Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]()
posted to alt.true-crime,rec.boats,talk.politics.guns
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -L. wrote: Bo Raxo wrote: snip Nope, you say we might as well throw that life away as garbage. Must be great to be able to see in to the future and know with such certainty whether a person will ever be able to change and ever be able to do any good for his fellow man. I don't know where one finds such certainty about human nature and the future, but somehow I think it comes from a place to which I wouldn't want to go. Bo Raxo I am normally anti-death penalty, but I have one name for you. Timothy Buss. Google it. And life without parole wouldn't have worked as well? These days, a crime like his would have gotten LWOP - sentences used to be lighter 30 years ago. And even murderers eligible for parole almost never get it granted - not since Willie Horton. Yes, his crime was heinous. That doesn't change the moral calculus of whether it is right to kill people. It isn't. He tortured his second victim, and raped him. Would you sentence him to torture? Would you sentence him to rape? If those things aren't right, why is the killing part right? Because it satisfies your rage? Bo Raxo |