![]() |
The Cutty Sark
I was in a tea shop today where they had a model of the sailing ship "The
Cutty Sark". I was intrigued by the way the masts were spliced. I would have expected that if a long enough tree trunk was not available, they would have spliced two pieces together using perhaps a scarf joint with maybe some metal binding as reinforcement. The actual splices on the model were overlapped by a distance approximately equal to 6 mast diameters, and adjacent to one another with the upper section towards the front of the ship. There was a horizontal plate at the top and bottom of the splice. Can anyone tell me if this is the type of splice that was actually used and what special feature about it made it the best splice to use? |
The Cutty Sark
"Mike Harrison" wrote in message news:TfiXg.129206$R63.43581@pd7urf1no... I was in a tea shop today where they had a model of the sailing ship "The Cutty Sark". I was intrigued by the way the masts were spliced. I would have expected that if a long enough tree trunk was not available, they would have spliced two pieces together using perhaps a scarf joint with maybe some metal binding as reinforcement. The actual splices on the model were overlapped by a distance approximately equal to 6 mast diameters, and adjacent to one another with the upper section towards the front of the ship. There was a horizontal plate at the top and bottom of the splice. Can anyone tell me if this is the type of splice that was actually used and what special feature about it made it the best splice to use? It was pointed out to us on the US Constitution tour, that the masts were not single trees as a single tree could more easily brake across completely. Was several trees split lengthwise and fastened together with iron rings. So you would have long overlaps also, for the same reason. |
The Cutty Sark
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
hlink.net... "Mike Harrison" wrote in message news:TfiXg.129206$R63.43581@pd7urf1no... I was in a tea shop today where they had a model of the sailing ship "The Cutty Sark". I was intrigued by the way the masts were spliced. I would have expected that if a long enough tree trunk was not available, they would have spliced two pieces together using perhaps a scarf joint with maybe some metal binding as reinforcement. The actual splices on the model were overlapped by a distance approximately equal to 6 mast diameters, and adjacent to one another with the upper section towards the front of the ship. There was a horizontal plate at the top and bottom of the splice. Can anyone tell me if this is the type of splice that was actually used and what special feature about it made it the best splice to use? It was pointed out to us on the US Constitution tour, that the masts were not single trees as a single tree could more easily brake across completely. Was several trees split lengthwise and fastened together with iron rings. So you would have long overlaps also, for the same reason. You can see that on: http://www.soic.se/engelska/inenglis...680002566.html third picture down. /Lars J |
The Cutty Sark
Mike Harrison writes:
Can anyone tell me if this is the type of splice that was actually used and what special feature about it made it the best splice to use? Gammon. |
The Cutty Sark
Mike Harrison wrote:
I was in a tea shop today where they had a model of the sailing ship "The Cutty Sark". I was intrigued by the way the masts were spliced. I would have expected that if a long enough tree trunk was not available, they would have spliced two pieces together using perhaps a scarf joint with maybe some metal binding as reinforcement. The actual splices on the model were overlapped by a distance approximately equal to 6 mast diameters, and adjacent to one another with the upper section towards the front of the ship. There was a horizontal plate at the top and bottom of the splice. Can anyone tell me if this is the type of splice that was actually used and what special feature about it made it the best splice to use? Yes, from what you describe, the model was probably pretty accurate. This was a standard way of making masts taller than trees for several hundred years. http://www.mkheritage.co.uk/cv/docs/...rnaticpic.html In the pic linked to above, see #20 "crosstrees." These were the pieces used at top & bottom of the splice between upper & lowr mast sections. One advantage of doing it this way is that the ship could carry spare mast sections and replace spars along the way. Here's another interesting link http://sailing-ships.oktett.net/square-rigging.html Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com