Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 201
Default "whale tails" or cavitation plate foils

Side to side stabilization is much very different than reducing bow lift
while getting the boat on plane.


Tabs will help get the bow down faster, not the same as "reducing lift" but the
result is the same, at least it seems to me it is.

So I guess, from the other posts, I was wrong & my friend was right. I hate
it when I have to admit I'm wrong.


--- AntiSpam/harvest ---
Remove X's to send email to me.
  #12   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 351
Default "whale tails" or cavitation plate foils

D.Duck wrote:

Isn't a good deal of that weight variation in fiberglass hulls?


Funny you should mention that.

I went/am going through this with Ranger right now.

Apparently weights can vary a lot.
  #13   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 351
Default "whale tails" or cavitation plate foils

Josh Assing wrote:
Side to side stabilization is much very different than reducing bow lift
while getting the boat on plane.


Tabs will help get the bow down faster, not the same as "reducing lift" but the
result is the same, at least it seems to me it is.

So I guess, from the other posts, I was wrong & my friend was right. I hate
it when I have to admit I'm wrong.


Welcome to the club - I've made an entire career out of being wrong. :)
  #14   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 201
Default "whale tails" or cavitation plate foils

Welcome to the club - I've made an entire career out of being wrong. :)

So I called & let him know he was right -- now he's asking me "which is best" --
how did I become some sort of reference for whale tails? Last time I say
something is worthless!

I said "whatever you have is the best"

-j


--- AntiSpam/harvest ---
Remove X's to send email to me.
  #15   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,533
Default "whale tails" or cavitation plate foils


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
m...
D.Duck wrote:

Isn't a good deal of that weight variation in fiberglass hulls?


Funny you should mention that.

I went/am going through this with Ranger right now.

Apparently weights can vary a lot.


If I recall correctly as near as you can figure your hull is something like
800 pounds over Ranger's advertised nominal.

Still haven't figured that out?




  #16   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 351
Default "whale tails" or cavitation plate foils

D.Duck wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
m...
D.Duck wrote:

Isn't a good deal of that weight variation in fiberglass hulls?

Funny you should mention that.

I went/am going through this with Ranger right now.

Apparently weights can vary a lot.


If I recall correctly as near as you can figure your hull is something like
800 pounds over Ranger's advertised nominal.

Still haven't figured that out?


Nope.
  #17   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 24
Default "whale tails" or cavitation plate foils

On Feb 19, 10:48 am, Josh Assing wrote:
So, a buddy and I were talking -- he said I wasted my money on trim tabs. I
said I did not.

The conversation revolved around the use of whale tails (foils on the
cavitation plate).

I said that they could help; but would add stress to the outdrive, and if
something that simple really helped, manufactures would make their cavitation
plates larger.

What's the general opinion on them?


A number of years ago, I added one to a 17' bass boat with a 75hp
motor. The hole shot was noticiably better, lost maybe 1 mph on the
top end, The best part was remarkably lower planing speed. Didn't
notice any difference in turn performance.

  #18   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,727
Default "whale tails" or cavitation plate foils


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news
Josh Assing wrote:
Side to side stabilization is much very different than reducing bow lift
while getting the boat on plane.


Tabs will help get the bow down faster, not the same as "reducing lift"
but the
result is the same, at least it seems to me it is.

So I guess, from the other posts, I was wrong & my friend was right. I
hate
it when I have to admit I'm wrong.


Welcome to the club - I've made an entire career out of being wrong. :)


I thought you were a mathematician, not a weatherman.


  #19   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,727
Default "whale tails" or cavitation plate foils


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
m...
D.Duck wrote:

Isn't a good deal of that weight variation in fiberglass hulls?
Funny you should mention that.

I went/am going through this with Ranger right now.

Apparently weights can vary a lot.


If I recall correctly as near as you can figure your hull is something
like 800 pounds over Ranger's advertised nominal.

Still haven't figured that out?


Nope.


My buddy's offshore raceboat a few years ago, came in 600# overweight.
Builder told him . . . Tough. You own it. Not competitoive, but you own
it.


  #20   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Default "whale tails" or cavitation plate foils


"Josh Assing" wrote in message
...
So, a buddy and I were talking -- he said I wasted my money on trim tabs.
I
said I did not.

The conversation revolved around the use of whale tails (foils on the
cavitation plate).

I said that they could help; but would add stress to the outdrive, and if
something that simple really helped, manufactures would make their
cavitation
plates larger.

What's the general opinion on them?

-j



I had a 18 foot century with a 140 mercruiser i/o. The boat was not much
good for salom skiing because it took so long for the front end to come down
and get on plane. With a plate shaped like a wing, sorry don't remember
brand, it would plane slightly faster, making the boat a tiny bit more
tolerable. With the the out drive trimmed up, the boat also turned better.
They are deffinately NOT a solution, but may help your particular boat.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
outboard height on a pod & cavitation plate angle Stevens Boat Building 0 January 13th 07 11:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017