|
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
|
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Harry #1, basskisser #2, no suprise there. At least basskisser has moved on from wrecked.boats- even seems to be acting like a human being in other groups. How about you give it a try Harold? |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
Nico wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Harry #1, basskisser #2, no suprise there. At least basskisser has moved on from wrecked.boats- even seems to be acting like a human being in other groups. Yep! Home brew and BBQ! |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
"Tim" wrote in message ups.com... Nico wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Harry #1, basskisser #2, no suprise there. At least basskisser has moved on from wrecked.boats- even seems to be acting like a human being in other groups. Yep! Home brew and BBQ! Kudos to him. |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
On 21 Feb 2007 09:14:50 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Wow, I was really feeling vociferous until I realized all of these were the same guy! I think I'll quit responding to Donnie's taunts. That'll cut my numbers in half. :) -- *****Have a Spectacular Day!***** John H |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:26:07 GMT, "Nico"
wrote: "Tim" wrote in message oups.com... Nico wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Harry #1, basskisser #2, no suprise there. At least basskisser has moved on from wrecked.boats- even seems to be acting like a human being in other groups. Yep! Home brew and BBQ! Kudos to him. Agreed. -- *****Have a Spectacular Day!***** John H |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
"JLH" wrote in message ... On 21 Feb 2007 09:14:50 -0800, "Chuck Gould" wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Wow, I was really feeling vociferous until I realized all of these were the same guy! I think I'll quit responding to Donnie's taunts. That'll cut my numbers in half. :) -- *****Have a Spectacular Day!***** John H I thought that's why you changed your handle from 'JohnH' to 'JHL'. You can run but you can't hide! |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Chuck.............what was your intention in starting this thread? An obvious answer is "to stir the pot" as it is something you succeeded in doing. Is there another reason?? |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
On Feb 21, 4:29?pm, "JimH" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Chuck.............what was your intention in starting this thread? An obvious answer is "to stir the pot" as it is something you succeeded in doing. Is there another reason?? Several. The site tracks the growth of rec.boats from the very beginning, from back in the days when there were only a couple of hundred posts per month up to current times when there are several thousand. There is information about how many people (just over 100) typically participate in the NG. Activity is compared to other rec.boats sites, with rec.boats cruising also being very active, rec.boats building being a bit less active, and rec.boats marketplace somewhat of a sleepy hollow. and so forth, It's fascinating to note that the only portion of the information that anybody found significant enough to comment about was to compare the number of posts that people have made throughout the years.....and with that information the very same people who are likely to climb another poster's frame for any other reason are (no surprise) using this item to make personal remarks about the people they dislike. Most of the information there is not personality oriented. If you failed to notice that, perhaps you might consider taking another look. Everyone knows how you despise any stirring of the pot, JimH. Let me assure you that such was not my intention. |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 21, 4:29?pm, "JimH" wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Chuck.............what was your intention in starting this thread? An obvious answer is "to stir the pot" as it is something you succeeded in doing. Is there another reason?? Several. The site tracks the growth of rec.boats from the very beginning, from back in the days when there were only a couple of hundred posts per month up to current times when there are several thousand. There is information about how many people (just over 100) typically participate in the NG. Activity is compared to other rec.boats sites, with rec.boats cruising also being very active, rec.boats building being a bit less active, and rec.boats marketplace somewhat of a sleepy hollow. and so forth, It's fascinating to note that the only portion of the information that anybody found significant enough to comment about was to compare the number of posts that people have made throughout the years.....and with that information the very same people who are likely to climb another poster's frame for any other reason are (no surprise) using this item to make personal remarks about the people they dislike. Most of the information there is not personality oriented. If you failed to notice that, perhaps you might consider taking another look. Everyone knows how you despise any stirring of the pot, JimH. Let me assure you that such was not my intention. What took you 500 words I can provide an appropriate response to you in one...........Bull. Walk the walk Chuck. ;-) |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
On 21 Feb 2007 16:46:18 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote: Everyone knows how you despise any stirring of the pot, JimH. Let me assure you that such was not my intention. I thought it interesting that only 3 of the most recently prolific have escaped my KF. Can it be that those with the most say the least? That's my guess. |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
Harry, via his different identities, has three of the top 4 spots, and 4 of
the top 10 spots for all time most prolific poster. basskisser is 2nd...chuck is 5th...and 7th place goes to moi. Harry: 37,705 posts. Just damn. "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
What are user ratings and how are they applied. I have 35 ratings with an
average of 3 out of 5 stars. basskisser has 100 ratings with an average of 1 star. Chuck has 1 rating with 5 out of 5 stars (vote for yourself, chuckie?) "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 03:41:28 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
basskisser has 100 ratings with an average of 1 star. Cripes, he must have voted for himself. |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 21, 4:29?pm, "JimH" wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Chuck.............what was your intention in starting this thread? An obvious answer is "to stir the pot" as it is something you succeeded in doing. Is there another reason?? Several. The site tracks the growth of rec.boats from the very beginning, from back in the days when there were only a couple of hundred posts per month up to current times when there are several thousand. There is information about how many people (just over 100) typically participate in the NG. Activity is compared to other rec.boats sites, with rec.boats cruising also being very active, rec.boats building being a bit less active, and rec.boats marketplace somewhat of a sleepy hollow. and so forth, It's fascinating to note that the only portion of the information that anybody found significant enough to comment about was to compare the number of posts that people have made throughout the years.....and with that information the very same people who are likely to climb another poster's frame for any other reason are (no surprise) using this item to make personal remarks about the people they dislike. Most of the information there is not personality oriented. If you failed to notice that, perhaps you might consider taking another look. Everyone knows how you despise any stirring of the pot, JimH. Let me assure you that such was not my intention. Chuck, there is nothing about the top posters I found interesting or surprising. My guess is everyone could have guessed who were the top posters, so I didn't think that was your purpose for posting the link. The "interesting facts" I found was to go back to the early 90's and read the topics of discussion and see what people were talking about a short 15 years ago. |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
NOYB wrote:
What are user ratings and how are they applied. I have 35 ratings with an average of 3 out of 5 stars. basskisser has 100 ratings with an average of 1 star. Chuck has 1 rating with 5 out of 5 stars (vote for yourself, chuckie?) "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Damn, and with 19 votes, I have 5 out of 5 stars. I don't think I am going to talk to you low life's anymore. ;) Somehow, I think this post will result in a change of my rating. grin |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
On Feb 21, 4:58�pm, "JimH" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 21, 4:29?pm, "JimH" wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message groups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Chuck.............what was your intention in starting this thread? An obvious answer is "to stir the pot" as it is something you succeeded in doing. Is there another reason?? Several. The site tracks the growth of rec.boats from the very beginning, from back in the days when there were only a couple of hundred posts per month up to current times when there are several thousand. There is information about how many people (just over 100) typically participate in the NG. Activity is compared to other rec.boats sites, with rec.boats cruising also being very active, rec.boats building being a bit less active, and rec.boats marketplace somewhat of a sleepy hollow. and so forth, It's fascinating to note that the only portion of the information that anybody found significant enough to comment about was to compare the number of posts that people have made throughout the years.....and with that information the very same people who are likely to climb another poster's frame for any other reason are (no surprise) using this item to make personal remarks about the people they dislike. Most of the information there is not personality oriented. If you failed to notice that, perhaps you might consider taking another look. Everyone knows how you despise any stirring of the pot, JimH. Let me assure you that such was not my intention. What took you 500 words I can provide an appropriate response to you in one...........Bull. Walk the walk Chuck. *;-)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Visualize sign language. Just because, for you, this group is all about Peyton Place personality intrigue doesn't mean that everybody else views everything in the group from a perspective of personalities, flame wars, and score settling. Most of us don't seem to really give a stinking squat about juvenile grudges or bother to keep track of who is currently po'd at poster X,Y, or Z. Did you notice that of all the responses to this thread yours is the only one focusing on personal remarks? Why do you suppose that is? Hard to believe, from a guy who preaches against "stirring the pot". |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 21, 4:58?pm, "JimH" wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 21, 4:29?pm, "JimH" wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message groups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Chuck.............what was your intention in starting this thread? An obvious answer is "to stir the pot" as it is something you succeeded in doing. Is there another reason?? Several. The site tracks the growth of rec.boats from the very beginning, from back in the days when there were only a couple of hundred posts per month up to current times when there are several thousand. There is information about how many people (just over 100) typically participate in the NG. Activity is compared to other rec.boats sites, with rec.boats cruising also being very active, rec.boats building being a bit less active, and rec.boats marketplace somewhat of a sleepy hollow. and so forth, It's fascinating to note that the only portion of the information that anybody found significant enough to comment about was to compare the number of posts that people have made throughout the years.....and with that information the very same people who are likely to climb another poster's frame for any other reason are (no surprise) using this item to make personal remarks about the people they dislike. Most of the information there is not personality oriented. If you failed to notice that, perhaps you might consider taking another look. Everyone knows how you despise any stirring of the pot, JimH. Let me assure you that such was not my intention. What took you 500 words I can provide an appropriate response to you in one...........Bull. Walk the walk Chuck. ;-) - Show quoted text - Visualize sign language. ======================= And right back atcha! |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
On Feb 22, 9:10 am, "Chuck Gould" wrote:
On Feb 21, 4:58?pm, "JimH" wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 21, 4:29?pm, "JimH" wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message groups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Chuck.............what was your intention in starting this thread? An obvious answer is "to stir the pot" as it is something you succeeded in doing. Is there another reason?? Several. The site tracks the growth of rec.boats from the very beginning, from back in the days when there were only a couple of hundred posts per month up to current times when there are several thousand. There is information about how many people (just over 100) typically participate in the NG. Activity is compared to other rec.boats sites, with rec.boats cruising also being very active, rec.boats building being a bit less active, and rec.boats marketplace somewhat of a sleepy hollow. and so forth, It's fascinating to note that the only portion of the information that anybody found significant enough to comment about was to compare the number of posts that people have made throughout the years.....and with that information the very same people who are likely to climb another poster's frame for any other reason are (no surprise) using this item to make personal remarks about the people they dislike. Most of the information there is not personality oriented. If you failed to notice that, perhaps you might consider taking another look. Everyone knows how you despise any stirring of the pot, JimH. Let me assure you that such was not my intention. What took you 500 words I can provide an appropriate response to you in one...........Bull. Walk the walk Chuck. ?;-)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Visualize sign language. Just because, for you, this group is all about Peyton Place personality intrigue doesn't mean that everybody else views everything in the group from a perspective of personalities, flame wars, and score settling. Most of us don't seem to really give a stinking squat about juvenile grudges or bother to keep track of who is currently po'd at poster X,Y, or Z. Did you notice that of all the responses to this thread yours is the only one focusing on personal remarks? Why do you suppose that is? Hard to believe, from a guy who preaches against "stirring the pot".- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It's interesting that they all are still stalking me, even to other newsgroups! Talk about infatuation!!! |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
On Feb 21, 7:41?pm, "NOYB" wrote:
Chuck has 1 rating with 5 out of 5 stars (vote for yourself, chuckie?) - Obviously not, NOYB. We West Coast liberals never vote less than three times in any single election. :-) |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
On Feb 22, 4:42�am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "remove
wrote: Chuck Gould wrote: On Feb 21, 4:29?pm, "JimH" wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message groups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Chuck.............what was your intention in starting this thread? An obvious answer is "to stir the pot" as it is something you succeeded in doing. Is there another reason?? Several. The site tracks the growth of rec.boats from the very beginning, from back in the days when there were only a couple of hundred posts per month up to current times when there are several thousand. There is information about how many people (just over 100) typically participate in the NG. Activity is compared to other rec.boats sites, with rec.boats cruising also being very active, rec.boats building being a bit less active, and rec.boats marketplace somewhat of a sleepy hollow. and so forth, It's fascinating to note that the only portion of the information that anybody found significant enough to comment about was to compare the number of posts that people have made throughout the years.....and with that information the very same people who are likely to climb another poster's frame for any other reason are (no surprise) using this item to make personal remarks about the people they dislike. Most of the information there is not personality oriented. If you failed to notice that, perhaps you might consider taking another look. Everyone knows how you despise any stirring of the pot, JimH. Let me assure you that such was not my intention. Chuck, there is nothing about the top posters I found interesting or surprising. *My guess is everyone could have guessed who were the top posters, so I didn't think that was your purpose for posting the link. * *The "interesting facts" I found was to go back to the early 90's and read the topics of discussion and see what people were talking about a short 15 years ago.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Precisely. How many people would have been unable to guess that the most prolific poster in the archives was the most prolific poster? More importantly--- who the heck would care? But it's no surprise that the same people who focus on personalities every day in the NG also chose to focus on the personalities on that link. It is *extremely* interesting to look at the previous years' posts, and there is a definite development pattern that these archives present. It's an interesting study in how a group that has no moderation has developed over a long period of time. I guess it's a question of what you look for. Look for a reason to flame somebody and you'll find one, even if you have to streeeeeeetch a long way to do so. |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
On Feb 22, 6:34?am, "JimH" wrote:
Visualize sign language. ======================= And right back atcha!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hmmm. I wonder what sort of "sign language" you visualized? |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... What are user ratings and how are they applied. I have 35 ratings with an average of 3 out of 5 stars. basskisser has 100 ratings with an average of 1 star. Chuck has 1 rating with 5 out of 5 stars (vote for yourself, chuckie?) "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Who's doing the ratings? I feel underappreciated with only two stars out of five. |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
Don White wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... What are user ratings and how are they applied. I have 35 ratings with an average of 3 out of 5 stars. basskisser has 100 ratings with an average of 1 star. Chuck has 1 rating with 5 out of 5 stars (vote for yourself, chuckie?) "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Who's doing the ratings? I feel underappreciated with only two stars out of five. Awwwwwww. Not to worry; it's as meaningless as the rest of the google groups b.s. :} |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
NOYB wrote: What are user ratings and how are they applied. I have 35 ratings with an average of 3 out of 5 stars. basskisser has 100 ratings with an average of 1 star. Chuck has 1 rating with 5 out of 5 stars (vote for yourself, chuckie?) "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Damn, and with 19 votes, I have 5 out of 5 stars. I don't think I am going to talk to you low life's anymore. ;) Somehow, I think this post will result in a change of my rating. grin Is not having a rating a good thing? |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
Chuck Gould wrote:
Visualize sign language. I'm visualizing your thumbs stuck in your ears and your are wiggling your fingers at the computer screen with your tongue hanging out. Close? |
Link to interesting facts about rec.boats NG
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: NOYB wrote: What are user ratings and how are they applied. I have 35 ratings with an average of 3 out of 5 stars. basskisser has 100 ratings with an average of 1 star. Chuck has 1 rating with 5 out of 5 stars (vote for yourself, chuckie?) "Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/about Damn, and with 19 votes, I have 5 out of 5 stars. I don't think I am going to talk to you low life's anymore. ;) Somehow, I think this post will result in a change of my rating. grin Is not having a rating a good thing? Tom, I really can't figure out who votes or who looks at the votes. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com