A Convenient Fiction
 

Dan wrote:
Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:

On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:57:31 GMT, Don White
wrote:


Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


Jack,
You will never convince Bassy of anything, he is cluttering up
this NG with crap, *trolling for fights*. It is time to ignore
his posts and hope he disappears. The NG has gotten much better,
but Bass is *doing his best to screw it up*.





Yet here you are doing exactly what you accuse Basskisser of doing.
eg: *trolling for fights*
*doing his best to screw it up*.



And you're here trying to start a fight with Reggie.

What exactly is it you're trolling for, Don?


I just want posters to be truthful....
If you want the newsgroup to be quieter and more civil..lead by example.
If not...carry on!



Donny,

You really need to do a review...

http://tinyurl.com/yg8ct2

...and lead by example.


Not sure what you're trying to prove here.....
Only a couple of the quotes listed were by me

Read your posts. How many would make this newsgroup "quieter and more
civil"? Compare that to the number that are trolls and flames. Get it now?

--
Dan, how does stalking me to ever post make this newsgroup "quieter and
more civil"?

A Convenient Fiction
 

Wayne.B wrote:

Dan, you've over stayed you welcome. Lead by example and give it up.

I'm betting that won't happen.

A Convenient Fiction
 

Harry Krause wrote:
On 12/17/2006 10:32 PM, Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:

On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:57:31 GMT, Don White
wrote:


Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


Jack,
You will never convince Bassy of anything, he is cluttering up
this NG with crap, *trolling for fights*. It is time to ignore
his posts and hope he disappears. The NG has gotten much
better, but Bass is *doing his best to screw it up*.






Yet here you are doing exactly what you accuse Basskisser of doing.
eg: *trolling for fights*
*doing his best to screw it up*.


And you're here trying to start a fight with Reggie.

What exactly is it you're trolling for, Don?

I just want posters to be truthful....
If you want the newsgroup to be quieter and more civil..lead by
example.
If not...carry on!




Donny,

You really need to do a review...

http://tinyurl.com/yg8ct2

...and lead by example.

Not sure what you're trying to prove here.....
Only a couple of the quotes listed were by me


Read your posts. How many would make this newsgroup "quieter and
more civil"? Compare that to the number that are trolls and flames.
Get it now?


All 'I get' is that your efforts here are a complete waste of time...
and worse, because you enjoy agitating a poster that you know will
respond back to your trolls.
If you want to improve the newsgroup... leave. The noise portion will
be reduced by about 20%



Perhaps he'll take jackoff, reggie and Herring with him.

Not to mention Colicky Bill, Bile Bill and the couple of 'newbies' who
have chosen to infest this newsgroup.
We just might approach that utopia the local sheriffs desire.

A Convenient Fiction
 

On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:31:09 GMT, Don White wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:57:31 GMT, Don White
wrote:


Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


Jack,
You will never convince Bassy of anything, he is cluttering up this NG
with crap, *trolling for fights*. It is time to ignore his posts and hope
he disappears. The NG has gotten much better, but Bass is *doing his
best to screw it up*.


Yet here you are doing exactly what you accuse Basskisser of doing.
eg: *trolling for fights*
*doing his best to screw it up*.



And you're here trying to start a fight with Reggie.

What exactly is it you're trolling for, Don?


I just want posters to be truthful....
If you want the newsgroup to be quieter and more civil..lead by example.
If not...carry on!

Hey Don, I'm being truthful. When you get down with basskisser, Harry,
JimH, et al, you are wallowing with the pigs (your words) you've chosen to
wallow with! Is that truthful enough for you?
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

A Convenient Fiction
 

On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:55:19 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 12/17/2006 10:32 PM, Don White wrote:
Dan wrote:
Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:

On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:57:31 GMT, Don White
wrote:


Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


Jack,
You will never convince Bassy of anything, he is cluttering up
this NG with crap, *trolling for fights*. It is time to ignore
his posts and hope he disappears. The NG has gotten much better,
but Bass is *doing his best to screw it up*.





Yet here you are doing exactly what you accuse Basskisser of doing.
eg: *trolling for fights*
*doing his best to screw it up*.


And you're here trying to start a fight with Reggie.

What exactly is it you're trolling for, Don?

I just want posters to be truthful....
If you want the newsgroup to be quieter and more civil..lead by
example.
If not...carry on!



Donny,

You really need to do a review...

http://tinyurl.com/yg8ct2

...and lead by example.

Not sure what you're trying to prove here.....
Only a couple of the quotes listed were by me

Read your posts. How many would make this newsgroup "quieter and more
civil"? Compare that to the number that are trolls and flames. Get it
now?


All 'I get' is that your efforts here are a complete waste of time...
and worse, because you enjoy agitating a poster that you know will
respond back to your trolls.
If you want to improve the newsgroup... leave. The noise portion will be
reduced by about 20%


Perhaps he'll take jackoff, reggie and Herring with him.

Well, you're such a neat guy, I hope he doesn't take you Harry!
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

A Convenient Fiction
 

On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:53:43 GMT, Don White wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:
On 12/17/2006 10:32 PM, Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:

On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:57:31 GMT, Don White
wrote:


Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


Jack,
You will never convince Bassy of anything, he is cluttering up
this NG with crap, *trolling for fights*. It is time to ignore
his posts and hope he disappears. The NG has gotten much
better, but Bass is *doing his best to screw it up*.






Yet here you are doing exactly what you accuse Basskisser of doing.
eg: *trolling for fights*
*doing his best to screw it up*.


And you're here trying to start a fight with Reggie.

What exactly is it you're trolling for, Don?

I just want posters to be truthful....
If you want the newsgroup to be quieter and more civil..lead by
example.
If not...carry on!




Donny,

You really need to do a review...

http://tinyurl.com/yg8ct2

...and lead by example.

Not sure what you're trying to prove here.....
Only a couple of the quotes listed were by me


Read your posts. How many would make this newsgroup "quieter and
more civil"? Compare that to the number that are trolls and flames.
Get it now?


All 'I get' is that your efforts here are a complete waste of time...
and worse, because you enjoy agitating a poster that you know will
respond back to your trolls.
If you want to improve the newsgroup... leave. The noise portion will
be reduced by about 20%



Perhaps he'll take jackoff, reggie and Herring with him.

Not to mention Colicky Bill, Bile Bill and the couple of 'newbies' who
have chosen to infest this newsgroup.
We just might approach that utopia the local sheriffs desire.

Why not start your own group, Don? You, Harry, Basskisser, and JimH could
just sit around and call names to your heart's content!
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

A Convenient Fiction
 

On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:03:52 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 12/18/2006 10:53 AM, Don White wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
On 12/17/2006 10:32 PM, Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:

On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:57:31 GMT, Don White
wrote:


Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


Jack,
You will never convince Bassy of anything, he is cluttering up
this NG with crap, *trolling for fights*. It is time to ignore
his posts and hope he disappears. The NG has gotten much
better, but Bass is *doing his best to screw it up*.





Yet here you are doing exactly what you accuse Basskisser of doing.
eg: *trolling for fights*
*doing his best to screw it up*.

And you're here trying to start a fight with Reggie.

What exactly is it you're trolling for, Don?

I just want posters to be truthful....
If you want the newsgroup to be quieter and more civil..lead by
example.
If not...carry on!



Donny,

You really need to do a review...

http://tinyurl.com/yg8ct2

...and lead by example.

Not sure what you're trying to prove here.....
Only a couple of the quotes listed were by me

Read your posts. How many would make this newsgroup "quieter and
more civil"? Compare that to the number that are trolls and flames.
Get it now?

All 'I get' is that your efforts here are a complete waste of time...
and worse, because you enjoy agitating a poster that you know will
respond back to your trolls.
If you want to improve the newsgroup... leave. The noise portion will
be reduced by about 20%


Perhaps he'll take jackoff, reggie and Herring with him.

Not to mention Colicky Bill, Bile Bill and the couple of 'newbies' who
have chosen to infest this newsgroup.
We just might approach that utopia the local sheriffs desire.



Indeed, at least 90% of the "a**holes" who post here these days are
righties. Amazing statistic. Most of them are boatless, too.

Harry, you're such a neat guy no one will comment on your political troll!
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

A Convenient Fiction
 

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Jack Goff wrote:
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:57:31 GMT, Don White
wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Jack,
You will never convince Bassy of anything, he is cluttering up this NG
with crap, *trolling for fights*. It is time to ignore his posts and hope
he disappears. The NG has gotten much better, but Bass is *doing his
best to screw it up*.

Yet here you are doing exactly what you accuse Basskisser of doing.
eg: *trolling for fights*
*doing his best to screw it up*.


And you're here trying to start a fight with Reggie.

What exactly is it you're trolling for, Don?

Don has been upset ever since Chuck tried to eliminate the cut and paste
inflammatory post. In Don't mind, anyone who discourages the cut and
paste the corresponding flame fest is ruining the part of the NG Don
likes.

Wouldn't bother me a bit, if it weren't for yours and other sheriff's
discrimination. When Tom posted a blatant anti-Gore troll, you said
nothing. When I posted a factual post about Mount Kiliminjaro, you
instantly jumped on it. In order for any of this to work, you need to
be against any and all trolls, not just letting your buddies get away
with it, while getting ****ty with others for doing the exact same
thing.

A Convenient Fiction
 

JohnH wrote:

Why not start your own group, Don? You, Harry, Basskisser, and JimH could
just sit around and call names to your heart's content!
--
John H

What names have I called you, John?

A Convenient Fiction
 

JohnH wrote:



Hey Don, I'm being truthful. When you get down with basskisser, Harry,
JimH, et al, you are wallowing with the pigs (your words) you've chosen to
wallow with! Is that truthful enough for you?
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

John..John!
For a guy who keeps wishing everyone a great Christmas... you get more
bizarre & combative the closer we get.

I took the trouble of going back to the post you wrongly quoted (as
usual) and am re-posting it for your education.
....and you say you were a teacher...pity!

*"Must admit.. after rolling in the mud with a handful of the motley
characters here, I feel a need to go confess my sins.
Priest would probably tell me to wash my keyboard and stay away from
temptation"*

A Convenient Fiction
 

JohnH wrote:

Why not start your own group, Don? You, Harry, Basskisser, and JimH could
just sit around and call names to your heart's content!
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Or better yet... you could start your own where you can play sheriff,
judge, jury & executioner all at the same time.
Wouldn't that be fun!

A Convenient Fiction
 

On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:23:02 GMT, Don White wrote:

JohnH wrote:



Hey Don, I'm being truthful. When you get down with basskisser, Harry,
JimH, et al, you are wallowing with the pigs (your words) you've chosen to
wallow with! Is that truthful enough for you?
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

John..John!
For a guy who keeps wishing everyone a great Christmas... you get more
bizarre & combative the closer we get.

I took the trouble of going back to the post you wrongly quoted (as
usual) and am re-posting it for your education.
...and you say you were a teacher...pity!

*"Must admit.. after rolling in the mud with a handful of the motley
characters here, I feel a need to go confess my sins.
Priest would probably tell me to wash my keyboard and stay away from
temptation"*

Ah, you got me. You didn't mention wallowing with 'pigs', only with 'motley
characters'. Well, like I say - you choose with whom you wallow.

I hope my Christmas and New Years wish doesn't bother you, and I *do* hope
you find both most enjoyable!
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

A Convenient Fiction
 

JohnH wrote:

Ah, you got me. You didn't mention wallowing with 'pigs', only with 'motley
characters'. Well, like I say - you choose with whom you wallow.

I hope my Christmas and New Years wish doesn't bother you, and I *do* hope
you find both most enjoyable!
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


The only thing you do that 'bothers me' is when you apply your laws
unfairly.
As far as the 'motley characters'.....you know very well who I was
referring to. (think of horror pictures etc..)

A Convenient Fiction
 

On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:02:56 GMT, Don White wrote:

JohnH wrote:

Ah, you got me. You didn't mention wallowing with 'pigs', only with 'motley
characters'. Well, like I say - you choose with whom you wallow.

I hope my Christmas and New Years wish doesn't bother you, and I *do* hope
you find both most enjoyable!
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


The only thing you do that 'bothers me' is when you apply your laws
unfairly.
As far as the 'motley characters'.....you know very well who I was
referring to. (think of horror pictures etc..)

Don, when I think of the characters you choose to wallow with, I *do* think
of horror pictures!
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

A Convenient Fiction
 

Hey, how about some compassion and respect here.

Butch
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:
On 12/17/2006 10:32 PM, Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:

On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:57:31 GMT, Don White

wrote:


Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


Jack,
You will never convince Bassy of anything, he is cluttering up
this NG with crap, *trolling for fights*. It is time to ignore
his posts and hope he disappears. The NG has gotten much better,
but Bass is *doing his best to screw it up*.






Yet here you are doing exactly what you accuse Basskisser of
doing.
eg: *trolling for fights*
*doing his best to screw it up*.


And you're here trying to start a fight with Reggie.

What exactly is it you're trolling for, Don?

I just want posters to be truthful....
If you want the newsgroup to be quieter and more civil..lead by
example.
If not...carry on!




Donny,

You really need to do a review...

http://tinyurl.com/yg8ct2

...and lead by example.

Not sure what you're trying to prove here.....
Only a couple of the quotes listed were by me


Read your posts. How many would make this newsgroup "quieter and more
civil"? Compare that to the number that are trolls and flames. Get it
now?


All 'I get' is that your efforts here are a complete waste of time...
and worse, because you enjoy agitating a poster that you know will
respond back to your trolls.
If you want to improve the newsgroup... leave. The noise portion will be
reduced by about 20%



Perhaps he'll take jackoff, reggie and Herring with him.

Not to mention Colicky Bill, Bile Bill and the couple of 'newbies' who
have chosen to infest this newsgroup.
We just might approach that utopia the local sheriffs desire.

A Convenient Fiction
 

Don White wrote:
Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

To make matters worse, they 'll ignore the half dozen clowns who
continually bait one individual but will attack that same person when
he responds.



Can you show where six people "continually bait" one person? That
"one individual" is the newsgroup troll. He lives for confrontation
and you are the boy's puppy who is there to follow him and nip at the
heels of anyone who responds with, often, goofy responses that only
you and the boy might find funny. How does your behavior make matters
better, Don?



I shine the light of day into the dark corners and under the rocks.
Does that bother your eyes?

Whatever.

http://netscan.research.microsoft.co...&sd=11/30/2006

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

A Convenient Fiction
 

Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:

On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:57:31 GMT, Don White
wrote:


Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


Jack,
You will never convince Bassy of anything, he is cluttering up
this NG with crap, *trolling for fights*. It is time to ignore
his posts and hope he disappears. The NG has gotten much
better, but Bass is *doing his best to screw it up*.







Yet here you are doing exactly what you accuse Basskisser of doing.
eg: *trolling for fights*
*doing his best to screw it up*.



And you're here trying to start a fight with Reggie.

What exactly is it you're trolling for, Don?


I just want posters to be truthful....
If you want the newsgroup to be quieter and more civil..lead by
example.
If not...carry on!





Donny,

You really need to do a review...

http://tinyurl.com/yg8ct2

...and lead by example.


Not sure what you're trying to prove here.....
Only a couple of the quotes listed were by me



Read your posts. How many would make this newsgroup "quieter and more
civil"? Compare that to the number that are trolls and flames. Get
it now?


All 'I get' is that your efforts here are a complete waste of time...
and worse, because you enjoy agitating a poster that you know will
respond back to your trolls.
If you want to improve the newsgroup... leave. The noise portion will be
reduced by about 20%

You should start by learning what an internet troll is and move up from
there.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

A Convenient Fiction
 

Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:20:44 -0500, Dan
wrote:


Can you show where six people "continually bait" one person? That "one
individual" is the newsgroup troll. He lives for confrontation and you
are the boy's puppy who is there to follow him and nip at the heels of
anyone who responds with, often, goofy responses that only you and the
boy might find funny. How does your behavior make matters better, Don?


Dan, you've over stayed you welcome. Lead by example and give it up.


Sure, officer, I'll do that because you said so. "You" welcome, Wayne.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

A Convenient Fiction
 

Kevin wrote:


Dan, how does stalking me to ever post make this newsgroup "quieter and
more civil"?


I ignore dozens of your insane posts every day. If you were smarter,
you would be able to see that. Keep on trollin', boy!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

A Convenient Fiction
 

Harry Krause wrote:

On 12/18/2006 10:53 AM, Don White wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

On 12/17/2006 10:32 PM, Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:

On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:57:31 GMT, Don White

wrote:


Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


Jack,
You will never convince Bassy of anything, he is cluttering
up this NG with crap, *trolling for fights*. It is time to
ignore his posts and hope he disappears. The NG has gotten
much better, but Bass is *doing his best to screw it up*.






Yet here you are doing exactly what you accuse Basskisser of
doing.
eg: *trolling for fights*
*doing his best to screw it up*.

And you're here trying to start a fight with Reggie.

What exactly is it you're trolling for, Don?

I just want posters to be truthful....
If you want the newsgroup to be quieter and more civil..lead by
example.
If not...carry on!




Donny,

You really need to do a review...

http://tinyurl.com/yg8ct2

...and lead by example.

Not sure what you're trying to prove here.....
Only a couple of the quotes listed were by me


Read your posts. How many would make this newsgroup "quieter and
more civil"? Compare that to the number that are trolls and
flames. Get it now?

All 'I get' is that your efforts here are a complete waste of
time... and worse, because you enjoy agitating a poster that you
know will respond back to your trolls.
If you want to improve the newsgroup... leave. The noise portion
will be reduced by about 20%



Perhaps he'll take jackoff, reggie and Herring with him.


Not to mention Colicky Bill, Bile Bill and the couple of 'newbies' who
have chosen to infest this newsgroup.
We just might approach that utopia the local sheriffs desire.




Indeed, at least 90% of the "a**holes" who post here these days are
righties. Amazing statistic. Most of them are boatless, too.

I'd love to see a shred of proof of that.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

A Convenient Fiction
 

Dan wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:

On 12/18/2006 10:53 AM, Don White wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

On 12/17/2006 10:32 PM, Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:

On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:57:31 GMT, Don White

wrote:


Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


Jack,
You will never convince Bassy of anything, he is cluttering
up this NG with crap, *trolling for fights*. It is time to
ignore his posts and hope he disappears. The NG has gotten
much better, but Bass is *doing his best to screw it up*.







Yet here you are doing exactly what you accuse Basskisser of
doing.
eg: *trolling for fights*
*doing his best to screw it up*.

And you're here trying to start a fight with Reggie.

What exactly is it you're trolling for, Don?

I just want posters to be truthful....
If you want the newsgroup to be quieter and more civil..lead by
example.
If not...carry on!





Donny,

You really need to do a review...

http://tinyurl.com/yg8ct2

...and lead by example.

Not sure what you're trying to prove here.....
Only a couple of the quotes listed were by me



Read your posts. How many would make this newsgroup "quieter and
more civil"? Compare that to the number that are trolls and
flames. Get it now?

All 'I get' is that your efforts here are a complete waste of
time... and worse, because you enjoy agitating a poster that you
know will respond back to your trolls.
If you want to improve the newsgroup... leave. The noise portion
will be reduced by about 20%




Perhaps he'll take jackoff, reggie and Herring with him.



Not to mention Colicky Bill, Bile Bill and the couple of 'newbies'
who have chosen to infest this newsgroup.
We just might approach that utopia the local sheriffs desire.





Indeed, at least 90% of the "a**holes" who post here these days are
righties. Amazing statistic. Most of them are boatless, too.


I'd love to see a shred of proof of that.

What do you expect from the epitome of narcissism?

A Convenient Fiction
 

Butch Davis wrote:
Hey, how about some compassion and respect here.

Butch


If you're referring to the motley crew that like to keep this newsgroup
in turmoil....
the Beatles said it best in 'Piggies'
'What they need is a damn good wackin'

A Convenient Fiction
 

Dan wrote:
Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

To make matters worse, they 'll ignore the half dozen clowns who
continually bait one individual but will attack that same person
when he responds.




Can you show where six people "continually bait" one person? That
"one individual" is the newsgroup troll. He lives for confrontation
and you are the boy's puppy who is there to follow him and nip at the
heels of anyone who responds with, often, goofy responses that only
you and the boy might find funny. How does your behavior make
matters better, Don?



I shine the light of day into the dark corners and under the rocks.
Does that bother your eyes?


Whatever.

http://netscan.research.microsoft.co...&sd=11/30/2006



Oh my!
I think this constitutes stalking by any definition.

A Convenient Fiction
 

animal wrote:

Dan wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

On 12/18/2006 10:53 AM, Don White wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

On 12/17/2006 10:32 PM, Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:

On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:57:31 GMT, Don White

wrote:


Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


Jack,
You will never convince Bassy of anything, he is cluttering
up this NG with crap, *trolling for fights*. It is time to
ignore his posts and hope he disappears. The NG has gotten
much better, but Bass is *doing his best to screw it up*.








Yet here you are doing exactly what you accuse Basskisser of
doing.
eg: *trolling for fights*
*doing his best to screw it up*.

And you're here trying to start a fight with Reggie.

What exactly is it you're trolling for, Don?

I just want posters to be truthful....
If you want the newsgroup to be quieter and more civil..lead
by example.
If not...carry on!






Donny,

You really need to do a review...

http://tinyurl.com/yg8ct2

...and lead by example.

Not sure what you're trying to prove here.....
Only a couple of the quotes listed were by me




Read your posts. How many would make this newsgroup "quieter and
more civil"? Compare that to the number that are trolls and
flames. Get it now?

All 'I get' is that your efforts here are a complete waste of
time... and worse, because you enjoy agitating a poster that you
know will respond back to your trolls.
If you want to improve the newsgroup... leave. The noise portion
will be reduced by about 20%





Perhaps he'll take jackoff, reggie and Herring with him.




Not to mention Colicky Bill, Bile Bill and the couple of 'newbies'
who have chosen to infest this newsgroup.
We just might approach that utopia the local sheriffs desire.






Indeed, at least 90% of the "a**holes" who post here these days are
righties. Amazing statistic. Most of them are boatless, too.



I'd love to see a shred of proof of that.

What do you expect from the epitome of narcissism?

Good point.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

A Convenient Fiction
 

Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

Dan wrote:

Don White wrote:

To make matters worse, they 'll ignore the half dozen clowns who
continually bait one individual but will attack that same person
when he responds.





Can you show where six people "continually bait" one person? That
"one individual" is the newsgroup troll. He lives for confrontation
and you are the boy's puppy who is there to follow him and nip at
the heels of anyone who responds with, often, goofy responses that
only you and the boy might find funny. How does your behavior make
matters better, Don?



I shine the light of day into the dark corners and under the rocks.
Does that bother your eyes?



Whatever.

http://netscan.research.microsoft.co...&sd=11/30/2006





Oh my!
I think this constitutes stalking by any definition.

No, it's 15 seconds of "research", dip****, by any definition.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

A Convenient Fiction
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Butch Davis wrote:
Hey, how about some compassion and respect here.

Butch


If you're referring to the motley crew that like to keep this newsgroup in
turmoil....
the Beatles said it best in 'Piggies'
'What they need is a damn good wackin'

So go wack you head against the wall!

A Convenient Fiction
 

Here is Al Gore's comment when confronted with the inaccuracies in his
film:
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the
audience."

So be careful when watching that film - he admits he is
"overrepresenting" facts to open you up to his opinion.


Maybe AGore is really basskisser?

A Convenient Fiction
 

Calif Bill wrote:


So go wack you head against the wall!


No...go wack 'you' head against the wall!

A Convenient Fiction
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:


So go wack you head against the wall!
No...go wack 'you' head against the wall!

Make that wack your head against the wall.

A Convenient Fiction
 

On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:31:01 -0500, Dan
wrote:

Sure, officer, I'll do that because you said so. "You" welcome, Wayne.

plonk

A Convenient Fiction
 

"Jack Goff" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:17:34 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:
On 16 Dec 2006 15:28:50 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:
On 16 Dec 2006 11:29:04 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:
On 16 Dec 2006 06:58:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:12:23 -0500, "Dixon"
wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...
ACP wrote:
"Duke Nukem" wrote in message
...
A Not Al Gore Production.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.a...20061215a.html
The pseudonym isn't going to protect from the wrath of the
likes of
Bassy.
8)
Man, talk about an infatuation with me......You'd better watch
it, Dan
will get jealous.
The
atmosphere seems almost infinitely thick to us, but on a globe
two feet in
dia. it would be as thick as a coat of varnish.
Dixon

What's the weather like on your two foot in diameter world?
What a stupid question.
Only if you're not thinking creatively.

Oh, um, nevermind. It's over your head.
No. It was just an idiotic question. Want to know why? Simple,
because
you took a statement that was informative too literally. It's called
perspective, something I take you don't have.
What exactly did I take literally, and how so? Be specific, and
explain what exactly you think my statement meant, at least to you.
Oh, hell. Are you so out of it that you don't even remember the
sentence you were making your idiotic remark about??? Well, here it is
again:

"The atmosphere seems almost infinitely thick to us, but on a globe two
feet in dia. it would be as thick as a coat of varnish."

With me so far? Come on, it's not really difficult, even for you, is
it?? Okay, here was your idiotic reply, too, just in case you've lost
THAT in your little mind:

What's the weather like on your two foot in diameter world?

Now, how could anybody think that that was an intelligent question?
Hmm, something tells me that YOU think it is!

So you weren't able to answer the questions I posed, huh? That's OK,
I didn't think you would, or could. Let me explain, try to follow
along, put your finger on the screen and move your lips as you read,
if it helps.

The two foot globe statement wasn't informative, other than being a
somewhat interesting excercise in scaling. Its intention in Gore's
"movie" is to grab your attention and scare you, as in "Oh my! The
earth's atmosphere is only as think as a layer of varnish! We better
do something!"

My weather statement was made to point out that the two foot globe,
while interesting, has no relevance to the earth we inhabit and its
own atmosphere. You see, with our full sized molecules, and the laws
of nature that they must abide by, "weather" wouldn't even be possible
in an atmosphere as thick as "a coat of varnish".

In reality, our earth is about 7926 MILES in diameter, which is
something over 41 MILLION feet, not 2 feet. Its atmosphere has 5
layers, and the one we live in, the troposphere, is about 10 MILES
thick. The 5th layer extends out to about 6000 MILES. A little
thicker and more substantial than a coat of varnish, huh?

In short, the two foot globe statement was a cheap and irrelevant
scare tactic designed to grab the more simple of those among us. My
weather statement exposed it for what it was.

But hey, the scare tactic worked on you, didn't it.

Merry Christmas.
Jack,
You will never convince Bassy of anything, he is cluttering up this NG
with crap, trolling for fights. It is time to ignore his posts and hope
he disappears. The NG has gotten much better, but Bass is doing his
best to screw it up.

True... you're right. I'm not going to get in a prolonged argument
over this. I just felt I should explain myself, since he was so
infatuated with my original post (that was a followup to someone else,
not him) that he felt he had to start this up.

Besides, it's 73 degrees here today, and we're getting ready to drive
the Torino down to the marina and go out on the boat for a while.

Have a good one!

But..but..but Goff that outer layer pretty much only reacts to the sun and
we are ignoring the effects the SUN has on our atmosphere. Right...we even
lump Ozone depletion into man caused pollution. We are not supposed to
consider SUN output and it's interaction with that layer of the atmosphere
where man made pollutants can't get, at least in amounts that make a
difference. See..we aren't supposed to know that Freon is MUCH heavier than
any other atmospheric gas and for it to be found that high up would be
incredibly unlikely. We aren't supposed to be able to think for ourselves,
know any high school science, have a sense of history.

You have made yourself incredibly unpopular by turning over the rock and
exposing the worms for what and where they are.

A Convenient Fiction
 

Dan wrote:
Kevin wrote:


Dan, how does stalking me to ever post make this newsgroup "quieter and
more civil"?


I ignore dozens of your insane posts every day. If you were smarter,
you would be able to see that. Keep on trollin', boy!



Psst, Dan, Kevin didn't write that.....I did. Nice edit, stalker. Show
me the "dozens" of posts I make every day that you ignore, stalker.

Infatuation.......
Infatuation......
It's driving Dan crazy......
It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYYY......

A Convenient Fiction
 

Calif Bill wrote:
Here is Al Gore's comment when confronted with the inaccuracies in his
film:
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the
audience."

So be careful when watching that film - he admits he is
"overrepresenting" facts to open you up to his opinion.


Maybe AGore is really basskisser?

I wonder how Mt. Kilaminjaro and other places in the world that are
made of of non-thinking elements were fooled into believing Gore?

A Convenient Fiction
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
Here is Al Gore's comment when confronted with the inaccuracies in his
film:
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the
audience."

So be careful when watching that film - he admits he is
"overrepresenting" facts to open you up to his opinion.


Maybe AGore is really basskisser?

I wonder how Mt. Kilaminjaro and other places in the world that are
made of of non-thinking elements were fooled into believing Gore?


Maybe it is all the hot air the politicos are expelling that is causing the
global warming. AGore puts 100% of the blame on man. Sure man has to add
to the warming. But what percentage? How much is solar? We have been
through heating and cooling periods for millenia! Maybe after the Shia and
Sunni factions kill most of each other off, we will have global cooling as
s50% of mankind will be gone.

A Convenient Fiction
 

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
Here is Al Gore's comment when confronted with the inaccuracies in his
film:
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the
audience."

So be careful when watching that film - he admits he is
"overrepresenting" facts to open you up to his opinion.


Maybe AGore is really basskisser?

I wonder how Mt. Kilaminjaro and other places in the world that are
made of of non-thinking elements were fooled into believing Gore?


Maybe it is all the hot air the politicos are expelling that is causing the
global warming. AGore puts 100% of the blame on man.

Dead wrong again. Where to HELL did you get the idea that Gore puts
100% of the blame on man??? I take it you've not read any of his
lectures, nor seen his movie.
You are NEVER right!

A Convenient Fiction
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
Here is Al Gore's comment when confronted with the inaccuracies in his
film:
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up
the
audience."

So be careful when watching that film - he admits he is
"overrepresenting" facts to open you up to his opinion.


Maybe AGore is really basskisser?

I wonder how Mt. Kilaminjaro and other places in the world that are
made of of non-thinking elements were fooled into believing Gore?


Maybe it is all the hot air the politicos are expelling that is causing
the
global warming. AGore puts 100% of the blame on man.

Dead wrong again. Where to HELL did you get the idea that Gore puts
100% of the blame on man??? I take it you've not read any of his
lectures, nor seen his movie.
You are NEVER right!


And all this time you have been accusing me of being right.

A Convenient Fiction
 

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
Here is Al Gore's comment when confronted with the inaccuracies in his
film:
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up
the
audience."

So be careful when watching that film - he admits he is
"overrepresenting" facts to open you up to his opinion.


Maybe AGore is really basskisser?

I wonder how Mt. Kilaminjaro and other places in the world that are
made of of non-thinking elements were fooled into believing Gore?


Maybe it is all the hot air the politicos are expelling that is causing
the
global warming. AGore puts 100% of the blame on man.

Dead wrong again. Where to HELL did you get the idea that Gore puts
100% of the blame on man??? I take it you've not read any of his
lectures, nor seen his movie.
You are NEVER right!


And all this time you have been accusing me of being right.

Damn, that's funny.....WRONG AGAIN!!!
Where, Bill? Huh? Where did I ever say that? Dumber than a post, that's
what you are!

A Convenient Fiction
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
Here is Al Gore's comment when confronted with the inaccuracies in
his
film:
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of
factual
presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up
the
audience."

So be careful when watching that film - he admits he is
"overrepresenting" facts to open you up to his opinion.


Maybe AGore is really basskisser?

I wonder how Mt. Kilaminjaro and other places in the world that are
made of of non-thinking elements were fooled into believing Gore?


Maybe it is all the hot air the politicos are expelling that is
causing
the
global warming. AGore puts 100% of the blame on man.

Dead wrong again. Where to HELL did you get the idea that Gore puts
100% of the blame on man??? I take it you've not read any of his
lectures, nor seen his movie.
You are NEVER right!


And all this time you have been accusing me of being right.

Damn, that's funny.....WRONG AGAIN!!!
Where, Bill? Huh? Where did I ever say that? Dumber than a post, that's
what you are!


Whoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh!!!!!!!!!!

A Convenient Fiction
 

Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...
Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...
Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...
Calif Bill wrote:
Here is Al Gore's comment when confronted with the inaccuracies in
his
film:
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of
factual
presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up
the
audience."

So be careful when watching that film - he admits he is
"overrepresenting" facts to open you up to his opinion.


Maybe AGore is really basskisser?
I wonder how Mt. Kilaminjaro and other places in the world that are
made of of non-thinking elements were fooled into believing Gore?

Maybe it is all the hot air the politicos are expelling that is
causing
the
global warming. AGore puts 100% of the blame on man.
Dead wrong again. Where to HELL did you get the idea that Gore puts
100% of the blame on man??? I take it you've not read any of his
lectures, nor seen his movie.
You are NEVER right!

And all this time you have been accusing me of being right.
Damn, that's funny.....WRONG AGAIN!!!
Where, Bill? Huh? Where did I ever say that? Dumber than a post, that's
what you are!


Whoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh!!!!!!!!!!


Bill,
You do realize that it will always go whoooooooooosh. Stop torturing
the boy, and let it go.

A Convenient Fiction
 

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

Bill,
You do realize that it will always go whoooooooooosh. Stop torturing
the boy, and let it go.

Now there's a prime example of your recent behaviour.
Not only do you hint that Basskisser will 'never get it' but you also
call him 'the boy'.
I realize you're just trying to ingrate yourself with your new friends
but don't insult the newsgroups intelligence by pretending you're trying
to improve it.