On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:51:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Fred Dehl wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote in
:

If there is any REAL concern with security, why is this being bid to
any NON American firm?

Would you have preferred it go to HAL?

The answer is simple: protecting our ports should not be something
contracted out. It should be something handled directly by the US Coast
Guard and the US Border Patrol, and if those organizations need to be
enlarged to handle the job, I know where $2 billion a week can be found
to pay for it.

You are confusing port operations and port security. Don't feel badly, many
of you are doing the same thing.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:33:41 -0500, JohnH wrote:


You are confusing port operations and port security. Don't feel badly,
many of you are doing the same thing.

If you think operations and security don't overlap, you are the one that
is confused.

On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:48:01 -0500, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:33:41 -0500, JohnH wrote:


You are confusing port operations and port security. Don't feel badly,
many of you are doing the same thing.

If you think operations and security don't overlap, you are the one that
is confused.

Overlap and totality are two different things. Saying the UAE would be
responsible for port security is flat wrong. The responsibility for port
security remains where it is.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************