"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...


People see through liberal lies. It gets old quick.


Which liberal views are NOT lies? Thank you think of any?

What kind of a question is "Thank you think of any?"

"azboating" wrote in message
oups.com...
There are plenty of off topic posts here and most are left leaning.
Why did you get your panties in a bunch over this one?

Chuckie is trying to be the OT cop of the group. However, Chuckie needs to
clean the left lens in his glasses because he sure as hell can't see any of
the OT posts from the left.

"DSK" wrote in message
...
"azboating" wrote
There are plenty of off topic posts here and most are left leaning.
Why did you get your panties in a bunch over this one?


JimH wrote:
Good question.

Are you, Bert Robbins, and John H, all "left leaning"? It's difficult to
figure out how "most" off-topic posts are such, unless you either don't
know right from left, or can't friggin' count.

Maybe you guys figure "most" using the new Bush-math, the same math which
blames liberals for the budget deficit?


I learned my math from those liberals pushing outcome based education.

wrote in message
oups.com...

Mule wrote:
Whoops, did I say on the rise? Sorry I was thinking about something
else...


In fact, you were so distracted you dumped this off topic political
bull**** right into the wrong newsgroup.

If your fellow liberals, I mean progressives, can dump their off topic
political bull**** as well as your off topic political bull**** then why
can't others dump their off topic political bull**** into the newsgroup too?

As I said earlier clean the left lens in your glasses.

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
Comes from one leg being shorter by a 1/4 inch. :)

It's difficult to figure out how "most" off-topic posts are such,
unless you either don't know right from left, or can't
friggin' count.

I have this theory that the more left you become politically, the more
right politically you are and vice versa.

Many political scientist believe political philosophy is circular not
linear. Hence the more left you become, you eventually become ultra
right wing or vice versa.

So you are not alone in your theory.
--
Reggie

"That's my story and I am sticking to it."

wrote:

Chuck,
It looks like political BS will still clutter up the NG.

I finally took your advice and skip over most of the political crap. It
makes it must easier to read rec.boats.

--
Reggie

"That's my story and I am sticking to it."

Bert Robbins wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Mule wrote:
Whoops, did I say on the rise? Sorry I was thinking about something
else...

In fact, you were so distracted you dumped this off topic political
bull**** right into the wrong newsgroup.

If your fellow liberals, I mean progressives, can dump their off topic
political bull**** as well as your off topic political bull**** then why
can't others dump their off topic political bull**** into the newsgroup too?

As I said earlier clean the left lens in your glasses.


Bert,
Chuck position on OT political posts are not based upon the viewpoint.
He has taken a very simple idea that all political posts are detrimental
to rec.boats. He has not been biased one way or the other.

--
Reggie

"That's my story and I am sticking to it."

On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 16:15:05 -0500, DSK wrote:

"azboating" wrote
There are plenty of off topic posts here and most are left leaning.
Why did you get your panties in a bunch over this one?


JimH wrote:
Good question.


Are you, Bert Robbins, and John H, all "left leaning"? It's
difficult to figure out how "most" off-topic posts are such,
unless you either don't know right from left, or can't
friggin' count.

Maybe you guys figure "most" using the new Bush-math, the
same math which blames liberals for the budget deficit?

DSK


While watching the northern lights in a stiff wind from the west, I am left
leaning.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:00:58 -0500, Reggie Smithers
wrote:

wrote:

Chuck,
It looks like political BS will still clutter up the NG.

I finally took your advice and skip over most of the political crap. It
makes it must easier to read rec.boats.

Ain't it the truth?
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

On 7 Mar 2006 13:30:46 -0800, wrote:


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:47:27 -0600, "Dan J.S." wrote:


wrote in message
oups.com...

Dan J.S. wrote:

People see through liberal lies. It gets old quick.

Good grief, Dan. The very *title of this thread* was a lie, or at least
a deliberate deception. Why not go find one of the hundreds of NG's
where right wingers congregate to GD people who don't subscribe to
their particular values and thought patterns? You could take this
thread, and the self-proclaimed jackass with you.


Come on back when you want to talk about boats. :-)

Have a happy Tuesday.


OK what boat should I get, a red one or blue one?

Get a red one, a white one and a blue one.

Good one. And make sure the ensign is properly red *and* blue, along
with white, of course. If you want to fly an all red ensign or an all
blue ensign, I guess that means relocating to country where everybody
thinks alike and nobody respects a difference of opinion. Sure as heck
wouldn't be the US, but there have been some recent social models in
the past 100 years or so, (many of them European), where only a single
type of thinking was considered "proper".

If one really wants to learn the meaning of red, white, and blue ensigns,
one should read all the Patrick O'Brian books.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************