Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wilko" wrote in message ... Bob P wrote: In desperate circumstances, you're better off taking off the PFD and diving down to follow the bottom current out of the backwash. Few people who get in (low-head-dam) trouble have the knowledge or composure to make that radical move, however. I've given that some thought. Over the years, this option seems to have surfaced on RBP a couple of times. My main concern would be what happens after you get out of the hydrolic, and what would happen if taking off your PFD wouldn't get you out. I'm fairly ambiguous about whether or not that would be a smart thing to do. It's the main reason why I have a PFD with a front zipper though... so that I can quickly take it off if needed. This boondoggle arises all the time. As far as my experience goes, the old "take off your PFD and flush out the bottom of the hole" strategy is an urban legend. Everyone knows the rule, but afaik, no one knows anyone who has actually had to do it. Its in the same legendary category as putting maggots in an open wound to stymie gangrene from forming, or as using soldier ants as stitches to close a wound, or to use a swiss army knife to cut an oar in half to extricate it from your leg. Sounds good in theory, but in practice you are just never in that exact type of situation, or else there are other complicating factors that prevent it from really being a good strategy. I think if you were actually trapped in a hole with sharp enough edges to keep you in, you would be underwater and tossed around so much that you would have no idea which way 'down' was, let alone how to crawl along the bottom. Also, once you shed your pfd, the force of the water would almost certainly prevent you from using the rocks along the bottom anyway, as you'd be plastered down there at best, or slammed among them at worst. As Wilko points out, even if it DID work, you'd then be downstream without a PFD, pretty beat up and completely out of breath. Also, in the aerated water behind the pourover, you would have less floatation than normal and would have NO chance to catch a breath, so you'd be more likely to drown without a pfd than with it on. I think it'd be very interesting to hear some statistics about people who have gone over low-head dams with and without PFDs, and get some statistics of who actually has washed out vs who has drowned. I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that the majority of people without PFDs drown, and the majority of people with them flush out. No, unless I hear some pretty definitive stories from folks who have had to actually do this, and who can verify that their PFD remained in the hole indefinately afterwards (in other words, it was a true keeper hole), I choose to believe that this is a poorly thought out legendary old wives tale that impressess newbies. --riverman |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Carolina Blackwater Trip Report (lengthy) | General | |||
Near drowning incident on the Potomac River (USA) - victim revived | General | |||
WTB: Autohelm 4000 control head in Washington state | Marketplace |