BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Lost American Sailor Located (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/77264-lost-american-sailor-located.html)

D.Duck January 7th 07 02:53 PM

Lost American Sailor Located
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:
I agree. If folks put themselves in harms way intentionally and end
up
needing rescue they should pay the bill. But that should not stop the
effort to save a human life.

I don't know about you, but around here we pay taxes just for those
things. You are putting yourself in harms way every time your furnace
turns on, risk of fire, you know. You are putting yourself in harms way
when you go outside and get your mail, you are always at some sort of
risk. So, again in these parts we pay taxes for fire departments,
emergency services and such.



Not the same. Intentionally putting oneself at undue risk is not the same
as
everyday going-about-your-life risks. (Unless you're a whiny ****bag
"everyone should pay for my mistakes and welfare"
run-the-****ing-country-into-the-ground and
sue-everyone-that-has-any-money
Socialist, I guess)

Need a rescue because you were in an auto accident? Sure thing.
Need a rescue because you were going 110 mph trying to drag race or
outrun
the police? Not on my tax bill, pal.

Need a rescue because your pleasure boat ran aground or ran out of gas?
No
problem.
Need a rescue because you ran through the "graveyard" around Tierra Del
Forego during the stormy season while trying to set a world record? Sure
thing- here's your itemized rescue bill.


You are intentionally putting yourself in harms way every time you get
in your car, go outside to get the mail, get on a plane, go to the
grocery store, plug something into a receptacle, anything.



There are "levels" of harms way.



Rick January 7th 07 03:13 PM

Lost American Sailor Located
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:
I agree. If folks put themselves in harms way intentionally and end
up
needing rescue they should pay the bill. But that should not stop the
effort to save a human life.

I don't know about you, but around here we pay taxes just for those
things. You are putting yourself in harms way every time your furnace
turns on, risk of fire, you know. You are putting yourself in harms way
when you go outside and get your mail, you are always at some sort of
risk. So, again in these parts we pay taxes for fire departments,
emergency services and such.



Not the same. Intentionally putting oneself at undue risk is not the same
as
everyday going-about-your-life risks. (Unless you're a whiny ****bag
"everyone should pay for my mistakes and welfare"
run-the-****ing-country-into-the-ground and
sue-everyone-that-has-any-money
Socialist, I guess)

Need a rescue because you were in an auto accident? Sure thing.
Need a rescue because you were going 110 mph trying to drag race or
outrun
the police? Not on my tax bill, pal.

Need a rescue because your pleasure boat ran aground or ran out of gas?
No
problem.
Need a rescue because you ran through the "graveyard" around Tierra Del
Forego during the stormy season while trying to set a world record? Sure
thing- here's your itemized rescue bill.


You are intentionally putting yourself in harms way every time you get
in your car, go outside to get the mail, get on a plane, go to the
grocery store, plug something into a receptacle, anything.


OK but if you are injured and need help who pays?
1) If you are in a car accident you pay car insurance for just such a
mishap. So in reality you pay.
2) If you go outside to get the mail, slip, and fall you have home
owners insurance or medical insurance. So in reality you pay.
3) If you slip and fall in the grocery store - well this is a little
tricky but either your insurance or their insurance will pay. If it is
their insurance - you pay because they charge you a little more on the price
of food for their premiums.

etc... etc...

It just happens that most folks plan on something happening and get
insurance to protect themselves. It doesn't mean that the get out of the
jamb for free it just means that they paid into a pool of money (insurance
company) that expects to pay out every once in a while. Did he have
insurance? I think he did. He had a sat phone and a super EPIRB. He also
had a provisioned life raft and a provisioned boat for a round the world
sail. It sounds to me that he was ready for mishap.

Will he get a bill - I would think so.







basskisser January 7th 07 04:17 PM

Lost American Sailor Located
 

Rick wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:
I agree. If folks put themselves in harms way intentionally and end
up
needing rescue they should pay the bill. But that should not stop the
effort to save a human life.

I don't know about you, but around here we pay taxes just for those
things. You are putting yourself in harms way every time your furnace
turns on, risk of fire, you know. You are putting yourself in harms way
when you go outside and get your mail, you are always at some sort of
risk. So, again in these parts we pay taxes for fire departments,
emergency services and such.


Not the same. Intentionally putting oneself at undue risk is not the same
as
everyday going-about-your-life risks. (Unless you're a whiny ****bag
"everyone should pay for my mistakes and welfare"
run-the-****ing-country-into-the-ground and
sue-everyone-that-has-any-money
Socialist, I guess)

Need a rescue because you were in an auto accident? Sure thing.
Need a rescue because you were going 110 mph trying to drag race or
outrun
the police? Not on my tax bill, pal.

Need a rescue because your pleasure boat ran aground or ran out of gas?
No
problem.
Need a rescue because you ran through the "graveyard" around Tierra Del
Forego during the stormy season while trying to set a world record? Sure
thing- here's your itemized rescue bill.


You are intentionally putting yourself in harms way every time you get
in your car, go outside to get the mail, get on a plane, go to the
grocery store, plug something into a receptacle, anything.


OK but if you are injured and need help who pays?
1) If you are in a car accident you pay car insurance for just such a
mishap. So in reality you pay.


EMS and fire services are payed by my tax obligations.

2) If you go outside to get the mail, slip, and fall you have home
owners insurance or medical insurance. So in reality you pay.


EMS and fire services are paid by my tax obligations.
3) If you slip and fall in the grocery store - well this is a little
tricky but either your insurance or their insurance will pay. If it is
their insurance - you pay because they charge you a little more on the price
of food for their premiums.


EMS and fire services, again, are paid by my tax obligations.


basskisser January 7th 07 04:18 PM

Lost American Sailor Located
 

D.Duck wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:
I agree. If folks put themselves in harms way intentionally and end
up
needing rescue they should pay the bill. But that should not stop the
effort to save a human life.

I don't know about you, but around here we pay taxes just for those
things. You are putting yourself in harms way every time your furnace
turns on, risk of fire, you know. You are putting yourself in harms way
when you go outside and get your mail, you are always at some sort of
risk. So, again in these parts we pay taxes for fire departments,
emergency services and such.


Not the same. Intentionally putting oneself at undue risk is not the same
as
everyday going-about-your-life risks. (Unless you're a whiny ****bag
"everyone should pay for my mistakes and welfare"
run-the-****ing-country-into-the-ground and
sue-everyone-that-has-any-money
Socialist, I guess)

Need a rescue because you were in an auto accident? Sure thing.
Need a rescue because you were going 110 mph trying to drag race or
outrun
the police? Not on my tax bill, pal.

Need a rescue because your pleasure boat ran aground or ran out of gas?
No
problem.
Need a rescue because you ran through the "graveyard" around Tierra Del
Forego during the stormy season while trying to set a world record? Sure
thing- here's your itemized rescue bill.


You are intentionally putting yourself in harms way every time you get
in your car, go outside to get the mail, get on a plane, go to the
grocery store, plug something into a receptacle, anything.



There are "levels" of harms way.


Yes, and driving a car on many highways is statistic wise, very
dangerous.


Animal05 January 7th 07 04:23 PM

Lost American Sailor Located
 
D.Duck wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:

I agree. If folks put themselves in harms way intentionally and end
up
needing rescue they should pay the bill. But that should not stop the
effort to save a human life.

I don't know about you, but around here we pay taxes just for those
things. You are putting yourself in harms way every time your furnace
turns on, risk of fire, you know. You are putting yourself in harms way
when you go outside and get your mail, you are always at some sort of
risk. So, again in these parts we pay taxes for fire departments,
emergency services and such.


Not the same. Intentionally putting oneself at undue risk is not the same
as
everyday going-about-your-life risks. (Unless you're a whiny ****bag
"everyone should pay for my mistakes and welfare"
run-the-****ing-country-into-the-ground and
sue-everyone-that-has-any-money
Socialist, I guess)

Need a rescue because you were in an auto accident? Sure thing.
Need a rescue because you were going 110 mph trying to drag race or
outrun
the police? Not on my tax bill, pal.

Need a rescue because your pleasure boat ran aground or ran out of gas?
No
problem.
Need a rescue because you ran through the "graveyard" around Tierra Del
Forego during the stormy season while trying to set a world record? Sure
thing- here's your itemized rescue bill.


You are intentionally putting yourself in harms way every time you get
in your car, go outside to get the mail, get on a plane, go to the
grocery store, plug something into a receptacle, anything.




There are "levels" of harms way.



THere is one constant, kevin will go out of his way to argue, and end up
making an ass of himself.

basskisser January 7th 07 04:35 PM

Lost American Sailor Located
 

SPAM Avenger wrote:
On 7 Jan 2007 08:17:41 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:

EMS and fire services, again, are paid by my tax obligations.


Basskisser The Broad's view of the world is that if she says it's so,
it's so. Anything outside her experience is invalid. She learned it
from Al Gore.

Let's just say, for instance, that there is a local quarry which is
off limits, a hazard, fenced and monitored. Some kids break in, one
falls and two are stranded while climbing the cliffs.

In her view, taxes pay for the rescue even if it's a budget buster - I
mean, that's why you pay taxes.

Now watch for the "PROVE THAT I SAID" statement. It will give proof
to the following:

You can't make a logical argument with somebody who view of the world
is inherently illogical.

Permanent PMS - very unfortunate.


What a childish little twit you are.


Animal05 January 7th 07 04:38 PM

Lost American Sailor Located
 
SPAM Avenger wrote:

On 7 Jan 2007 08:17:41 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


EMS and fire services, again, are paid by my tax obligations.



Basskisser The Broad's view of the world is that if she says it's so,
it's so. Anything outside her experience is invalid. She learned it
from Al Gore.

Let's just say, for instance, that there is a local quarry which is
off limits, a hazard, fenced and monitored. Some kids break in, one
falls and two are stranded while climbing the cliffs.

In her view, taxes pay for the rescue even if it's a budget buster - I
mean, that's why you pay taxes.

Now watch for the "PROVE THAT I SAID" statement. It will give proof
to the following:

You can't make a logical argument with somebody who view of the world
is inherently illogical.

Permanent PMS - very unfortunate.


Kevin's taxes don't pay for ems service except for the municipality of
thatt he has his double wide parked.....so unless he never travels more
than a few miles from the double wide, it is a meaningless point (but
then all of his "points" are meaningless)


Reginald P. Smithers III January 7th 07 04:41 PM

Lost American Sailor Located
 
basskisser wrote:
Rick wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...
Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:
I agree. If folks put themselves in harms way intentionally and end
up
needing rescue they should pay the bill. But that should not stop the
effort to save a human life.
I don't know about you, but around here we pay taxes just for those
things. You are putting yourself in harms way every time your furnace
turns on, risk of fire, you know. You are putting yourself in harms way
when you go outside and get your mail, you are always at some sort of
risk. So, again in these parts we pay taxes for fire departments,
emergency services and such.

Not the same. Intentionally putting oneself at undue risk is not the same
as
everyday going-about-your-life risks. (Unless you're a whiny ****bag
"everyone should pay for my mistakes and welfare"
run-the-****ing-country-into-the-ground and
sue-everyone-that-has-any-money
Socialist, I guess)

Need a rescue because you were in an auto accident? Sure thing.
Need a rescue because you were going 110 mph trying to drag race or
outrun
the police? Not on my tax bill, pal.

Need a rescue because your pleasure boat ran aground or ran out of gas?
No
problem.
Need a rescue because you ran through the "graveyard" around Tierra Del
Forego during the stormy season while trying to set a world record? Sure
thing- here's your itemized rescue bill.
You are intentionally putting yourself in harms way every time you get
in your car, go outside to get the mail, get on a plane, go to the
grocery store, plug something into a receptacle, anything.

OK but if you are injured and need help who pays?
1) If you are in a car accident you pay car insurance for just such a
mishap. So in reality you pay.


EMS and fire services are payed by my tax obligations.

2) If you go outside to get the mail, slip, and fall you have home
owners insurance or medical insurance. So in reality you pay.


EMS and fire services are paid by my tax obligations.
3) If you slip and fall in the grocery store - well this is a little
tricky but either your insurance or their insurance will pay. If it is
their insurance - you pay because they charge you a little more on the price
of food for their premiums.


EMS and fire services, again, are paid by my tax obligations.

guess again, you and your insurance company will be billed for EMS and
Fire Services.

Animal05 January 7th 07 04:45 PM

Lost American Sailor Located
 
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Rick wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:

I agree. If folks put themselves in harms way intentionally and end
up
needing rescue they should pay the bill. But that should not
stop the
effort to save a human life.

I don't know about you, but around here we pay taxes just for those
things. You are putting yourself in harms way every time your furnace
turns on, risk of fire, you know. You are putting yourself in
harms way
when you go outside and get your mail, you are always at some sort of
risk. So, again in these parts we pay taxes for fire departments,
emergency services and such.


Not the same. Intentionally putting oneself at undue risk is not
the same
as
everyday going-about-your-life risks. (Unless you're a whiny ****bag
"everyone should pay for my mistakes and welfare"
run-the-****ing-country-into-the-ground and
sue-everyone-that-has-any-money
Socialist, I guess)

Need a rescue because you were in an auto accident? Sure thing.
Need a rescue because you were going 110 mph trying to drag race or
outrun
the police? Not on my tax bill, pal.

Need a rescue because your pleasure boat ran aground or ran out of
gas?
No
problem.
Need a rescue because you ran through the "graveyard" around Tierra
Del
Forego during the stormy season while trying to set a world record?
Sure
thing- here's your itemized rescue bill.

You are intentionally putting yourself in harms way every time you get
in your car, go outside to get the mail, get on a plane, go to the
grocery store, plug something into a receptacle, anything.

OK but if you are injured and need help who pays?
1) If you are in a car accident you pay car insurance for just
such a
mishap. So in reality you pay.



EMS and fire services are payed by my tax obligations.

2) If you go outside to get the mail, slip, and fall you have home
owners insurance or medical insurance. So in reality you pay.



EMS and fire services are paid by my tax obligations.

3) If you slip and fall in the grocery store - well this is a little
tricky but either your insurance or their insurance will pay. If it is
their insurance - you pay because they charge you a little more on
the price
of food for their premiums.



EMS and fire services, again, are paid by my tax obligations.

guess again, you and your insurance company will be billed for EMS and
Fire Services.


Around here, they even bill for police response to car accidents if they
are not a resident of the municipality.

Reginald P. Smithers III January 7th 07 04:56 PM

Lost American Sailor Located
 
Animal05 wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Rick wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:

I agree. If folks put themselves in harms way intentionally and
end
up
needing rescue they should pay the bill. But that should not
stop the
effort to save a human life.

I don't know about you, but around here we pay taxes just for those
things. You are putting yourself in harms way every time your
furnace
turns on, risk of fire, you know. You are putting yourself in
harms way
when you go outside and get your mail, you are always at some
sort of
risk. So, again in these parts we pay taxes for fire departments,
emergency services and such.


Not the same. Intentionally putting oneself at undue risk is not
the same
as
everyday going-about-your-life risks. (Unless you're a whiny ****bag
"everyone should pay for my mistakes and welfare"
run-the-****ing-country-into-the-ground and
sue-everyone-that-has-any-money
Socialist, I guess)

Need a rescue because you were in an auto accident? Sure thing.
Need a rescue because you were going 110 mph trying to drag race or
outrun
the police? Not on my tax bill, pal.

Need a rescue because your pleasure boat ran aground or ran out of
gas?
No
problem.
Need a rescue because you ran through the "graveyard" around
Tierra Del
Forego during the stormy season while trying to set a world
record? Sure
thing- here's your itemized rescue bill.

You are intentionally putting yourself in harms way every time you get
in your car, go outside to get the mail, get on a plane, go to the
grocery store, plug something into a receptacle, anything.

OK but if you are injured and need help who pays?
1) If you are in a car accident you pay car insurance for just
such a
mishap. So in reality you pay.


EMS and fire services are payed by my tax obligations.

2) If you go outside to get the mail, slip, and fall you have home
owners insurance or medical insurance. So in reality you pay.


EMS and fire services are paid by my tax obligations.

3) If you slip and fall in the grocery store - well this is a
little
tricky but either your insurance or their insurance will pay. If it is
their insurance - you pay because they charge you a little more on
the price
of food for their premiums.


EMS and fire services, again, are paid by my tax obligations.

guess again, you and your insurance company will be billed for EMS and
Fire Services.


Around here, they even bill for police response to car accidents if they
are not a resident of the municipality.

and it appears that many agencies are charging for their SAR services:

Utah is not the only place where lost hikers can be billed for rescues.
Several states, including Idaho, Hawaii and New Hampshire, allow
counties to issue bills. Some ski resorts in Oregon, Washington and
Colorado have also charged for rescues.

The National Park Service does not bill for rescues but has considered
it. The agency spent $3 million on rescue costs last year.

State Sen. John Valentine, a Republican who also is a lieutenant for
Utah County Search and Rescue, sponsored a bill in 1997 that created a
fund to reimburse counties for some search-and-rescue costs.

In fiscal year 2003, counties received more than $153,000 from the fund,
but that represented just a fraction of their expenses. Each of Utah's
29 counties calculates its search-and-rescue budget differently, but
costs commonly range from $60,000 to $100,000. Just one difficult search
can shatter the best financial plans.

Collection laws have drawn protest from critics who view rescue
operations as a tax-funded service, just like firefighting.

"It's almost an entitlement," said Golike of the National Search and
Rescue Association.

Green, the Grand County sheriff's sergeant, said sending a bill to a
family who lost a loved one is a "big gray area" that makes him
uncomfortable, "even though it has been done."

He recalled a search for a missing 13-year-old boy that used airplanes
and helicopters, all-terrain vehicles and at least 50 volunteers. The
effort ended four days later when searchers found the boy's body.

The boy's family received a bill for tens of thousands of dollars.

"They paid as much as they could," Green said.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...searches_x.htm


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com