|
For you global warming/cooling fans....
.....there is a program concerning that subject on The Discovery Channel,
Sunday, July 16th, at 9:00P EDT. Maybe it will provide some ammo for all the participants in the humongous thread below. Bishoop.... |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
? wrote: ....there is a program concerning that subject on The Discovery Channel, Sunday, July 16th, at 9:00P EDT. Maybe it will provide some ammo for all the participants in the humongous thread below. Bishoop.... The righties won't watch it. They'd rather stick there head in the sand than be informed, because Rush And Hannity tell them to. |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
On 13 Jul 2006 04:49:24 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:
? wrote: ....there is a program concerning that subject on The Discovery Channel, Sunday, July 16th, at 9:00P EDT. Maybe it will provide some ammo for all the participants in the humongous thread below. Bishoop.... The righties won't watch it. They'd rather stick there head in the sand than be informed, because Rush And Hannity tell them to. What the hell is with you and 'the righties'? This is twice in the past week you've accused 'the righties' of something. -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
-- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
? wrote: ....there is a program concerning that subject on The Discovery Channel, Sunday, July 16th, at 9:00P EDT. Maybe it will provide some ammo for all the participants in the humongous thread below. Bishoop.... Recommended sites for right wing political trolls: http://www.kkk.bz/ http://www.americannaziparty.com/ https://www.donationreport.com/init/...key=L1M7U8Y0F0 http://www.whitehouse.gov/ http://www.patrobertson.com/ http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html http://www.hannity.com/ Recommended sites for left wing political trolls: http://www.americanprogress.org/site...RJ8OVF/b.8473/ http://sp-usa.org/principles.html http://www.votehillary.org/ http://www.dnc.org/ http://www.michaelmoore.com/ http://www.greenpeace.org/international/ http://www.aclu.org/ |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
Harry Krause wrote: Why not take your side of the argument to a.politics, John, where no one will bother to read it? If people are posting the political schidt to rec.boats because they don't know where to go to find like-minded people with whom to high five, or opposite minded people with whom to argue, here's a useful list for both "sides" of the question: Recommended sites for right wing political trolls: http://www.kkk.bz/ http://www.americannaziparty.com/ https://www.donationreport.com/init/...key=L1M7U8Y0F0 http://www.whitehouse.gov/ http://www.patrobertson.com/ http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html http://www.hannity.com/ Recommended sites for left wing political trolls: http://www.americanprogress.org/site...RJ8OVF/b.8473/ http://sp-usa.org/principles.html http://www.votehillary.org/ http://www.dnc.org/ http://www.michaelmoore.com/ http://www.greenpeace.org/international/ http://www.aclu.org/ |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message ps.com... Harry Krause wrote: Why not take your side of the argument to a.politics, John, where no one will bother to read it? If people are posting the political schidt to rec.boats because they don't know where to go to find like-minded people with whom to high five, or opposite minded people with whom to argue, here's a useful list for both "sides" of the question: Recommended sites for right wing political trolls: http://www.kkk.bz/ http://www.americannaziparty.com/ KKK and Nazi Party make your top links for right wingers? https://www.donationreport.com/init/...key=L1M7U8Y0F0 http://www.whitehouse.gov/ http://www.patrobertson.com/ http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html http://www.hannity.com/ Recommended sites for left wing political trolls: http://www.americanprogress.org/site...RJ8OVF/b.8473/ http://sp-usa.org/principles.html http://www.votehillary.org/ http://www.dnc.org/ http://www.michaelmoore.com/ http://www.greenpeace.org/international/ http://www.aclu.org/ Your post was more of a troll than any others I have recently read. |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:27:40 -0400, " JimH"
jimhUNDERSCOREosudad@yahooDOTcom wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... Harry Krause wrote: Why not take your side of the argument to a.politics, John, where no one will bother to read it? If people are posting the political schidt to rec.boats because they don't know where to go to find like-minded people with whom to high five, or opposite minded people with whom to argue, here's a useful list for both "sides" of the question: Recommended sites for right wing political trolls: http://www.kkk.bz/ http://www.americannaziparty.com/ KKK and Nazi Party make your top links for right wingers? https://www.donationreport.com/init/...key=L1M7U8Y0F0 http://www.whitehouse.gov/ http://www.patrobertson.com/ http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html http://www.hannity.com/ Recommended sites for left wing political trolls: http://www.americanprogress.org/site...RJ8OVF/b.8473/ http://sp-usa.org/principles.html http://www.votehillary.org/ http://www.dnc.org/ http://www.michaelmoore.com/ http://www.greenpeace.org/international/ http://www.aclu.org/ Your post was more of a troll than any others I have recently read. I concur. -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
huh?
basskisser wrote: ? wrote: ....there is a program concerning that subject on The Discovery Channel, Sunday, July 16th, at 9:00P EDT. Maybe it will provide some ammo for all the participants in the humongous thread below. Bishoop.... The righties won't watch it. They'd rather stick there head in the sand than be informed, because Rush And Hannity tell them to. |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
Gentlemen, who started this to be a "political" thread.
A documentary on the Dscovery Channel, was all that was mentioned, then here comes a comment about the "righties" The origional post? I didn't see anything "political" about it at all, until the thread was quickly being turned into one. Why couldn't it have been left for what it was? A simple statement concerning a scientific program on Discovery Channel? Chuck Gould wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Why not take your side of the argument to a.politics, John, where no one will bother to read it? If people are posting the political schidt to rec.boats because they don't know where to go to find like-minded people with whom to high five, or opposite minded people with whom to argue, here's a useful list for both "sides" of the question: Recommended sites for right wing political trolls: http://www.kkk.bz/ http://www.americannaziparty.com/ https://www.donationreport.com/init/...key=L1M7U8Y0F0 http://www.whitehouse.gov/ http://www.patrobertson.com/ http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html http://www.hannity.com/ Recommended sites for left wing political trolls: http://www.americanprogress.org/site...RJ8OVF/b.8473/ http://sp-usa.org/principles.html http://www.votehillary.org/ http://www.dnc.org/ http://www.michaelmoore.com/ http://www.greenpeace.org/international/ http://www.aclu.org/ |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
|
For you global warming/cooling fans....
JohnH wrote: On 13 Jul 2006 09:28:57 -0700, wrote: Gentlemen, who started this to be a "political" thread. A documentary on the Dscovery Channel, was all that was mentioned, then here comes a comment about the "righties" The origional post? I didn't see anything "political" about it at all, until the thread was quickly being turned into one. Why couldn't it have been left for what it was? A simple statement concerning a scientific program on Discovery Channel? Amen! -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John Check the left wing sites, please. You will find that they are equally absurd. (one is the Amercan Socialist Party, fer cry sakes) The intent of the post was to provide equal relocation assistance to lost trolls of all stripes. |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
On 13 Jul 2006 13:46:26 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote: JohnH wrote: On 13 Jul 2006 09:28:57 -0700, wrote: Gentlemen, who started this to be a "political" thread. A documentary on the Dscovery Channel, was all that was mentioned, then here comes a comment about the "righties" The origional post? I didn't see anything "political" about it at all, until the thread was quickly being turned into one. Why couldn't it have been left for what it was? A simple statement concerning a scientific program on Discovery Channel? Amen! -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John Check the left wing sites, please. You will find that they are equally absurd. (one is the Amercan Socialist Party, fer cry sakes) The intent of the post was to provide equal relocation assistance to lost trolls of all stripes. I just looked at the titles. No harm, no foul. -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
JohnH wrote: On 13 Jul 2006 04:49:24 -0700, "basskisser" wrote: ? wrote: ....there is a program concerning that subject on The Discovery Channel, Sunday, July 16th, at 9:00P EDT. Maybe it will provide some ammo for all the participants in the humongous thread below. Bishoop.... The righties won't watch it. They'd rather stick there head in the sand than be informed, because Rush And Hannity tell them to. What the hell is with you and 'the righties'? This is twice in the past week you've accused 'the righties' of something. -- Don't go JimH on me. MOST of the right wing choose to believe right wing views over good, honest science in this case. Just look at the thread on global warming here, and you can instantly tell who is hard core right wing, and who is either left or center. The belief that man has had absolutely NO impact on the environment and it's changes is pure ignorance. We're here, how could we not have an impact. Same thing with people who believe clear cutting forests is good for the trees! |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
|
For you global warming/cooling fans....
On 13 Jul 2006 14:31:31 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:
JohnH wrote: On 13 Jul 2006 04:49:24 -0700, "basskisser" wrote: ? wrote: ....there is a program concerning that subject on The Discovery Channel, Sunday, July 16th, at 9:00P EDT. Maybe it will provide some ammo for all the participants in the humongous thread below. Bishoop.... The righties won't watch it. They'd rather stick there head in the sand than be informed, because Rush And Hannity tell them to. What the hell is with you and 'the righties'? This is twice in the past week you've accused 'the righties' of something. -- Don't go JimH on me. MOST of the right wing choose to believe right wing views over good, honest science in this case. Just look at the thread on global warming here, and you can instantly tell who is hard core right wing, and who is either left or center. The belief that man has had absolutely NO impact on the environment and it's changes is pure ignorance. We're here, how could we not have an impact. Same thing with people who believe clear cutting forests is good for the trees! My advice is this: Stay away from political threads. Don't generalize. Stop using the inclusive term 'righties' to express your views about individuals with whom you choose to argue. You have no idea how many 'righties', if any, believe that man has NO impact on global warming. Anyone who has ever struck a match has had an impact on global warming! -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 13 Jul 2006 04:49:24 -0700, "basskisser" wrote: ? wrote: ....there is a program concerning that subject on The Discovery Channel, Sunday, July 16th, at 9:00P EDT. Maybe it will provide some ammo for all the participants in the humongous thread below. Bishoop.... The righties won't watch it. They'd rather stick there head in the sand than be informed, because Rush And Hannity tell them to. It's more like following the party line for the "warmers". Any scientist who actually has studied the issue says it's bull****. Really? Union of Concerned Scientists: http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming...gerprints.html States in part: In its 2001 report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stated, "There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities." [3] Carbon dioxide from fossil fuel burning and land clearing has been accumulating in the atmosphere, where it acts like a blanket keeping Earth warm and heating up the surface, ocean, and atmosphere. As a result, current levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than at any time during the last 650,000 years. [4,5,6] NASA scientists rip Bush on Global Warming (and the typical head in the sand) http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6341451/ Which states in part: Hansen said the scientific community generally agrees that temperatures on Earth are rising because of the greenhouse effect - increased emissions of carbon dioxide and other materials into the atmosphere that trap heat. Most of that increase comes from burning fossil fuels. Theres many, many more. As a matter of fact, most scientists who have spoken about Al Gore's movie says he's spot on in a lot of cases, and not far from spot on the rest of the movie. I'd suppose you only consider "any scientist who has actually studied the issue" just the one's who have a right wing agenda, correct? |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
No, not at all. I'm just wondering why you had to make this a political
thread? basskisser wrote: wrote: huh? Having trouble reading? |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
Chuck Gould wrote:
? wrote: ....there is a program concerning that subject on The Discovery Channel, Sunday, July 16th, at 9:00P EDT. Maybe it will provide some ammo for all the participants in the humongous thread below. Bishoop.... Recommended sites for right wing political trolls: http://www.kkk.bz/ http://www.americannaziparty.com/ https://www.donationreport.com/init/...key=L1M7U8Y0F0 http://www.whitehouse.gov/ http://www.patrobertson.com/ http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html http://www.hannity.com/ Recommended sites for left wing political trolls: http://www.americanprogress.org/site...RJ8OVF/b.8473/ http://sp-usa.org/principles.html http://www.votehillary.org/ http://www.dnc.org/ http://www.michaelmoore.com/ http://www.greenpeace.org/international/ http://www.aclu.org/ Chuck's true colors come shinning through by his own words and actions. Do you still believe that you are neutral? |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
basskisser wrote:
wrote: No, not at all. I'm just wondering why you had to make this a political thread? Because the right wing made it a political issue. Thanks a good excuse Kevin, not a reason, but an excuse. When you stand before the judge and say that you are not guilty of the crime because someone else grew the pot and you only smoked it he is going to laugh as he throws you in jail. |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
Don't you know better than to argue with the religion of "global warming
alarmists" ? "JohnH" wrote in message ... On 13 Jul 2006 04:49:24 -0700, "basskisser" wrote: ? wrote: ....there is a program concerning that subject on The Discovery Channel, Sunday, July 16th, at 9:00P EDT. Maybe it will provide some ammo for all the participants in the humongous thread below. Bishoop.... The righties won't watch it. They'd rather stick there head in the sand than be informed, because Rush And Hannity tell them to. What the hell is with you and 'the righties'? This is twice in the past week you've accused 'the righties' of something. -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
Because to those that adhere to the religion of "global warming alarmists"
anyone that disagrees is a heretic and must be condemned. Kevin wouldn't know 'good science' if it bitch slapped him in the head. He is the same person to have claimed to have a masters degree that was not even offered by the institute he claimed granted it. wrote in message oups.com... No, the "right" wasn't even mentioned in the origional post, until you felt it your duty to force it on the thread. The thread was about a program on the Discovery Chanel, and nothing political about the post. basskisser wrote: wrote: No, not at all. I'm just wondering why you had to make this a political thread? Because the right wing made it a political issue. |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
On 14 Jul 2006 04:11:08 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:
wrote: No, not at all. I'm just wondering why you had to make this a political thread? Because the right wing made it a political issue. The original post made mention of a program on the Discovery Channel. It made no comments about 'left or right'. -- ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** John |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
"basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 13 Jul 2006 04:49:24 -0700, "basskisser" wrote: ? wrote: ....there is a program concerning that subject on The Discovery Channel, Sunday, July 16th, at 9:00P EDT. Maybe it will provide some ammo for all the participants in the humongous thread below. Bishoop.... The righties won't watch it. They'd rather stick there head in the sand than be informed, because Rush And Hannity tell them to. It's more like following the party line for the "warmers". Any scientist who actually has studied the issue says it's bull****. Really? Union of Concerned Scientists: http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming...gerprints.html States in part: In its 2001 report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stated, "There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities." [3] Carbon dioxide from fossil fuel burning and land clearing has been accumulating in the atmosphere, where it acts like a blanket keeping Earth warm and heating up the surface, ocean, and atmosphere. As a result, current levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than at any time during the last 650,000 years. [4,5,6] NASA scientists rip Bush on Global Warming (and the typical head in the sand) http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6341451/ Which states in part: Hansen said the scientific community generally agrees that temperatures on Earth are rising because of the greenhouse effect - increased emissions of carbon dioxide and other materials into the atmosphere that trap heat. Most of that increase comes from burning fossil fuels. Theres many, many more. As a matter of fact, most scientists who have spoken about Al Gore's movie says he's spot on in a lot of cases, and not far from spot on the rest of the movie. I'd suppose you only consider "any scientist who has actually studied the issue" just the one's who have a right wing agenda, correct? The models show that increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will cause a global average temperature increase. How much is debatable and it's hard to determine if the one degree temp increase in average temperatures over the last 50 years is due to the sun or carbon dioxide as variations in global temperatures have varied much more than one degree over the last eighty years. So what if temps increase two more degrees over then next 50 years (if the model is correct). So the seas go up 18 inches, we have stronger hurricanes and storms. More flooding....higher crop yields....less cancer....some islands in the pacific (2 foot above sea level) will flood out....less heating oil used in the north (milder winters)....fewer fires .....it's a mixed bag. Conservatives are traditionally the ones who resist change....here it seems the lefties don't like change....they must own allot of that waterfront property. |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
|
For you global warming/cooling fans....
"Alotta Fagina" wrote in message ... You wrote: The models show that increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will cause a global average temperature increase. Actual increased CO2 increases plant growth, and that has happened: there is more forest land in the US today than 100 years ago. That's mainly because land cleared for small, individual farms 100 years ago has been allowed to regrow. Eisboch |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
|
For you global warming/cooling fans....
|
For you global warming/cooling fans....
P. Fritz wrote: Because to those that adhere to the religion of "global warming alarmists" anyone that disagrees is a heretic and must be condemned. Kevin wouldn't know 'good science' if it bitch slapped him in the head. He is the same person to have claimed to have a masters degree that was not even offered by the institute he claimed granted it. Hey, Fritz, care to take the $5000 challenge that I'm not Kevin? Put up, or shut up. Oh, and you are dead ass wrong about my degrees. Dead wrong. And, if you'll put up the $5000 to prove that I'm not Kevin, then you'll know who I am, and can investigate. Ready? |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
Alotta Fagina wrote: You wrote: "Alotta Fagina" wrote in message ... You wrote: The models show that increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will cause a global average temperature increase. Actual increased CO2 increases plant growth, and that has happened: there is more forest land in the US today than 100 years ago. That's mainly because land cleared for small, individual farms 100 years ago has been allowed to regrow. I was hoping someone would point this out, since it permits us to split the leftie wackos into competing "save the family farm" and "save the forest" camps and watch them beat eachother up. Both can happen and coexist, but you are too narrow minded to know that. Save the forests from clear cutting thousands and thousands of acres, leave the farms as is. Pretty simple when you get your head out of the sand, huh? |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
Alotta Fagina wrote: You wrote: MOST of the right wing choose to believe right wing views over good, honest science in this case. You've never cited "good, honest science" proving that human activity causes global warming. Or explained how humans are causing the warming on Mars. Or how Earth warming and Mars warming can't possibly be related, and can't possibly be caused by their primary source of heat. And that is because it is impossible to prove or explain any of those things. Because they're all lies. The belief that man has had absolutely NO impact on the environment and it's changes is pure ignorance. "Pure ignorance" is not knowing the difference between "it's" and "its". Do you also write "hi's", "her's", "their's", "mine's", and "your's"? Wait, you probably do. We're here, how could we not have an impact. Carrots are here, how could they not have an impact? What about elephants? Playing cards? Fireants? Eradicate them all! They're destroying the planet! Same thing with people who believe clear cutting forests is good for the trees! Clear cutting occurs in govt forests, not in privately owned ones. Private forests are preserved far better than govt owned ones. And property taxes are paid by private forest owners. Cite? |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote: Alotta Fagina wrote: You wrote: MOST of the right wing choose to believe right wing views over good, honest science in this case. You've never cited "good, honest science" proving that human activity causes global warming. Or explained how humans are causing the warming on Mars. Or how Earth warming and Mars warming can't possibly be related, and can't possibly be caused by their primary source of heat. And that is because it is impossible to prove or explain any of those things. Because they're all lies. The belief that man has had absolutely NO impact on the environment and it's changes is pure ignorance. "Pure ignorance" is not knowing the difference between "it's" and "its". Do you also write "hi's", "her's", "their's", "mine's", and "your's"? Wait, you probably do. We're here, how could we not have an impact. Carrots are here, how could they not have an impact? What about elephants? Playing cards? Fireants? Eradicate them all! They're destroying the planet! Same thing with people who believe clear cutting forests is good for the trees! Clear cutting occurs in govt forests, not in privately owned ones. Private forests are preserved far better than govt owned ones. And property taxes are paid by private forest owners. Cite? YOU? Asking for a CITE? After refusing 3,507 requests for a single link between human activity and climate? ****. You. Hard. Asshole. He, Kevin, has taken on JoeSpareBedroom's, aka Doug Kanter, tactic of askig for a cite and badgering to get his questions answered. When in reality this is a newsgroup and nobody has to answer anybody's questions. |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
basskisser wrote:
Alotta Fagina wrote: You wrote: Alotta Fagina wrote: You wrote: MOST of the right wing choose to believe right wing views over good, honest science in this case. You've never cited "good, honest science" proving that human activity causes global warming. Or explained how humans are causing the warming on Mars. Or how Earth warming and Mars warming can't possibly be related, and can't possibly be caused by their primary source of heat. And that is because it is impossible to prove or explain any of those things. Because they're all lies. The belief that man has had absolutely NO impact on the environment and it's changes is pure ignorance. "Pure ignorance" is not knowing the difference between "it's" and "its". Do you also write "hi's", "her's", "their's", "mine's", and "your's"? Wait, you probably do. We're here, how could we not have an impact. Carrots are here, how could they not have an impact? What about elephants? Playing cards? Fireants? Eradicate them all! They're destroying the planet! Same thing with people who believe clear cutting forests is good for the trees! Clear cutting occurs in govt forests, not in privately owned ones. Private forests are preserved far better than govt owned ones. And property taxes are paid by private forest owners. Cite? YOU? Asking for a CITE? After refusing 3,507 requests for a single link between human activity and climate? ****. You. Hard. Asshole. First, I gave several. Second, your childish name calling and petty insults certainly shows just how credible you are. At least you realized that you didn't have a clue in hell about forestry, so instead of even attempting to give some facts, start spewing the above crap. How childish can you get? Stop whining and act like a man. |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Alotta Fagina wrote: You wrote: Alotta Fagina wrote: You wrote: MOST of the right wing choose to believe right wing views over good, honest science in this case. You've never cited "good, honest science" proving that human activity causes global warming. Or explained how humans are causing the warming on Mars. Or how Earth warming and Mars warming can't possibly be related, and can't possibly be caused by their primary source of heat. And that is because it is impossible to prove or explain any of those things. Because they're all lies. The belief that man has had absolutely NO impact on the environment and it's changes is pure ignorance. "Pure ignorance" is not knowing the difference between "it's" and "its". Do you also write "hi's", "her's", "their's", "mine's", and "your's"? Wait, you probably do. We're here, how could we not have an impact. Carrots are here, how could they not have an impact? What about elephants? Playing cards? Fireants? Eradicate them all! They're destroying the planet! Same thing with people who believe clear cutting forests is good for the trees! Clear cutting occurs in govt forests, not in privately owned ones. Private forests are preserved far better than govt owned ones. And property taxes are paid by private forest owners. Cite? YOU? Asking for a CITE? After refusing 3,507 requests for a single link between human activity and climate? ****. You. Hard. Asshole. First, I gave several. Second, your childish name calling and petty insults certainly shows just how credible you are. At least you realized that you didn't have a clue in hell about forestry, so instead of even attempting to give some facts, start spewing the above crap. How childish can you get? Stop whining and act like a man. Grow up. If you knew how to read and comprehend, you'd see there is no whining in my above STATEMENTS. Just the facts. What facts? I don't see any facts from you. All you ever do is bless us with your opinion, Kevin. |
For you global warming/cooling fans....
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Alotta Fagina wrote: You wrote: Alotta Fagina wrote: You wrote: MOST of the right wing choose to believe right wing views over good, honest science in this case. You've never cited "good, honest science" proving that human activity causes global warming. Or explained how humans are causing the warming on Mars. Or how Earth warming and Mars warming can't possibly be related, and can't possibly be caused by their primary source of heat. And that is because it is impossible to prove or explain any of those things. Because they're all lies. The belief that man has had absolutely NO impact on the environment and it's changes is pure ignorance. "Pure ignorance" is not knowing the difference between "it's" and "its". Do you also write "hi's", "her's", "their's", "mine's", and "your's"? Wait, you probably do. We're here, how could we not have an impact. Carrots are here, how could they not have an impact? What about elephants? Playing cards? Fireants? Eradicate them all! They're destroying the planet! Same thing with people who believe clear cutting forests is good for the trees! Clear cutting occurs in govt forests, not in privately owned ones. Private forests are preserved far better than govt owned ones. And property taxes are paid by private forest owners. Cite? YOU? Asking for a CITE? After refusing 3,507 requests for a single link between human activity and climate? ****. You. Hard. Asshole. First, I gave several. Second, your childish name calling and petty insults certainly shows just how credible you are. At least you realized that you didn't have a clue in hell about forestry, so instead of even attempting to give some facts, start spewing the above crap. How childish can you get? Stop whining and act like a man. Grow up. If you knew how to read and comprehend, you'd see there is no whining in my above STATEMENTS. Just the facts. What facts? I don't see any facts from you. All you ever do is bless us with your opinion, Kevin. Fact: I'm not Kevin. Care to take the $5000 challenge, or are you chicken ****? Fact: I gave several cites about man made global warming. Fact: Alotta did, indeed, resort to childish and petty name calling when unable to come up with a single cite to back up the wild claim. Fact: You are a childish acting boor, and are scared to take the $5000 challenge to prove I'm not Kevin. Just plain scared. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com