| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
oh sh*t
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. ps - Bassy, I am playing with you because you are taking this thing way to serious. You really do need to sit back and enjoy life and not go looking for a fight on every post. The OP comment was a comment made in passing, it was not meant to be taken as the gospel. |
oh sh*t
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. 80% is a B, isn't that good? Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even MORE, can't you? OK, but 80% is better than 70%. |
oh sh*t
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. ps - Bassy, I am playing with you because you are taking this thing way to serious. You really do need to sit back and enjoy life and not go looking for a fight on every post. The OP comment was a comment made in passing, it was not meant to be taken as the gospel. No, but it was a knee jerk response. Most intelligent people THINK before they make comments like JimH made. He does so consitently here. Not long ago, he made a comment about a boating accident saying that the people must have been drunk rednecks. Neither was the case. |
oh sh*t
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. 80% is a B, isn't that good? Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even MORE, can't you? OK, but 80% is better than 70%. Cite? |
oh sh*t
JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. 80% is a B, isn't that good? Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even MORE, can't you? OK, but 80% is better than 70%. Cite? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage |
oh sh*t
"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message . .. JohnH wrote: On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. 80% is a B, isn't that good? Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even MORE, can't you? OK, but 80% is better than 70%. Cite? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage So 35% unemployment is better than 4.5%? |
oh sh*t
Calif Bill wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message . .. JohnH wrote: On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. 80% is a B, isn't that good? Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even MORE, can't you? OK, but 80% is better than 70%. Cite? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage So 35% unemployment is better than 4.5%? Always, 35 is better than 4. See how easy this is. |
oh sh*t
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:09:17 -0500, JohnH wrote: On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:39 GMT, Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message . .. Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. I thought this looked familiar: http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001945.html Capt Jack R.. So who got the speed right? Everybody - I think the consensus is that he was going too freakin' fast. Yea - and the guy who got the speed wrong was the driver :-) Capt Jack R.. |
oh sh*t
JimH wrote:
Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:39 GMT, Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. I thought this looked familiar: http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001945.html Capt Jack R.. So who got the speed right? You will have to wait for the human radar to log back on. My guess is 8:00 or later on Monday... That boy is easily wound up over nothing. I could be wrong, but I think the driver fell out of the boat. And that the boat was new. of course all the warranties expired on impact. I was just glad no one was killed. and there was one less nut on the lake we enjoy - for awhile anyway.. Capt Jack R.. |
oh sh*t
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:13:44 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message . .. JohnH wrote: On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. 80% is a B, isn't that good? Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even MORE, can't you? OK, but 80% is better than 70%. Cite? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage So 35% unemployment is better than 4.5%? Always, 35 is better than 4. See how easy this is. Where'd he go? Anyway, your lesson on percents from wikipedia was a knee jerk reaction. It didn't prove that 80% was better than 70%, it just said it was bigger. Bigger is not necessarily better, even if Paris Hilton says so. |
oh sh*t
JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:13:44 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message . .. JohnH wrote: On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:29:47 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. 80% is a B, isn't that good? Thanks for making my point! Come on, you can dumb yourself down even MORE, can't you? OK, but 80% is better than 70%. Cite? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage So 35% unemployment is better than 4.5%? Always, 35 is better than 4. See how easy this is. Where'd he go? Anyway, your lesson on percents from wikipedia was a knee jerk reaction. It didn't prove that 80% was better than 70%, it just said it was bigger. Bigger is not necessarily better, even if Paris Hilton says so. I have to be honest with you, I think your comment about my wikipedia link is a knee jerk reaction. |
oh sh*t
Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:39 GMT, Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. I thought this looked familiar: http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001945.html Capt Jack R.. So who got the speed right? You will have to wait for the human radar to log back on. My guess is 8:00 or later on Monday... That boy is easily wound up over nothing. I could be wrong, but I think the driver fell out of the boat. And that the boat was new. of course all the warranties expired on impact. I was just glad no one was killed. and there was one less nut on the lake we enjoy - for awhile anyway.. Capt Jack R.. I stand by my belief that it was a toothless Georgia redneck on a canal and doing 70 mph. The boat reportedly (according to WCNZ TV, Atlanta) had an experimental black box and the last words recorded were on it "Hold my beer and watch what I can do". The news report went on to say that this was not the first time this type of incident has happened, although mainly occurring with bassboats. ;-) |
oh sh*t
JimH wrote:
Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:39 GMT, Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. I thought this looked familiar: http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001945.html Capt Jack R.. So who got the speed right? You will have to wait for the human radar to log back on. My guess is 8:00 or later on Monday... That boy is easily wound up over nothing. That's what makes it so much fun! |
oh sh*t
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oglegroups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message . 247... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? And you also, I wouldn't expect anything more or less than a kneejerk reaction from you. Any thought or investigation from you and people like Reggie and Calif Bill before your mouth (fingers) engage would probably be impossible. My knee did not jerk when I typed "100 mph". And your brain didn't engage, neither. Try "either" next time. You will look, and feel, much smarter than you really are! |
oh sh*t
Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/20/2006 9:16 AM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: JohnH wrote: I wonder if basskisser realizes the maturity level he portrays. Is your knee jerking? ;) Are you two in competition for "A**hole of the Newgroup" Trophy? Only second place is open at the moment. |
oh sh*t
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Yeah, but I got an 80% on the test. For awhile you were doing pretty good here. Now I see that you are dumbing yourself down again. ps - Bassy, I am playing with you because you are taking this thing way to serious. You really do need to sit back and enjoy life and not go looking for a fight on every post. The OP comment was a comment made in passing, it was not meant to be taken as the gospel. No, but it was a knee jerk response. Most intelligent people THINK before they make comments like JimH made. He does so consitently here. Not long ago, he made a comment about a boating accident saying that the people must have been drunk rednecks. Neither was the case. "knee jerk" is the catch phrase of the day. Does that mean "childish" and "bubble wrap" are gone forever? Stay tuned... |
oh sh*t
On 19 Nov 2006 07:28:29 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. Was it an even 100 mph? And of course.......another one. Wouldn't expect anything more from you. Bassy was only doing 20mph in the stolen boat when he ran it up the bank... :-) |
oh sh*t
Dan wrote:
Harry Krause wrote: On 11/20/2006 9:16 AM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: JohnH wrote: I wonder if basskisser realizes the maturity level he portrays. Is your knee jerking? ;) Are you two in competition for "A**hole of the Newgroup" Trophy? Only second place is open at the moment. Nope, the first 3 places are wrapped up......kevin, harry and doug |
oh sh*t
"Dan" wrote in message ink.net... basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ooglegroups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message .247... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? And you also, I wouldn't expect anything more or less than a kneejerk reaction from you. Any thought or investigation from you and people like Reggie and Calif Bill before your mouth (fingers) engage would probably be impossible. My knee did not jerk when I typed "100 mph". And your brain didn't engage, neither. Try "either" next time. You will look, and feel, much smarter than you really are! You're looking for a good tongue thrashing.... |
oh sh*t
JimH wrote:
Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:39 GMT, Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message 47... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. I thought this looked familiar: http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001945.html Capt Jack R.. So who got the speed right? You will have to wait for the human radar to log back on. My guess is 8:00 or later on Monday... That boy is easily wound up over nothing. I could be wrong, but I think the driver fell out of the boat. And that the boat was new. of course all the warranties expired on impact. I was just glad no one was killed. and there was one less nut on the lake we enjoy - for awhile anyway.. Capt Jack R.. I stand by my belief that it was a toothless Georgia redneck on a canal and doing 70 mph. The boat reportedly (according to WCNZ TV, Atlanta) had an experimental black box and the last words recorded were on it "Hold my beer and watch what I can do". The news report went on to say that this was not the first time this type of incident has happened, although mainly occurring with bassboats. ;-) Hehehehe yea - it all started with the famous words - Now watch this!! Capt Jack R.. |
oh sh*t
JimH wrote: Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:39 GMT, Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. I thought this looked familiar: http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001945.html Capt Jack R.. So who got the speed right? You will have to wait for the human radar to log back on. My guess is 8:00 or later on Monday... That boy is easily wound up over nothing. I could be wrong, but I think the driver fell out of the boat. And that the boat was new. of course all the warranties expired on impact. I was just glad no one was killed. and there was one less nut on the lake we enjoy - for awhile anyway.. Capt Jack R.. I stand by my belief that it was a toothless Georgia redneck on a canal and doing 70 mph. The boat reportedly (according to WCNZ TV, Atlanta) had an experimental black box and the last words recorded were on it "Hold my beer and watch what I can do". The news report went on to say that this was not the first time this type of incident has happened, although mainly occurring with bassboats. ;-) Again, JimH proves himself the newsgroup liar. Every single thing in that whole paragraph is a lie. And he's so stupid he can't even look up a real TV station. There is no WCNZ in Atlanta. |
oh sh*t
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oglegroups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message . 247... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? And you also, I wouldn't expect anything more or less than a kneejerk reaction from you. Any thought or investigation from you and people like Reggie and Calif Bill before your mouth (fingers) engage would probably be impossible. My knee did not jerk when I typed "100 mph". And your brain didn't engage, neither. Try "either" next time. You will look, and feel, much smarter than you really are! Infatuation...... Infatuation.... It's making Dan crazy...... It's driving him CRAAAAAZZZZYYYY...... |
oh sh*t
Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:39 GMT, Jack Redington wrote: JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message ... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. I thought this looked familiar: http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001945.html Capt Jack R.. So who got the speed right? You will have to wait for the human radar to log back on. My guess is 8:00 or later on Monday... That boy is easily wound up over nothing. I could be wrong, but I think the driver fell out of the boat. I believe that's correct. And that the boat was new. of course all the warranties expired on impact. I was just glad no one was killed. and there was one less nut on the lake we enjoy - for awhile anyway. I think that it happened quite close to Tugaloo state park. Capt Jack R.. |
oh sh*t
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message news:1163876243.714701.258660@h48g2000cwc. googlegroups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message 6.247... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? And you also, I wouldn't expect anything more or less than a kneejerk reaction from you. Any thought or investigation from you and people like Reggie and Calif Bill before your mouth (fingers) engage would probably be impossible. My knee did not jerk when I typed "100 mph". And your brain didn't engage, neither. Try "either" next time. You will look, and feel, much smarter than you really are! Infatuation...... Infatuation.... It's making Dan crazy...... It's driving him CRAAAAAZZZZYYYY...... This is a classic knee-jerk reaction from a childish liar who should be limited to the back yard while in bubble wrap. Put the bong away, relax for a few years, and come back then, Kevin. |
oh sh*t
ACP wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message ink.net... basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message news:1163876243.714701.258660@h48g2000cwc. googlegroups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message 6.247... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? And you also, I wouldn't expect anything more or less than a kneejerk reaction from you. Any thought or investigation from you and people like Reggie and Calif Bill before your mouth (fingers) engage would probably be impossible. My knee did not jerk when I typed "100 mph". And your brain didn't engage, neither. Try "either" next time. You will look, and feel, much smarter than you really are! You're looking for a good tongue thrashing.... The boy will likely try very hard at a rebuttal. My money says it's lame. |
oh sh*t
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message news:1163876243.714701.258660@h48g2000cwc. googlegroups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message 6.247... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? And you also, I wouldn't expect anything more or less than a kneejerk reaction from you. Any thought or investigation from you and people like Reggie and Calif Bill before your mouth (fingers) engage would probably be impossible. My knee did not jerk when I typed "100 mph". And your brain didn't engage, neither. Try "either" next time. You will look, and feel, much smarter than you really are! Infatuation...... Infatuation.... It's making Dan crazy...... It's driving him CRAAAAAZZZZYYYY...... This is a classic knee-jerk reaction from a childish liar who should be limited to the back yard while in bubble wrap. Put the bong away, relax for a few years, and come back then, Kevin. Where did I lie, Dan? What evidence do you have that I have a "bong"? And, I"m not Kevin.... Infatuation...... Infatuation......... |
oh sh*t
Dan wrote: ACP wrote: "Dan" wrote in message ink.net... basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message news:1163876243.714701.258660@h48g2000cwc. googlegroups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message 6.247... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? And you also, I wouldn't expect anything more or less than a kneejerk reaction from you. Any thought or investigation from you and people like Reggie and Calif Bill before your mouth (fingers) engage would probably be impossible. My knee did not jerk when I typed "100 mph". And your brain didn't engage, neither. Try "either" next time. You will look, and feel, much smarter than you really are! You're looking for a good tongue thrashing.... The boy will likely try very hard at a rebuttal. My money says it's lame. "the boy"? This from Dan, the person who is so infatuated with me that he follows me around to every single thread I post to!!!!! Does your mommy know that you are using her computer to stalk people you are infatuated with on usenet? |
oh sh*t
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: ACP wrote: "Dan" wrote in message thlink.net... basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message news:1163876243.714701.258660@h48g2000cw c.googlegroups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message . 106.247... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? And you also, I wouldn't expect anything more or less than a kneejerk reaction from you. Any thought or investigation from you and people like Reggie and Calif Bill before your mouth (fingers) engage would probably be impossible. My knee did not jerk when I typed "100 mph". And your brain didn't engage, neither. Try "either" next time. You will look, and feel, much smarter than you really are! You're looking for a good tongue thrashing.... The boy will likely try very hard at a rebuttal. My money says it's lame. "the boy"? This from Dan, the person who is so infatuated with me that he follows me around to every single thread I post to!!!!! Does your mommy know that you are using her computer to stalk people you are infatuated with on usenet? A typical response expected from a boy. |
oh sh*t
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message news:1163876243.714701.258660@h48g2000cw c.googlegroups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message . 106.247... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? And you also, I wouldn't expect anything more or less than a kneejerk reaction from you. Any thought or investigation from you and people like Reggie and Calif Bill before your mouth (fingers) engage would probably be impossible. My knee did not jerk when I typed "100 mph". And your brain didn't engage, neither. Try "either" next time. You will look, and feel, much smarter than you really are! Infatuation...... Infatuation.... It's making Dan crazy...... It's driving him CRAAAAAZZZZYYYY...... This is a classic knee-jerk reaction from a childish liar who should be limited to the back yard while in bubble wrap. Put the bong away, relax for a few years, and come back then, Kevin. Where did I lie, Dan? What evidence do you have that I have a "bong"? And, I"m not Kevin.... Infatuation...... Infatuation......... Can't you count five Kevinisms in two sentences? Look again. Try harder this time. You'll get it! |
oh sh*t
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: ACP wrote: "Dan" wrote in message thlink.net... basskisser wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: basskisser wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 06:45:11 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message news:1163876243.714701.258660@h48g2000cw c.googlegroups.com... JimH wrote: "Ron" wrote in message . 106.247... Hows this for docking ? http://forums.victoria.craigslist.or...=Q&ID=52778720 quite the bass boat :-) Ron in BC Probably some dumbass doing 70 miles/hour in a canal. Wrong again. Your knee-jerk reactions are always wrong. 90 mph? Another idiotic knee-jerk reaction. And another wrong one. 100? And you also, I wouldn't expect anything more or less than a kneejerk reaction from you. Any thought or investigation from you and people like Reggie and Calif Bill before your mouth (fingers) engage would probably be impossible. My knee did not jerk when I typed "100 mph". And your brain didn't engage, neither. Try "either" next time. You will look, and feel, much smarter than you really are! You're looking for a good tongue thrashing.... The boy will likely try very hard at a rebuttal. My money says it's lame. "the boy"? This from Dan, the person who is so infatuated with me that he follows me around to every single thread I post to!!!!! Does your mommy know that you are using her computer to stalk people you are infatuated with on usenet? A typical response expected from a boy. Infatuation..... Infatuation..... It's making Dan crazy..... It's driving Dan CRAAAZZZYYY...... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:02 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com