Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]()
posted to alt.true-crime,rec.boats,talk.politics.guns
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 03:21:03 -0500, "tiny dancer"
wrote: "Bo Raxo" wrote in message roups.com... Bo Raxo wrote: tiny dancer wrote: Think Kenneth MacDuff. He got a plea bargain, that's how he got out. You want to outlaw plea bargains? Has nothing to do with death penalty versus life without parole. Oh wait, I was thinking of someone else. This is an hilarious example: if he'd been originally sentenced to LWOP, nobody else would have died. But he was given the death penalty, under a flawed process, and the conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court. And the state whose law he was convicted under was poorly written so it didn't roll over to a life sentence, as with for example Manson. *That* is why he got out - poorly written laws, and *because* people like you wanted the death penalty. No death penalty, and he would not have gotten out. Plus, that loophole in state laws has been plugged, overturn the death penalty and they automatically become LWOP. So it is no excuse to keep killing people. You want to claim the system is flawed, and that is a reason to execute people? Do you see that makes no sense? Bo Raxo Nope, wait until you have a kid. And somebody hurts your kid. I'm thinking you might change your story. Especially if you find out your kid was just one in a long line. You mean a kid like Devin Miles Gibson, diapered and left to asphyxiate in the car, his mom, acquitted of all charges, quipping: "Putting me behind bars wasn't going to solve anything. No matter what the outcome was, it wasn't going to bring Devin back." You were fine with that one, Tiny. Sure, it was probably not intentional (funny, how she'd finally discovered the concept of "outcome", a bit late for Devin's sake), but then no one ever suggested Michele face capital punishment in turn. Fact is, most of the same arguments you use on career criminals apply he there's no reason to assume she won't have more children, no reason to assume she'll be more responsible or better able to care for them in the future. No reason at all to believe there won't be more Devins in her future. His death was even more agonizing than the Hawks', more prolonged ... and wasn't his *mother* supposed to care for him? What do you suppose his last thoughts were as he lay, suffocating, burning up, encased in his own ****? Was *that* a better way to die than plunging through icy waters weighted down by your own anchor? Yet you were fine with Michele walking away scot-free. I've had it with degenerates who treat innocent human beings as pawns in their sick games. Yes, there is a difference in human life IMO. There is no way in hell I'd lay down my life for Joseph Duncan or this Deleon dude. Sorry, but the raw outrage is misplaced here. I don't necessarily agree with Bo, I don't care what happens to the Duncans or Davies of this world. I *think* capital punishment is nearly run its course in the USA (hell, even the Chinese, its most enthusiastic practitioners, are backing off a bit on it), but that's neither here nor there. You seem like the quintessential juror for whom the circumstances of the case are less important than the question, does she identify more with the victim or the perpetrator? Andy Katz |