|
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
|
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
wrote in message oups.com... Bert Robbins wrote: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/...districting_12 That's the problem with voice recognition software. You obviously wanted to post this political bull guano to the "voting" newsgroup- and darned if you weren't tripped up by technology and you landed in the "boating" newsgroup instead. Until they come out with a downloadable patch to fix you program, you'll simply have to enunciate very clearly. No mistake on my part Chuckie! Besides I like the fact that you blast me for political posts but you refrain from doing so to others. Keep up the double standard. |
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/...districting_12 I got a particular kick out of Justice Kennedy's concern about the convoluted districts. "....Kennedy said the result was an odd-looking map that mixed voters of very different backgrounds..." If that is of serious concern to Justice Kennedy, he ought to take a moment to look at the Massachusetts district map, which is the result of fifty years or more of unabated, unrestricted jockeying on the part of the overwhelmingly Democrat state legislature, the sole aim of which has been to solidify the nest of those in power and to throw those who don't play ball off the boat [nautical connection]. The districts are all gerrymandered to death, but pay special attention to the smooth, cohesive boundary and shape of the Mass 4th District, seat of the Hon. Barney Frank. http://www.sec.state.ma.us/cis/cispdf/ma_uscongress.pdf |
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
|
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
|
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
Skipper wrote:
I find Bert's contributions knowledgeable, interesting and enjoyable. I've also had the displeasure of meeting you in person and noticing how quickly your glitz wears away upon closer review. I also suspect you are not the moderator of this NG nor as magnificent as you perceive. -- Skipper Yeah... but does he ever boat? |
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
|
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
Gene Kearns wrote:
Skipper penned the following thoughts: I find Bert's contributions knowledgeable, interesting and enjoyable. I've also had the displeasure of meeting you in person and noticing how quickly your glitz wears away upon closer review. I also suspect you are not the moderator of this NG nor as magnificent as you perceive. Does Skipper have *any* recent boating stories? Yep, and more to come. Where can we find the Kool Kearns Kruising Adventures posted? -- Skipper |
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
Gene Kearns wrote:
Where can we find the Kool Kearns Kruising adventures posted? And these are posted, where? Not a one in the Google archives from Kearns. Do you have any cruising experience of note, Kearns? -- Skipper |
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 06:58:24 -0500, "Bert Robbins" wrote:
wrote in message roups.com... Bert Robbins wrote: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/...districting_12 That's the problem with voice recognition software. You obviously wanted to post this political bull guano to the "voting" newsgroup- and darned if you weren't tripped up by technology and you landed in the "boating" newsgroup instead. Until they come out with a downloadable patch to fix you program, you'll simply have to enunciate very clearly. No mistake on my part Chuckie! Besides I like the fact that you blast me for political posts but you refrain from doing so to others. Keep up the double standard. There's some truth to your statement, but it *would* be nice if everyone stopped the political crap! a.politics is wide open! -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 06:58:24 -0500, "Bert Robbins" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... Bert Robbins wrote: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/...districting_12 That's the problem with voice recognition software. You obviously wanted to post this political bull guano to the "voting" newsgroup- and darned if you weren't tripped up by technology and you landed in the "boating" newsgroup instead. Until they come out with a downloadable patch to fix you program, you'll simply have to enunciate very clearly. No mistake on my part Chuckie! Besides I like the fact that you blast me for political posts but you refrain from doing so to others. Keep up the double standard. There's some truth to your statement, but it *would* be nice if everyone stopped the political crap! a.politics is wide open! -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** Back on your bandwagon again Sheriff. I seem to recall you deeply involved in several political threads over the past few days. Your act is getting old. |
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:28:59 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT
comREMOVETHIS wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 06:58:24 -0500, "Bert Robbins" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... Bert Robbins wrote: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/...districting_12 That's the problem with voice recognition software. You obviously wanted to post this political bull guano to the "voting" newsgroup- and darned if you weren't tripped up by technology and you landed in the "boating" newsgroup instead. Until they come out with a downloadable patch to fix you program, you'll simply have to enunciate very clearly. No mistake on my part Chuckie! Besides I like the fact that you blast me for political posts but you refrain from doing so to others. Keep up the double standard. There's some truth to your statement, but it *would* be nice if everyone stopped the political crap! a.politics is wide open! -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** Back on your bandwagon again Sheriff. I seem to recall you deeply involved in several political threads over the past few days. Your act is getting old. Ah, have you found something 'political' I've posted? Or, are you pretending that any comment about ports is a political comment. Sorry if trying to keep the flames out is offensive to you. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:28:59 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 06:58:24 -0500, "Bert Robbins" wrote: wrote in message legroups.com... Bert Robbins wrote: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/...districting_12 That's the problem with voice recognition software. You obviously wanted to post this political bull guano to the "voting" newsgroup- and darned if you weren't tripped up by technology and you landed in the "boating" newsgroup instead. Until they come out with a downloadable patch to fix you program, you'll simply have to enunciate very clearly. No mistake on my part Chuckie! Besides I like the fact that you blast me for political posts but you refrain from doing so to others. Keep up the double standard. There's some truth to your statement, but it *would* be nice if everyone stopped the political crap! a.politics is wide open! -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** Back on your bandwagon again Sheriff. I seem to recall you deeply involved in several political threads over the past few days. Your act is getting old. Ah, have you found something 'political' I've posted? Yes. Or, are you pretending that any comment about ports is a political comment. Yes again. Sorry if trying to keep the flames out is offensive to you. The sheriffing aspect is offensive John. And I am not the only one who feels that way. Drop it already Sheriff as you act is getting old. |
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:59:10 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT
comREMOVETHIS wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:28:59 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 06:58:24 -0500, "Bert Robbins" wrote: wrote in message glegroups.com... Bert Robbins wrote: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/...districting_12 That's the problem with voice recognition software. You obviously wanted to post this political bull guano to the "voting" newsgroup- and darned if you weren't tripped up by technology and you landed in the "boating" newsgroup instead. Until they come out with a downloadable patch to fix you program, you'll simply have to enunciate very clearly. No mistake on my part Chuckie! Besides I like the fact that you blast me for political posts but you refrain from doing so to others. Keep up the double standard. There's some truth to your statement, but it *would* be nice if everyone stopped the political crap! a.politics is wide open! -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** Back on your bandwagon again Sheriff. I seem to recall you deeply involved in several political threads over the past few days. Your act is getting old. Ah, have you found something 'political' I've posted? Yes. Or, are you pretending that any comment about ports is a political comment. Yes again. Sorry if trying to keep the flames out is offensive to you. The sheriffing aspect is offensive John. And I am not the only one who feels that way. Drop it already Sheriff as you act is getting old. Then act your age. I find your name-calling and personal attacks offensive. So do others. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:59:10 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:28:59 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message m... On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 06:58:24 -0500, "Bert Robbins" wrote: wrote in message oglegroups.com... Bert Robbins wrote: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/...districting_12 That's the problem with voice recognition software. You obviously wanted to post this political bull guano to the "voting" newsgroup- and darned if you weren't tripped up by technology and you landed in the "boating" newsgroup instead. Until they come out with a downloadable patch to fix you program, you'll simply have to enunciate very clearly. No mistake on my part Chuckie! Besides I like the fact that you blast me for political posts but you refrain from doing so to others. Keep up the double standard. There's some truth to your statement, but it *would* be nice if everyone stopped the political crap! a.politics is wide open! -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** Back on your bandwagon again Sheriff. I seem to recall you deeply involved in several political threads over the past few days. Your act is getting old. Ah, have you found something 'political' I've posted? Yes. Or, are you pretending that any comment about ports is a political comment. Yes again. Sorry if trying to keep the flames out is offensive to you. The sheriffing aspect is offensive John. And I am not the only one who feels that way. Drop it already Sheriff as you act is getting old. Then act your age. Ditto. Gittyup Sheriff. |
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/...districting_12 I got a particular kick out of Justice Kennedy's concern about the convoluted districts. "....Kennedy said the result was an odd-looking map that mixed voters of very different backgrounds..." If that is of serious concern to Justice Kennedy, he ought to take a moment to look at the Massachusetts district map, which is the result of fifty years or more of unabated, unrestricted jockeying on the part of the overwhelmingly Democrat state legislature, the sole aim of which has been to solidify the nest of those in power and to throw those who don't play ball off the boat [nautical connection]. The districts are all gerrymandered to death, but pay special attention to the smooth, cohesive boundary and shape of the Mass 4th District, seat of the Hon. Barney Frank. http://www.sec.state.ma.us/cis/cispdf/ma_uscongress.pdf I got redistricted out of a majority conservative disctrict and now I am an in a majority liberal district. It was done to get one particular Republican out of her congressional seat. |
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... "John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/...districting_12 I got a particular kick out of Justice Kennedy's concern about the convoluted districts. "....Kennedy said the result was an odd-looking map that mixed voters of very different backgrounds..." If that is of serious concern to Justice Kennedy, he ought to take a moment to look at the Massachusetts district map, which is the result of fifty years or more of unabated, unrestricted jockeying on the part of the overwhelmingly Democrat state legislature, the sole aim of which has been to solidify the nest of those in power and to throw those who don't play ball off the boat [nautical connection]. The districts are all gerrymandered to death, but pay special attention to the smooth, cohesive boundary and shape of the Mass 4th District, seat of the Hon. Barney Frank. http://www.sec.state.ma.us/cis/cispdf/ma_uscongress.pdf I got redistricted out of a majority conservative disctrict and now I am an in a majority liberal district. It was done to get one particular Republican out of her congressional seat. Why not let the chips fall as they will? Districts should be drawn along established state, county or city lines. Everything is Gerrymandering. |
Bush May Get Two More On the SCOTUS
" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message . .. "Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... "John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/...districting_12 I got a particular kick out of Justice Kennedy's concern about the convoluted districts. "....Kennedy said the result was an odd-looking map that mixed voters of very different backgrounds..." If that is of serious concern to Justice Kennedy, he ought to take a moment to look at the Massachusetts district map, which is the result of fifty years or more of unabated, unrestricted jockeying on the part of the overwhelmingly Democrat state legislature, the sole aim of which has been to solidify the nest of those in power and to throw those who don't play ball off the boat [nautical connection]. The districts are all gerrymandered to death, but pay special attention to the smooth, cohesive boundary and shape of the Mass 4th District, seat of the Hon. Barney Frank. http://www.sec.state.ma.us/cis/cispdf/ma_uscongress.pdf I got redistricted out of a majority conservative disctrict and now I am an in a majority liberal district. It was done to get one particular Republican out of her congressional seat. Why not let the chips fall as they will? Districts should be drawn along established state, county or city lines. Everything is Gerrymandering. Re-districting is one of the political spoils. Whichever party holds a majority in the respective legislature is in the drivers seat every ten years. This just proves that getting out and voting is very important. Also, the legislature has the constitutional requirement to redraw the districts and the judiciary should keep its nose out. If the people don't like the new districts then they have a course to remedy the problem. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com