Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:13:44 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message . .. JohnH wrote: On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. 80% is a B, isn't that good? Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even MORE, can't you? OK, but 80% is better than 70%. Cite? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage So 35% unemployment is better than 4.5%? Always, 35 is better than 4. See how easy this is. Where'd he go? Anyway, your lesson on percents from wikipedia was a knee jerk reaction. It didn't prove that 80% was better than 70%, it just said it was bigger. Bigger is not necessarily better, even if Paris Hilton says so. |