Gene Kearns wrote:

No matter what side of the aisle you sit on, this is just nuts!

And particularly affects:
New York
New Jersey
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Baltimore, Maryland
Miami, Florida
New Orleans, Louisiana

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185479,00.html
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=1644106
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/...ity/index.html
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/3652381.html

If there is any REAL concern with security, why is this being bid to
any NON American firm? This is just plain nuts!


I does not sound like a good idea to me. But if you are concened about
"any" Non-American firm running these ports. They are run by
Non-American firms now.

Capt Jack R..

Jack Redington wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote:

No matter what side of the aisle you sit on, this is just nuts!

And particularly affects:
New York
New Jersey
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Baltimore, Maryland
Miami, Florida
New Orleans, Louisiana

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185479,00.html
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=1644106
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/...ity/index.html
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/3652381.html

If there is any REAL concern with security, why is this being bid to
any NON American firm? This is just plain nuts!


I does not sound like a good idea to me. But if you are concened about
"any" Non-American firm running these ports. They are run by
Non-American firms now.

Capt Jack R..


This is the way we run our port these days. Maybe more American
companies should think of shipping through Halifax.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halifax_Port_Authority

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:33:10 GMT, Don White wrote:

Jack Redington wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote:

No matter what side of the aisle you sit on, this is just nuts!

And particularly affects:
New York
New Jersey
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Baltimore, Maryland
Miami, Florida
New Orleans, Louisiana

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185479,00.html
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=1644106
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/...ity/index.html
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/3652381.html

If there is any REAL concern with security, why is this being bid to
any NON American firm? This is just plain nuts!


I does not sound like a good idea to me. But if you are concened about
"any" Non-American firm running these ports. They are run by
Non-American firms now.

Capt Jack R..


This is the way we run our port these days. Maybe more American
companies should think of shipping through Halifax.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halifax_Port_Authority

Are the employees of a Crown Corporation government employees? Here, I
believe, they are unionized employees of the corporation managing the port
operations. I don't think we'd want them federalized.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

Are the employees of a Crown Corporation government employees? Here, I
believe, they are unionized employees of the corporation managing the port
operations. I don't think we'd want them federalized.
--
'Til next time,

John H


Not usually, although employees of Federal Crown Corporations are
covered by Federal Labour Laws
Examples of Crown Corporations are Canada Post, Canadian Broadcasting
Corporation etc.
http://www.ctf.ca/FN2003/chap17.pdf

On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:29:12 +0000, Jack Redington wrote:


I does not sound like a good idea to me. But if you are concened about
"any" Non-American firm running these ports. They are run by Non-American
firms now.

Yeah, unfortunately. Oh for the good old days, when America was the
buyer, not the bought.