Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:11:10 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: Ford's development of a hybrid SUV is an attempt to control behavior? Please explain this conclusion. They'll still be selling the "regular" kind, for people who actually need a truck-style power train, but sales of those will be reduced to levels they were at 30 years ago, when they were mostly purchased by people who needed the 4WD and the gear ratio. Don't get mired in that paragraph. Explain your conclusion. I was reading in the Times this morning about hybrids and the really curious part is that they aren't that much more "efficient" than a regular car - maybe a mpg or two at most. Emissions are about the same. So far....but they will address the need. It's obvious that they see it, or they wouldn't be spending money trying to build something better. It has to be obvious to anyone but a total idiot that the vast majority of SUVs are NOT being purchased by people who tow things or clamber over bolders and drive through streams for fun. Luggage space and driving in snow are two reasons which hold no water, so we can safely eliminate those. Some of us don't fit into regular cars. My legs and torso are long most of tyical sedans I can't fit into. Therefore, I buy vehicles where I can comfortably sit in the drivers seat and operate the vehicle without contorting my body. I'm not talking about changes to the size of the driver's seat, or the SUV in general. According to an interview with a Ford representative on the radio news a month ago, neither are they. Their goal is to maintain some of what they know to be the main selling points for many buyers: Size. What they ARE trying to do is two things: Build a hybrid SUV (what's under the hood, in other words), and make major changes to the drive train. Besides aerodynamics, those are obviously the two major detractors from better gas mileage. The majority of non-sports-oriented buyers have no need for 4WD or towing capability. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(non-political) comments on fuel economy and technology | General | |||
A Recreational Boating Message | General | |||
A Recreational Boating Message | General |