BoatBanter.com - YO - Gene Kearns

On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 07:58:48 -0500, JohnH wrote:

On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:31:51 GMT, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:43:04 -0500, JohnH penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

If you still have the message, why not cut and paste the headers and the
message and let some of the sleuths on rec.boats have a look at it?

Here goes:

Return-path:
Received: from ms-mta-02-eri0 (ms-mta-02-qfe1 [10.10.5.71])
by ms-mss-02.southeast.rr.com
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.04 (built Feb 8
2005))
with ESMTP id
for
; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 11:12:08 -0500
(EST)
Received: from txmx03.mgw.rr.com (txmx03.mgw.rr.com
[24.93.41.202])
by ms-mta-02.southeast.rr.com
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.04 (built Feb 8
2005))
with ESMTP id
for
(ORCPT ); Thu,
09 Mar 2006 11:12:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from orngca-mx-11.mgw.rr.com
(orngca-mx-11.mgw.rr.com [66.75.160.145]) by
txmx03.mgw.rr.com
(8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k29GATEQ015413 for
;
Thu, 09 Mar 2006 11:12:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 83-131-198-159.adsl.net.t-com.hr (HELO
triad.rr.com)
([83.131.198.159]) by orngca-mx-11.mgw.rr.com with ESMTP;
Thu,
09 Mar 2006 11:11:33 -0500
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:11:45 +0100
From:
Subject: read it immediatelly
To:
Message-id:
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_000043B5.00002087"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Virus-Scan-Result: Repaired 39365 W32.Netsky.C@mm
Original-recipient:

Message:

do not give up!

Attachment:

doc_id.rtf.com

Anybody have that particular "Message-id" saved?

If it came from this group, and it had an attachment, wouldn't the
attachment show up in the header? I'm going to attach a recipe (a '.doc'
file) with the extension changed to '.com'.

If you try to open the file, your computer will either report an illegal
operation or try to make potato salad.

Well, the message with the attachment did not show up on my computer. But,
that's probably because Cox prevents attachments from non-binary groups.
Did it show up on yours?

Wait. Stop. I just realized you *already* know which message had the
attachment. Here I was trying to figure out a way to identify the message.
Another 'senior moment'. Guess I'd better get out and play some golf.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************