OK... let's stop the Chuckie dots.....
 

On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:47:11 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote:

... at least as a subject line. It's driving my anti-virus software
nuts.... and you get deleted without any chance of being read....

I don't recall seeing any dots used as the subject, although I've used a
couple myself in the text portion within the past few weeks.

Actually, I'm wondering why anyone would put the dot in the subject line.
If the dot is to affect a thread, then changing the subject would change
the thread, no?

This bears some testing.
--
******************************************
***** Have a super day! *****
******************************************

John H

No changing the subject does not change the thread
 

JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:47:11 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote:

... at least as a subject line. It's driving my anti-virus software
nuts.... and you get deleted without any chance of being read....

I don't recall seeing any dots used as the subject, although I've used a
couple myself in the text portion within the past few weeks.

Actually, I'm wondering why anyone would put the dot in the subject line.
If the dot is to affect a thread, then changing the subject would change
the thread, no?

This bears some testing.
--
******************************************
***** Have a super day! *****
******************************************

John H

Gene,
Why do dots affect your antivirus?

.
 

On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:04:26 GMT, Gene Kearn's Chuckie Dot Nightmare
wrote:

On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:58:17 -0500, JohnH wrote:

.


The above is what showed up when I clicked on the header. Because your
response was part of the " OK... let's stop the Chuckie dots....."
thread, only "Gene Kearn's Chuckie Dot Nightmare" (i.e., the 'author')
showed up under the thread title.

My anti-virus software was not affected.
--
******************************************
***** Have a super day! *****
******************************************

John H

.
 

On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:24:29 -0500, JohnH wrote:

On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:04:26 GMT, Gene Kearn's Chuckie Dot Nightmare
wrote:

On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:58:17 -0500, JohnH wrote:

.


The above is what showed up when I clicked on the header. Because your
response was part of the " OK... let's stop the Chuckie dots....."
thread, only "Gene Kearn's Chuckie Dot Nightmare" (i.e., the 'author')
showed up under the thread title.

My anti-virus software was not affected.

Whoops! Now my response to you showed up under the

" ." header.

As usual, I'm confused.
--
******************************************
***** Have a super day! *****
******************************************

John H

.
 

JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:24:29 -0500, JohnH wrote:


On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:04:26 GMT, Gene Kearn's Chuckie Dot Nightmare
wrote:


On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:58:17 -0500, JohnH wrote:

.


The above is what showed up when I clicked on the header. Because your
response was part of the " OK... let's stop the Chuckie dots....."
thread, only "Gene Kearn's Chuckie Dot Nightmare" (i.e., the 'author')
showed up under the thread title.

My anti-virus software was not affected.


Whoops! Now my response to you showed up under the

" ." header.

As usual, I'm confused.
Dont be. posted with the descriptive part of his/its
name set to "Gene Kearn's Chuckie Dot Nightmare" on an easynews server,
changing the subject to "." and typing a single "." as the message
contents. Gene uses Roadrunner and a completely different (and also
bogus, I suspect, email address). I smell a large and hairy TROLL.

Incidentally freak.com is registered to Contrast Technologies, Inc. of
Cherry Hill, NJ and is currently with a domain parking service,
namely domains.googlesyndication.com, I wonder if 'freak' is an
authorised user ;-)

Finally, if you want/need to use a bogus email address, please tack
'.invalid' on the end to guarantee some poor ******* isn't getting the
spam YOU are avoiding.


--
Ian Malcolm. London, ENGLAND. (NEWSGROUP REPLY PREFERRED)
ianm[at]the[dash]malcolms[dot]freeserve[dot]co[dot]uk
[at]=@, [dash]=- & [dot]=. *Warning* HTML & 32K emails -- NUL:
'Stingo' Albacore #1554 - 15' Early 60's, Uffa Fox designed,
All varnished hot moulded wooden racing dinghy.

.
 

On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:01:18 +0000, Ian Malcolm
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:24:29 -0500, JohnH wrote:


On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:04:26 GMT, Gene Kearn's Chuckie Dot Nightmare
wrote:


On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:58:17 -0500, JohnH wrote:

.


The above is what showed up when I clicked on the header. Because your
response was part of the " OK... let's stop the Chuckie dots....."
thread, only "Gene Kearn's Chuckie Dot Nightmare" (i.e., the 'author')
showed up under the thread title.

My anti-virus software was not affected.


Whoops! Now my response to you showed up under the

" ." header.

As usual, I'm confused.
Dont be. posted with the descriptive part of his/its
name set to "Gene Kearn's Chuckie Dot Nightmare" on an easynews server,
changing the subject to "." and typing a single "." as the message
contents. Gene uses Roadrunner and a completely different (and also
bogus, I suspect, email address). I smell a large and hairy TROLL.

Incidentally freak.com is registered to Contrast Technologies, Inc. of
Cherry Hill, NJ and is currently with a domain parking service,
namely domains.googlesyndication.com, I wonder if 'freak' is an
authorised user ;-)

Finally, if you want/need to use a bogus email address, please tack
'.invalid' on the end to guarantee some poor ******* isn't getting the
spam YOU are avoiding.

Thanks. Now I feel a little less illiterate, but not much. :)
--
******************************************
***** Have a super day! *****
******************************************

John H

.
 

On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:15:08 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 1/17/2007 9:01 AM, Ian Malcolm wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:24:29 -0500, JohnH wrote:


On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:04:26 GMT, Gene Kearn's Chuckie Dot Nightmare
wrote:


On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:58:17 -0500, JohnH wrote:

.

The above is what showed up when I clicked on the header. Because your
response was part of the " OK... let's stop the Chuckie dots....."
thread, only "Gene Kearn's Chuckie Dot Nightmare" (i.e., the 'author')
showed up under the thread title.

My anti-virus software was not affected.

Whoops! Now my response to you showed up under the

" ." header.

As usual, I'm confused.
Dont be. posted with the descriptive part of his/its
name set to "Gene Kearn's Chuckie Dot Nightmare" on an easynews server,
changing the subject to "." and typing a single "." as the message
contents. Gene uses Roadrunner and a completely different (and also
bogus, I suspect, email address). I smell a large and hairy TROLL.

Incidentally freak.com is registered to Contrast Technologies, Inc. of
Cherry Hill, NJ and is currently with a domain parking service,
namely domains.googlesyndication.com, I wonder if 'freak' is an
authorised user ;-)

Finally, if you want/need to use a bogus email address, please tack
'.invalid' on the end to guarantee some poor ******* isn't getting the
spam YOU are avoiding.



This newsgroup is full of a**holes hiding behind bogus names and bogus
email addresses.

And a neat name-caller trying to get the real ones for nefarious purposes!
--
******************************************
***** Have a super day! *****
******************************************

John H

No changing the subject does not change the thread
 

Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:59:58 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:47:11 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote:

... at least as a subject line. It's driving my anti-virus software
nuts.... and you get deleted without any chance of being read....
I don't recall seeing any dots used as the subject, although I've used a
couple myself in the text portion within the past few weeks.

Actually, I'm wondering why anyone would put the dot in the subject line.
If the dot is to affect a thread, then changing the subject would change
the thread, no?

This bears some testing.
--
******************************************
***** Have a super day! *****
******************************************

John H
Gene,
Why do dots affect your antivirus?

Detects it as measles?

CWM
That seem way to obvious, I don't know why I missed it.

No changing the subject does not change the thread
 

Gene Kearns wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:59:58 -0500, Reginald P. Smithers III penned
the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:47:11 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote:

... at least as a subject line. It's driving my anti-virus software
nuts.... and you get deleted without any chance of being read....
I don't recall seeing any dots used as the subject, although I've used a
couple myself in the text portion within the past few weeks.

Actually, I'm wondering why anyone would put the dot in the subject line.
If the dot is to affect a thread, then changing the subject would change
the thread, no?

This bears some testing.
--
******************************************
***** Have a super day! *****
******************************************

John H
Gene,
Why do dots affect your antivirus?

I'm not entirely sure, but it appears that it saw the subject as "."
which it flagged as suspicious and asked me if I wanted to delete the
message body. Seeing no point in reading about the subject "." I told
it to delete the message(s).....

It seems to me that Chuckie dots are making your life easier.