BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/69046-if-you-want-cut-your-fuel-bill-get-off-throttle.html)

[email protected] April 24th 06 06:13 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 
Fuel consumption figures for Mercruiser marine engines:

3.0 L: 6gph at 3500 cruise, 11.5 gph WOT
4.3 L (2 bbl): 8.5 gph at 3500 cruise, 16.7 gph WOT
4.3 L MPI: 9.0 gph at 3500 cruise, 19.5 gph WOT
5.0L (2 bbl): 9.0 gph at 3000 (not 3500) cruise, 20.5gph WOT
5.0 L MPI: 10.9 gph at 3500 cruise, 22 gph WOT
350 Mag MPI: 12gph at 3500 cruise, 22gph at (5000 rpm) WOT
MX 6.2L MPI: 13.2 gph at 3500 cruise, 25.1 gph at 5200 WOT
496 Magnum: 16.0 gph at 3500 cruise, 30.5 gph at WOT
496 Magnum HO: 18.5 at 3500 cruise, 33gph at 5000 WOT.


Hmm, lets see: Running a pair of 496 HO gassers at well above cruise
speed would likely burn
close to 30 gph per side or 60gph total. 60 gph X $5/gal = $300 per
hour in fuel costs. Over $2000 for an all-day high speed run.

Running the same engines at 3500 rpm cruise would burn 37 gph, for a
total of $185 per hour in fuel costs at $5 a gallon. Still not cheap by
any stretch of the imagination, but at least not as far out of the
questiong for most folks as a $2000 daily (or even weekend) fuel bill
would be.


[email protected] April 24th 06 06:39 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 

Harry Krause wrote:
wrote:
Fuel consumption figures for Mercruiser marine engines:

3.0 L: 6gph at 3500 cruise, 11.5 gph WOT
4.3 L (2 bbl): 8.5 gph at 3500 cruise, 16.7 gph WOT
4.3 L MPI: 9.0 gph at 3500 cruise, 19.5 gph WOT
5.0L (2 bbl): 9.0 gph at 3000 (not 3500) cruise, 20.5gph WOT
5.0 L MPI: 10.9 gph at 3500 cruise, 22 gph WOT
350 Mag MPI: 12gph at 3500 cruise, 22gph at (5000 rpm) WOT
MX 6.2L MPI: 13.2 gph at 3500 cruise, 25.1 gph at 5200 WOT
496 Magnum: 16.0 gph at 3500 cruise, 30.5 gph at WOT
496 Magnum HO: 18.5 at 3500 cruise, 33gph at 5000 WOT.


Hmm, lets see: Running a pair of 496 HO gassers at well above cruise
speed would likely burn
close to 30 gph per side or 60gph total. 60 gph X $5/gal = $300 per
hour in fuel costs. Over $2000 for an all-day high speed run.

Running the same engines at 3500 rpm cruise would burn 37 gph, for a
total of $185 per hour in fuel costs at $5 a gallon. Still not cheap by
any stretch of the imagination, but at least not as far out of the
questiong for most folks as a $2000 daily (or even weekend) fuel bill
would be.



Runnone *one* 496 HO gas engine in a boat is an acceptable definition of
stupidity. If your is heavy enough to need a pair, then you should have
gone diesel.


No argument from me, but that immortal line "I can sure buy a lot of
gasoline for the difference in price between putting gas and diesel
engine in my boat" is going to be severely strained, if not sorely
tested, in the coming months. The high $/gal figures, for both gas and
diesel, probably have some people second guessing choices to power with
big block gas engines.


azboating April 24th 06 07:33 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 
Here's a typical day at the lake. - This does not include the monthly
payment, maintenance, insurance or possible repairs needed after the
trip on either the boat or the tow vehicle, only the expense for the
day.

If we're on the lake for about 8 hours and cruise (~35-40 mph) about
25% of the time and approximately 10% of the time we're running wot
to pull a skier or towable and the other 65% the engine was off and
we're relaxing or swimming, we would burn about 35 gallons of gas.
That will cost us about $112. And I used to think the beer and ice was
the big expense.

(8 x .25)9.0=18 x $3.25 = $58.50
(8 x .10)20.5=16.4 x $3.25 = $53.30
34.4 gph 111.80
Park entrance fee 7.00
Food/beverage/ice 38.00
TOTAL= $156.80

Fuel consumption figures for Mercruiser marine engines:
3.0 L: 6gph at 3500 cruise, 11.5 gph WOT
4.3 L (2 bbl): 8.5 gph at 3500 cruise, 16.7 gph WOT
4.3 L MPI: 9.0 gph at 3500 cruise, 19.5 gph WOT
----- 5.0L (2 bbl): 9.0 gph at 3000 cruise, 20.5gph WOT ----- My
category
5.0 L MPI: 10.9 gph at 3500 cruise, 22 gph WOT
350 Mag MPI: 12gph at 3500 cruise, 22gph at (5000 rpm) WOT
MX 6.2L MPI: 13.2 gph at 3500 cruise, 25.1 gph at 5200 WOT
496 Magnum: 16.0 gph at 3500 cruise, 30.5 gph at WOT
496 Magnum HO: 18.5 at 3500 cruise, 33gph at 5000 WOT.


JohnH April 24th 06 07:55 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 
On 24 Apr 2006 11:33:54 -0700, "azboating" wrote:

Here's a typical day at the lake. - This does not include the monthly
payment, maintenance, insurance or possible repairs needed after the
trip on either the boat or the tow vehicle, only the expense for the
day.

If we're on the lake for about 8 hours and cruise (~35-40 mph) about
25% of the time and approximately 10% of the time we're running wot
to pull a skier or towable and the other 65% the engine was off and
we're relaxing or swimming, we would burn about 35 gallons of gas.
That will cost us about $112. And I used to think the beer and ice was
the big expense.

(8 x .25)9.0=18 x $3.25 = $58.50
(8 x .10)20.5=16.4 x $3.25 = $53.30
34.4 gph 111.80
Park entrance fee 7.00
Food/beverage/ice 38.00
TOTAL= $156.80

Fuel consumption figures for Mercruiser marine engines:
3.0 L: 6gph at 3500 cruise, 11.5 gph WOT
4.3 L (2 bbl): 8.5 gph at 3500 cruise, 16.7 gph WOT
4.3 L MPI: 9.0 gph at 3500 cruise, 19.5 gph WOT
----- 5.0L (2 bbl): 9.0 gph at 3000 cruise, 20.5gph WOT ----- My
category
5.0 L MPI: 10.9 gph at 3500 cruise, 22 gph WOT
350 Mag MPI: 12gph at 3500 cruise, 22gph at (5000 rpm) WOT
MX 6.2L MPI: 13.2 gph at 3500 cruise, 25.1 gph at 5200 WOT
496 Magnum: 16.0 gph at 3500 cruise, 30.5 gph at WOT
496 Magnum HO: 18.5 at 3500 cruise, 33gph at 5000 WOT.


Where did you find that info, and why isn't the 5.7L included?
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

RG April 24th 06 08:40 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 

Where did you find that info, and why isn't the 5.7L included?
--


The 5.7 isn't included because it hasn't been a current offering in the
lineup for some time now, other than in the 350 mag version. The 5.0 has
replaced the 5.7 as the standard small block V8 offering. Go figure.



RG April 24th 06 08:42 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 

"azboating" wrote in message
ups.com...
Here's a typical day at the lake. - This does not include the monthly
payment, maintenance, insurance or possible repairs needed after the
trip on either the boat or the tow vehicle, only the expense for the
day.

If we're on the lake for about 8 hours and cruise (~35-40 mph) about
25% of the time and approximately 10% of the time we're running wot
to pull a skier or towable and the other 65% the engine was off and
we're relaxing or swimming, we would burn about 35 gallons of gas.
That will cost us about $112. And I used to think the beer and ice was
the big expense.

(8 x .25)9.0=18 x $3.25 = $58.50
(8 x .10)20.5=16.4 x $3.25 = $53.30
34.4 gph 111.80
Park entrance fee 7.00
Food/beverage/ice 38.00
TOTAL= $156.80


You forgot to include what it costs you in gas to get to and from the lake,
towing your boat. The hits just keep on coming.



azboating April 24th 06 08:50 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 
You did have to remind me of that. We live about 30 minutes from the
lake which burns about 15 gallons round trip, so add another $48 to
that total. Yikes! a $200 day.


azboating April 24th 06 09:28 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 
Typically for a day trip we go to lake pleasant, it's close enough for
us to go afterwork on a weekday or first thing on a Saturday morning
for a breakfast cruise. If we're going for a few days or more we'll
head to Lake Mead or Lake Powell.


RG April 24th 06 09:44 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 

"azboating" wrote in message
ups.com...
Typically for a day trip we go to lake pleasant, it's close enough for
us to go afterwork on a weekday or first thing on a Saturday morning
for a breakfast cruise. If we're going for a few days or more we'll
head to Lake Mead or Lake Powell.


Mine's slipped at Saguaro. I towed a friends boat to Lake Mead two weeks
ago. He keeps it in dry storage at Lake Pleasant. We launched and stayed
at Temple Bar. My boat hasn't been on Lake Powell since Summer 2003.



JimH April 24th 06 11:04 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
Fuel consumption figures for Mercruiser marine engines:

3.0 L: 6gph at 3500 cruise, 11.5 gph WOT
4.3 L (2 bbl): 8.5 gph at 3500 cruise, 16.7 gph WOT
4.3 L MPI: 9.0 gph at 3500 cruise, 19.5 gph WOT
5.0L (2 bbl): 9.0 gph at 3000 (not 3500) cruise, 20.5gph WOT
5.0 L MPI: 10.9 gph at 3500 cruise, 22 gph WOT
350 Mag MPI: 12gph at 3500 cruise, 22gph at (5000 rpm) WOT
MX 6.2L MPI: 13.2 gph at 3500 cruise, 25.1 gph at 5200 WOT
496 Magnum: 16.0 gph at 3500 cruise, 30.5 gph at WOT
496 Magnum HO: 18.5 at 3500 cruise, 33gph at 5000 WOT.


Hmm, lets see: Running a pair of 496 HO gassers at well above cruise
speed would likely burn
close to 30 gph per side or 60gph total. 60 gph X $5/gal = $300 per
hour in fuel costs. Over $2000 for an all-day high speed run.

Running the same engines at 3500 rpm cruise would burn 37 gph, for a
total of $185 per hour in fuel costs at $5 a gallon. Still not cheap by
any stretch of the imagination, but at least not as far out of the
questiong for most folks as a $2000 daily (or even weekend) fuel bill
would be.


Our 21 foot runabout is powered by a single 190 HP 4.3L Volvo Penta I/O. We
normally cruise at about 3200 rpm, although we may run it up a bit to catch
up with some friends on the Lake or to get somewhere.......fast. This boat
cruises at 35 mph and will do close to 50 mph WOT.

Most of our high fuel consumption comes when we pull the kids skiing or
tubing. As we only purchased this boat late last summer I have not had the
chance to develop any GPH estimates when cruising vs. pulling our kids on
skis or in tubes....but the bottom line for us is that the fuel price
increases will not be a problem or impact our new boating habits.

I am certainly glad we sold our 32 footer with twin 260HP engines. ;-)



azboating April 24th 06 11:08 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 

RG wrote:
"azboating" wrote in message
ups.com...
Typically for a day trip we go to lake pleasant, it's close enough for
us to go afterwork on a weekday or first thing on a Saturday morning
for a breakfast cruise. If we're going for a few days or more we'll
head to Lake Mead or Lake Powell.


Mine's slipped at Saguaro. I towed a friends boat to Lake Mead two weeks
ago. He keeps it in dry storage at Lake Pleasant. We launched and stayed
at Temple Bar. My boat hasn't been on Lake Powell since Summer 2003.


Last September the family and I went to Lake Mead. We were able to
visit Echo Bay, Temple Bar and Callville Bay within 3 days. We had the
lake to ourselves and the water was like glass so we cruised around at
about 45-50 mph. Of course like topic of this post suggests we paid for
it.


[email protected] April 24th 06 11:51 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 




Runnone *one* 496 HO gas engine in a boat is an acceptable definition of
stupidity. If your is heavy enough to need a pair, then you should have
gone diesel.


Harry, that might be alright for a cruiser or trawler, but the
speedboat crowd.
I don't think the Donzi, Cigarette, and Baja crowd will go for it.

And if you can afford the $225,000 for the boat, then fuel economy is
probably the last on your mind....


Lost In Space/Woodchuck April 24th 06 11:57 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 
If you have the money to have a boat with 2 496 mags, then the price per/gal
has no concern to the owner!


wrote in message
oups.com...
Fuel consumption figures for Mercruiser marine engines:

3.0 L: 6gph at 3500 cruise, 11.5 gph WOT
4.3 L (2 bbl): 8.5 gph at 3500 cruise, 16.7 gph WOT
4.3 L MPI: 9.0 gph at 3500 cruise, 19.5 gph WOT
5.0L (2 bbl): 9.0 gph at 3000 (not 3500) cruise, 20.5gph WOT
5.0 L MPI: 10.9 gph at 3500 cruise, 22 gph WOT
350 Mag MPI: 12gph at 3500 cruise, 22gph at (5000 rpm) WOT
MX 6.2L MPI: 13.2 gph at 3500 cruise, 25.1 gph at 5200 WOT
496 Magnum: 16.0 gph at 3500 cruise, 30.5 gph at WOT
496 Magnum HO: 18.5 at 3500 cruise, 33gph at 5000 WOT.


Hmm, lets see: Running a pair of 496 HO gassers at well above cruise
speed would likely burn
close to 30 gph per side or 60gph total. 60 gph X $5/gal = $300 per
hour in fuel costs. Over $2000 for an all-day high speed run.

Running the same engines at 3500 rpm cruise would burn 37 gph, for a
total of $185 per hour in fuel costs at $5 a gallon. Still not cheap by
any stretch of the imagination, but at least not as far out of the
questiong for most folks as a $2000 daily (or even weekend) fuel bill
would be.




[email protected] April 25th 06 12:00 AM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 

azboating wrote:
You did have to remind me of that. We live about 30 minutes from the
lake which burns about 15 gallons round trip, so add another $48 to
that total. Yikes! a $200 day.


For what we do, it's really not bad by the standards of the day. $30.
for fuel for my old '89 mercury to tow my 18' Chris Craft to the lake
and back 120 mi. round trip

Cruise and putter around the lake for a day. with a 3.0 GM running 3200
rpm, and that will pull about 5-7 gal. Another $21.00.


I look at it like this. My family can have a decent day on Lthe lake,
OR I can load up the car and take them to 6-Flags St. louis. and pay 40
bucks a pop to get in and eat their $4.00 hotdogs and $2.50 soda pop
and stand in a hot line for 45 min, to ride some whirlie-gig for about
3 minutes.

By the time we get home we's spent $300.00 and wonder ..."why?"


The lake is proven to be the better choice. We get to do what we want
to do, and enjoy the water.

More fun, practical, and economical!


JimH April 25th 06 12:31 AM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 

wrote in message
oups.com...




Runnone *one* 496 HO gas engine in a boat is an acceptable definition of
stupidity. If your is heavy enough to need a pair, then you should have
gone diesel.


Harry, that might be alright for a cruiser or trawler, but the
speedboat crowd.
I don't think the Donzi, Cigarette, and Baja crowd will go for it.

And if you can afford the $225,000 for the boat, then fuel economy is
probably the last on your mind....


Not really. New boats in the 33+ foot range generally will cost that and
more..................many (most?) take out loans to afford them. These
boats hold 200+ gallons of fuel and are not fuel efficient. A $1 to $2
jump in fuel prices will certainly change their boating habits. ;-)



JimH April 25th 06 12:42 AM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 

"Lost In Space/Woodchuck" wrote in message
...
If you have the money to have a boat with 2 496 mags, then the price
per/gal has no concern to the owner!


A generalization that is certainly not true. Many folks with boats,
regardless of size or power, are just making it and a jump in fuel prices
may do them in or greatly curtail their time on the water under power.



RG April 25th 06 01:11 AM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 
Last September the family and I went to Lake Mead. We were able to
visit Echo Bay, Temple Bar and Callville Bay within 3 days. We had the
lake to ourselves and the water was like glass so we cruised around at
about 45-50 mph. Of course like topic of this post suggests we paid for
it.


From Temple Bar, we went all the way into Iceberg Canyon, to where you run
out of water. I used to fish in Iceberg Canyon as a kid. It's very strange
to see the lake down so low. We also made a run down to Hoover Dam. Over
the two days, we had a mix of glass-like water and Mead's infamous
wind-driven chop.

If you go to alt.binaries.pictures.sports.ocean, I posted some pics of the
trip. The posting date is 4/9/06.




JohnH April 25th 06 12:56 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:42:36 -0400, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT
comREMOVETHIS wrote:


"Lost In Space/Woodchuck" wrote in message
...
If you have the money to have a boat with 2 496 mags, then the price
per/gal has no concern to the owner!


A generalization that is certainly not true. Many folks with boats,
regardless of size or power, are just making it and a jump in fuel prices
may do them in or greatly curtail their time on the water under power.


Jim, the OP *did* limit his statement to people with '2 496 mags'. If the
owners of the boats with 2 496 Mags are 'just making it', then they should
sell their damn boat. Wouldn't you agree?
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

azboating April 25th 06 04:45 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 

RG wrote:
Last September the family and I went to Lake Mead. We were able to
visit Echo Bay, Temple Bar and Callville Bay within 3 days. We had the
lake to ourselves and the water was like glass so we cruised around at
about 45-50 mph. Of course like topic of this post suggests we paid for
it.


From Temple Bar, we went all the way into Iceberg Canyon, to where you run
out of water. I used to fish in Iceberg Canyon as a kid. It's very strange
to see the lake down so low. We also made a run down to Hoover Dam. Over
the two days, we had a mix of glass-like water and Mead's infamous
wind-driven chop.

If you go to alt.binaries.pictures.sports.ocean, I posted some pics of the
trip. The posting date is 4/9/06.


That sounds like a fun trip. I'd like to see those pics, but I don't
have access to that newsgroup. If you'd like you could email me a few.


RG April 25th 06 05:23 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 

"azboating" wrote in message
ups.com...

RG wrote:
Last September the family and I went to Lake Mead. We were able to
visit Echo Bay, Temple Bar and Callville Bay within 3 days. We had the
lake to ourselves and the water was like glass so we cruised around at
about 45-50 mph. Of course like topic of this post suggests we paid for
it.


From Temple Bar, we went all the way into Iceberg Canyon, to where you
run
out of water. I used to fish in Iceberg Canyon as a kid. It's very
strange
to see the lake down so low. We also made a run down to Hoover Dam.
Over
the two days, we had a mix of glass-like water and Mead's infamous
wind-driven chop.

If you go to alt.binaries.pictures.sports.ocean, I posted some pics of
the
trip. The posting date is 4/9/06.


That sounds like a fun trip. I'd like to see those pics, but I don't
have access to that newsgroup. If you'd like you could email me a few.


I'd be happy to. Do you have broadband? Do you want them full-sized or
would you prefer a smaller resolution?



azboating April 25th 06 07:56 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 

RG wrote:
"azboating" wrote in message
ups.com...

RG wrote:
Last September the family and I went to Lake Mead. We were able to
visit Echo Bay, Temple Bar and Callville Bay within 3 days. We had the
lake to ourselves and the water was like glass so we cruised around at
about 45-50 mph. Of course like topic of this post suggests we paid for
it.


From Temple Bar, we went all the way into Iceberg Canyon, to where you
run
out of water. I used to fish in Iceberg Canyon as a kid. It's very
strange
to see the lake down so low. We also made a run down to Hoover Dam.
Over
the two days, we had a mix of glass-like water and Mead's infamous
wind-driven chop.

If you go to alt.binaries.pictures.sports.ocean, I posted some pics of
the
trip. The posting date is 4/9/06.


That sounds like a fun trip. I'd like to see those pics, but I don't
have access to that newsgroup. If you'd like you could email me a few.


I'd be happy to. Do you have broadband? Do you want them full-sized or
would you prefer a smaller resolution?


Full sized would be great. Thank you!


RG April 25th 06 09:39 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 

Full sized would be great. Thank you!


Sent, and hopefully received.



[email protected] April 25th 06 10:40 PM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 
Chuck,

Where did you get your fuel consumption numbers? They are a bit on the
low side in my experience. The normal rule of thumb for gas engines,
which I've found to be pretty close, is 1 gph for every 10 hp. At 3400
RPM most engines, properly propped for the boat, will run at about 50%
of maximum rated power. That would put the 350MPI at 15 gph and the
496 HO at 21 or 22. I have neighbors with both engines and that's in
the ballpark for what they are seeing. My old 350 4bbl rated at 260 hp
has always burned right around 13 gph at 3400 cruise.


[email protected] April 26th 06 01:01 AM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 

wrote:
Chuck,

Where did you get your fuel consumption numbers? They are a bit on the
low side in my experience. The normal rule of thumb for gas engines,
which I've found to be pretty close, is 1 gph for every 10 hp. At 3400
RPM most engines, properly propped for the boat, will run at about 50%
of maximum rated power. That would put the 350MPI at 15 gph and the
496 HO at 21 or 22. I have neighbors with both engines and that's in
the ballpark for what they are seeing. My old 350 4bbl rated at 260 hp
has always burned right around 13 gph at 3400 cruise.


The carbed 350 in the Mercruiser chart is a 2 bbl, not a 4 bbl, and the
9 gph is at 3000 RPM vs.your observations at 3400.... 9.0 gph for a 2
bbl operating at 3000 vs. 13 gph for a 4 bbl operating at 3400 probably
represents as much difference between the two figures as would be
believable- but I don't think the difference defies credibility.

Other differences between the "dock talk" numbers and the Mercruiser
figures may (possibly) be due to MPI or other advances in engine
technology, may be influenced by the fact that the Mercruisers tested
by Mercury Marine will typically be perfectly in tune, and results from
controlled tests will undoubtedly vary from horseback estimates made by
boat owners. Most boat owners may not be actually running at a fixed
RPM for an extended period of time and many are probably not using a
fuel flow meter.

Mercruiser is a Brunswick product, and the fuel consuption data is from
a sales borchure for another Brunswick division.

Can you accept attachments at your hotmail address? If so, I'll scan
the page and email it to you.


RCE April 26th 06 02:31 AM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
Chuck,

Where did you get your fuel consumption numbers? They are a bit on the
low side in my experience. The normal rule of thumb for gas engines,
which I've found to be pretty close, is 1 gph for every 10 hp. At 3400
RPM most engines, properly propped for the boat, will run at about 50%
of maximum rated power. That would put the 350MPI at 15 gph and the
496 HO at 21 or 22. I have neighbors with both engines and that's in
the ballpark for what they are seeing. My old 350 4bbl rated at 260 hp
has always burned right around 13 gph at 3400 cruise.


Wayne,

Since I gotcha....

Do you have the inflatable/dingey setup on your boat on the starboard side
of the aft cabin?
Mrs.E. has me on a mission to find one that fits the existing holder
(davits?) .... I don't know what you call it.
She wants something with a small outboard. Any recommendations?

RCE



[email protected] May 2nd 06 01:42 AM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 
Yes, our dinghy is on the starboard side of the aft cabin. It is an 11
ft Caribe RIB with a 15 hp Merc which rides and performs well for a
boat of that size. It would be too much weight without a hoist
however. We use our mast and boom as a cargo crane but have extra
reinforcing stays on the mast, in addition to an electric hoisting
winch, and multi part block and tackle on the boom lift.

Unless you have an electric or hydraulic hoist, you really need to
stick with something that is light and easy to handle. A small, soft
bottom Avon with something like a 3 hp OB would fit that description
but not perform particularly well except for short harbor hops.


[email protected] May 2nd 06 01:46 AM

If you want to cut your fuel bill, get off the throttle
 
Can you accept attachments at your hotmail address? If so, I'll scan
the page and email it to you.


Yes, attachments are no problem.

My 350 burns about 9 gph at 3000 RPMs also. Probably it is running on
only 2 bbls at that speed.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com