Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RG" wrote in message .. . Now you're dancing. Humor me. What could consumers do to reduce the need to manufacture so many vehicles? Drive them less, maintain them better. In other words, make them last longer. How about changing what they buy, and HOW they buy? Perhaps leasing should be on the hit list, at least for non-business customers. That almost guarantees that someone won't hang onto a car very long. Some cars are still babies when they're two years old, so selling them used is easy. Others are known to be middle aged at 2 years, and you can see them lined up at any dealership, collecting dust. That's wasteful. |
#62
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message om... If you personally have the ability to influence one of those factors, and you are bothered by rising prices, do you think it makes no sense at all to do your part to effect a change? I'm curious, because I'll bet you call yourself patriotic. *Effect* a change? Yes. It's correct. I did not say otherwise. I used the *'s for emphasis. You start. Sell your boat, cars and other equipment powered by gasoline engines. Let us know when are done with that simple task. Another giant of a thinker. Where in this discussion do you think I suggested that people get rid of their vehicles? Find the text and present it as evidence of your conclusion. You made no such proposal. I made one to you however. You want to effect a change. Go ahead and start by doing what I suggested. ;-) Since this country, for the most part, is in the dark ages in terms of city design and transportation, it would obviously be impossible for us to get rid of cars completely. Perhaps, but then again we could also start riding horses again. But as was asked earlier of you..........do you really need that boat and lawn tractor? How about the snow blower? Come on Doug, do you want to effect a change or not? You have to lead by setting an example. |
#63
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RCE" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... As far as the 40 mpg hybrids you keep mentioning, you need to stop that. According to two people I know who own them, Escalades get 12-14 mpg on a good day. A Camry or an Impala get numbers in the high 20s - low 30s. I wasn't a math whiz in high school, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but I *think* that's about twice the gas mileage of an Escalade. A 40 mpg hybrid, a Camry or an Impala are not suitable to tow a 5000 lb boat to the launch site. A F-350 diesel pickup that gets 16-18 mpg is, among many other uses. RCE I never suggested that someone who needs to tow should own anything but a vehicle capable of doing it. Maybe we should check here and see what we both believe, based on our own observations. I'll use the word "truck" here to mean actual trucks, SUVs, Humjobs, etc. Now: For every 100 trucks you see, what percentage do you think actually tow anything, or, for that matter, to do ANYTHING that only a truck can do? To assist with the answer, think about two things. First, think about how trucks are sold in commercials - how they portray the customers, and the activities shown. Second, think back to the 1960s - 1970s. Do you have any memory of how many trucks you'd see in parking lots, compared to what you see now? I'm not talking about the parking lot of a hunting lodge - I'm talking about places which represent a more average selection of drivers. |
#64
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "RG" wrote in message .. . Now you're dancing. Humor me. What could consumers do to reduce the need to manufacture so many vehicles? Drive them less, maintain them better. In other words, make them last longer. How about changing what they buy, and HOW they buy? Perhaps leasing should be on the hit list, at least for non-business customers. That almost guarantees that someone won't hang onto a car very long. Some cars are still babies when they're two years old, so selling them used is easy. Others are known to be middle aged at 2 years, and you can see them lined up at any dealership, collecting dust. That's wasteful. But aren't the people buying used cars reducing the amount of new cars to be manufactured? (this is fun) RCE |
#65
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
. .. Come on Doug, do you want to effect a change or not? You have to lead by setting an example. Go play stupid with someone else. Maybe your stapler is interested. |
#66
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() How about changing what they buy, and HOW they buy? Perhaps leasing should be on the hit list, at least for non-business customers. That almost guarantees that someone won't hang onto a car very long. Some cars are still babies when they're two years old, so selling them used is easy. Others are known to be middle aged at 2 years, and you can see them lined up at any dealership, collecting dust. That's wasteful. The changing of what they buy is happening right now, this very minute. Trust me, dealerships across the nation will be having brisk business this week from people trading in high fuel consuming vehicles for more economical ones. The motivator? None other than high fuel prices. The machinery of a free market system in perfect motion. Leasing has provisions to deal with the issue as well. Leasing companies right now are no doubt lowering the expected residual factors on high fuel consumption cars and trucks. This will increase the monthly payments to new lessees, thereby reducing demand. As a side note, the car that I owned the longest of any was a car that I originally leased and then bought at the end of the lease term. Total of seven years, which is a very long time for me. |
#67
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RCE" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "RG" wrote in message .. . Now you're dancing. Humor me. What could consumers do to reduce the need to manufacture so many vehicles? Drive them less, maintain them better. In other words, make them last longer. How about changing what they buy, and HOW they buy? Perhaps leasing should be on the hit list, at least for non-business customers. That almost guarantees that someone won't hang onto a car very long. Some cars are still babies when they're two years old, so selling them used is easy. Others are known to be middle aged at 2 years, and you can see them lined up at any dealership, collecting dust. That's wasteful. But aren't the people buying used cars reducing the amount of new cars to be manufactured? (this is fun) RCE It *should* reduce waste, assuming the manufacturers don't keep pumping out so many new ones that they also sit on the lots for a year at a time. Unfortunately, they do. |
#68
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 02:13:10 GMT, Don White wrote: tillius wrote: Don't worry. Enough folks already know what Harry and the rest of you socialist Demoncraps are trying to do. Till Like maybe.. save your country and your sorry *ss for you? Don, if the US had a severe shortage of gas, would Canada not be affected? -- 'Til next time, John H Yes. Even though we should be able to provide enough for our own needs, the provinces producing same expect to receive the 'world price' ...not a made in Canada price. Your shortages drive up our prices. As a matter of fact, our only refinery in Nova Scotia gets it's oil from Venezuela http://tinyurl.com/f9q3t |
#69
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... Come on Doug, do you want to effect a change or not? You have to lead by setting an example. Go play stupid with someone else. Maybe your stapler is interested. Personal attacks and insults only show you have nothing left to argue with. Now I could call you a bleeding heart hypocrite who wants everyone else but himself to change...........but I won't. ;-) |
#70
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RG" wrote in message . .. How about changing what they buy, and HOW they buy? Perhaps leasing should be on the hit list, at least for non-business customers. That almost guarantees that someone won't hang onto a car very long. Some cars are still babies when they're two years old, so selling them used is easy. Others are known to be middle aged at 2 years, and you can see them lined up at any dealership, collecting dust. That's wasteful. The changing of what they buy is happening right now, this very minute. Trust me, dealerships across the nation will be having brisk business this week from people trading in high fuel consuming vehicles for more economical ones. The motivator? None other than high fuel prices. The machinery of a free market system in perfect motion. Yep. My brother in law sells new cars....Fords. He is selling Focus's and Fusion's like crazy while the pickup trucks and SUV's on the lot collect dust. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|