OT but definitely not inflammatory
 

http://simurl.com/najkin

--
Reggie
************************************************** *********************
If you would like to make rec.boats an enjoyable place to discuss
boating, please do not respond to the political and inflammatory
off- topic posts and flames.
************************************************** *********************

OT but definitely not inflammatory
 

"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message
. ..
http://simurl.com/najkin

--
Reggie
************************************************** *********************
If you would like to make rec.boats an enjoyable place to discuss
boating, please do not respond to the political and inflammatory
off- topic posts and flames.
************************************************** *********************

Take your non boating posts to eva.com

OT but definitely not inflammatory
 

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:09:26 -0500, Reggie Smithers
wrote:

http://simurl.com/najkin

I think the purpose of that post was to present us with some magazines to
read while bottom fishing when the bite is slow. Right?

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

OT but definitely not inflammatory
 

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:16:45 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudadATyahooDOT com
wrote:


"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message
...
http://simurl.com/najkin

--
Reggie
************************************************** *********************
If you would like to make rec.boats an enjoyable place to discuss
boating, please do not respond to the political and inflammatory
off- topic posts and flames.
************************************************** *********************

Take your non boating posts to eva.com


Jim, a couple days ago you complained publicly and privately that I
shouldn't be your 'net nanny'. Today you are being same to several of us.
Am I missing something here?

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

OT but definitely not inflammatory
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:16:45 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudadATyahooDOT com
wrote:


"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message
m...
http://simurl.com/najkin

--
Reggie
************************************************** *********************
If you would like to make rec.boats an enjoyable place to discuss
boating, please do not respond to the political and inflammatory
off- topic posts and flames.
************************************************** *********************

Take your non boating posts to eva.com


Jim, a couple days ago you complained publicly and privately that I
shouldn't be your 'net nanny'. Today you are being same to several of us.
Am I missing something here?

--
John H.


Not at all, other than the inconsistencies on what some folks deem
acceptable and not acceptable to post here.

BTW: I was just being facetious with my reply to Reggie to make that point.

What I think about the new and improved NG:

I appreciate the new tone. However, I think that everyone needs to step
back and stop the netcopping (as I have been guilty of in the past, and
perhaps am guilty of with this post). I think folks should be allowed to
post whatever they want to. I think that folks should take it upon
themselves to decide what discussions they want to participate in. I think
some folks here need to remain consistent on what they find acceptable and
not acceptable here (I know I do).

What do you think?

OT but definitely not inflammatory
 

JimH wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:16:45 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudadATyahooDOT com
wrote:


"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message
m...
http://simurl.com/najkin

--
Reggie
************************************************** *********************
If you would like to make rec.boats an enjoyable place to discuss
boating, please do not respond to the political and inflammatory
off- topic posts and flames.
************************************************** *********************

Take your non boating posts to eva.com


Jim, a couple days ago you complained publicly and privately that I
shouldn't be your 'net nanny'. Today you are being same to several of us.
Am I missing something here?

--
John H.


Not at all, other than the inconsistencies on what some folks deem
acceptable and not acceptable to post here.

Yes, you are very inconsistent. What you deem non-acceptable to some,
you turn right around and do the exact same thing!

BTW: I was just being facetious with my reply to Reggie to make that point.

I think folks should be allowed to
post whatever they want to.

Uh, oh, here you go, back to your ways of lying about other people?
Starting vicious, untruthful ennuendo about other people, their
relatives, etc?

OT but definitely not inflammatory
 

"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message
. ..
http://simurl.com/najkin

--
Reggie

She is hot! Good post!