Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:48:22 -0500, "Reggie Smithers"
wrote:


010101000110111101101101001011000000110100001010 010010110
110000101110010011001010110111000100000011010010 111001100
100000011101110110111101110010011010110110100101 101110011
001110010000001100001011100110010000001101000011 000010111
001001100100001000000110000101110011001000000100 100001100
001011100100111001001111001001000000110100101110 011001000
000110100101101110001000000110011101100101011101 000111010
001101001011011100110011100001101000010100110000 101101110
001000000110000101110010011001110111010101101101 011001010
110111001110100001000000110011101101111011010010 110111001
100111001011100010000000100000010101000110100001 100101001
000000110101101101001011011100110010001100101011 100100010
000001100111011001010110111001110100011011000110 010101110
010001000000000110100001010011100100110010101100 011001011
100110001001101111011000010111010001110011001000 000110100
101110011001000000111010001101111011011110010000 001100010
011011110111001001101001011011100110011100100000 011001100
110111101110010001000000111010001101000011001010 110110100
10111000001101000010


No - it's not that at all. Some people can't do anything other than
criticize, complain and cut 'n paste issues to "prove" their points.

Karen actually did have something intelligent and on topic to say, but
she lost all credibility when she cut 'n paste what I said to prove
her point about FICHTS - it's very much akin to lying.

She is what she is - unimaginative, uncreative, uninspired, unoriginal
and bit with the green eyed jealousy bug.

Whoa there Tommy my ultra boring boy; you better do some cutting &
pasting of your own. You're the current OT queen & all I did was inject
some on topic for you, got any actual rejoinders on the boating subject???

Truly Tom you post machine code as if it is of interest to anyone in a
boating NG???

I assume it's your 1 in 3 failure admission that has upset you?????
well how do you count then??? Till recently you'd bought 3 fichts & one
had failed?? which is a pretty poor record?? I mean the dealers tried to
hide 1 in 5 it was so bad, I now point out that you've got yourself back
on par by buying 2 more so now you're at the worst they were prepared to
admit which is the dealer scary 1 in 5.

As for all the "uns" that's OK by me but of course I actually have the
runs on the board regarding the DFI engines & OMC was the case study
till the test dummy died:-)

So far all you do is spruik dealer BS in a deceptive & selfish attempt
to trap other unsuspecting boaters into the same trap you've boxed
yourself into; a failed engine system. Of course you'll deny same but
hey as I said, I have the proof.

Did you hear about the ficht failures exactly as we predicted within a
couple of months of their release, have you looked at the pathetic
attempts of E-tec not to even try to resolve the causes but to try to
build an engine strong enough to hold together a little longer with
special high melting point pistons, treated bores, special high temp
oil, new head fastening, new plumbing etc etc all not to address the
original still existing issue but feeble OMC style attempts to "live"
with it on other peoples' money!!

My original 98 OMC complaints remain, not enough injection pressure,
not enough atomisation, a mixture at power way too lean to be safe & a
suicidal lubrication system (although this has always been the standard
for any OMC based product:-)).

Anyway no need to thank me for trying to get your thread back on topic I
wasn't really expecting any:-) but hey at least the ultra boring machine
code went:-) Did I really type a treated bore above & not reference
you?? see kinder & nicer NG to a fault:-)

For the record the new improve NG doesn't mean I have to tolerate
endless OT threads nor mean I can't make on topic comments??? we've
gotten rid of the mindless political stuff now lets discuss the boating
subjects I'm always willing to say what I say about your E-Tec disaster
why are you so worried about it???

K