The Voting Process in Maryland
 

Harry Krause wrote:

We have those damned electronic voting machines in Maryland, the ones
that do not provide any printed record of your vote.

I asked the polling "referee" why I should trust these machines to
produce an honest count, and she said, "Well, I feel secure about them."

To which I responded, "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why
should I trust you?" She really had no answers that were satisfactory.

Why would you become confrontational with someone who has no decision
making authority? She is a very nice volunteer, who was laughing at you
as soon as you walked away. Even if she agrees with your assessment,
she was laughing at your behavior.

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/7/2006 3:16 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
We have those damned electronic voting machines in Maryland, the ones
that do not provide any printed record of your vote.

I asked the polling "referee" why I should trust these machines to
produce an honest count, and she said, "Well, I feel secure about them."

To which I responded, "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why
should I trust you?" She really had no answers that were satisfactory.

Why would you become confrontational with someone who has no decision
making authority? She is a very nice volunteer, who was laughing at you
as soon as you walked away. Even if she agrees with your assessment, she
was laughing at your behavior.



No, she wasn't, because at least five other people around me were asking
her the same questions.

Then she laughed at all of you.

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 3:16 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
We have those damned electronic voting machines in Maryland, the ones
that do not provide any printed record of your vote.

I asked the polling "referee" why I should trust these machines to
produce an honest count, and she said, "Well, I feel secure about them."

To which I responded, "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why
should I trust you?" She really had no answers that were satisfactory.

Why would you become confrontational with someone who has no decision
making authority? She is a very nice volunteer, who was laughing at
you as soon as you walked away. Even if she agrees with your
assessment, she was laughing at your behavior.



No, she wasn't, because at least five other people around me were asking
her the same questions.

Perhaps you take the voting process lightly. I don't.

She was laughing at your inability to make speak your displeasure about
the voting machines in an effective manner. You asking a poll volunteer
"What are your credentials? Who are you? Why should I trust you?" makes
as much sense as screaming at the moon, both of them are just as
effective in changing the voting process. Perhaps if you did take the
voting process seriously, and really wanted to make a change, you would
realize how completely ineffective your confrontational behavior is and
so something that would make a difference. My guess is you enjoy the
confrontation, and really don't care if they change the machines.

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 3:16 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
We have those damned electronic voting machines in Maryland, the
ones that do not provide any printed record of your vote.

I asked the polling "referee" why I should trust these machines to
produce an honest count, and she said, "Well, I feel secure about
them."

To which I responded, "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why
should I trust you?" She really had no answers that were satisfactory.

Why would you become confrontational with someone who has no decision
making authority? She is a very nice volunteer, who was laughing at
you as soon as you walked away. Even if she agrees with your
assessment, she was laughing at your behavior.



No, she wasn't, because at least five other people around me were
asking her the same questions.

Perhaps you take the voting process lightly. I don't.

She was laughing at your inability to make speak your displeasure about
the voting machines in an effective manner. You asking a poll volunteer
"What are your credentials? Who are you? Why should I trust you?" makes
as much sense as screaming at the moon, both of them are just as
effective in changing the voting process. Perhaps if you did take the
voting process seriously, and really wanted to make a change, you would
realize how completely ineffective your confrontational behavior is and
do something that would make a difference. My guess is you enjoy the
confrontation, and really don't care if they change the machines.

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

..NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/7/2006 3:16 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
We have those damned electronic voting machines in Maryland, the ones
that do not provide any printed record of your vote.

I asked the polling "referee" why I should trust these machines to
produce an honest count, and she said, "Well, I feel secure about them."

To which I responded, "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why
should I trust you?" She really had no answers that were satisfactory.
Why would you become confrontational with someone who has no decision
making authority? She is a very nice volunteer, who was laughing at you
as soon as you walked away. Even if she agrees with your assessment, she
was laughing at your behavior.


No, she wasn't, because at least five other people around me were asking
her the same questions.

Then she laughed at all of you.


NYOB
This reminds me of the old feeble minded people yelling at the clerk at
the airline ticket desk when the flight is canceled due to bad weather.

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
On 11/7/2006 5:45 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 3:16 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
We have those damned electronic voting machines in Maryland, the ones
that do not provide any printed record of your vote.

I asked the polling "referee" why I should trust these machines to
produce an honest count, and she said, "Well, I feel secure about
them."

To which I responded, "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why
should I trust you?" She really had no answers that were satisfactory.
Why would you become confrontational with someone who has no decision
making authority? She is a very nice volunteer, who was laughing at
you as soon as you walked away. Even if she agrees with your
assessment, she was laughing at your behavior.


No, she wasn't, because at least five other people around me were asking
her the same questions.

Perhaps you take the voting process lightly. I don't.

She was laughing at your inability to make speak your displeasure about
the voting machines in an effective manner. You asking a poll volunteer
"What are your credentials? Who are you? Why should I trust you?" makes
as much sense as screaming at the moon, both of them are just as
effective in changing the voting process. Perhaps if you did take the
voting process seriously, and really wanted to make a change, you would
realize how completely ineffective your confrontational behavior is and
so something that would make a difference. My guess is you enjoy the
confrontation, and really don't care if they change the machines.


You assume the woman was a "volunteer." She was not. She introduced
herself as a "supervisor" from the state board of elections, and was
wearing a state ID nameplate. We had some serious problems during the
primaries some weeks ago, and the board of elections caught hell.

Perhaps you ought to have a few facts on hand before you drool in here,
hey?


Say hello to the new tactics of the Democrats in Election 2006.

sigh

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 5:45 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 3:16 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
We have those damned electronic voting machines in Maryland, the
ones that do not provide any printed record of your vote.

I asked the polling "referee" why I should trust these machines to
produce an honest count, and she said, "Well, I feel secure about
them."

To which I responded, "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why
should I trust you?" She really had no answers that were satisfactory.
Why would you become confrontational with someone who has no
decision making authority? She is a very nice volunteer, who was
laughing at you as soon as you walked away. Even if she agrees with
your assessment, she was laughing at your behavior.


No, she wasn't, because at least five other people around me were
asking her the same questions.

Perhaps you take the voting process lightly. I don't.

She was laughing at your inability to make speak your displeasure
about the voting machines in an effective manner. You asking a poll
volunteer "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why should I trust
you?" makes as much sense as screaming at the moon, both of them are
just as effective in changing the voting process. Perhaps if you did
take the voting process seriously, and really wanted to make a change,
you would realize how completely ineffective your confrontational
behavior is and so something that would make a difference. My guess
is you enjoy the confrontation, and really don't care if they change
the machines.


You assume the woman was a "volunteer." She was not. She introduced
herself as a "supervisor" from the state board of elections, and was
wearing a state ID nameplate. We had some serious problems during the
primaries some weeks ago, and the board of elections caught hell.

Perhaps you ought to have a few facts on hand before you drool in here,
hey?

Perhaps you should understand that yelling and asking them "What are
your credentials? Who are you? Why should I trust you?" , at anyone
during the voting process has no effect on the system, no matter what
their position is. The fact that you do not realize this will make you
completely ineffective campaigning for anything you believe in.

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/7/2006 6:12 PM, JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
On 11/7/2006 5:45 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 3:16 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
We have those damned electronic voting machines in Maryland, the
ones that do not provide any printed record of your vote.

I asked the polling "referee" why I should trust these machines to
produce an honest count, and she said, "Well, I feel secure about
them."

To which I responded, "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why
should I trust you?" She really had no answers that were
satisfactory.
Why would you become confrontational with someone who has no decision
making authority? She is a very nice volunteer, who was laughing at
you as soon as you walked away. Even if she agrees with your
assessment, she was laughing at your behavior.

No, she wasn't, because at least five other people around me were
asking her the same questions.

Perhaps you take the voting process lightly. I don't.
She was laughing at your inability to make speak your displeasure about
the voting machines in an effective manner. You asking a poll volunteer
"What are your credentials? Who are you? Why should I trust you?" makes
as much sense as screaming at the moon, both of them are just as
effective in changing the voting process. Perhaps if you did take the
voting process seriously, and really wanted to make a change, you would
realize how completely ineffective your confrontational behavior is and
so something that would make a difference. My guess is you enjoy the
confrontation, and really don't care if they change the machines.

You assume the woman was a "volunteer." She was not. She introduced
herself as a "supervisor" from the state board of elections, and was
wearing a state ID nameplate. We had some serious problems during the
primaries some weeks ago, and the board of elections caught hell.

Perhaps you ought to have a few facts on hand before you drool in here,
hey?


Say hello to the new tactics of the Democrats in Election 2006.

sigh


Really? The Republican governor of this state urged voters to obtain
absentee ballots because he had no confidence in the electronic machines.

He


Governor Warns of Crisis in Wake of Diebold 'Repair' Revelations
By Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews
October 27, 2006, 1:30 PM



Let's see who starts to file the lawsuits.

Oops, the Dems have already filing them in Ohio, even before the voting
sites close at 7:30. ;-)

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/7/2006 6:25 PM, JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/7/2006 6:12 PM, JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
On 11/7/2006 5:45 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 3:16 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
We have those damned electronic voting machines in Maryland, the
ones that do not provide any printed record of your vote.

I asked the polling "referee" why I should trust these machines to
produce an honest count, and she said, "Well, I feel secure about
them."

To which I responded, "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why
should I trust you?" She really had no answers that were
satisfactory.
Why would you become confrontational with someone who has no
decision making authority? She is a very nice volunteer, who was
laughing at you as soon as you walked away. Even if she agrees
with your assessment, she was laughing at your behavior.
No, she wasn't, because at least five other people around me were
asking her the same questions.

Perhaps you take the voting process lightly. I don't.
She was laughing at your inability to make speak your displeasure
about the voting machines in an effective manner. You asking a poll
volunteer "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why should I trust
you?" makes as much sense as screaming at the moon, both of them are
just as effective in changing the voting process. Perhaps if you did
take the voting process seriously, and really wanted to make a
change, you would realize how completely ineffective your
confrontational behavior is and so something that would make a
difference. My guess is you enjoy the confrontation, and really
don't care if they change the machines.
You assume the woman was a "volunteer." She was not. She introduced
herself as a "supervisor" from the state board of elections, and was
wearing a state ID nameplate. We had some serious problems during the
primaries some weeks ago, and the board of elections caught hell.

Perhaps you ought to have a few facts on hand before you drool in
here, hey?

Say hello to the new tactics of the Democrats in Election 2006.

sigh

Really? The Republican governor of this state urged voters to obtain
absentee ballots because he had no confidence in the electronic
machines.

He


Governor Warns of Crisis in Wake of Diebold 'Repair' Revelations
By Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews
October 27, 2006, 1:30 PM



Let's see who starts to file the lawsuits.

Oops, the Dems have already filing them in Ohio, even before the voting
sites close at 7:30. ;-)


The FBI is in Virginia, investigating Republican intimidation of voters.



In all my voting life I have never been nor have I ever seen a voter or
voters being intimidated.

This whole voting process now sickens me thanks to your party.

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/7/2006 6:33 PM, JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/7/2006 6:25 PM, JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/7/2006 6:12 PM, JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
On 11/7/2006 5:45 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 3:16 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
We have those damned electronic voting machines in Maryland, the
ones that do not provide any printed record of your vote.

I asked the polling "referee" why I should trust these machines
to produce an honest count, and she said, "Well, I feel secure
about them."

To which I responded, "What are your credentials? Who are you?
Why should I trust you?" She really had no answers that were
satisfactory.
Why would you become confrontational with someone who has no
decision making authority? She is a very nice volunteer, who was
laughing at you as soon as you walked away. Even if she agrees
with your assessment, she was laughing at your behavior.
No, she wasn't, because at least five other people around me were
asking her the same questions.

Perhaps you take the voting process lightly. I don't.
She was laughing at your inability to make speak your displeasure
about the voting machines in an effective manner. You asking a poll
volunteer "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why should I
trust you?" makes as much sense as screaming at the moon, both of
them are just as effective in changing the voting process. Perhaps
if you did take the voting process seriously, and really wanted to
make a change, you would realize how completely ineffective your
confrontational behavior is and so something that would make a
difference. My guess is you enjoy the confrontation, and really
don't care if they change the machines.
You assume the woman was a "volunteer." She was not. She introduced
herself as a "supervisor" from the state board of elections, and was
wearing a state ID nameplate. We had some serious problems during
the primaries some weeks ago, and the board of elections caught
hell.

Perhaps you ought to have a few facts on hand before you drool in
here, hey?
Say hello to the new tactics of the Democrats in Election 2006.

sigh
Really? The Republican governor of this state urged voters to obtain
absentee ballots because he had no confidence in the electronic
machines.

He


Governor Warns of Crisis in Wake of Diebold 'Repair' Revelations
By Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews
October 27, 2006, 1:30 PM


Let's see who starts to file the lawsuits.

Oops, the Dems have already filing them in Ohio, even before the voting
sites close at 7:30. ;-)

The FBI is in Virginia, investigating Republican intimidation of voters.



In all my voting life I have never been nor have I ever seen a voter or
voters being intimidated.

This whole voting process now sickens me thanks to your party.
It usually isn't white suburbanites who are the subject of GOP voter
intimidation techniques.


Yeah....sure Harry. It is always the white, black and Hispanic city
dwellers who are always the ones subject to intimidation.

And the cow jumped over the moon...........

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 6:15 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 5:45 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 3:16 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
We have those damned electronic voting machines in Maryland, the
ones that do not provide any printed record of your vote.

I asked the polling "referee" why I should trust these machines
to produce an honest count, and she said, "Well, I feel secure
about them."

To which I responded, "What are your credentials? Who are you?
Why should I trust you?" She really had no answers that were
satisfactory.
Why would you become confrontational with someone who has no
decision making authority? She is a very nice volunteer, who was
laughing at you as soon as you walked away. Even if she agrees
with your assessment, she was laughing at your behavior.

No, she wasn't, because at least five other people around me were
asking her the same questions.

Perhaps you take the voting process lightly. I don't.
She was laughing at your inability to make speak your displeasure
about the voting machines in an effective manner. You asking a poll
volunteer "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why should I
trust you?" makes as much sense as screaming at the moon, both of
them are just as effective in changing the voting process. Perhaps
if you did take the voting process seriously, and really wanted to
make a change, you would realize how completely ineffective your
confrontational behavior is and so something that would make a
difference. My guess is you enjoy the confrontation, and really
don't care if they change the machines.

You assume the woman was a "volunteer." She was not. She introduced
herself as a "supervisor" from the state board of elections, and was
wearing a state ID nameplate. We had some serious problems during the
primaries some weeks ago, and the board of elections caught hell.

Perhaps you ought to have a few facts on hand before you drool in
here, hey?

Perhaps you should understand that yelling and asking them "What are
your credentials? Who are you? Why should I trust you?" , at anyone
during the voting process has no effect on the system, no matter what
their position is. The fact that you do not realize this will make
you completely ineffective campaigning for anything you believe in.


Where did you get the idea I was yelling, d.f.? The woman was a
representative of the state; she damned well better know what she is doing.

My guess: you didn't vote in this election. You're a watcher, not a do-er.

I did vote, and I know asking a supervisor "What are your credentials?
Who are you? Why should I trust you?" while they are supervising an
election in process will do nothing. The fact that you continue to try
to justify your behavior shows how out of touch with how "do'er" get
things done. Hint- they way you did it isn't the way.

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:21:26 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



My guess: you didn't vote in this election. You're a watcher, not a do-er.

I didn't vote today. Decided that if I post in this group I'll end up
in political discussions. So my opinions must be totally unbiased,
and not tainted by a voting record.
Besides, I didn't like any of the candidates.

--Vic

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

I voted green party for governor. I know the guy doesn't stand a
snowballs chance, but I'm comfortable I voted and how I voted, , and I
didn't vote for either dem. nor rep.


I feel good.


Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:21:26 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



My guess: you didn't vote in this election. You're a watcher, not a do-er.

I didn't vote today. Decided that if I post in this group I'll end up
in political discussions. So my opinions must be totally unbiased,
and not tainted by a voting record.
Besides, I didn't like any of the candidates.

--Vic

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:21:26 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



My guess: you didn't vote in this election. You're a watcher, not a do-er.

I didn't vote today.

Shame on you.

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

On 7 Nov 2006 16:21:34 -0800, wrote:

I voted green party for governor. I know the guy doesn't stand a
snowballs chance, but I'm comfortable I voted and how I voted, , and I
didn't vote for either dem. nor rep.


I feel good.

Darn, I forgot about that. It's a good thing to get any third party
to the 5% threshold so they can get funding. The more voices,
the better, unless it gets babylonian.

--Vic

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

Vic Smith wrote:
The more voices, the better, unless it gets babylonian.

--Vic

And it probably will....

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:23:22 -0500, " JimH" not telling you @
pffftt.com wrote:


"Vic Smith" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:21:26 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



My guess: you didn't vote in this election. You're a watcher, not a do-er.

I didn't vote today.

Shame on you.

I'm a watcher this cycle. I'll just have to live with that, head hung
low. But I do vow to continue paying my taxes.

--Vic

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

" JimH" not telling you @ pffftt.com wrote in message
. ..

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

The FBI is in Virginia, investigating Republican intimidation of voters.



In all my voting life I have never been nor have I ever seen a voter or
voters being intimidated.

This whole voting process now sickens me thanks to your party.


According to that well know conservative, Keith Olbermann of MSNBC, a few
people reported getting anonymous phone calls telling the recipient that
their voting location had changed and gave them a location in which the
voter could not vote.

There is no evidence yet that this is being done by any political
organization nor does it sound like intimidation to me. But anyway, that's
why the FBI was called in by the head of the Virginia election overseers.

Eisboch

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:21:26 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



My guess: you didn't vote in this election. You're a watcher, not a do-er.

I didn't vote today. Decided that if I post in this group I'll end up
in political discussions. So my opinions must be totally unbiased,
and not tainted by a voting record.
Besides, I didn't like any of the candidates.

--Vic

watsamatta with Daffy Duck?

Eisboch

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message
...
.NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/7/2006 3:16 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
We have those damned electronic voting machines in Maryland, the ones
that do not provide any printed record of your vote.

I asked the polling "referee" why I should trust these machines to
produce an honest count, and she said, "Well, I feel secure about
them."

To which I responded, "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why
should I trust you?" She really had no answers that were satisfactory.
Why would you become confrontational with someone who has no decision
making authority? She is a very nice volunteer, who was laughing at
you as soon as you walked away. Even if she agrees with your
assessment, she was laughing at your behavior.


No, she wasn't, because at least five other people around me were asking
her the same questions.

Then she laughed at all of you.
NYOB
This reminds me of the old feeble minded people yelling at the clerk at
the airline ticket desk when the flight is canceled due to bad weather.

Or at the waitress because the kitchen is backed up. And then she spits in
their food.

I wonder if the poll worker unplugged Harry's machine before it could post.

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

Harry Krause wrote:

Your own state is having horrendous electronic voting machine problems
today.

I had a first today. we voted on paper ballot,a nd it was recorded
electronicly.

No chads, clear instructions, and easy to do. then the ballot is put in
a machine, and votes electronically counted, and the ballot remains. in
case of a manual recount.

pretty neat idea.

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:39:42 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Vic Smith" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:21:26 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



My guess: you didn't vote in this election. You're a watcher, not a do-er.

I didn't vote today. Decided that if I post in this group I'll end up
in political discussions. So my opinions must be totally unbiased,
and not tainted by a voting record.
Besides, I didn't like any of the candidates.

--Vic

watsamatta with Daffy Duck?

I was afraid that write-in would confuse the poll-watchers.
Both sides.

--Vic

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

Vic Smith wrote:
I was afraid that write-in would confuse the poll-watchers.
Both sides.

--Vic

Who knows?

It might have been good for them.

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 3:16 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
We have those damned electronic voting machines in Maryland, the ones
that do not provide any printed record of your vote.

I asked the polling "referee" why I should trust these machines to
produce an honest count, and she said, "Well, I feel secure about them."

To which I responded, "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why
should I trust you?" She really had no answers that were satisfactory.

Why would you become confrontational with someone who has no decision
making authority? She is a very nice volunteer, who was laughing at
you as soon as you walked away. Even if she agrees with your
assessment, she was laughing at your behavior.



No, she wasn't, because at least five other people around me were asking
her the same questions.

Go complain to the Elections Commissioner in your county.

Perhaps you take the voting process lightly. I don't.

You were ****ing on the working stiff again.

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 6:25 PM, JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/7/2006 6:12 PM, JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
On 11/7/2006 5:45 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 3:16 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
We have those damned electronic voting machines in Maryland,
the ones that do not provide any printed record of your vote.

I asked the polling "referee" why I should trust these machines
to produce an honest count, and she said, "Well, I feel secure
about them."

To which I responded, "What are your credentials? Who are you?
Why should I trust you?" She really had no answers that were
satisfactory.
Why would you become confrontational with someone who has no
decision making authority? She is a very nice volunteer, who
was laughing at you as soon as you walked away. Even if she
agrees with your assessment, she was laughing at your behavior.
No, she wasn't, because at least five other people around me were
asking her the same questions.

Perhaps you take the voting process lightly. I don't.
She was laughing at your inability to make speak your displeasure
about the voting machines in an effective manner. You asking a
poll volunteer "What are your credentials? Who are you? Why should
I trust you?" makes as much sense as screaming at the moon, both
of them are just as effective in changing the voting process.
Perhaps if you did take the voting process seriously, and really
wanted to make a change, you would realize how completely
ineffective your confrontational behavior is and so something that
would make a difference. My guess is you enjoy the confrontation,
and really don't care if they change the machines.
You assume the woman was a "volunteer." She was not. She introduced
herself as a "supervisor" from the state board of elections, and
was wearing a state ID nameplate. We had some serious problems
during the primaries some weeks ago, and the board of elections
caught hell.

Perhaps you ought to have a few facts on hand before you drool in
here, hey?

Say hello to the new tactics of the Democrats in Election 2006.

sigh

Really? The Republican governor of this state urged voters to obtain
absentee ballots because he had no confidence in the electronic
machines.

He


Governor Warns of Crisis in Wake of Diebold 'Repair' Revelations
By Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews
October 27, 2006, 1:30 PM



Let's see who starts to file the lawsuits.

Oops, the Dems have already filing them in Ohio, even before the
voting sites close at 7:30. ;-)



The FBI is in Virginia, investigating Republican intimidation of voters.

Democrats posing as Republicans.

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 23:56:58 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:41:39 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote:

I didn't like any of the candidates.

I didn't like most of them myself but there were constitutional
amendments I had an opinion on and some of the candidates were worse
than the other enough to get me down there. Not voting means you don't
even care and that is the mandate they like to have when they screw
you.

Nope. No amendments or special ballots. And no good choices.
This is a solid Dem district, and I don't like the Dem. I had an
extended e-mail exchange with the Republican candidate after
asking a simple question: "What is your position on illegal
immigration?" His initial answer was, "Improve the economy of
Mexico," and it went downhill from there.
Not voting this time out was a good exercise of my constitutional
rights. And I'm damned proud of it.

--Vic

The Voting Process in Maryland
 

Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 9:20 PM, Bert Robbins wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 6:25 PM, JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 11/7/2006 6:12 PM, JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
On 11/7/2006 5:45 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/7/2006 3:16 PM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
We have those damned electronic voting machines in Maryland,
the ones that do not provide any printed record of your vote.

I asked the polling "referee" why I should trust these
machines to produce an honest count, and she said, "Well, I
feel secure about them."

To which I responded, "What are your credentials? Who are
you? Why should I trust you?" She really had no answers that
were satisfactory.
Why would you become confrontational with someone who has no
decision making authority? She is a very nice volunteer, who
was laughing at you as soon as you walked away. Even if she
agrees with your assessment, she was laughing at your behavior.
No, she wasn't, because at least five other people around me
were asking her the same questions.

Perhaps you take the voting process lightly. I don't.
She was laughing at your inability to make speak your
displeasure about the voting machines in an effective manner.
You asking a poll volunteer "What are your credentials? Who are
you? Why should I trust you?" makes as much sense as screaming
at the moon, both of them are just as effective in changing the
voting process. Perhaps if you did take the voting process
seriously, and really wanted to make a change, you would realize
how completely ineffective your confrontational behavior is and
so something that would make a difference. My guess is you
enjoy the confrontation, and really don't care if they change
the machines.
You assume the woman was a "volunteer." She was not. She
introduced herself as a "supervisor" from the state board of
elections, and was wearing a state ID nameplate. We had some
serious problems during the primaries some weeks ago, and the
board of elections caught hell.

Perhaps you ought to have a few facts on hand before you drool in
here, hey?
Say hello to the new tactics of the Democrats in Election 2006.

sigh
Really? The Republican governor of this state urged voters to
obtain absentee ballots because he had no confidence in the
electronic machines.

He


Governor Warns of Crisis in Wake of Diebold 'Repair' Revelations
By Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews
October 27, 2006, 1:30 PM


Let's see who starts to file the lawsuits.

Oops, the Dems have already filing them in Ohio, even before the
voting sites close at 7:30. ;-)


The FBI is in Virginia, investigating Republican intimidation of voters.

Democrats posing as Republicans.



Right, Democrats posing as Republicans to lower Webb's vote.
Have you been a brainless ass all your life?

If you wanted the issue rather than the responsibility.