pointed out, one could always advise anybody to compare any
two products, no matter how dissimilar, because there's a chance that
the product normally considered to be of lesser quality might have
better components than the product typically considered superior.