Trouble shooting a bad back
 

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:

You just don't get it, do you?

You are partially right, I don't get ... you. But why should I , you
really don't exit, so I suppose I'm typing words on a subject that
doesn't matter, to someone who never was.

. Personally, I'd be the first one to tell ANY person here that
acted like as childish, as nasty, as dishonest, as mean spirited as
JimH to quit.

As if you haven't followed JimH around and verbally blasted him
continually, because you said he "needed punished" and that's not
childish?


But if I was to say
he was selling meth, manufacturing meth, using meth, giving meth to his
children, selling his wife's ass to supply his habit, beating his wife,
ALL without ANY bit of evidence, that would be okay???

Sure, you can say anything you want. , but it is a free country, and
this is a public forum, and you do have freedom of speech. Because of
your own set standard of namecalling and lack of credibility works only
on others, and never yourself, you can use all the vulgarities you
want, too. No one is going to stop you.

I'm really suprised you have to ask me for aproval.


Wait, I might have finally figured out this subject, I think Bassy
didn't mean "Trouble shooting" a bad back, which doesn't make any sense
at all, but it is possible he meant "Troubleshooting" a bad back, but
that still doesn't make any sense based upon his post, which didn't talk
about anyone's bad back and how to "troubleshoot" their problem.

Bassy what does this subject and post mean?

It's a play on words......think......deeply.......
It just MIGHT come to you......

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:


You just don't get it, do you?

You are partially right, I don't get ... you. But why should I , you
really don't exit, so I suppose I'm typing words on a subject that
doesn't matter, to someone who never was.

. Personally, I'd be the first one to tell ANY person here that
acted like as childish, as nasty, as dishonest, as mean spirited as
JimH to quit.

As if you haven't followed JimH around and verbally blasted him
continually, because you said he "needed punished" and that's not
childish?


But if I was to say
he was selling meth, manufacturing meth, using meth, giving meth to his
children, selling his wife's ass to supply his habit, beating his wife,
ALL without ANY bit of evidence, that would be okay???

Sure, you can say anything you want. , but it is a free country, and
this is a public forum, and you do have freedom of speech. Because of
your own set standard of namecalling and lack of credibility works only
on others, and never yourself, you can use all the vulgarities you
want, too. No one is going to stop you.

I'm really suprised you have to ask me for aproval.

So, here's a really simple question. Do you, or do you not condone
JimH's actions like lying, wild criminal allegations about me, my wife
and my family?

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On 5 Jan 2007 06:56:28 -0800, "Tim" wrote:


basskisser wrote:
Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:

I wonder what he holds against all of you.

at least to me?

nothing.

Then why do you condone his actions such as lying about people, saying
untrue and nasty things about one's self, wife and kids? Why do you
condone someone who spreads untrue and wild allegations about criminal
activities? Would you like it if someone did those things to you? Do
you think someone who would stoop so low as to bring your wife and kids
into a discussion just to talk nasty about them is the kind of person
you want to associate with? Do you think that someone who would turn on
you in a heartbeat (think JohnH) and do the exact same to you is the
kind of person you want as a friend?

I wish basskisser would notice how much time and effort I've devoted to
JimH since his little backstabbing soiree.

Not much!
--

John

I donated to the Susan Komen fund on behalf of your daughter.
No you didn't. You were one of the very few here who wouldn't donate.

Then why is my name on the back of the t-shirt John, his daughter and
their team wore?

Sorry guy but you are wrong as usual.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

JimH wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On 5 Jan 2007 06:56:28 -0800, "Tim" wrote:


basskisser wrote:
Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:

I wonder what he holds against all of you.

at least to me?

nothing.

Then why do you condone his actions such as lying about people, saying
untrue and nasty things about one's self, wife and kids? Why do you
condone someone who spreads untrue and wild allegations about criminal
activities? Would you like it if someone did those things to you? Do
you think someone who would stoop so low as to bring your wife and kids
into a discussion just to talk nasty about them is the kind of person
you want to associate with? Do you think that someone who would turn on
you in a heartbeat (think JohnH) and do the exact same to you is the
kind of person you want as a friend?

I wish basskisser would notice how much time and effort I've devoted to
JimH since his little backstabbing soiree.

Not much!
--

John

I donated to the Susan Komen fund on behalf of your daughter.
No you didn't. You were one of the very few here who wouldn't donate.

Then why is my name on the back of the t-shirt John, his daughter and
their team wore?

Sorry guy but you are wrong as usual.

You refused right here, or was you lying again? And I thought I was
killfiled, another lie from the biggest liar in usenet?
Go back into hiding, low life. Did you notice that not ONE person ever
asked where you were? Everyone just reveled in the peace....

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

basskisser wrote:
Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:


You just don't get it, do you?

You are partially right, I don't get ... you. But why should I , you
really don't exit, so I suppose I'm typing words on a subject that
doesn't matter, to someone who never was.

. Personally, I'd be the first one to tell ANY person here that
acted like as childish, as nasty, as dishonest, as mean spirited as
JimH to quit.

As if you haven't followed JimH around and verbally blasted him
continually, because you said he "needed punished" and that's not
childish?


But if I was to say
he was selling meth, manufacturing meth, using meth, giving meth to his
children, selling his wife's ass to supply his habit, beating his wife,
ALL without ANY bit of evidence, that would be okay???

Sure, you can say anything you want. , but it is a free country, and
this is a public forum, and you do have freedom of speech. Because of
your own set standard of namecalling and lack of credibility works only
on others, and never yourself, you can use all the vulgarities you
want, too. No one is going to stop you.

I'm really suprised you have to ask me for aproval.

So, here's a really simple question. Do you, or do you not condone
JimH's actions like lying, wild criminal allegations about me, my wife
and my family?

Will you grow up and drop it already? You talk about folks stalking
you............when you are doing, and have been doing, the very same
thing to me.

You accuse others of using nasty language and insults when you spend
your day here doing those very things.

Folks are fed up with you. Time to change your attitude and
contribute positively to the group.

Tom has asked you.

Gene has asked you.

Several others have asked you.

If you can't change then please leave. If you can't leave then at
least leave me alone.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

basskisser wrote:
So, here's a really simple question. Do you, or do you not condone
JimH's actions like lying, wild criminal allegations about me, my wife
and my family?

So, here's a really simple reply.

Evidently you missed my second posting to this odd thread where I said:

"As far as condoning his actions? I'm not condoning anything. .."

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On 5 Jan 2007 06:56:28 -0800, "Tim" wrote:

basskisser wrote:
Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:

I wonder what he holds against all of you.
at least to me?

nothing.
Then why do you condone his actions such as lying about people, saying
untrue and nasty things about one's self, wife and kids? Why do you
condone someone who spreads untrue and wild allegations about criminal
activities? Would you like it if someone did those things to you? Do
you think someone who would stoop so low as to bring your wife and kids
into a discussion just to talk nasty about them is the kind of person
you want to associate with? Do you think that someone who would turn on
you in a heartbeat (think JohnH) and do the exact same to you is the
kind of person you want as a friend?
I wish basskisser would notice how much time and effort I've devoted to
JimH since his little backstabbing soiree.

Not much!
--

John
I donated to the Susan Komen fund on behalf of your daughter.
No you didn't. You were one of the very few here who wouldn't donate.
Then why is my name on the back of the t-shirt John, his daughter and
their team wore?

Sorry guy but you are wrong as usual.

You refused right here, or was you lying again? And I thought I was
killfiled, another lie from the biggest liar in usenet?
Go back into hiding, low life. Did you notice that not ONE person ever
asked where you were? Everyone just reveled in the peace....

I have to agree with Bassy when he said:

It's often noted that people with an infatuation complex will, when
shunned by the person they are stalking, often turn against the very
person they are enamored with.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

JimH wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:


You just don't get it, do you?

You are partially right, I don't get ... you. But why should I , you
really don't exit, so I suppose I'm typing words on a subject that
doesn't matter, to someone who never was.

. Personally, I'd be the first one to tell ANY person here that
acted like as childish, as nasty, as dishonest, as mean spirited as
JimH to quit.

As if you haven't followed JimH around and verbally blasted him
continually, because you said he "needed punished" and that's not
childish?


But if I was to say
he was selling meth, manufacturing meth, using meth, giving meth to his
children, selling his wife's ass to supply his habit, beating his wife,
ALL without ANY bit of evidence, that would be okay???

Sure, you can say anything you want. , but it is a free country, and
this is a public forum, and you do have freedom of speech. Because of
your own set standard of namecalling and lack of credibility works only
on others, and never yourself, you can use all the vulgarities you
want, too. No one is going to stop you.

I'm really suprised you have to ask me for aproval.

So, here's a really simple question. Do you, or do you not condone
JimH's actions like lying, wild criminal allegations about me, my wife
and my family?

Will you grow up and drop it already? You talk about folks stalking
you............when you are doing, and have been doing, the very same
thing to me.

You accuse others of using nasty language and insults when you spend
your day here doing those very things.

Folks are fed up with you. Time to change your attitude and
contribute positively to the group.

Tom has asked you.

Gene has asked you.

Several others have asked you.

If you can't change then please leave. If you can't leave then at
least leave me alone.

Do you care to answer the question? YOU are the one who lied about me.
Are you denying that? YOU are the one who made wild, untrue criminal
allegations about me, my wife and my kids. Are you denying that? Do you
think that anybody that has a soul, or a brain, that makes those kinds
of lies and allegations someone who people should look up to? In doing
that **** over and over again, you proved just what a low life you are.
Now you think people should just ignore your crap? You came back here
with the sole purpose of stirring up ****, and that's just what you
did, instantly upon your return. Did you notice that not ONE SINGLE
PERSON asked and wondered where you were? Do you have any idea why?
Because of your lies and criminal allegations about me, you get less
respect here than Skipper!

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:

You just don't get it, do you?
You are partially right, I don't get ... you. But why should I , you
really don't exit, so I suppose I'm typing words on a subject that
doesn't matter, to someone who never was.

. Personally, I'd be the first one to tell ANY person here that
acted like as childish, as nasty, as dishonest, as mean spirited as
JimH to quit.
As if you haven't followed JimH around and verbally blasted him
continually, because you said he "needed punished" and that's not
childish?


But if I was to say
he was selling meth, manufacturing meth, using meth, giving meth to his
children, selling his wife's ass to supply his habit, beating his wife,
ALL without ANY bit of evidence, that would be okay???
Sure, you can say anything you want. , but it is a free country, and
this is a public forum, and you do have freedom of speech. Because of
your own set standard of namecalling and lack of credibility works only
on others, and never yourself, you can use all the vulgarities you
want, too. No one is going to stop you.

I'm really suprised you have to ask me for aproval.
So, here's a really simple question. Do you, or do you not condone
JimH's actions like lying, wild criminal allegations about me, my wife
and my family?
Will you grow up and drop it already? You talk about folks stalking
you............when you are doing, and have been doing, the very same
thing to me.

You accuse others of using nasty language and insults when you spend
your day here doing those very things.

Folks are fed up with you. Time to change your attitude and
contribute positively to the group.

Tom has asked you.

Gene has asked you.

Several others have asked you.

If you can't change then please leave. If you can't leave then at
least leave me alone.

Do you care to answer the question? YOU are the one who lied about me.
Are you denying that? YOU are the one who made wild, untrue criminal
allegations about me, my wife and my kids. Are you denying that? Do you
think that anybody that has a soul, or a brain, that makes those kinds
of lies and allegations someone who people should look up to? In doing
that **** over and over again, you proved just what a low life you are.
Now you think people should just ignore your crap? You came back here
with the sole purpose of stirring up ****, and that's just what you
did, instantly upon your return. Did you notice that not ONE SINGLE
PERSON asked and wondered where you were? Do you have any idea why?
Because of your lies and criminal allegations about me, you get less
respect here than Skipper!


Bassy,
Why don't you show JimH how much everyone likes you, and take a month
off, so we can wonder where you are.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

basskisser wrote:

JimH wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Tim wrote:

basskisser wrote:

You just don't get it, do you?

You are partially right, I don't get ... you. But why should I , you
really don't exit, so I suppose I'm typing words on a subject that
doesn't matter, to someone who never was.

. Personally, I'd be the first one to tell ANY person here that

acted like as childish, as nasty, as dishonest, as mean spirited as
JimH to quit.

As if you haven't followed JimH around and verbally blasted him
continually, because you said he "needed punished" and that's not
childish?


But if I was to say
he was selling meth, manufacturing meth, using meth, giving meth
to his
children, selling his wife's ass to supply his habit, beating his
wife,
ALL without ANY bit of evidence, that would be okay???

Sure, you can say anything you want. , but it is a free country, and
this is a public forum, and you do have freedom of speech. Because of
your own set standard of namecalling and lack of credibility works
only
on others, and never yourself, you can use all the vulgarities you
want, too. No one is going to stop you.

I'm really suprised you have to ask me for aproval.

So, here's a really simple question. Do you, or do you not condone
JimH's actions like lying, wild criminal allegations about me, my wife
and my family?

Will you grow up and drop it already? You talk about folks stalking
you............when you are doing, and have been doing, the very same
thing to me.

You accuse others of using nasty language and insults when you spend
your day here doing those very things.

Folks are fed up with you. Time to change your attitude and
contribute positively to the group.

Tom has asked you.

Gene has asked you.

Several others have asked you.

If you can't change then please leave. If you can't leave then at
least leave me alone.


Do you care to answer the question? YOU are the one who lied about me.
Are you denying that? YOU are the one who made wild, untrue criminal
allegations about me, my wife and my kids. Are you denying that? Do you
think that anybody that has a soul, or a brain, that makes those kinds
of lies and allegations someone who people should look up to? In doing
that **** over and over again, you proved just what a low life you are.
Now you think people should just ignore your crap? You came back here
with the sole purpose of stirring up ****, and that's just what you
did, instantly upon your return. Did you notice that not ONE SINGLE
PERSON asked and wondered where you were? Do you have any idea why?
Because of your lies and criminal allegations about me, you get less
respect here than Skipper!


Bassy,
Why don't you show JimH how much everyone likes you, and take a month
off, so we can wonder where you are.

The graduate from "Penn Tech" is the expert on not being respected.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:32:00 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On 5 Jan 2007 06:56:28 -0800, "Tim" wrote:

basskisser wrote:
Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:

I wonder what he holds against all of you.
at least to me?

nothing.
Then why do you condone his actions such as lying about people, saying
untrue and nasty things about one's self, wife and kids? Why do you
condone someone who spreads untrue and wild allegations about criminal
activities? Would you like it if someone did those things to you? Do
you think someone who would stoop so low as to bring your wife and kids
into a discussion just to talk nasty about them is the kind of person
you want to associate with? Do you think that someone who would turn on
you in a heartbeat (think JohnH) and do the exact same to you is the
kind of person you want as a friend?
I wish basskisser would notice how much time and effort I've devoted to
JimH since his little backstabbing soiree.

Not much!
--

John
I donated to the Susan Komen fund on behalf of your daughter.
No you didn't. You were one of the very few here who wouldn't donate.
Then why is my name on the back of the t-shirt John, his daughter and
their team wore?

Sorry guy but you are wrong as usual.

You refused right here, or was you lying again? And I thought I was
killfiled, another lie from the biggest liar in usenet?
Go back into hiding, low life. Did you notice that not ONE person ever
asked where you were? Everyone just reveled in the peace....

I have to agree with Bassy when he said:

It's often noted that people with an infatuation complex will, when
shunned by the person they are stalking, often turn against the very
person they are enamored with.

Reggie, what would I do without you? Why, I'd have missed these wonderful
posts by basskisser and JimH. Now, for the record:

First, JimH *did* make a contribution to the cancer foundation. His lying
and false allegations were made after he made his contribution, when the
little green jealousy bug got him. (Just as it gets him with anyone who is
respected here.)

Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:32:00 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On 5 Jan 2007 06:56:28 -0800, "Tim" wrote:

basskisser wrote:
Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:

I wonder what he holds against all of you.
at least to me?

nothing.
Then why do you condone his actions such as lying about people, saying
untrue and nasty things about one's self, wife and kids? Why do you
condone someone who spreads untrue and wild allegations about criminal
activities? Would you like it if someone did those things to you? Do
you think someone who would stoop so low as to bring your wife and kids
into a discussion just to talk nasty about them is the kind of person
you want to associate with? Do you think that someone who would turn on
you in a heartbeat (think JohnH) and do the exact same to you is the
kind of person you want as a friend?
I wish basskisser would notice how much time and effort I've devoted to
JimH since his little backstabbing soiree.

Not much!
--

John
I donated to the Susan Komen fund on behalf of your daughter.
No you didn't. You were one of the very few here who wouldn't donate.
Then why is my name on the back of the t-shirt John, his daughter and
their team wore?

Sorry guy but you are wrong as usual.

You refused right here, or was you lying again? And I thought I was
killfiled, another lie from the biggest liar in usenet?
Go back into hiding, low life. Did you notice that not ONE person ever
asked where you were? Everyone just reveled in the peace....

I have to agree with Bassy when he said:

It's often noted that people with an infatuation complex will, when
shunned by the person they are stalking, often turn against the very
person they are enamored with.

Reggie, what would I do without you? Why, I'd have missed these wonderful
posts by basskisser and JimH. Now, for the record:

First, JimH *did* make a contribution to the cancer foundation. His lying
and false allegations were made after he made his contribution, when the
little green jealousy bug got him. (Just as it gets him with anyone who is
respected here.)

Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John

Well maybe you will miss this one too.

Go find a golfing NG John. You have nothing to offer here.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

SPAM Avenger wrote:
On 6 Jan 2007 06:45:38 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


SPAM Avenger wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 16:22:48 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Come to rec.boats, and do nothing but stir ****, then whine about your
poor little back. Make sure that you killfile someone, then like a
coward, talk **** about them knowing they can't reply.

What does "Trouble shooting a bad back" mean in English?
Only a sick person would make fun of anothers medical condition. Kevin
needs serious psychological help.
Karma. You deserve everything you get. Maybe you'll quit your incessant
lying about others, liar.

Who is shooting whose back and why is he having trouble doing it?

You just don't get it, do you?

No, I don't.

Basskisser is really a woman.

Think about it - look back at the posts over the past year.

Bassy is a woman - no doubt about it.

And you're an idiot.

Definitely a woman. Worse yet, permanent PMS.

Try some Midol.

Defintely a child. Worse yet, a dumb child. Try giving mommy back her
computer.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

JimH wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:32:00 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On 5 Jan 2007 06:56:28 -0800, "Tim" wrote:

basskisser wrote:
Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:

I wonder what he holds against all of you.
at least to me?

nothing.
Then why do you condone his actions such as lying about people, saying
untrue and nasty things about one's self, wife and kids? Why do you
condone someone who spreads untrue and wild allegations about criminal
activities? Would you like it if someone did those things to you? Do
you think someone who would stoop so low as to bring your wife and kids
into a discussion just to talk nasty about them is the kind of person
you want to associate with? Do you think that someone who would turn on
you in a heartbeat (think JohnH) and do the exact same to you is the
kind of person you want as a friend?
I wish basskisser would notice how much time and effort I've devoted to
JimH since his little backstabbing soiree.

Not much!
--

John
I donated to the Susan Komen fund on behalf of your daughter.
No you didn't. You were one of the very few here who wouldn't donate.
Then why is my name on the back of the t-shirt John, his daughter and
their team wore?

Sorry guy but you are wrong as usual.

You refused right here, or was you lying again? And I thought I was
killfiled, another lie from the biggest liar in usenet?
Go back into hiding, low life. Did you notice that not ONE person ever
asked where you were? Everyone just reveled in the peace....

I have to agree with Bassy when he said:

It's often noted that people with an infatuation complex will, when
shunned by the person they are stalking, often turn against the very
person they are enamored with.

Reggie, what would I do without you? Why, I'd have missed these wonderful
posts by basskisser and JimH. Now, for the record:

First, JimH *did* make a contribution to the cancer foundation. His lying
and false allegations were made after he made his contribution, when the
little green jealousy bug got him. (Just as it gets him with anyone who is
respected here.)

Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John

Well maybe you will miss this one too.

Go find a golfing NG John. You have nothing to offer here.

Jim, what have you offered since your return?

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

SPAM Avenger wrote:
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:29:18 -0500, JohnH wrote:

Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.

Basskisser, being a fine example of womanhood, deserves a new name.

Why? Well she's living out a fantasy life here where all her thoughts
and comments are considered by her to be reasoned and the sheer number
of posts means that she has an active social life - albeit a negative
one.

Thus, in the Grand Tradition of Fantasy Role Playing - which is
Basskisser's realm - Basskisser shall change names and become a new
character.

That character is:



Wait for it


Wait for it


Wait for it


BASSKISSER THE BROAD!!

Description: Basskisser The Broad isn't a traditional fantasy
character in the sense of over whelming intellect, speed of thought or
reasoned logic. In fact, compared to other characters, Basskisser The
Broad is fairly, and almost universally, considered one of the weaker
fantasy characters.

However, Basskisser The Broad does have an advantage that other
characters don't - words. Sheer, unmitigated, uncontrolled and over
powering amounts of words. Words in combinations that have never been
seen in the fantasy universe.

Profile:

Hit Points: Unlimited. Doesn't shut up.
Comprehension: None - complete inability to read.
Sentence Construction: Marginal.
Insult Level: Unlimited
Health: Mental - Unstable. Physical - Unknown
Healing: Low - inability to admit error
Babble factor: Unlimited.

General Usage:

Basskisser the Broad has limited use in normal discussion. However,
she can be effective in destroying any reasoned debate by the use of
key words and phrases such as Al Gore Invented the Internet or Global
Warming. Or combinations such as Al Gore Invented Global Warming. Any
combination of common liberal key words will set her off.

Be aware that Basskisser The Broad has a natural opponent in Dan The
Dim. However, if a slight reasoned debate truce between opponents can
be arranged, it is possible for you to set Basskisser The Broad
against Dan The Dim allowing for you and another debate opponent(s) to
walk off allowing Basskisser The Broad to babble on distracted and not
noticing anything outside her current situation.

Awe, how cute! Now give mommy back her computer before you get spanked,
little guy.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
snip...
Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John

There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz but do applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class by themselves.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:41 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
snip...
Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John

There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz but do applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class by themselves.


Wrong.
--

John

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:41 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
. ..
snip...

Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John

There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz but do applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class by themselves.



Wrong.

It is obvious who is in a class all by themselves in polluting this NG

This month's top posters

103 basskisser
63
49
47
43
41
35
33 JimH
27
24

All time top posters

12864
12093 basskisser
9354
8766
8612
8507
6632
6359
5927
5425

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:41 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
. ..
snip...
Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not
at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John

There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz but do
applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class by
themselves.


Wrong.
--

John

Really? I thought about this and decided that Calif Bill & Jack Goff would
have to be in a slightly higher catagory only because they actually own
boats and do boat on occasion. (at least I think they do)

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 10:25:44 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


Bilious Bill is a boater and fisherman, no doubt about it.
Jackoff is just...a jackoff.

He probably thinks you're quite neat also and is thankful that you will
deign to call him names!
--

John

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 1/7/2007 10:17 AM, Don White wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:41 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
snip...
Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not
at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John
There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz but do
applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class by
themselves.

Wrong.
--

John

Really? I thought about this and decided that Calif Bill & Jack Goff
would have to be in a slightly higher catagory only because they actually
own boats and do boat on occasion. (at least I think they do)


Bilious Bill is a boater and fisherman, no doubt about it.
Jackoff is just...a jackoff.

Hows the Lobsta boat?

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

Gene Kearns wrote:
On 5 Jan 2007 13:23:01 -0800, JimH penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

I have really tried to ignore the boy. I have him killfiled and the
only time I see his posts is when someone responds to him.

Really?

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/

Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats

Really. How many times have I responded directly to him? He had been
killfiled until yesterday.

Also compare the number of times I referenced him or indirectly
responded to something he posted.

A clue......take a look at who started this thread and who it was
about. Also look at the fact that the boy makes fun of my medical
condition and upcoming surgery.

So what exactly is your point Gene?

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

JimH wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote:
On 5 Jan 2007 13:23:01 -0800, JimH penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

I have really tried to ignore the boy. I have him killfiled and the
only time I see his posts is when someone responds to him.

Really?

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/

Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats

Really. How many times have I responded directly to him? He had been
killfiled until yesterday.

Compare the number of times I referenced him or indirectly
responded to something he posted. Now look at the number of times he has launched attacks on me or posted mean spirited things about me. Up until yesterday I only saw the ones folks respond to but those alone were quite plentiful.

A clue......take a look at who started this thread and who it was
about. Also look at the fact that he sunk so low as to make fun of my medical
condition and upcoming surgery.

So what exactly is your point Gene?

Edit

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

JimH wrote:
JimH wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote:
On 5 Jan 2007 13:23:01 -0800, JimH penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

I have really tried to ignore the boy. I have him killfiled and the
only time I see his posts is when someone responds to him.
Really?

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/

Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats
Really. How many times have I responded directly to him? He had been
killfiled until yesterday.

Compare the number of times I referenced him or indirectly
responded to something he posted. Now look at the number of times he has launched attacks on me or posted mean spirited things about me. Up until yesterday I only saw the ones folks respond to but those alone were quite plentiful.

A clue......take a look at who started this thread and who it was
about. Also look at the fact that he sunk so low as to make fun of my medical
condition and upcoming surgery.

So what exactly is your point Gene?

Edit

I was wondering if you "really" had him kill filtered. Most people who
talk about their killfilteres really don't have one.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

Calif Bill wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 1/7/2007 10:17 AM, Don White wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:41 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
snip...
Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're not
at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John
There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz but do
applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class by
themselves.

Wrong.
--

John

Really? I thought about this and decided that Calif Bill & Jack Goff
would have to be in a slightly higher catagory only because they actually
own boats and do boat on occasion. (at least I think they do)


Bilious Bill is a boater and fisherman, no doubt about it.
Jackoff is just...a jackoff.

Hows the Lobsta boat?

Probably as good as that pig Evinrude snowmobile that had a 35hp Wankel
and did 70 mph.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 15:41:17 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

JimH wrote:
JimH wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote:
On 5 Jan 2007 13:23:01 -0800, JimH penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

I have really tried to ignore the boy. I have him killfiled and the
only time I see his posts is when someone responds to him.
Really?

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/

Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats
Really. How many times have I responded directly to him? He had been
killfiled until yesterday.

Compare the number of times I referenced him or indirectly
responded to something he posted. Now look at the number of times he has launched attacks on me or posted mean spirited things about me. Up until yesterday I only saw the ones folks respond to but those alone were quite plentiful.

A clue......take a look at who started this thread and who it was
about. Also look at the fact that he sunk so low as to make fun of my medical
condition and upcoming surgery.

So what exactly is your point Gene?

Edit

I was wondering if you "really" had him kill filtered. Most people who
talk about their killfilteres really don't have one.

They ought a' invest in Agent!
--

John

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

JimH wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote:
On 5 Jan 2007 13:23:01 -0800, JimH penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

I have really tried to ignore the boy. I have him killfiled and the
only time I see his posts is when someone responds to him.

Really?

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/

Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats

Really. How many times have I responded directly to him? He had been
killfiled until yesterday.

Also compare the number of times I referenced him or indirectly
responded to something he posted.

A clue......take a look at who started this thread and who it was
about. Also look at the fact that the boy makes fun of my medical
condition and upcoming surgery.

So what exactly is your point Gene?

Jim, just yesterday you replied directly to me. How did you do that?

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 1/7/2007 10:17 AM, Don White wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:41 GMT, "Don White"

wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
snip...
Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're
not
at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John
There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz but do
applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class by
themselves.

Wrong.
--

John

Really? I thought about this and decided that Calif Bill & Jack Goff
would have to be in a slightly higher catagory only because they
actually
own boats and do boat on occasion. (at least I think they do)


Bilious Bill is a boater and fisherman, no doubt about it.
Jackoff is just...a jackoff.

Hows the Lobsta boat?

Probably as good as that pig Evinrude snowmobile that had a 35hp Wankel
and did 70 mph.


What the F' are you so F'n stupid that you do not know that snowmobiles went
over 80 mph? I guess you just come here to get in a fight with everybody
and anybody.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 1/7/2007 10:17 AM, Don White wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:41 GMT, "Don White"

wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
snip...
Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't. You're
not
at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John
There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz but do
applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class by
themselves.

Wrong.
--

John

Really? I thought about this and decided that Calif Bill & Jack Goff
would have to be in a slightly higher catagory only because they
actually
own boats and do boat on occasion. (at least I think they do)


Bilious Bill is a boater and fisherman, no doubt about it.
Jackoff is just...a jackoff.

Hows the Lobsta boat?

Probably as good as that pig Evinrude snowmobile that had a 35hp Wankel
and did 70 mph.


What the F' are you so F'n stupid that you do not know that snowmobiles went
over 80 mph? I guess you just come here to get in a fight with everybody
and anybody.

An Evinrude with a 35hp Wankel NEVER went 80mph!!!! NEVER. You were
talking about a specific very heavy snowmobile. They were noted to be
pigs. I raced snowmobiles for several years. Yes, there are/were
snowmobiles that went over 80mph. But your Evinrude with the 35 hp
Wankel NEVER did. It may have seen half of 80 on a good snow day,
downhill.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

JimH wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote:
On 5 Jan 2007 13:23:01 -0800, JimH penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

I have really tried to ignore the boy. I have him killfiled and the
only time I see his posts is when someone responds to him.

Really?

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/

Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats

Really. How many times have I responded directly to him? He had been
killfiled until yesterday.

Also compare the number of times I referenced him or indirectly
responded to something he posted.

A clue......take a look at who started this thread and who it was
about. Also look at the fact that the boy makes fun of my medical
condition and upcoming surgery.

If I'm just a "boy", how come you reneged on meeting me when I was in
Loraine?

Also, please show where I made "fun" of your medical condition? I
simply stated that because of your horrid actions concerning me, my
wife and my kids, you are deserving. Also the human body is an amazing
machine, if you take care of it.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

wrote:
On 7 Jan 2007 12:01:46 -0800, "JimH" wrote:

A clue......take a look at who started this thread and who it was
about. Also look at the fact that the boy makes fun of my medical
condition and upcoming surgery.

So what exactly is your point Gene?

I guess my point has three parts.

1) Who ends these ****ing contests is a lot more important than who
starts them. He isn't going to post to you about the weather.... he's
going to post something that gets a rise out of you..... No, I said
that wrong.... he's going to post something that you let him get a
rise out of you....

2) After about one exchange, this back and forth becomes self
perpetuating (and not to mention, absolutely pointless) and serves
absolutely no purpose other than to get the other person to angrily
post back.....

3) This is between the two of you. I challenge either or both of you
to give me *one* good reason this little private squabble between you
two should be held publicly, when email would be MUCH more
appropriate.

That is my point. Am I wrong?
--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

eMail


Homepage
http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/

Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats
-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------

Yes. I am not the one perpetuating it. This thread is a prime example.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 1/7/2007 10:17 AM, Don White wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:41 GMT, "Don White"

wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
snip...
Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't.
You're
not
at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John
There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz but
do
applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class by
themselves.

Wrong.
--

John

Really? I thought about this and decided that Calif Bill & Jack
Goff
would have to be in a slightly higher catagory only because they
actually
own boats and do boat on occasion. (at least I think they do)


Bilious Bill is a boater and fisherman, no doubt about it.
Jackoff is just...a jackoff.

Hows the Lobsta boat?

Probably as good as that pig Evinrude snowmobile that had a 35hp Wankel
and did 70 mph.


What the F' are you so F'n stupid that you do not know that snowmobiles
went
over 80 mph? I guess you just come here to get in a fight with everybody
and anybody.

An Evinrude with a 35hp Wankel NEVER went 80mph!!!! NEVER. You were
talking about a specific very heavy snowmobile. They were noted to be
pigs. I raced snowmobiles for several years. Yes, there are/were
snowmobiles that went over 80mph. But your Evinrude with the 35 hp
Wankel NEVER did. It may have seen half of 80 on a good snow day,
downhill.


Mabe with your fat ass aboard. Prove you raced snowmobiles!

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 1/7/2007 10:17 AM, Don White wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:41 GMT, "Don White"

wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
snip...
Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't.
You're
not
at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John
There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz but
do
applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class by
themselves.

Wrong.
--

John

Really? I thought about this and decided that Calif Bill & Jack
Goff
would have to be in a slightly higher catagory only because they
actually
own boats and do boat on occasion. (at least I think they do)


Bilious Bill is a boater and fisherman, no doubt about it.
Jackoff is just...a jackoff.

Hows the Lobsta boat?

Probably as good as that pig Evinrude snowmobile that had a 35hp Wankel
and did 70 mph.


What the F' are you so F'n stupid that you do not know that snowmobiles
went
over 80 mph? I guess you just come here to get in a fight with everybody
and anybody.

An Evinrude with a 35hp Wankel NEVER went 80mph!!!! NEVER. You were
talking about a specific very heavy snowmobile. They were noted to be
pigs. I raced snowmobiles for several years. Yes, there are/were
snowmobiles that went over 80mph. But your Evinrude with the 35 hp
Wankel NEVER did. It may have seen half of 80 on a good snow day,
downhill.


Mabe with your fat ass aboard. Prove you raced snowmobiles!

Bill, are you really saying that an 70's model Evinrude (very heavy)
with a 35hp Wankel went 80mph with ANYONE aboard? By the way, I weigh
in at 165. But, alas, you lied. That Evinrude MIGHT get 45mph out of
it. MAYBE.

I'll see if I can dig up some pictures of my racing days.

But, I want to see how you think that that particular snowmobile would
do 80. My last racing sled weighed about half of what your Evinrude
did, was powered by a twin 440 Rotax, twin carbs, expansion chamber
exhaust, cleated track, etc, etc, and IT never saw 80mph.

Now did you lie when you said that your Evinrude snowmobile went 80mph,
or was you just wrong as usual?

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 1/7/2007 10:17 AM, Don White wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:41 GMT, "Don White"

wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
snip...
Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't.
You're
not
at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John
There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz
but
do
applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class
by
themselves.

Wrong.
--

John

Really? I thought about this and decided that Calif Bill & Jack
Goff
would have to be in a slightly higher catagory only because they
actually
own boats and do boat on occasion. (at least I think they do)


Bilious Bill is a boater and fisherman, no doubt about it.
Jackoff is just...a jackoff.

Hows the Lobsta boat?

Probably as good as that pig Evinrude snowmobile that had a 35hp
Wankel
and did 70 mph.


What the F' are you so F'n stupid that you do not know that
snowmobiles
went
over 80 mph? I guess you just come here to get in a fight with
everybody
and anybody.

An Evinrude with a 35hp Wankel NEVER went 80mph!!!! NEVER. You were
talking about a specific very heavy snowmobile. They were noted to be
pigs. I raced snowmobiles for several years. Yes, there are/were
snowmobiles that went over 80mph. But your Evinrude with the 35 hp
Wankel NEVER did. It may have seen half of 80 on a good snow day,
downhill.


Mabe with your fat ass aboard. Prove you raced snowmobiles!

Bill, are you really saying that an 70's model Evinrude (very heavy)
with a 35hp Wankel went 80mph with ANYONE aboard? By the way, I weigh
in at 165. But, alas, you lied. That Evinrude MIGHT get 45mph out of
it. MAYBE.

I'll see if I can dig up some pictures of my racing days.

But, I want to see how you think that that particular snowmobile would
do 80. My last racing sled weighed about half of what your Evinrude
did, was powered by a twin 440 Rotax, twin carbs, expansion chamber
exhaust, cleated track, etc, etc, and IT never saw 80mph.

Now did you lie when you said that your Evinrude snowmobile went 80mph,
or was you just wrong as usual?


You drove a slug.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 1/7/2007 10:17 AM, Don White wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:41 GMT, "Don White"

wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
snip...
Second, Reggie, you are agitating basskisser. Please don't.
You're
not
at
the Dan, Don White, JimH, PFritz, etc. level.


--

John
There you go again. I resent being compared to Dan, or Fritz
but
do
applaud
you for at least mentioning their names. They are in a class
by
themselves.

Wrong.
--

John

Really? I thought about this and decided that Calif Bill & Jack
Goff
would have to be in a slightly higher catagory only because they
actually
own boats and do boat on occasion. (at least I think they do)


Bilious Bill is a boater and fisherman, no doubt about it.
Jackoff is just...a jackoff.

Hows the Lobsta boat?

Probably as good as that pig Evinrude snowmobile that had a 35hp
Wankel
and did 70 mph.


What the F' are you so F'n stupid that you do not know that
snowmobiles
went
over 80 mph? I guess you just come here to get in a fight with
everybody
and anybody.

An Evinrude with a 35hp Wankel NEVER went 80mph!!!! NEVER. You were
talking about a specific very heavy snowmobile. They were noted to be
pigs. I raced snowmobiles for several years. Yes, there are/were
snowmobiles that went over 80mph. But your Evinrude with the 35 hp
Wankel NEVER did. It may have seen half of 80 on a good snow day,
downhill.


Mabe with your fat ass aboard. Prove you raced snowmobiles!

Bill, are you really saying that an 70's model Evinrude (very heavy)
with a 35hp Wankel went 80mph with ANYONE aboard? By the way, I weigh
in at 165. But, alas, you lied. That Evinrude MIGHT get 45mph out of
it. MAYBE.

I'll see if I can dig up some pictures of my racing days.

But, I want to see how you think that that particular snowmobile would
do 80. My last racing sled weighed about half of what your Evinrude
did, was powered by a twin 440 Rotax, twin carbs, expansion chamber
exhaust, cleated track, etc, etc, and IT never saw 80mph.

Now did you lie when you said that your Evinrude snowmobile went 80mph,
or was you just wrong as usual?


You drove a slug.

If you think that, then you're even dumber than previously thought.
I've still got the trophies to prove it. I even held the local track
record for half a season. Now, again, were you lying about your 35hp
Wankel in a pig of an Evinrude that did 80mph, or were you just wrong
as usual?

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

By the way, I weigh in at 165....

A scrawny man, or an overweight woman?

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

John Blum wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

By the way, I weigh in at 165....

A scrawny man, or an overweight woman?

I'd love to show you, punk.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

John Blum wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

By the way, I weigh in at 165....

A scrawny man, or an overweight woman?

I'd love to show you, punk.


1. angry napoleon syndrome
Little short men with attitudes. Usually they are looking for a fight.
I guess scrawny man it is!

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

John Blum wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

John Blum wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

By the way, I weigh in at 165....

A scrawny man, or an overweight woman?

I'd love to show you, punk.


1. angry napoleon syndrome
Little short men with attitudes. Usually they are looking for a fight.
I guess scrawny man it is!

Little punk go away. You remind me of a pesky little gnat, although
because of your above comments, you think that at 5'8" a 165 pound man
is scrawny, you must be some fat couch potato pig. For your
information, I work out every single day, Not only am I training for my
next level of black belt, but I also teach karate most evenings, I am
on the sparring team at my dojo, and lift weights and do cardio at
least twice a week. Go get another donut and sit in front of the TV
pigboy.

Trouble shooting a bad back
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

John Blum wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

John Blum wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

By the way, I weigh in at 165....

A scrawny man, or an overweight woman?

I'd love to show you, punk.


1. angry napoleon syndrome
Little short men with attitudes. Usually they are looking for a fight.
I guess scrawny man it is!

Little punk go away. You remind me of a pesky little gnat, although
because of your above comments, you think that at 5'8" a 165 pound man
is scrawny, you must be some fat couch potato pig. For your
information, I work out every single day, Not only am I training for my
next level of black belt, but I also teach karate most evenings, I am
on the sparring team at my dojo, and lift weights and do cardio at
least twice a week. Go get another donut and sit in front of the TV
pigboy.


ANS + FAS = ASS