BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Hey Chuck... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/76210-re-hey-chuck.html)

Chuck Gould November 28th 06 02:15 AM

Hey Chuck...
 

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
I thought it only rained out in Seattle?

~~ snerk ~~


What are you referencing?


Calif Bill November 28th 06 03:22 AM

Hey Chuck...
 

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On 27 Nov 2006 18:15:07 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:


Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
I thought it only rained out in Seattle?

~~ snerk ~~


What are you referencing?


Never mind. It's only the solid form of rain. :)


There are at least two solid forms of rain.



Tim November 28th 06 03:24 AM

Hey Chuck...
 
snow and hail?


Calif Bill wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On 27 Nov 2006 18:15:07 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:


Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
I thought it only rained out in Seattle?

~~ snerk ~~

What are you referencing?


Never mind. It's only the solid form of rain. :)


There are at least two solid forms of rain.



Calif Bill November 28th 06 04:02 AM

Hey Chuck...
 

"Tim" wrote in message
oups.com...
snow and hail?


Calif Bill wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On 27 Nov 2006 18:15:07 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:


Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
I thought it only rained out in Seattle?

~~ snerk ~~

What are you referencing?

Never mind. It's only the solid form of rain. :)


There are at least two solid forms of rain.



At least. Probably some other esoteric forms also.



Tim November 28th 06 12:04 PM

Hey Chuck...
 

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 27 Nov 2006 19:24:58 -0800, "Tim" wrote:

snow and hail?


Hail, Hail the gang's all here...

WTF do we care, WTF do we care...

Um....

Sorry - joke gone bad. :)


i was gonna say, Aw hail, you didn't have to bring that up , did you?


DSK November 28th 06 12:10 PM

Hey Chuck...
 
There are at least two solid forms of rain.


Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
Well EEEXXXCCCUUUUUUSEEEEEEE MMMMEEEEE!!!!!

PRECIPITATION....

Rain - Liquid
Drizzle - liquid, light, moves with air currents
Freezing Rain - liquid until hitting a cold surface
Freezing Drizzle - see Freezing Rain
Hail - precipitation in the form of balls or irregular lumps of ice
Snow - precipitation of white or translucent ice crystals

Thus ends the meteorological portion of this post which relates to
boating because apparently it never snows in the Pacific Northwest
where they boat all year 'round.


You know, the Eskimos have over 70 words for snow. I wonder
how many different words for "rain" they have in Seattle.

DSK


DSK November 28th 06 01:24 PM

Hey Chuck...
 
You know, the Eskimos have over 70 words for snow. I wonder
how many different words for "rain" they have in Seattle.



Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
Just walk into a Starbucks and look at the board with the coffee drink
descriptions.

With that many ways to describe coffee, it has to be about a
bizillion.


Years ago, I narrowly escaped getting lynched in Seattle...
I went to a couple of different shops & street vendors
trying to buy a cup of coffee, and finally in exasperation
said out loud "All I want is a PLAIN CUP OF COFFEE!"

DSK


Reginald P. Smithers III November 28th 06 01:41 PM

Hey Chuck...
 
DSK wrote:
There are at least two solid forms of rain.



Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
Well EEEXXXCCCUUUUUUSEEEEEEE MMMMEEEEE!!!!!

PRECIPITATION....

Rain - Liquid
Drizzle - liquid, light, moves with air currents
Freezing Rain - liquid until hitting a cold surface
Freezing Drizzle - see Freezing Rain
Hail - precipitation in the form of balls or irregular lumps of ice
Snow - precipitation of white or translucent ice crystals

Thus ends the meteorological portion of this post which relates to
boating because apparently it never snows in the Pacific Northwest
where they boat all year 'round.


You know, the Eskimos have over 70 words for snow. I wonder how many
different words for "rain" they have in Seattle.

DSK

Doug,
That is an often repeated urban legend, the number of words always
changes, but the one constant is it is an urban legend

DSK November 28th 06 01:54 PM

Hey Chuck...
 
You know, the Eskimos have over 70 words for snow. I wonder how many
different words for "rain" they have in Seattle.



Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Doug,
That is an often repeated urban legend, the number of words always
changes, but the one constant is it is an urban legend


Well, OK, maybe I exaggerate.

Then again, maybe not:
http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_297.html

And here is a revision of the same issue, including comments
from a native Koniaq Eskimo who calls the Straight Dope
author a dumb redneck (amusing in itself, but unfortunately
she doesn't say how many words for snow there are in her
language)
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/010202.html

Regards
Doug King


Reginald P. Smithers III November 28th 06 02:21 PM

Hey Chuck...
 
DSK wrote:
You know, the Eskimos have over 70 words for snow. I wonder how many
different words for "rain" they have in Seattle.



Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Doug,
That is an often repeated urban legend, the number of words always
changes, but the one constant is it is an urban legend


Well, OK, maybe I exaggerate.

Then again, maybe not:
http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_297.html

And here is a revision of the same issue, including comments from a
native Koniaq Eskimo who calls the Straight Dope author a dumb redneck
(amusing in itself, but unfortunately she doesn't say how many words for
snow there are in her language)
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/010202.html

Regards
Doug King

http://www.derose.net/steve/guides/snowwords/

So how many already?
Pullum cites several sources on how many words certain Inuit dialects
actually have for snow. The two main ones a

The Dictionary of the West Greenlandic Eskimo Language (C. W.
Schultz-Lorentzen, Copenhagan: Reitzels, 1927) gives just two words:
qanik for snowflakes in the air, and aput for snow on the ground.

The Yup'ik Eskimo Dictionary (Steven A. Jacobson, Fairbanks: University
of Alaska, 1984) has, according to Pullum's colleague Anthony Woodbury,
about 24 if you're very generous. By "very generous", I mean including
words for "stuff for sinking habitually into", "blizzard", "avalanche",
and so on.

So 24 seems to be the outer limit that could be defended, at least for
Yup'ik. Unless there are speakers somewhere who make a living by coining
new snow-words and selling them.... No one seems to have checked on that
possibility.

Oh yeah, does English have any words for snow?
It's only fair to see how many snow-words we can find in English. I
didn't even poke around the OED yet, but even if we skip the inflected
forms (snows, snowed, snowing, snowy, snowness, snew, snewn,... well, we
weren't going to count those anyway), there is still a veritable hail of
terms:

berg, cornice, crevasse, floe, frost, glacier, hail, hardpack,
hoarfrost, ice, iceball, icecap, iceberg, ice field, icicle, powder,
rime, snow, slush, sleet, snowball, snowcap
Not to mention a blizzard of words for the parts of snow and for snow as
a weather condition:

avalanche, blizzard, dusting, flurry, ice crystal, ice storm
And the list snowballs as we notice compound words related to snow
(excluding snow-related objects like snowboards and snowshovels):

snowball, snowbank, snowcapped, snowdrift, snowfall, snowflake,
snowlike, snowman, snowstorm
And let us not forget the storm of words that are spelled with a space
in them: phrases that have (arguably, of course) become lexical items
through frequent and distinctive use:

freezing rain, new-fallen snow, yellow snow, glare ice, purple wax snow
(and a host of others skiers can cite)
I can't imagine I've listed anywhere near all the good candidates, but
already that's 40. Which, by the way, is several more than the generous
estimate for Inuit.

If we were as generous as some are for Eskimo, beyond those we'd add
etiology, construction material, food, weapon, toy, floor, projectile,
sculpture, refrigerator, obstruction (reaching double the total for
Inuit), and probably dozens more. And we haven't even considered any
synonyms for "snow job" (a quick look in a thesaurus reveals over 100),
"snow" on your TV, and being "snowed" under.

And why should we care?
It is the conclusions drawn from this bizarre claim that puzzle me most.
One seemingly popular conclusion takes Whorf (of the "Sapir-Whorf
hypothesis") farther than perhaps even Whorf would go, and suggests that
such differences in vocabulary make cross-language communication
fundamentally impossible, or even make a notion of any underlying
reality (accessible or not) impossible. None of this of course follows.
As Pullum again points out, anyone concerned about a particular subject
has a proportionately detailed vocabulary for it. There is little
surprising or interesting about this, and it doesn't seem to have much
affect on communication, realism, or anything else beyond signalling
that you are (or aren't) an expert on a precise topic:

I have precise words for things others would merely lump together and
call "hypertext links".

In reading a book on knife sharpening, I just discovered formal
terminology for bits of rock, carefully distinguished by diameters from
10 inches down to 0.00015 or so. They're also described here.

Wine tasters have another set of terms, far more detailed than I can use
competently.

....

So if some language(s) did have many words for snow, it should be no
more interesting than these other everyday cases. But if you think about
it, people who live in ever-snowful lands may perhaps care no more about
fine variations of snow, than we in warmer climes care about fine
variations of grass or pavement: anything so constant disappears into
the background and becomes less interesting.

DSK November 28th 06 02:36 PM

Hey Chuck... words for snow
 
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
http://www.derose.net/steve/guides/snowwords/

So how many already?
Pullum cites several sources on how many words certain Inuit dialects
actually have for snow. The two main ones a

The Dictionary of the West Greenlandic Eskimo Language (C. W.
Schultz-Lorentzen, Copenhagan: Reitzels, 1927) gives just two words:
qanik for snowflakes in the air, and aput for snow on the ground.


We don't even have that, considering that "snowflakes" is
just "snow flakes" pretending to be a single word. English
being such a flexible language, we could even make it three
words "flakes of snow." 3 + 2 plus your suggested two makes
7 words for snow! The problem is that there is really only
one word: "snow" the rest is just creative accounting.



As Pullum again points out, anyone concerned about a particular subject
has a proportionately detailed vocabulary for it.


Sure, that's elementary. For example, there are huge numbers
of odd & wonderful words for all the different parts of a boat.

Any specialized field of knowledge has it's vocabulary,
medicine, computers, etc etc. To know the field one must
master the vocabulary.


... There is little
surprising or interesting about this,



Surprising? Not to smart people, agreed.
Interesting? I guess that all depends.

.... it doesn't seem to have much
affect on communication, realism, or anything else


Horse puckey. Try discussing a medical issue with a doctor:
2/3 of the conversation will be him explaining what the
words mean. Yet to another medical professional, the
communication is efficient and accurate.



.... beyond signalling
that you are (or aren't) an expert on a precise topic:


Yep.
Tell me again, how is it that we spot the BS'ers and fakers
and wanna-bees in this newsgroup?




So if some language(s) did have many words for snow, it should be no
more interesting than these other everyday cases. But if you think about
it, people who live in ever-snowful lands may perhaps care no more about
fine variations of snow, than we in warmer climes care about fine
variations of grass or pavement: anything so constant disappears into
the background and becomes less interesting.


I disagree. We don't make a living from pavement or grass,
and they vary considerably less than snow. The Eskimos have
a very good reason for their vocabulary, just as your doctor
has a good reason for his.

Actually there are two reasons, but we don't need to go into
the second one just now.

Regards
Doug King


Chuck Gould November 28th 06 04:44 PM

Hey Chuck...
 

DSK wrote:


You know, the Eskimos have over 70 words for snow. I wonder
how many different words for "rain" they have in Seattle.

DSK



No such thing as a wordy Seattlite. :-)


Wayne.B November 28th 06 04:45 PM

Hey Chuck...
 
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:54:36 -0500, DSK wrote:

Well, OK, maybe I exaggerate.

Then again, maybe not:
http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_297.html

And here is a revision of the same issue, including comments
from a native Koniaq Eskimo who calls the Straight Dope
author a dumb redneck (amusing in itself, but unfortunately
she doesn't say how many words for snow there are in her
language)
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/010202.html


Skiers have a pretty good snow vocabulary also, e.g.:

dry powder

deep powder

wet powder (an oxymoron)

packed powder

machine made

hard pack

granular

frozen granular

loose granular (corn)

wind blown

wind blown with crust

I'd guess that the inuit have some corresponding terms for all but the
"machine made", and maybe some that I've never encountered.






Chuck Gould November 28th 06 04:47 PM

Hey Chuck...
 

DSK wrote:
You know, the Eskimos have over 70 words for snow. I wonder
how many different words for "rain" they have in Seattle.



Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
Just walk into a Starbucks and look at the board with the coffee drink
descriptions.

With that many ways to describe coffee, it has to be about a
bizillion.


Years ago, I narrowly escaped getting lynched in Seattle...
I went to a couple of different shops & street vendors
trying to buy a cup of coffee, and finally in exasperation
said out loud "All I want is a PLAIN CUP OF COFFEE!"

DSK



Times have changed, and most of the coffee snobs are out of business.
Anybody with the facilties to brew traditional coffee does so these
days.
The local Starbucks told me that drip coffee is their number one
seller.

I once ordered a cup of coffee and the barista replied, "I can make you
an Americano...."

"Too late. I was born an Americano. Right now I just want a cup of
coffee."


Calif Bill November 28th 06 04:58 PM

Hey Chuck...
 

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:22:13 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
On 27 Nov 2006 18:15:07 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:


Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
I thought it only rained out in Seattle?

~~ snerk ~~

What are you referencing?

Never mind. It's only the solid form of rain. :)


There are at least two solid forms of rain.


Well EEEXXXCCCUUUUUUSEEEEEEE MMMMEEEEE!!!!!

PRECIPITATION....

Rain - Liquid
Drizzle - liquid, light, moves with air currents
Freezing Rain - liquid until hitting a cold surface
Freezing Drizzle - see Freezing Rain
Hail - precipitation in the form of balls or irregular lumps of ice
Snow - precipitation of white or translucent ice crystals

Thus ends the meteorological portion of this post which relates to
boating because apparently it never snows in the Pacific Northwest
where they boat all year 'round.


Noted. Ignored, but noted.



Reginald P. Smithers III November 28th 06 05:16 PM

Hey Chuck... words for snow
 
DSK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
http://www.derose.net/steve/guides/snowwords/

So how many already?
Pullum cites several sources on how many words certain Inuit dialects
actually have for snow. The two main ones a

The Dictionary of the West Greenlandic Eskimo Language (C. W.
Schultz-Lorentzen, Copenhagan: Reitzels, 1927) gives just two words:
qanik for snowflakes in the air, and aput for snow on the ground.


We don't even have that, considering that "snowflakes" is just "snow
flakes" pretending to be a single word. English being such a flexible
language, we could even make it three words "flakes of snow." 3 + 2 plus
your suggested two makes 7 words for snow! The problem is that there is
really only one word: "snow" the rest is just creative accounting.



As Pullum again points out, anyone concerned about a particular
subject has a proportionately detailed vocabulary for it.


Sure, that's elementary. For example, there are huge numbers of odd &
wonderful words for all the different parts of a boat.

Any specialized field of knowledge has it's vocabulary, medicine,
computers, etc etc. To know the field one must master the vocabulary.


... There is little surprising or interesting about this,



Surprising? Not to smart people, agreed.
Interesting? I guess that all depends.

.... it doesn't seem to have much affect on communication, realism, or
anything else


Horse puckey. Try discussing a medical issue with a doctor: 2/3 of the
conversation will be him explaining what the words mean. Yet to another
medical professional, the communication is efficient and accurate.



.... beyond signalling that you are (or aren't) an expert on a precise
topic:


Yep.
Tell me again, how is it that we spot the BS'ers and fakers and
wanna-bees in this newsgroup?




So if some language(s) did have many words for snow, it should be no
more interesting than these other everyday cases. But if you think
about it, people who live in ever-snowful lands may perhaps care no
more about fine variations of snow, than we in warmer climes care
about fine variations of grass or pavement: anything so constant
disappears into the background and becomes less interesting.


I disagree. We don't make a living from pavement or grass, and they vary
considerably less than snow. The Eskimos have a very good reason for
their vocabulary, just as your doctor has a good reason for his.

Actually there are two reasons, but we don't need to go into the second
one just now.

Regards
Doug King

So how many different words do the Eskimos have for snow?

Reginald P. Smithers III November 28th 06 05:19 PM

Hey Chuck... words for snow
 
DSK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
http://www.derose.net/steve/guides/snowwords/

So how many already?
Pullum cites several sources on how many words certain Inuit dialects
actually have for snow. The two main ones a

The Dictionary of the West Greenlandic Eskimo Language (C. W.
Schultz-Lorentzen, Copenhagan: Reitzels, 1927) gives just two words:
qanik for snowflakes in the air, and aput for snow on the ground.


We don't even have that, considering that "snowflakes" is just "snow
flakes" pretending to be a single word. English being such a flexible
language, we could even make it three words "flakes of snow." 3 + 2 plus
your suggested two makes 7 words for snow! The problem is that there is
really only one word: "snow" the rest is just creative accounting.



As Pullum again points out, anyone concerned about a particular
subject has a proportionately detailed vocabulary for it.


Sure, that's elementary. For example, there are huge numbers of odd &
wonderful words for all the different parts of a boat.

Any specialized field of knowledge has it's vocabulary, medicine,
computers, etc etc. To know the field one must master the vocabulary.


... There is little surprising or interesting about this,



Surprising? Not to smart people, agreed.
Interesting? I guess that all depends.

.... it doesn't seem to have much affect on communication, realism, or
anything else


Horse puckey. Try discussing a medical issue with a doctor: 2/3 of the
conversation will be him explaining what the words mean. Yet to another
medical professional, the communication is efficient and accurate.



.... beyond signalling that you are (or aren't) an expert on a precise
topic:


Yep.
Tell me again, how is it that we spot the BS'ers and fakers and
wanna-bees in this newsgroup?




So if some language(s) did have many words for snow, it should be no
more interesting than these other everyday cases. But if you think
about it, people who live in ever-snowful lands may perhaps care no
more about fine variations of snow, than we in warmer climes care
about fine variations of grass or pavement: anything so constant
disappears into the background and becomes less interesting.


I disagree. We don't make a living from pavement or grass, and they vary
considerably less than snow. The Eskimos have a very good reason for
their vocabulary, just as your doctor has a good reason for his.

Actually there are two reasons, but we don't need to go into the second
one just now.

Regards
Doug King

When people are talking about snow and they use the word "powder" is
that another word for snow?


JohnH November 28th 06 06:16 PM

Hey Chuck...
 
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:00:12 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:45:00 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:54:36 -0500, DSK wrote:

Well, OK, maybe I exaggerate.

Then again, maybe not:
http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_297.html

And here is a revision of the same issue, including comments
from a native Koniaq Eskimo who calls the Straight Dope
author a dumb redneck (amusing in itself, but unfortunately
she doesn't say how many words for snow there are in her
language)
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/010202.html


Skiers have a pretty good snow vocabulary also, e.g.:

dry powder

deep powder

wet powder (an oxymoron)

packed powder

machine made

hard pack

granular

frozen granular

loose granular (corn)

wind blown

wind blown with crust

I'd guess that the inuit have some corresponding terms for all but the
"machine made", and maybe some that I've never encountered.


Do golfers have a corresponding vocabulary for grass?

Enquiring minds (or in my case - empty mind) want to know.


Too high, too fast, too slow, too thick, probably more.

Chuck Gould November 28th 06 06:30 PM

Hey Chuck...
 

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 28 Nov 2006 08:44:06 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:


DSK wrote:


You know, the Eskimos have over 70 words for snow. I wonder
how many different words for "rain" they have in Seattle.


No such thing as a wordy Seattlite. :-)


Really? I thought Seattle was the home of the breathless, wordy,
world weary literary set?


"Nope!" he replied, (thereby validating his previous observation that
there is no such thing as a wordy Seattlite). :-)


DSK November 28th 06 07:39 PM

Hey Chuck...
 
Chuck Gould wrote:
Times have changed, and most of the coffee snobs are out of business.
Anybody with the facilties to brew traditional coffee does so these
days.
The local Starbucks told me that drip coffee is their number one
seller.


Wow sounds like times have changed.

I once ordered a cup of coffee and the barista replied, "I can make you
an Americano...."

"Too late. I was born an Americano. Right now I just want a cup of
coffee."


He may have been trying to offer you a date.

DSK


basskisser November 28th 06 07:47 PM

Hey Chuck...
 

Chuck Gould wrote:
DSK wrote:
You know, the Eskimos have over 70 words for snow. I wonder
how many different words for "rain" they have in Seattle.


Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
Just walk into a Starbucks and look at the board with the coffee drink
descriptions.

With that many ways to describe coffee, it has to be about a
bizillion.


Years ago, I narrowly escaped getting lynched in Seattle...
I went to a couple of different shops & street vendors
trying to buy a cup of coffee, and finally in exasperation
said out loud "All I want is a PLAIN CUP OF COFFEE!"

DSK



Times have changed, and most of the coffee snobs are out of business.
Anybody with the facilties to brew traditional coffee does so these
days.
The local Starbucks told me that drip coffee is their number one
seller.

I love drip coffee, but I like it to be made with good coffee, not that
**** in a can like Maxwell House or Folgers.


Dry 1 November 28th 06 11:05 PM

Hey Chuck...
 
Poop I am from Canada and our only concern is what to put in our whisky.
What is coffee or this ?? drink lattiee?

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:58:12 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:22:13 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On 27 Nov 2006 18:15:07 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:


Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
I thought it only rained out in Seattle?

~~ snerk ~~

What are you referencing?

Never mind. It's only the solid form of rain. :)

There are at least two solid forms of rain.

Well EEEXXXCCCUUUUUUSEEEEEEE MMMMEEEEE!!!!!

PRECIPITATION....

Rain - Liquid
Drizzle - liquid, light, moves with air currents
Freezing Rain - liquid until hitting a cold surface
Freezing Drizzle - see Freezing Rain
Hail - precipitation in the form of balls or irregular lumps of ice
Snow - precipitation of white or translucent ice crystals

Thus ends the meteorological portion of this post which relates to
boating because apparently it never snows in the Pacific Northwest
where they boat all year 'round.


Noted. Ignored, but noted.


Ok, I know you live in liberal California so anything can be parsed in
numerous ways, but exactly how to you note something and ignore it at
the same time?

Hmmmmm? :)



Calif Bill November 28th 06 11:12 PM

Hey Chuck...
 

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:58:12 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:22:13 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
m...
On 27 Nov 2006 18:15:07 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:


Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
I thought it only rained out in Seattle?

~~ snerk ~~

What are you referencing?

Never mind. It's only the solid form of rain. :)

There are at least two solid forms of rain.

Well EEEXXXCCCUUUUUUSEEEEEEE MMMMEEEEE!!!!!

PRECIPITATION....

Rain - Liquid
Drizzle - liquid, light, moves with air currents
Freezing Rain - liquid until hitting a cold surface
Freezing Drizzle - see Freezing Rain
Hail - precipitation in the form of balls or irregular lumps of ice
Snow - precipitation of white or translucent ice crystals

Thus ends the meteorological portion of this post which relates to
boating because apparently it never snows in the Pacific Northwest
where they boat all year 'round.


Noted. Ignored, but noted.


Ok, I know you live in liberal California so anything can be parsed in
numerous ways, but exactly how to you note something and ignore it at
the same time?

Hmmmmm? :)


It's a West Coast thing.



Calif Bill November 28th 06 11:13 PM

Hey Chuck...
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:00:12 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:45:00 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:54:36 -0500, DSK wrote:

Well, OK, maybe I exaggerate.

Then again, maybe not:
http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_297.html

And here is a revision of the same issue, including comments
from a native Koniaq Eskimo who calls the Straight Dope
author a dumb redneck (amusing in itself, but unfortunately
she doesn't say how many words for snow there are in her
language)
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/010202.html

Skiers have a pretty good snow vocabulary also, e.g.:

dry powder

deep powder

wet powder (an oxymoron)

packed powder

machine made

hard pack

granular

frozen granular

loose granular (corn)

wind blown

wind blown with crust

I'd guess that the inuit have some corresponding terms for all but the
"machine made", and maybe some that I've never encountered.


Do golfers have a corresponding vocabulary for grass?

Enquiring minds (or in my case - empty mind) want to know.


Too high, too fast, too slow, too thick, probably more.


F'n grass?



Calif Bill November 28th 06 11:18 PM

Hey Chuck... words for snow
 

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:16:37 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

So how many different words do the Eskimos have for snow?


42 - The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything.


Or is that 24? Maybe the answer is dyslexic.



Reginald P. Smithers III November 28th 06 11:22 PM

Hey Chuck... words for snow
 
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:16:37 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

So how many different words do the Eskimos have for snow?


42 - The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything.

You have the answer to all questions, but you never said they were
correct. grin

Tim November 29th 06 02:48 AM

Hey Chuck...
 

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:05:21 GMT, Dry 1 "spots are out "@ Vail's.com
wrote:

Poop I am from Canada and our only concern is what to put in our whisky.


Hockey pucks?


Horse hockey pucks?


Jack Goff November 29th 06 04:27 AM

Hey Chuck...
 
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:34:42 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:05:21 GMT, Dry 1 "spots are out "@ Vail's.com
wrote:

Poop I am from Canada and our only concern is what to put in our whisky.


Hockey pucks?


LOL! Good one.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com