Slap on wrist
 

Well...the US bullied & pushed us around and is now getting away with
only returning about 78% of the money it had stolen from Canadian lumber
interests.
So much for 'Free Trade'. Canada had to agree to a cap of 34% of the US
market.
My question would be...if the US wasn't honorable with the original Free
Trade Agreement, how can it be trusted to honour this agreement?
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/nation...ood060427.html

Slap on wrist
 

Don White wrote:
Well...the US bullied & pushed us around and is now getting away with
only returning about 78% of the money it had stolen from Canadian lumber
interests.
So much for 'Free Trade'. Canada had to agree to a cap of 34% of the US
market.
My question would be...if the US wasn't honorable with the original Free
Trade Agreement, how can it be trusted to honour this agreement?
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/nation...ood060427.html

Too bad. What are you going to do now, invade the US like the Mexicans
have?

Slap on wrist
 

Spoken like a true bully Bert . You should be proud of yourself
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
Don White wrote:
Well...the US bullied & pushed us around and is now getting away with
only returning about 78% of the money it had stolen from Canadian lumber
interests.
So much for 'Free Trade'. Canada had to agree to a cap of 34% of the US
market.
My question would be...if the US wasn't honorable with the original Free
Trade Agreement, how can it be trusted to honour this agreement?
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/nation...ood060427.html

Too bad. What are you going to do now, invade the US like the Mexicans
have?

Slap on wrist
 

Canada had to agree...

YAWN.

Slap on wrist
 

Bert Robbins wrote:
Don White wrote:

Well...the US bullied & pushed us around and is now getting away with
only returning about 78% of the money it had stolen from Canadian
lumber interests.
So much for 'Free Trade'. Canada had to agree to a cap of 34% of the
US market.
My question would be...if the US wasn't honorable with the original
Free Trade Agreement, how can it be trusted to honour this agreement?
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/nation...ood060427.html


Too bad. What are you going to do now, invade the US like the Mexicans
have?

Since our dollar is now over .89 US and rising...we'll just buy you out
and send the republican supporters packing. (unless they see the evil
of their ways & repent)

Slap on wrist
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
Don White wrote:

Well...the US bullied & pushed us around and is now getting away with
only returning about 78% of the money it had stolen from Canadian lumber
interests.
So much for 'Free Trade'. Canada had to agree to a cap of 34% of the US
market.
My question would be...if the US wasn't honorable with the original Free
Trade Agreement, how can it be trusted to honour this agreement?
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/nation...ood060427.html


Too bad. What are you going to do now, invade the US like the Mexicans
have?

Since our dollar is now over .89 US and rising...we'll just buy you out
and send the republican supporters packing. (unless they see the evil of
their ways & repent)

You mean Canada is about to make an offer that we can't refuse?

RCE

Slap on wrist/ Boats turning around and going north
 

Don White wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
Don White wrote:

Well...the US bullied & pushed us around and is now getting away with
only returning about 78% of the money it had stolen from Canadian
lumber interests.
So much for 'Free Trade'. Canada had to agree to a cap of 34% of the
US market.
My question would be...if the US wasn't honorable with the original
Free Trade Agreement, how can it be trusted to honour this agreement?
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/nation...ood060427.html


Too bad. What are you going to do now, invade the US like the Mexicans
have?

Since our dollar is now over .89 US and rising...we'll just buy you out
and send the republican supporters packing. (unless they see the evil
of their ways & repent)

The yacht brokers in the Pacific NW are all saying "Throw me in the
briars!"

Business is brisk right now with Canadian buyers. For the last 10 years
or so, when the US dollar was a titan vs. the Canadian dollar, the
Canadian brokers have all complained that they were running low on
inventory as US buyers were crossing the border to scoop up boats that
were artificially cheaper based on currency exchange rates. With NAFTA,
any boat built in North America crosses the border duty free.

The Canadians are down here now, buying everything in sight. Lots of
boats going north again. Oh well, we'll have to wait a year of two
until the US buck gets stronger again and then some of the same boats
will once again turn around and head south.

And don't speak too harshly about those Republicans. You can thank the
current congress and administration's fiscal irresponsibility and
record breaking deficit spending for driving down the US dollar to be
close to par for you guys. If we don't get some fiscally responsibly
leadership in DC soon (from either or any party), you'll need a
wheelbarrow full of yankee dollars to buy a cubic foot of Canadian
natural gas.

Slap on wrist
 

Pete Wedeles wrote:
Spoken like a true bully Bert . You should be proud of yourself
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
Don White wrote:
Well...the US bullied & pushed us around and is now getting away with
only returning about 78% of the money it had stolen from Canadian lumber
interests.
So much for 'Free Trade'. Canada had to agree to a cap of 34% of the US
market.
My question would be...if the US wasn't honorable with the original Free
Trade Agreement, how can it be trusted to honour this agreement?
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/nation...ood060427.html
Too bad. What are you going to do now, invade the US like the Mexicans
have?



Bully? You make me laugh. Diplomacy is the attempt to bully someone into
doing what you want with the threat of harm if they don't.

Slap on wrist
 

On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:51:40 -0400, "RCE" wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
Don White wrote:

Well...the US bullied & pushed us around and is now getting away with
only returning about 78% of the money it had stolen from Canadian lumber
interests.
So much for 'Free Trade'. Canada had to agree to a cap of 34% of the US
market.
My question would be...if the US wasn't honorable with the original Free
Trade Agreement, how can it be trusted to honour this agreement?
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/nation...ood060427.html


Too bad. What are you going to do now, invade the US like the Mexicans
have?

Since our dollar is now over .89 US and rising...we'll just buy you out
and send the republican supporters packing. (unless they see the evil of
their ways & repent)

You mean Canada is about to make an offer that we can't refuse?

RCE


Rich, now that I've made the 'match' it offer, please ask your wife to be
gentle when she makes her donation!!
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

Slap on wrist
 

RCE wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...

Bert Robbins wrote:

Don White wrote:


Well...the US bullied & pushed us around and is now getting away with
only returning about 78% of the money it had stolen from Canadian lumber
interests.
So much for 'Free Trade'. Canada had to agree to a cap of 34% of the US
market.
My question would be...if the US wasn't honorable with the original Free
Trade Agreement, how can it be trusted to honour this agreement?
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/nation...ood060427.html


Too bad. What are you going to do now, invade the US like the Mexicans
have?

Since our dollar is now over .89 US and rising...we'll just buy you out
and send the republican supporters packing. (unless they see the evil of
their ways & repent)


You mean Canada is about to make an offer that we can't refuse?

RCE


One way ticket to Oz.

Slap on wrist/ Boats turning around and going north
 

Slap on wrist
 

Don White wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
Don White wrote:


Since our dollar is now over .89 US and rising...we'll just buy you out


Stand in line, The chinese are about 13 nations in front of you.....

Slap on wrist
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...

Rich, now that I've made the 'match' it offer, please ask your wife to be
gentle when she makes her donation!!
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************


John, just to clarify ..... our donation was made on April 22.
Was it not received? We got the receipt and your automated email response.

RCE

Slap on wrist
 

Don White wrote:
RCE wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...

Bert Robbins wrote:

Don White wrote:


Well...the US bullied & pushed us around and is now getting away
with only returning about 78% of the money it had stolen from
Canadian lumber interests.
So much for 'Free Trade'. Canada had to agree to a cap of 34% of
the US market.
My question would be...if the US wasn't honorable with the original
Free Trade Agreement, how can it be trusted to honour this agreement?
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/nation...ood060427.html


Too bad. What are you going to do now, invade the US like the
Mexicans have?

Since our dollar is now over .89 US and rising...we'll just buy you
out and send the republican supporters packing. (unless they see the
evil of their ways & repent)


You mean Canada is about to make an offer that we can't refuse?

RCE

One way ticket to Oz.

We are not part of that club.

Slap on wrist/ Boats turning around and going north
 

Don White wrote:
wrote:

And don't speak too harshly about those Republicans. You can thank the
current congress and administration's fiscal irresponsibility and
record breaking deficit spending for driving down the US dollar to be
close to par for you guys.

Bush is actually a Canadian spy, don't ya know. We knew we'd look good
in comparison. In fact, during your last election I remember saying -
"Well, Bush may be bad for the planet, but he is GOOD for Canada." It's
an ill wind and all that . . .



On cue, our manufacturing and tourism people are now crying and moaning
about the strength of our dollar. They say sales will start to drop off
as our goods become more expensive. Tourism is down as many Americans
find that Canada isn't the cheap deal it once was. Then we have Bush's
new law requiring a passport or expensive identity card for US citizens
to get back into their own country. Land of the Free indeed!

What our tourism people fail to see is that Americans, on the whole,
aren't going anywhere anymore. Pansies!

Slap on wrist/ Boats turning around and going north
 

Don White wrote:


On cue, our manufacturing and tourism people are now crying and moaning
about the strength of our dollar. They say sales will start to drop off
as our goods become more expensive. Tourism is down as many Americans
find that Canada isn't the cheap deal it once was. Then we have Bush's
new law requiring a passport or expensive identity card for US citizens
to get back into their own country. Land of the Free indeed!

The law doesn't specifically require a passport. The standard is that
you must be "able to prove to the satisfaction of the Customs examiner"
that you are a US citizen. Depending on the mood or motivation of the
individual customs examiner, this can vary between a simple verbal
interview, "Where were you born, how long were you in Canada, what are
you bringing back? Ok, have a nice day" to a full blown third degree
with "park your car and bring your papers to the office". The reason
the passport has become the default document is that everybody, (even
Customs examiners), is expected to accept a valid US Passport as proof
of citizenship. Sometimes you can get by with a driver's license and a
copy of a birth certificate. (You can usually get by with a photo ID
and a copy of the birth certificate for your own minor children
travelling in your company). But if you get a grumpy examiner who wants
to put you through the most extreme number of hoops, a passport is
going to be needed to prove citizenship.

Slap on wrist
 

On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:59:54 -0400, "RCE" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .

Rich, now that I've made the 'match' it offer, please ask your wife to be
gentle when she makes her donation!!
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************


John, just to clarify ..... our donation was made on April 22.
Was it not received? We got the receipt and your automated email response.

RCE


As Eisboch, or something else? Are your wife's initials 'AME" ?


--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

Slap on wrist/ Boats turning around and going north
 

wrote:
Don White wrote:


On cue, our manufacturing and tourism people are now crying and moaning
about the strength of our dollar. They say sales will start to drop off
as our goods become more expensive. Tourism is down as many Americans
find that Canada isn't the cheap deal it once was. Then we have Bush's
new law requiring a passport or expensive identity card for US citizens
to get back into their own country. Land of the Free indeed!


The law doesn't specifically require a passport. The standard is that
you must be "able to prove to the satisfaction of the Customs examiner"
that you are a US citizen. Depending on the mood or motivation of the
individual customs examiner, this can vary between a simple verbal
interview, "Where were you born, how long were you in Canada, what are
you bringing back? Ok, have a nice day" to a full blown third degree
with "park your car and bring your papers to the office". The reason
the passport has become the default document is that everybody, (even
Customs examiners), is expected to accept a valid US Passport as proof
of citizenship. Sometimes you can get by with a driver's license and a
copy of a birth certificate. (You can usually get by with a photo ID
and a copy of the birth certificate for your own minor children
travelling in your company). But if you get a grumpy examiner who wants
to put you through the most extreme number of hoops, a passport is
going to be needed to prove citizenship.

Chuck...
Are you referring to the current situation or the upcoming draconian state?
http://tinyurl.com/e6pdo

Slap on wrist
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:59:54 -0400, "RCE" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
. ..

Rich, now that I've made the 'match' it offer, please ask your wife to
be
gentle when she makes her donation!!
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************


John, just to clarify ..... our donation was made on April 22.
Was it not received? We got the receipt and your automated email
response.

RCE


As Eisboch, or something else? Are your wife's initials 'AME" ?


--
'Til next time,

John H


That's correct. Anna M. Eriksson

Just didn't want you to think we reneged as it seemed you were still waiting
for the donation.

RCE

Slap on wrist
 

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:27:41 -0400, "RCE" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:59:54 -0400, "RCE" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
...

Rich, now that I've made the 'match' it offer, please ask your wife to
be
gentle when she makes her donation!!
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************


John, just to clarify ..... our donation was made on April 22.
Was it not received? We got the receipt and your automated email
response.

RCE


As Eisboch, or something else? Are your wife's initials 'AME" ?


--
'Til next time,

John H


That's correct. Anna M. Eriksson

Just didn't want you to think we reneged as it seemed you were still waiting
for the donation.

RCE


Aha! Your contribution was in the category of "I wonder who that is?". Now
I know. Thanks so much, you were one of the first contributors and got the
first iteration of my 'thank you' email. (Which isn't automated!)

Check your email, and thanks again (especially for making it before my
'matching contribution' offer, although you *could* do it again if you
really wanted to put me in the poorhouse.)
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

Slap on wrist/ Boats turning around and going north
 

Don White wrote:
wrote:
Don White wrote:


On cue, our manufacturing and tourism people are now crying and moaning
about the strength of our dollar. They say sales will start to drop off
as our goods become more expensive. Tourism is down as many Americans
find that Canada isn't the cheap deal it once was. Then we have Bush's
new law requiring a passport or expensive identity card for US citizens
to get back into their own country. Land of the Free indeed!


The law doesn't specifically require a passport. The standard is that
you must be "able to prove to the satisfaction of the Customs examiner"
that you are a US citizen. Depending on the mood or motivation of the
individual customs examiner, this can vary between a simple verbal
interview, "Where were you born, how long were you in Canada, what are
you bringing back? Ok, have a nice day" to a full blown third degree
with "park your car and bring your papers to the office". The reason
the passport has become the default document is that everybody, (even
Customs examiners), is expected to accept a valid US Passport as proof
of citizenship. Sometimes you can get by with a driver's license and a
copy of a birth certificate. (You can usually get by with a photo ID
and a copy of the birth certificate for your own minor children
travelling in your company). But if you get a grumpy examiner who wants
to put you through the most extreme number of hoops, a passport is
going to be needed to prove citizenship.

Chuck...
Are you referring to the current situation or the upcoming draconian state?
http://tinyurl.com/e6pdo

I'm referring to the current situation, which is what your tourism
folks, marinas, etc are wailing about.

How many provinces you got up there? We could use a few more states.
We'd get your natural resources (and it would take a couple of
generations to waste them as completely as we have wasted those below
the 49 N.) In return, of course, you would get unfettered traffic of
people and commerce across the entirely erased border. And just think,
you would wake up some morning and realize that your national leader
was George Bush! Let me ask you, what could possibly be better than
that? :-)

Slap on wrist/ Boats turning around and going north
 

wrote:
Don White wrote:

wrote:

Don White wrote:



On cue, our manufacturing and tourism people are now crying and moaning
about the strength of our dollar. They say sales will start to drop off
as our goods become more expensive. Tourism is down as many Americans
find that Canada isn't the cheap deal it once was. Then we have Bush's
new law requiring a passport or expensive identity card for US citizens
to get back into their own country. Land of the Free indeed!


The law doesn't specifically require a passport. The standard is that
you must be "able to prove to the satisfaction of the Customs examiner"
that you are a US citizen. Depending on the mood or motivation of the
individual customs examiner, this can vary between a simple verbal
interview, "Where were you born, how long were you in Canada, what are
you bringing back? Ok, have a nice day" to a full blown third degree
with "park your car and bring your papers to the office". The reason
the passport has become the default document is that everybody, (even
Customs examiners), is expected to accept a valid US Passport as proof
of citizenship. Sometimes you can get by with a driver's license and a
copy of a birth certificate. (You can usually get by with a photo ID
and a copy of the birth certificate for your own minor children
travelling in your company). But if you get a grumpy examiner who wants
to put you through the most extreme number of hoops, a passport is
going to be needed to prove citizenship.


Chuck...
Are you referring to the current situation or the upcoming draconian state?
http://tinyurl.com/e6pdo


I'm referring to the current situation, which is what your tourism
folks, marinas, etc are wailing about.

How many provinces you got up there? We could use a few more states.
We'd get your natural resources (and it would take a couple of
generations to waste them as completely as we have wasted those below
the 49 N.) In return, of course, you would get unfettered traffic of
people and commerce across the entirely erased border. And just think,
you would wake up some morning and realize that your national leader
was George Bush! Let me ask you, what could possibly be better than
that? :-)

Ten provinces & three territories.
I think our tourism people are pulling a 'sky is falling' scenario in
anticipation of the 'dark day' when your new ID Card law comes into effect.
Let me see..what could compare with Bush being my president...?
How about a naked swim in our polluted harbour in January?

Slap on wrist/ Boats turning around and going north
 

On 28 Apr 2006 11:07:39 -0700, "
wrote:


Don White wrote:
wrote:
Don White wrote:


On cue, our manufacturing and tourism people are now crying and moaning
about the strength of our dollar. They say sales will start to drop off
as our goods become more expensive. Tourism is down as many Americans
find that Canada isn't the cheap deal it once was. Then we have Bush's
new law requiring a passport or expensive identity card for US citizens
to get back into their own country. Land of the Free indeed!


The law doesn't specifically require a passport. The standard is that
you must be "able to prove to the satisfaction of the Customs examiner"
that you are a US citizen. Depending on the mood or motivation of the
individual customs examiner, this can vary between a simple verbal
interview, "Where were you born, how long were you in Canada, what are
you bringing back? Ok, have a nice day" to a full blown third degree
with "park your car and bring your papers to the office". The reason
the passport has become the default document is that everybody, (even
Customs examiners), is expected to accept a valid US Passport as proof
of citizenship. Sometimes you can get by with a driver's license and a
copy of a birth certificate. (You can usually get by with a photo ID
and a copy of the birth certificate for your own minor children
travelling in your company). But if you get a grumpy examiner who wants
to put you through the most extreme number of hoops, a passport is
going to be needed to prove citizenship.

Chuck...
Are you referring to the current situation or the upcoming draconian state?
http://tinyurl.com/e6pdo

I'm referring to the current situation, which is what your tourism
folks, marinas, etc are wailing about.

How many provinces you got up there? We could use a few more states.
We'd get your natural resources (and it would take a couple of
generations to waste them as completely as we have wasted those below
the 49 N.) In return, of course, you would get unfettered traffic of
people and commerce across the entirely erased border. And just think,
you would wake up some morning and realize that your national leader
was George Bush! Let me ask you, what could possibly be better than
that? :-)

Chuck, are you going political on us again? You've been quite borderline
lately!

Here, make a contribution through this site, and I'll double it!

http://www.active.com/donate/varace4cure/JohnHerring

That'll take your mind off Bush for a couple minutes!
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

Slap on wrist/ Boats turning around and going north
 

JohnH wrote:


Chuck, are you going political on us again? You've been quite borderline
lately!

Here, make a contribution through this site, and I'll double it!

http://www.active.com/donate/varace4cure/JohnHerring

That'll take your mind off Bush for a couple minutes!
--
'Til next time,

John H

For some reason your site won't accept donations from WA State. WA
isn't an option on the automatic fill list, and can't be entered
manually.
However, I sent you a modest amount using the state designation AA as a
substitute for WA. I did get a receipt, but who knows if it will really
take with the bogus state address on the charge card? If the donation
comes through, please match it.

Slap on wrist/ Boats turning around and going north
 

On 28 Apr 2006 12:31:27 -0700, "
wrote:


JohnH wrote:


Chuck, are you going political on us again? You've been quite borderline
lately!

Here, make a contribution through this site, and I'll double it!

http://www.active.com/donate/varace4cure/JohnHerring

That'll take your mind off Bush for a couple minutes!
--
'Til next time,

John H

For some reason your site won't accept donations from WA State. WA
isn't an option on the automatic fill list, and can't be entered
manually.
However, I sent you a modest amount using the state designation AA as a
substitute for WA. I did get a receipt, but who knows if it will really
take with the bogus state address on the charge card? If the donation
comes through, please match it.

It took! Damn, you're vicious! I doubled it as per above, but now I won't
be going fishing a couple times. Hell, I may have to give up golf too!

Thanks Chuck, you're most generous. I wish I could see my daughter's eyes
when she sees the jump in the donations amount!
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

Slap on wrist/ Boats turning around and going north
 

On 28 Apr 2006 12:31:27 -0700, "
wrote:


JohnH wrote:


Chuck, are you going political on us again? You've been quite borderline
lately!

Here, make a contribution through this site, and I'll double it!

http://www.active.com/donate/varace4cure/JohnHerring

That'll take your mind off Bush for a couple minutes!
--
'Til next time,

John H

For some reason your site won't accept donations from WA State. WA
isn't an option on the automatic fill list, and can't be entered
manually.
However, I sent you a modest amount using the state designation AA as a
substitute for WA. I did get a receipt, but who knows if it will really
take with the bogus state address on the charge card? If the donation
comes through, please match it.

PS. Check your email.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************