![]() |
A comment taken from...
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:55:29 -0400, "Reginal P. Smithers III"
wrote: JimH wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:26:58 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: The left have such compelling arguments... when they have none, they simply try to insult. And that's not clear thinking, Don. It's a one-track mind that you two have. The inability to get beyond your obsession. Speaking of obsession.. that's twice now that you've included my 91 year old mother in your filthy fantasies. I'm very suprised that our local sheriff hasn't come calling... as he seems to keep a close eye on me. Don, when you make the type comments you've made (copying Harry), do you not expect similar comments in return? How does Jack's comment displlay any more obsession than yours? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John Still John.. you made it a point to jump on me and didn't say a word to Jackoff. If you want to play this little Sheriff game at least apply your laws evenly. I realize American justice operates differently for the rich vs the poor.. but lets pretend all the posters here are roughly equal for arguments sake. And for your information, I wasn't copying Harry... I posted my reply as I read the posts in chronological order...that is, I replied before I read Harry's similar post. It is indeed unbelievable that Herring cannot see the difference between insulting one's elderly mother and members insulting each other. Amazing. It is one of the problems with insulting each other in the general. I can't remember who, but someone used to insult Don on a regular basis because he took care of his mother. It probably would be better if we just gave up insulting each other all together. Somehow insults always end up turning molehills into mountains. Who could have done such a thing? Talk about crap behavior. I do think I recall that. It continued for quite a while. -- John H. "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
A comment taken from...
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:17:06 -0400, " JimH" not telling you @ pffftt.com
wrote: "Reginal P. Smithers III" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:26:58 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: The left have such compelling arguments... when they have none, they simply try to insult. And that's not clear thinking, Don. It's a one-track mind that you two have. The inability to get beyond your obsession. Speaking of obsession.. that's twice now that you've included my 91 year old mother in your filthy fantasies. I'm very suprised that our local sheriff hasn't come calling... as he seems to keep a close eye on me. Don, when you make the type comments you've made (copying Harry), do you not expect similar comments in return? How does Jack's comment displlay any more obsession than yours? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John Still John.. you made it a point to jump on me and didn't say a word to Jackoff. If you want to play this little Sheriff game at least apply your laws evenly. I realize American justice operates differently for the rich vs the poor.. but lets pretend all the posters here are roughly equal for arguments sake. And for your information, I wasn't copying Harry... I posted my reply as I read the posts in chronological order...that is, I replied before I read Harry's similar post. It is indeed unbelievable that Herring cannot see the difference between insulting one's elderly mother and members insulting each other. Amazing. It is one of the problems with insulting each other in the general. I can't remember who, but someone used to insult Don on a regular basis because he took care of his mother. It was not right then and is not right now. But, as I stated earlier, teasing another member is quite different than insulting ones elderly mother. Teasing? Like in 'friendly teasing'? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Gay Day, Jim! ***** ****************************************** John |
A comment taken from...
JimH wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:26:58 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: The left have such compelling arguments... when they have none, they simply try to insult. And that's not clear thinking, Don. It's a one-track mind that you two have. The inability to get beyond your obsession. Speaking of obsession.. that's twice now that you've included my 91 year old mother in your filthy fantasies. I'm very suprised that our local sheriff hasn't come calling... as he seems to keep a close eye on me. Don, when you make the type comments you've made (copying Harry), do you not expect similar comments in return? How does Jack's comment displlay any more obsession than yours? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John Still John.. you made it a point to jump on me and didn't say a word to Jackoff. If you want to play this little Sheriff game at least apply your laws evenly. I realize American justice operates differently for the rich vs the poor.. but lets pretend all the posters here are roughly equal for arguments sake. And for your information, I wasn't copying Harry... I posted my reply as I read the posts in chronological order...that is, I replied before I read Harry's similar post. It is indeed unbelievable that Herring cannot see the difference between insulting one's elderly mother and members insulting each other. Amazing. Jim, you've made insulting remarks about MY mother many times....was THAT okay? Careful, now, everyone remembers. |
A comment taken from...
"basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:26:58 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: The left have such compelling arguments... when they have none, they simply try to insult. And that's not clear thinking, Don. It's a one-track mind that you two have. The inability to get beyond your obsession. Speaking of obsession.. that's twice now that you've included my 91 year old mother in your filthy fantasies. I'm very suprised that our local sheriff hasn't come calling... as he seems to keep a close eye on me. Don, when you make the type comments you've made (copying Harry), do you not expect similar comments in return? How does Jack's comment displlay any more obsession than yours? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John Still John.. you made it a point to jump on me and didn't say a word to Jackoff. If you want to play this little Sheriff game at least apply your laws evenly. I realize American justice operates differently for the rich vs the poor.. but lets pretend all the posters here are roughly equal for arguments sake. And for your information, I wasn't copying Harry... I posted my reply as I read the posts in chronological order...that is, I replied before I read Harry's similar post. It is indeed unbelievable that Herring cannot see the difference between insulting one's elderly mother and members insulting each other. Amazing. Jim, you've made insulting remarks about MY mother many times....was THAT okay? Careful, now, everyone remembers. Care to show us that post Kevin? |
A comment taken from...
JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:26:58 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: The left have such compelling arguments... when they have none, they simply try to insult. And that's not clear thinking, Don. It's a one-track mind that you two have. The inability to get beyond your obsession. Speaking of obsession.. that's twice now that you've included my 91 year old mother in your filthy fantasies. I'm very suprised that our local sheriff hasn't come calling... as he seems to keep a close eye on me. Don, when you make the type comments you've made (copying Harry), do you not expect similar comments in return? How does Jack's comment displlay any more obsession than yours? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John Still John.. you made it a point to jump on me and didn't say a word to Jackoff. If you want to play this little Sheriff game at least apply your laws evenly. I realize American justice operates differently for the rich vs the poor.. but lets pretend all the posters here are roughly equal for arguments sake. And for your information, I wasn't copying Harry... I posted my reply as I read the posts in chronological order...that is, I replied before I read Harry's similar post. It is indeed unbelievable that Herring cannot see the difference between insulting one's elderly mother and members insulting each other. Amazing. He doesn't *want* to see the difference or even that's it's an equal offence. Then he'd have to apply his laws equally. |
A comment taken from...
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:33:55 GMT, Don White wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:26:58 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: The left have such compelling arguments... when they have none, they simply try to insult. And that's not clear thinking, Don. It's a one-track mind that you two have. The inability to get beyond your obsession. Speaking of obsession.. that's twice now that you've included my 91 year old mother in your filthy fantasies. I'm very suprised that our local sheriff hasn't come calling... as he seems to keep a close eye on me. Don, when you make the type comments you've made (copying Harry), do you not expect similar comments in return? How does Jack's comment displlay any more obsession than yours? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John Still John.. you made it a point to jump on me and didn't say a word to Jackoff. If you want to play this little Sheriff game at least apply your laws evenly. I realize American justice operates differently for the rich vs the poor.. but lets pretend all the posters here are roughly equal for arguments sake. And for your information, I wasn't copying Harry... I posted my reply as I read the posts in chronological order...that is, I replied before I read Harry's similar post. Harry started the 'jack off' comments long ago. You've since followed suit. Are you suggesting you thought of that nickname yourself? If you'll read my last post to you, you'll see I put *both* comments in the same category, yours and Jack's. -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Gay Day, Jim! ***** ****************************************** John ...but you scold/reply to me directly. I don't expect any better from Jackoff or a couple others..they only come here to stir the pot, but you put yourself up on a pedestal as a moral compass for the group. All I ask is that you do your duty in a fair and balanced manner... or if that is impossible, take your law enforcement talents to another territory.. |
A comment taken from...
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:06:09 GMT, Don White wrote:
JimH wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:26:58 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: The left have such compelling arguments... when they have none, they simply try to insult. And that's not clear thinking, Don. It's a one-track mind that you two have. The inability to get beyond your obsession. Speaking of obsession.. that's twice now that you've included my 91 year old mother in your filthy fantasies. I'm very suprised that our local sheriff hasn't come calling... as he seems to keep a close eye on me. Don, when you make the type comments you've made (copying Harry), do you not expect similar comments in return? How does Jack's comment displlay any more obsession than yours? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John Still John.. you made it a point to jump on me and didn't say a word to Jackoff. If you want to play this little Sheriff game at least apply your laws evenly. I realize American justice operates differently for the rich vs the poor.. but lets pretend all the posters here are roughly equal for arguments sake. And for your information, I wasn't copying Harry... I posted my reply as I read the posts in chronological order...that is, I replied before I read Harry's similar post. It is indeed unbelievable that Herring cannot see the difference between insulting one's elderly mother and members insulting each other. Amazing. He doesn't *want* to see the difference or even that's it's an equal offence. Then he'd have to apply his laws equally. Why not stop *all* of it? -- John H. "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
A comment taken from...
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:12:08 GMT, Don White wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:33:55 GMT, Don White wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:26:58 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: The left have such compelling arguments... when they have none, they simply try to insult. And that's not clear thinking, Don. It's a one-track mind that you two have. The inability to get beyond your obsession. Speaking of obsession.. that's twice now that you've included my 91 year old mother in your filthy fantasies. I'm very suprised that our local sheriff hasn't come calling... as he seems to keep a close eye on me. Don, when you make the type comments you've made (copying Harry), do you not expect similar comments in return? How does Jack's comment displlay any more obsession than yours? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John Still John.. you made it a point to jump on me and didn't say a word to Jackoff. If you want to play this little Sheriff game at least apply your laws evenly. I realize American justice operates differently for the rich vs the poor.. but lets pretend all the posters here are roughly equal for arguments sake. And for your information, I wasn't copying Harry... I posted my reply as I read the posts in chronological order...that is, I replied before I read Harry's similar post. Harry started the 'jack off' comments long ago. You've since followed suit. Are you suggesting you thought of that nickname yourself? If you'll read my last post to you, you'll see I put *both* comments in the same category, yours and Jack's. -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Gay Day, Jim! ***** ****************************************** John ..but you scold/reply to me directly. I don't expect any better from Jackoff or a couple others..they only come here to stir the pot, but you put yourself up on a pedestal as a moral compass for the group. All I ask is that you do your duty in a fair and balanced manner... or if that is impossible, take your law enforcement talents to another territory.. Jack's comment was obscene. Your comments were obscene, just as were JimH's comments about your caring for your mother. Why not stop *all* of it? -- John H. "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
A comment taken from...
"Reginal P. Smithers III" wrote in message . .. It probably would be better if we just gave up insulting each other all together. Just curious; did you ever see the movie "Grumpy Old Men"? Do you see any correlation with this NG? Other then there is no Ann Margaret, many of the characters here seem similar. |
A comment taken from...
Don White wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:33:55 GMT, Don White wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:26:58 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: The left have such compelling arguments... when they have none, they simply try to insult. And that's not clear thinking, Don. It's a one-track mind that you two have. The inability to get beyond your obsession. Speaking of obsession.. that's twice now that you've included my 91 year old mother in your filthy fantasies. I'm very suprised that our local sheriff hasn't come calling... as he seems to keep a close eye on me. Don, when you make the type comments you've made (copying Harry), do you not expect similar comments in return? How does Jack's comment displlay any more obsession than yours? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John Still John.. you made it a point to jump on me and didn't say a word to Jackoff. If you want to play this little Sheriff game at least apply your laws evenly. I realize American justice operates differently for the rich vs the poor.. but lets pretend all the posters here are roughly equal for arguments sake. And for your information, I wasn't copying Harry... I posted my reply as I read the posts in chronological order...that is, I replied before I read Harry's similar post. Harry started the 'jack off' comments long ago. You've since followed suit. Are you suggesting you thought of that nickname yourself? If you'll read my last post to you, you'll see I put *both* comments in the same category, yours and Jack's. -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Gay Day, Jim! ***** ****************************************** John ..but you scold/reply to me directly. I don't expect any better from Jackoff or a couple others..they only come here to stir the pot, but you put yourself up on a pedestal as a moral compass for the group. All I ask is that you do your duty in a fair and balanced manner... or if that is impossible, take your law enforcement talents to another territory.. Old Herring complains about this and that, including folks talking about queers, yet he is the one (see his tag line above) stirring the pot on that subject. I think he got ****ed when I teased him about the nice fuzzy white woman's hat he wanted to buy during the Olympics and when Tom teased him about his license plate (something like ILIKEMEN) Herring has one set of standards........if you don't disagree with him you are OK and get a free pass to go directly to Go, collecting $200. If you disagree with him however, watch out as he comes after you on his painted pony the minute you break *his* rules. This is the same guy who could not accept a cease fire from me. What an ass he is. |
A comment taken from...
-- ****************************************** ***** Have a Gay Day, Jim! ***** ****************************************** John |
A comment taken from...
JimH wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:26:58 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: The left have such compelling arguments... when they have none, they simply try to insult. And that's not clear thinking, Don. It's a one-track mind that you two have. The inability to get beyond your obsession. Speaking of obsession.. that's twice now that you've included my 91 year old mother in your filthy fantasies. I'm very suprised that our local sheriff hasn't come calling... as he seems to keep a close eye on me. Don, when you make the type comments you've made (copying Harry), do you not expect similar comments in return? How does Jack's comment displlay any more obsession than yours? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John Still John.. you made it a point to jump on me and didn't say a word to Jackoff. If you want to play this little Sheriff game at least apply your laws evenly. I realize American justice operates differently for the rich vs the poor.. but lets pretend all the posters here are roughly equal for arguments sake. And for your information, I wasn't copying Harry... I posted my reply as I read the posts in chronological order...that is, I replied before I read Harry's similar post. It is indeed unbelievable that Herring cannot see the difference between insulting one's elderly mother and members insulting each other. Amazing. Jim, you've made insulting remarks about MY mother many times....was THAT okay? Careful, now, everyone remembers. Care to show us that post Kevin? When you stop calling me Kevin. Really, Jim, give us a couple of answers. Why do you INSIST on acting like a spoiled little child? Why don't you grow up (mentally) and start acting like a man? Why are you so spineless that you can't even debate someone without petty insults, and childish name calling? Now, want to see who here REMEMBERS that exchange? Probably too old to be archived, but if you don't remember, then you ARE bipolar.. Get help! |
A comment taken from...
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:12:08 GMT, Don White
wrote: ..but you scold/reply to me directly. I don't expect any better from Jackoff or a couple others..they only come here to stir the pot, but you put yourself up on a pedestal as a moral compass for the group. All I ask is that you do your duty in a fair and balanced manner... or if that is impossible, take your law enforcement talents to another territory.. This is all quite funny. Don, you're saying that I come here just to stir the pot, but over the past couple of days, you've made several replies to my posts that were just to stir the pot yourself. Replies to posts that had nothing to do with you, and said nothing about you in any way. Yet you felt the need to jump in with your childish insults. It would be quite easy to count them up and show that you and a couple of others on this NG, not me, are the most prolific pot stirrers here. In any case, you'd find that if you did not insult me, I would not insult you. Indeed, I think that taking care of one's mom in her waning years is a noble and giving gesture. Surely you'll agree that making childish insults on this NG is not in line with that. So, you quit, and I'll quit. We'll draw the line here. It's totally up to you. But understand that a shot over my bow, even if you're just doing a follow-up for Harry, will negate it all. Your choice. |
A comment taken from...
JimH wrote: Don White wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:33:55 GMT, Don White wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:26:58 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: The left have such compelling arguments... when they have none, they simply try to insult. And that's not clear thinking, Don. It's a one-track mind that you two have. The inability to get beyond your obsession. Speaking of obsession.. that's twice now that you've included my 91 year old mother in your filthy fantasies. I'm very suprised that our local sheriff hasn't come calling... as he seems to keep a close eye on me. Don, when you make the type comments you've made (copying Harry), do you not expect similar comments in return? How does Jack's comment displlay any more obsession than yours? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John Still John.. you made it a point to jump on me and didn't say a word to Jackoff. If you want to play this little Sheriff game at least apply your laws evenly. I realize American justice operates differently for the rich vs the poor.. but lets pretend all the posters here are roughly equal for arguments sake. And for your information, I wasn't copying Harry... I posted my reply as I read the posts in chronological order...that is, I replied before I read Harry's similar post. Harry started the 'jack off' comments long ago. You've since followed suit. Are you suggesting you thought of that nickname yourself? If you'll read my last post to you, you'll see I put *both* comments in the same category, yours and Jack's. -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Gay Day, Jim! ***** ****************************************** John ..but you scold/reply to me directly. I don't expect any better from Jackoff or a couple others..they only come here to stir the pot, but you put yourself up on a pedestal as a moral compass for the group. All I ask is that you do your duty in a fair and balanced manner... or if that is impossible, take your law enforcement talents to another territory.. Old Herring complains about this and that, including folks talking about queers, yet he is the one (see his tag line above) stirring the pot on that subject. I think he got ****ed when I teased him about the nice fuzzy white woman's hat he wanted to buy during the Olympics and when Tom teased him about his license plate (something like ILIKEMEN) Herring has one set of standards........if you don't disagree with him you are OK and get a free pass to go directly to Go, collecting $200. If you disagree with him however, watch out as he comes after you on his painted pony the minute you break *his* rules. This is the same guy who could not accept a cease fire from me. What an ass he is. Jim, it's because of actions and words like yours above. A cease fire to you, means that the other person should stop picking on poor childish JimH, but you think you can keep calling people childish names and issueing petty insults. You reap what you sow. You acted like a total ass here for so long that no one wants a anything to do with you. |
A comment taken from...
"basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:26:58 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: The left have such compelling arguments... when they have none, they simply try to insult. And that's not clear thinking, Don. It's a one-track mind that you two have. The inability to get beyond your obsession. Speaking of obsession.. that's twice now that you've included my 91 year old mother in your filthy fantasies. I'm very suprised that our local sheriff hasn't come calling... as he seems to keep a close eye on me. Don, when you make the type comments you've made (copying Harry), do you not expect similar comments in return? How does Jack's comment displlay any more obsession than yours? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John Still John.. you made it a point to jump on me and didn't say a word to Jackoff. If you want to play this little Sheriff game at least apply your laws evenly. I realize American justice operates differently for the rich vs the poor.. but lets pretend all the posters here are roughly equal for arguments sake. And for your information, I wasn't copying Harry... I posted my reply as I read the posts in chronological order...that is, I replied before I read Harry's similar post. It is indeed unbelievable that Herring cannot see the difference between insulting one's elderly mother and members insulting each other. Amazing. Jim, you've made insulting remarks about MY mother many times....was THAT okay? Careful, now, everyone remembers. Care to show us that post Kevin? When you stop calling me Kevin. Really, Jim, give us a couple of answers. Why do you INSIST on acting like a spoiled little child? Why don't you grow up (mentally) and start acting like a man? Why are you so spineless that you can't even debate someone without petty insults, and childish name calling? Now, want to see who here REMEMBERS that exchange? Probably too old to be archived, but if you don't remember, then you ARE bipolar.. Get help! Hey Reggie, need more proof? |
A comment taken from...
Jack Goff wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:12:08 GMT, Don White wrote: ..but you scold/reply to me directly. I don't expect any better from Jackoff or a couple others..they only come here to stir the pot, but you put yourself up on a pedestal as a moral compass for the group. All I ask is that you do your duty in a fair and balanced manner... or if that is impossible, take your law enforcement talents to another territory.. This is all quite funny. Don, you're saying that I come here just to stir the pot, but over the past couple of days, you've made several replies to my posts that were just to stir the pot yourself. Replies to posts that had nothing to do with you, and said nothing about you in any way. Yet you felt the need to jump in with your childish insults. It would be quite easy to count them up and show that you and a couple of others on this NG, not me, are the most prolific pot stirrers here. In any case, you'd find that if you did not insult me, I would not insult you. Horse****, you do it on a regular basis. 90% if not more of your posts are insulting someone. Bringing someone's elderly mother into a fray is cowardice pure and simple. |
A comment taken from...
On 10 Aug 2006 06:44:31 -0700, "basskisser"
wrote: Grow up, how much more childish can you get? I could chase everyone around the NG, daring them to take a silly challenge because they call me a name I chose. Nahhh... that'd be over the line. What a pathetic loser,saying stuff about someone's elderly mother. Childish name-calling destroys the tiny bit of credibiliy you had left, Kevin. |
A comment taken from...
JimH wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:26:58 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: The left have such compelling arguments... when they have none, they simply try to insult. And that's not clear thinking, Don. It's a one-track mind that you two have. The inability to get beyond your obsession. Speaking of obsession.. that's twice now that you've included my 91 year old mother in your filthy fantasies. I'm very suprised that our local sheriff hasn't come calling... as he seems to keep a close eye on me. Don, when you make the type comments you've made (copying Harry), do you not expect similar comments in return? How does Jack's comment displlay any more obsession than yours? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John Still John.. you made it a point to jump on me and didn't say a word to Jackoff. If you want to play this little Sheriff game at least apply your laws evenly. I realize American justice operates differently for the rich vs the poor.. but lets pretend all the posters here are roughly equal for arguments sake. And for your information, I wasn't copying Harry... I posted my reply as I read the posts in chronological order...that is, I replied before I read Harry's similar post. It is indeed unbelievable that Herring cannot see the difference between insulting one's elderly mother and members insulting each other. Amazing. Jim, you've made insulting remarks about MY mother many times....was THAT okay? Careful, now, everyone remembers. Care to show us that post Kevin? When you stop calling me Kevin. Really, Jim, give us a couple of answers. Why do you INSIST on acting like a spoiled little child? Why don't you grow up (mentally) and start acting like a man? Why are you so spineless that you can't even debate someone without petty insults, and childish name calling? Now, want to see who here REMEMBERS that exchange? Probably too old to be archived, but if you don't remember, then you ARE bipolar.. Get help! Hey Reggie, need more proof? Here you go, Reggie!!!! You are no longer in my killfile Kevin........I missed reading your posts to this NG and the laughs I got from them. Did you figure out what 'MM' means yet? ;-) |
A comment taken from...
Jack Goff wrote:
This is all quite funny. Don, you're saying that I come here just to stir the pot, but over the past couple of days, you've made several replies to my posts that were just to stir the pot yourself. Replies to posts that had nothing to do with you, and said nothing about you in any way. Yet you felt the need to jump in with your childish insults. It would be quite easy to count them up and show that you and a couple of others on this NG, not me, are the most prolific pot stirrers here. In any case, you'd find that if you did not insult me, I would not insult you. Indeed, I think that taking care of one's mom in her waning years is a noble and giving gesture. Surely you'll agree that making childish insults on this NG is not in line with that. So, you quit, and I'll quit. We'll draw the line here. It's totally up to you. But understand that a shot over my bow, even if you're just doing a follow-up for Harry, will negate it all. Your choice. Hmmm.. I get the feeling that entering a deal with you would be akin to Israel entering an agreement with Hezbollah. I will pledge that I will never degrade your mother ..or any other member of your family. I will not belittle your boat, whether it's a 100 foot trawler or an 8 foor pram, as that is the one thing most of us have in common and should be the reason why we're here. |
A comment taken from...
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:56:32 GMT, Don White
wrote: Jack Goff wrote: This is all quite funny. Don, you're saying that I come here just to stir the pot, but over the past couple of days, you've made several replies to my posts that were just to stir the pot yourself. Replies to posts that had nothing to do with you, and said nothing about you in any way. Yet you felt the need to jump in with your childish insults. It would be quite easy to count them up and show that you and a couple of others on this NG, not me, are the most prolific pot stirrers here. In any case, you'd find that if you did not insult me, I would not insult you. Indeed, I think that taking care of one's mom in her waning years is a noble and giving gesture. Surely you'll agree that making childish insults on this NG is not in line with that. So, you quit, and I'll quit. We'll draw the line here. It's totally up to you. But understand that a shot over my bow, even if you're just doing a follow-up for Harry, will negate it all. Your choice. Hmmm.. I get the feeling that entering a deal with you would be akin to Israel entering an agreement with Hezbollah. I will pledge that I will never degrade your mother ..or any other member of your family. I will not belittle your boat, whether it's a 100 foot trawler or an 8 foor pram, as that is the one thing most of us have in common and should be the reason why we're here. So you'll continue with your childish name-calling? |
A comment taken from...
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:56:32 GMT, Don White
wrote: I will not belittle your boat, whether it's a 100 foot trawler or an 8 foor pram, as that is the one thing most of us have in common and should be the reason why we're here. So why are you following me around throwing insults my way? Even in the vast majority of cases where I've not mentioned you or insulted you in any way? If you can't resist insulting people, then admit it. Otherwise, enter the agreement with me, and let's put it behind us. Your reputation in this NG awaits your decision. |
A comment taken from...
Jack Goff wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:56:32 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: This is all quite funny. Don, you're saying that I come here just to stir the pot, but over the past couple of days, you've made several replies to my posts that were just to stir the pot yourself. Replies to posts that had nothing to do with you, and said nothing about you in any way. Yet you felt the need to jump in with your childish insults. It would be quite easy to count them up and show that you and a couple of others on this NG, not me, are the most prolific pot stirrers here. In any case, you'd find that if you did not insult me, I would not insult you. Indeed, I think that taking care of one's mom in her waning years is a noble and giving gesture. Surely you'll agree that making childish insults on this NG is not in line with that. So, you quit, and I'll quit. We'll draw the line here. It's totally up to you. But understand that a shot over my bow, even if you're just doing a follow-up for Harry, will negate it all. Your choice. Hmmm.. I get the feeling that entering a deal with you would be akin to Israel entering an agreement with Hezbollah. I will pledge that I will never degrade your mother ..or any other member of your family. I will not belittle your boat, whether it's a 100 foot trawler or an 8 foor pram, as that is the one thing most of us have in common and should be the reason why we're here. So you'll continue with your childish name-calling? As I'm sure you'll continue with your childish behavior. |
A comment taken from...
Jack Goff wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:56:32 GMT, Don White wrote: I will not belittle your boat, whether it's a 100 foot trawler or an 8 foor pram, as that is the one thing most of us have in common and should be the reason why we're here. So why are you following me around throwing insults my way? Even in the vast majority of cases where I've not mentioned you or insulted you in any way? If you can't resist insulting people, then admit it. Otherwise, enter the agreement with me, and let's put it behind us. Your reputation in this NG awaits your decision. You're worried about my reputation?? Better clean up your own first. |
A comment taken from...
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 02:07:48 GMT, Don White
wrote: Jack Goff wrote: On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:56:32 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: This is all quite funny. Don, you're saying that I come here just to stir the pot, but over the past couple of days, you've made several replies to my posts that were just to stir the pot yourself. Replies to posts that had nothing to do with you, and said nothing about you in any way. Yet you felt the need to jump in with your childish insults. It would be quite easy to count them up and show that you and a couple of others on this NG, not me, are the most prolific pot stirrers here. In any case, you'd find that if you did not insult me, I would not insult you. Indeed, I think that taking care of one's mom in her waning years is a noble and giving gesture. Surely you'll agree that making childish insults on this NG is not in line with that. So, you quit, and I'll quit. We'll draw the line here. It's totally up to you. But understand that a shot over my bow, even if you're just doing a follow-up for Harry, will negate it all. Your choice. Hmmm.. I get the feeling that entering a deal with you would be akin to Israel entering an agreement with Hezbollah. I will pledge that I will never degrade your mother ..or any other member of your family. I will not belittle your boat, whether it's a 100 foot trawler or an 8 foor pram, as that is the one thing most of us have in common and should be the reason why we're here. So you'll continue with your childish name-calling? As I'm sure you'll continue with your childish behavior. Nope... unless you do. So what do you say? Do you agree to stop this Don, or do you want to continue the name-calling? It's your call. |
A comment taken from...
Do you agree to stop this Don, or do you want to continue the
name-calling? PLEASE...just stop, even if he doesn't. If he doesn't then just killfile him and be done with it. --Mike "Jack Goff" wrote in message ... On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 02:07:48 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:56:32 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: This is all quite funny. Don, you're saying that I come here just to stir the pot, but over the past couple of days, you've made several replies to my posts that were just to stir the pot yourself. Replies to posts that had nothing to do with you, and said nothing about you in any way. Yet you felt the need to jump in with your childish insults. It would be quite easy to count them up and show that you and a couple of others on this NG, not me, are the most prolific pot stirrers here. In any case, you'd find that if you did not insult me, I would not insult you. Indeed, I think that taking care of one's mom in her waning years is a noble and giving gesture. Surely you'll agree that making childish insults on this NG is not in line with that. So, you quit, and I'll quit. We'll draw the line here. It's totally up to you. But understand that a shot over my bow, even if you're just doing a follow-up for Harry, will negate it all. Your choice. Hmmm.. I get the feeling that entering a deal with you would be akin to Israel entering an agreement with Hezbollah. I will pledge that I will never degrade your mother ..or any other member of your family. I will not belittle your boat, whether it's a 100 foot trawler or an 8 foor pram, as that is the one thing most of us have in common and should be the reason why we're here. So you'll continue with your childish name-calling? As I'm sure you'll continue with your childish behavior. Nope... unless you do. So what do you say? Do you agree to stop this Don, or do you want to continue the name-calling? It's your call. |
A comment taken from...
John Wentworth wrote:
"Reginal P. Smithers III" wrote in message . .. It probably would be better if we just gave up insulting each other all together. Just curious; did you ever see the movie "Grumpy Old Men"? Do you see any correlation with this NG? Other then there is no Ann Margaret, many of the characters here seem similar. I think the characters in the movie were funnier. |
A comment taken from...
Jack Goff wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 02:07:48 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:56:32 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: This is all quite funny. Don, you're saying that I come here just to stir the pot, but over the past couple of days, you've made several replies to my posts that were just to stir the pot yourself. Replies to posts that had nothing to do with you, and said nothing about you in any way. Yet you felt the need to jump in with your childish insults. It would be quite easy to count them up and show that you and a couple of others on this NG, not me, are the most prolific pot stirrers here. In any case, you'd find that if you did not insult me, I would not insult you. Indeed, I think that taking care of one's mom in her waning years is a noble and giving gesture. Surely you'll agree that making childish insults on this NG is not in line with that. So, you quit, and I'll quit. We'll draw the line here. It's totally up to you. But understand that a shot over my bow, even if you're just doing a follow-up for Harry, will negate it all. Your choice. Hmmm.. I get the feeling that entering a deal with you would be akin to Israel entering an agreement with Hezbollah. I will pledge that I will never degrade your mother ..or any other member of your family. I will not belittle your boat, whether it's a 100 foot trawler or an 8 foor pram, as that is the one thing most of us have in common and should be the reason why we're here. So you'll continue with your childish name-calling? As I'm sure you'll continue with your childish behavior. Nope... unless you do. So what do you say? Do you agree to stop this Don, or do you want to continue the name-calling? It's your call. Let's just say I'll keep an eye on you. You've already called me childish a couple of times. I doubt you can control yourself but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt...for now! |
A comment taken from...
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:56:32 GMT, Don White wrote:
Jack Goff wrote: This is all quite funny. Don, you're saying that I come here just to stir the pot, but over the past couple of days, you've made several replies to my posts that were just to stir the pot yourself. Replies to posts that had nothing to do with you, and said nothing about you in any way. Yet you felt the need to jump in with your childish insults. It would be quite easy to count them up and show that you and a couple of others on this NG, not me, are the most prolific pot stirrers here. In any case, you'd find that if you did not insult me, I would not insult you. Indeed, I think that taking care of one's mom in her waning years is a noble and giving gesture. Surely you'll agree that making childish insults on this NG is not in line with that. So, you quit, and I'll quit. We'll draw the line here. It's totally up to you. But understand that a shot over my bow, even if you're just doing a follow-up for Harry, will negate it all. Your choice. Hmmm.. I get the feeling that entering a deal with you would be akin to Israel entering an agreement with Hezbollah. I will pledge that I will never degrade your mother ..or any other member of your family. I will not belittle your boat, whether it's a 100 foot trawler or an 8 foor pram, as that is the one thing most of us have in common and should be the reason why we're here. Unreal. -- John H. "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
A comment taken from...
Jack Goff wrote: On 10 Aug 2006 06:44:31 -0700, "basskisser" wrote: Grow up, how much more childish can you get? I could chase everyone around the NG, daring them to take a silly challenge because they call me a name I chose. Nahhh... that'd be over the line. What a pathetic loser,saying stuff about someone's elderly mother. Childish name-calling destroys the tiny bit of credibiliy you had left, Kevin. Grow up. |
A comment taken from...
basskisser wrote:
MGG wrote: Do you agree to stop this Don, or do you want to continue the name-calling? PLEASE...just stop, even if he doesn't. If he doesn't then just killfile him and be done with it. Yeah, everyone here knows that the only person who can engage in name calling and petty insults without being called to the carpet is JimH. I see you made it to work safely again. Since you state you are self-employed how do you make money when all you do all week is post to this newsgroup? I believe that you are charging your clients for time you spend posting. I hope you don't send them bills through the US mail. |
A comment taken from...
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: MGG wrote: Do you agree to stop this Don, or do you want to continue the name-calling? PLEASE...just stop, even if he doesn't. If he doesn't then just killfile him and be done with it. Yeah, everyone here knows that the only person who can engage in name calling and petty insults without being called to the carpet is JimH. I see you made it to work safely again. Since you state you are self-employed how do you make money when all you do all week is post to this newsgroup? Easily. Unlike you, it only takes me a couple of minutes to type something out in the newsgroup. I spend probably all together an hour a day making you look silly. I believe that you are charging your clients for time you spend posting. Have any evidence of your wild allegations? Huh? Do you? If not, then I suggest you quit posting in ignorance. For your information, my fee has nothing to do with time. I hope you don't send them bills through the US mail. Why? |
A comment taken from...
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: MGG wrote: Do you agree to stop this Don, or do you want to continue the name-calling? PLEASE...just stop, even if he doesn't. If he doesn't then just killfile him and be done with it. Yeah, everyone here knows that the only person who can engage in name calling and petty insults without being called to the carpet is JimH. I see you made it to work safely again. Since you state you are self-employed how do you make money when all you do all week is post to this newsgroup? I believe that you are charging your clients for time you spend posting. I hope you don't send them bills through the US mail. Oh, and shouldn't you be brushing your TOOTH before you go to work? |
A comment taken from...
JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:56:32 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: This is all quite funny. Don, you're saying that I come here just to stir the pot, but over the past couple of days, you've made several replies to my posts that were just to stir the pot yourself. Replies to posts that had nothing to do with you, and said nothing about you in any way. Yet you felt the need to jump in with your childish insults. It would be quite easy to count them up and show that you and a couple of others on this NG, not me, are the most prolific pot stirrers here. In any case, you'd find that if you did not insult me, I would not insult you. Indeed, I think that taking care of one's mom in her waning years is a noble and giving gesture. Surely you'll agree that making childish insults on this NG is not in line with that. So, you quit, and I'll quit. We'll draw the line here. It's totally up to you. But understand that a shot over my bow, even if you're just doing a follow-up for Harry, will negate it all. Your choice. Hmmm.. I get the feeling that entering a deal with you would be akin to Israel entering an agreement with Hezbollah. I will pledge that I will never degrade your mother ..or any other member of your family. I will not belittle your boat, whether it's a 100 foot trawler or an 8 foor pram, as that is the one thing most of us have in common and should be the reason why we're here. Unreal. Maybe... but he seems to be trying . We'll see how well he does over the long haul. A bit of effective unbiased law enforcement would go a long ways. |
A comment taken from...
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:56:57 GMT, Don White
wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:56:32 GMT, Don White wrote: Jack Goff wrote: This is all quite funny. Don, you're saying that I come here just to stir the pot, but over the past couple of days, you've made several replies to my posts that were just to stir the pot yourself. Replies to posts that had nothing to do with you, and said nothing about you in any way. Yet you felt the need to jump in with your childish insults. It would be quite easy to count them up and show that you and a couple of others on this NG, not me, are the most prolific pot stirrers here. In any case, you'd find that if you did not insult me, I would not insult you. Indeed, I think that taking care of one's mom in her waning years is a noble and giving gesture. Surely you'll agree that making childish insults on this NG is not in line with that. So, you quit, and I'll quit. We'll draw the line here. It's totally up to you. But understand that a shot over my bow, even if you're just doing a follow-up for Harry, will negate it all. Your choice. Hmmm.. I get the feeling that entering a deal with you would be akin to Israel entering an agreement with Hezbollah. I will pledge that I will never degrade your mother ..or any other member of your family. I will not belittle your boat, whether it's a 100 foot trawler or an 8 foor pram, as that is the one thing most of us have in common and should be the reason why we're here. Unreal. Maybe... but he seems to be trying . We'll see how well he does over the long haul. A bit of effective unbiased law enforcement would go a long ways. I'm a bit confused, Don. While you didn't agree to the cease-fire, you seemed like you would be agreeable to it, as long as I was. Now you're taking shots across my bow, and without me making a single post. I'll continue to hold my fire, as I realize that changing your stripes may take a while. As I've repeatedly said, just say that you agree, and it's over. Do you agree? |
A comment taken from...
Maybe... but he seems to be trying . We'll see how well he does over the long haul. A bit of effective unbiased law enforcement would go a long ways. I'm a bit confused, Don. While you didn't agree to the cease-fire, you seemed like you would be agreeable to it, as long as I was. Now you're taking shots across my bow, and without me making a single post. I'll continue to hold my fire, as I realize that changing your stripes may take a while. As I've repeatedly said, just say that you agree, and it's over. Do you agree? I thought I clearly stated my pledge. Do you consider my statement above to be 'firing a shot across your bow'? You may be too sensitive for this rough & tumble newsgroup. |
A comment taken from...
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 03:57:33 GMT, Don White
wrote: Maybe... but he seems to be trying . We'll see how well he does over the long haul. A bit of effective unbiased law enforcement would go a long ways. I'm a bit confused, Don. While you didn't agree to the cease-fire, you seemed like you would be agreeable to it, as long as I was. Now you're taking shots across my bow, and without me making a single post. I'll continue to hold my fire, as I realize that changing your stripes may take a while. As I've repeatedly said, just say that you agree, and it's over. Do you agree? I thought I clearly stated my pledge. Do you consider my statement above to be 'firing a shot across your bow'? You may be too sensitive for this rough & tumble newsgroup. Ahh.. I see. You pledge to not insult my family or my boat, but I'm still on the table. Your intentions are clear. See ya. |
A comment taken from...
Jack Goff wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 03:57:33 GMT, Don White wrote: Maybe... but he seems to be trying . We'll see how well he does over the long haul. A bit of effective unbiased law enforcement would go a long ways. I'm a bit confused, Don. While you didn't agree to the cease-fire, you seemed like you would be agreeable to it, as long as I was. Now you're taking shots across my bow, and without me making a single post. I'll continue to hold my fire, as I realize that changing your stripes may take a while. As I've repeatedly said, just say that you agree, and it's over. Do you agree? I thought I clearly stated my pledge. Do you consider my statement above to be 'firing a shot across your bow'? You may be too sensitive for this rough & tumble newsgroup. Ahh.. I see. You pledge to not insult my family or my boat, but I'm still on the table. Your intentions are clear. See ya. I have to say, this a very cute thread. Sort of the Geneva Convention of Newsgroup Insults, what is an acceptable targets of personal insults, what is not an acceptable insults, "Ya Mama" jokes are off limits, "Jack Off" jokes are on limits. What is even funnier is no is since no one's mother who is being insulted probably ever reads reads rec.boats there is a "no harm; no foul" clause that could be enforced into this Geneva Convention. Once all parties agree what is acceptable insults we need to have all parties have the agreement signed and notarized and submitted to ........... ooooo wait who do we submit the Geneva Convention agreement to? Wouldn't it just be easier to agree not to insult each other than to agree what is acceptable and what is not acceptable targets of insults? |
A comment taken from...
Reginal P. Smithers III wrote:
I have to say, this a very cute thread. Sort of the Geneva Convention of Newsgroup Insults, what is an acceptable targets of personal insults, what is not an acceptable insults, "Ya Mama" jokes are off limits, "Jack Off" jokes are on limits. What is even funnier is no is since no one's mother who is being insulted probably ever reads reads rec.boats there is a "no harm; no foul" clause that could be enforced into this Geneva Convention. Once all parties agree what is acceptable insults we need to have all parties have the agreement signed and notarized and submitted to ........... ooooo wait who do we submit the Geneva Convention agreement to? Wouldn't it just be easier to agree not to insult each other than to agree what is acceptable and what is not acceptable targets of insults? If we had proper law enforcement for such accords we could put this to rest. I don't trust those big belly Southern sheriffs to be unbiased. Maybe we need a Mountie in here to bring back respect for law & order. |
A comment taken from...
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:32:39 -0400, "Reginal P. Smithers III"
wrote: Jack Goff wrote: On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 03:57:33 GMT, Don White wrote: Maybe... but he seems to be trying . We'll see how well he does over the long haul. A bit of effective unbiased law enforcement would go a long ways. I'm a bit confused, Don. While you didn't agree to the cease-fire, you seemed like you would be agreeable to it, as long as I was. Now you're taking shots across my bow, and without me making a single post. I'll continue to hold my fire, as I realize that changing your stripes may take a while. As I've repeatedly said, just say that you agree, and it's over. Do you agree? I thought I clearly stated my pledge. Do you consider my statement above to be 'firing a shot across your bow'? You may be too sensitive for this rough & tumble newsgroup. Ahh.. I see. You pledge to not insult my family or my boat, but I'm still on the table. Your intentions are clear. See ya. I have to say, this a very cute thread. Sort of the Geneva Convention of Newsgroup Insults, what is an acceptable targets of personal insults, what is not an acceptable insults, "Ya Mama" jokes are off limits, "Jack Off" jokes are on limits. What is even funnier is no is since no one's mother who is being insulted probably ever reads reads rec.boats there is a "no harm; no foul" clause that could be enforced into this Geneva Convention. Once all parties agree what is acceptable insults we need to have all parties have the agreement signed and notarized and submitted to ........... ooooo wait who do we submit the Geneva Convention agreement to? Wouldn't it just be easier to agree not to insult each other than to agree what is acceptable and what is not acceptable targets of insults? Sounds fair to me! -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John |
A comment taken from...
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 17:03:25 GMT, Don White wrote:
Reginal P. Smithers III wrote: I have to say, this a very cute thread. Sort of the Geneva Convention of Newsgroup Insults, what is an acceptable targets of personal insults, what is not an acceptable insults, "Ya Mama" jokes are off limits, "Jack Off" jokes are on limits. What is even funnier is no is since no one's mother who is being insulted probably ever reads reads rec.boats there is a "no harm; no foul" clause that could be enforced into this Geneva Convention. Once all parties agree what is acceptable insults we need to have all parties have the agreement signed and notarized and submitted to ........... ooooo wait who do we submit the Geneva Convention agreement to? Wouldn't it just be easier to agree not to insult each other than to agree what is acceptable and what is not acceptable targets of insults? If we had proper law enforcement for such accords we could put this to rest. I don't trust those big belly Southern sheriffs to be unbiased. Maybe we need a Mountie in here to bring back respect for law & order. How about mature self-restraint? -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com