Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:28:16 +0000, Don White wrote:
There's been a bit of talk about 'Master & Commander' and "capt Hornblower' off & on here. Meet the original..... http://www.herald.ns.ca/Search/483801.html "Master and Commander" covers chapter 2 (approximately) of a Cochrane biography I read a few years ago... /Martin |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 22:49:15 +0100, Martin Schöön
wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:28:16 +0000, Don White wrote: There's been a bit of talk about 'Master & Commander' and "capt Hornblower' off & on here. Meet the original..... http://www.herald.ns.ca/Search/483801.html "Master and Commander" covers chapter 2 (approximately) of a Cochrane biography I read a few years ago... /Martin Are you referring to the movie or the book? -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:28:39 -0500, JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 22:49:15 +0100, Martin Schöön wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:28:16 +0000, Don White wrote: There's been a bit of talk about 'Master & Commander' and "capt Hornblower' off & on here. Meet the original..... http://www.herald.ns.ca/Search/483801.html "Master and Commander" covers chapter 2 (approximately) of a Cochrane biography I read a few years ago... /Martin Are you referring to the movie or the book? The book! The film has very little in common with the book apart from the title. As bad as it gets IMHO. /Martin |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:30:31 +0100, Martin Schöön
wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:28:39 -0500, JohnH wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 22:49:15 +0100, Martin Schöön wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:28:16 +0000, Don White wrote: There's been a bit of talk about 'Master & Commander' and "capt Hornblower' off & on here. Meet the original..... http://www.herald.ns.ca/Search/483801.html "Master and Commander" covers chapter 2 (approximately) of a Cochrane biography I read a few years ago... /Martin Are you referring to the movie or the book? The book! The film has very little in common with the book apart from the title. As bad as it gets IMHO. /Martin I'd have to go back and see the movie again, but I think it was taken from a few parts of several of the Aubrey series. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is an interesting post as there is a wierd psuedo-biography
(forget the author) of Hornblower written as a real biography. In fact, I found it in the non-fiction section of the library and it puzzled me. It seems to have been copied after Cochranes real life. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Feb 2006 17:56:55 -0800, "
wrote: This is an interesting post as there is a wierd psuedo-biography (forget the author) of Hornblower written as a real biography. In fact, I found it in the non-fiction section of the library and it puzzled me. It seems to have been copied after Cochranes real life. To what post are you referring? -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:20:34 -0500, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:30:31 +0100, Martin Schöön wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:28:39 -0500, JohnH wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 22:49:15 +0100, Martin Schöön wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:28:16 +0000, Don White wrote: There's been a bit of talk about 'Master & Commander' and "capt Hornblower' off & on here. Meet the original..... http://www.herald.ns.ca/Search/483801.html "Master and Commander" covers chapter 2 (approximately) of a Cochrane biography I read a few years ago... /Martin Are you referring to the movie or the book? The book! The film has very little in common with the book apart from the title. As bad as it gets IMHO. /Martin I'd have to go back and see the movie again, but I think it was taken from a few parts of several of the Aubrey series. I recognised maybe two details from "Master and Commander" (the only in the series I have read) and all the rest was pure Hollywood as far as I could see. The main characters were so badly changed that nothing of what is in the book was left. And then you have things like that British and French naval units never fought in the Pacific during the Napoleonic era or when they play music together at the end of the film it is a piece that was written much later in the 19th century. Just to pick two nits. My main problems with the film are really how one-dimensional they managed to make the main characters and how they turned a rather exciting, action-packed novel into not so exciting, pasteurised Hollywood product. Sorry for the rant. /Martin |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:12:40 +0100, Martin Schöön
wrote: On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:20:34 -0500, JohnH wrote: On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:30:31 +0100, Martin Schöön wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:28:39 -0500, JohnH wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 22:49:15 +0100, Martin Schöön wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:28:16 +0000, Don White wrote: There's been a bit of talk about 'Master & Commander' and "capt Hornblower' off & on here. Meet the original..... http://www.herald.ns.ca/Search/483801.html "Master and Commander" covers chapter 2 (approximately) of a Cochrane biography I read a few years ago... /Martin Are you referring to the movie or the book? The book! The film has very little in common with the book apart from the title. As bad as it gets IMHO. /Martin I'd have to go back and see the movie again, but I think it was taken from a few parts of several of the Aubrey series. I recognised maybe two details from "Master and Commander" (the only in the series I have read) and all the rest was pure Hollywood as far as I could see. The main characters were so badly changed that nothing of what is in the book was left. And then you have things like that British and French naval units never fought in the Pacific during the Napoleonic era or when they play music together at the end of the film it is a piece that was written much later in the 19th century. Just to pick two nits. My main problems with the film are really how one-dimensional they managed to make the main characters and how they turned a rather exciting, action-packed novel into not so exciting, pasteurised Hollywood product. Sorry for the rant. /Martin In the series there are several interactions between the British and the French in the Pacific. I'm finishing the series now. It's great. I only wish there were another fifteen or so books to go. I'm starting the Hornblower series next. Learning a lot about ships of that era. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:05:25 -0500, JohnH wrote:
snip In the series there are several interactions between the British and the French in the Pacific. Not Spanish? That was the case for the real guy: Cochrane. /Martin |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Around 2/21/2006 1:12 PM, Martin Schöön wrote:
My main problems with the film are really how one-dimensional they managed to make the main characters and how they turned a rather exciting, action-packed novel into not so exciting, pasteurised Hollywood product. Just which movie were you watching, anyway? It can't be the same version of "Master & Commander: The Far Side of the World" that's sitting on my DVD shelf... Read the entire series, in order. I think you'll find that, although some plot sacrifices were made for the sake of the medium, almost every shot of the movie was lifted directly from one of the books or another. The level of detail in both the visual and sound effects are nothing short of breathtaking; It's one of the few movies I've ever seen that holds up to *frequent* repeated viewings. The characters may have come across as one-dimensional, but that's almost exactly how they're portrayed in the later books, when both Aubrey and Maturin are older and more set in their ways. If you've only read M&C, you've only read about the younger, more vibrant versions of those characters. -- ~/Garth - 1966 Glastron V-142 Skiflite: "Blue-Boat" "There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in boats." -- Kenneth Grahame ~~ Ventis secundis, tene cursum ~~ |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
History of Beer | General | |||
A beer with Bush | General |