basskisser wrote:

JimH wrote:

"Dan" wrote in message
...

JohnH wrote:


On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan
wrote:




Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the
problem, respond to him.


It takes two, Dan.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by
the lunatic with attacks approaching libel.

Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different?

It's not.

Dan, it is just another of our sheriffs doing the 'do as I say, not as I do'
routine.


Jim, it's so good to see you back and doing NOTHING except stirring
****. You're certainly living up to your reputation as a complete ass.


This post was brought to you by the boy who has posted "Awe, your once
again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute!" several
times for your enjoyment.

If he didn't miss all of those days at school while tending his crops,
he would know that "your" and "you're" are two different words and he
chose the wrong one.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com