![]() |
Yo - RCE, DSK and anybody else interested...
JimH wrote:
"RCE" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message m... So why did you clip my entire message then? Not a nice thing to do Richard..........so I reinserted my full original message with this reply. Good luck on the test tomorrow. Tonight will not be too fun for you. My reply was meant to be humorous. RCE Fair enough but I obviously missed the humor. But it does not explain away you editing my original reply. NP though as my point has been made. Regardless......good luck tonight...........have plenty of reading material available. Tomorrow will be a breeze. ;-) Many folks think snipping to only leave the relevant previous material is a good thing. -- Del Cecchi "This post is my own and doesn’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions.” |
Yo - RCE, DSK and anybody else interested...
Del Cecchi wrote:
Fair enough but I obviously missed the humor. But it does not explain away you editing my original reply. NP though as my point has been made. Regardless......good luck tonight...........have plenty of reading material available. Tomorrow will be a breeze. ;-) Many folks think snipping to only leave the relevant previous material is a good thing. Most people think it is a good thing. I wish more people would snip their messages. Some of these threads will be 8 pages long and at the bottom someone will say "Me Too". ; ) Reminds me of when AOL users first starting using Usenet. -- Reggie "That's my story and I am sticking to it." |
Yo - RCE, DSK and anybody else interested...
"Del Cecchi" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "RCE" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message om... So why did you clip my entire message then? Not a nice thing to do Richard..........so I reinserted my full original message with this reply. Good luck on the test tomorrow. Tonight will not be too fun for you. My reply was meant to be humorous. RCE Fair enough but I obviously missed the humor. But it does not explain away you editing my original reply. NP though as my point has been made. Regardless......good luck tonight...........have plenty of reading material available. Tomorrow will be a breeze. ;-) Many folks think snipping to only leave the relevant previous material is a good thing. -- Del Cecchi "This post is my own and doesn’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions.” Fair enough. I see I was wrong. |
Yo - RCE, DSK and anybody else interested...
"JohnH" wrote in message ... If you don't have it ... you should get it before you can't. The reviews say this is the best of them all. It's a hybrid - so it will play in a conventional CD player, but to really get the full benefit of this DSD recording, you need to use the SACD layer with, obviously, a SACD player with the 6 analog outputs. RCE Is this it? http://tinyurl.com/heum5 -- 'Til next time, John H Yup. RCE |
Yo - RCE, DSK and anybody else interested...
"JohnH" wrote in message ... Oh, and did everything come out alright in your 'procedure'? -- 'Til next time, John H Fine. You all were right. The biggest issue is the anxiety of going to do it. They gave me enough of something so I really didn't care what they were doing. RCE |
Yo - RCE, DSK and anybody else interested...
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... That's one of my problems with the procedure. I don't trust these folks enough. Plus, with my background, I'm not sure it's a great idea - I try to stay away from drugs that put you in lala land. Glad it all worked out in the end. Get it? Worked out in the end? BBAAWWWWAAAAHHHHHAAAAAA!!!! Um... Never mind. Well, I am just glad to get this "behind me". Part of the deal is becoming the "butt" of many jokes. In fact, Mrs.E. lost it while we where in the waiting room waiting for my name to be called. She had to cover her face with a magazine, she was laughing so hard. That was max anxiety time and my demeanor must have showed. I came close a couple of times of getting up and walking out. Butt, (heheh) it's really not a big deal. RCE |
Yo - RCE, DSK and anybody else interested...
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:25:40 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: The three movements on my hard drive show up as: 52,294 KB 23,883 KB 18,784 KB How'd you squeeze your movements in there? Last night mine took up about 350 gabillion jeelion Gigabytes. RCE |
Yo - RCE, DSK and anybody else interested...
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:38:01 -0600, Del Cecchi
wrote: Many folks think snipping to only leave the relevant previous material is a good thing. Yes it is as long as the meaning is unchanged. |
Yo - RCE, DSK and anybody else interested...
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:57:42 -0500, "RCE" wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message .. . If you don't have it ... you should get it before you can't. The reviews say this is the best of them all. It's a hybrid - so it will play in a conventional CD player, but to really get the full benefit of this DSD recording, you need to use the SACD layer with, obviously, a SACD player with the 6 analog outputs. RCE Is this it? http://tinyurl.com/heum5 -- 'Til next time, John H Yup. RCE Thanks. It be ordered. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Yo - RCE, DSK and anybody else interested...
"Black Dog" wrote in message ... Brings to mind first-year physics labs. My 3 lab partners were all male. One day we went in and the lab instructor says - "Guys you'll be doing this one today". It was an experiment on finding harmonics. She told me women can't ususally hear the spot as easily as men. It was true. My partners had no problem hearing the harmonic point as we filled the glass tube with water. I heard a vague buzzing. The tables were turned when we did optics. Find a second or third order green in a split spectrum. I can discern, under the right conditions, up to seven orders. My partners only saw one shade of green. Stella What's "green"? RCE Leaves, grass, seaweed, Kermit It's not that easy . . . Reminds me of something I learned while working in the optical coating industry. It seems that nature's version of "green" is one of the most difficult colors to artificially recreate. The military has dealt with this issue for many years, trying to develop green camouflage colors without success. The human eye and optical instruments can pick out the fake from the real with no difficulty. Yet, in nature, there are many animals that can quickly take on the color of surrounding leaves or brush and effectively disappear. The same optical instruments have a hard time resolving them. RCE |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com